Skip to main content
Log in

Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors propose a framework for understanding key mechanisms that shape satisfaction in individual encounters, and loyalty across ongoing exchanges. In particular, the framework draws together two distinct approaches: (1) agency theory, rooted in the economic approach, that views relational exchanges as encounters between principals (consumers) and agents (service providers) and (2) trust research that adopts a psychological approach toward consumer-provider relationships. In so doing, the authors specify how trust mechanisms cooperate and compete with agency mechanisms to affect satisfaction in individual encounters and influence loyalty in the long run. Because a multidimensional conceptualization of trust is used, the hypothesized framework offers a fine-grained understanding of the interrelated mechanisms. The high level of specificity allows extraction of multiple propositions, facilitates empirical testing, and encourages theoretical development of the proposed model. Several directions to guide future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Eugene W. and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms.”Marketing Science 12 (2): 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Bernard. 1983.The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, Mark, Shantanu Dutta, and Orville Walker. 1992. “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories.”Journal of Marketing 56 (July): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Leonard L. 1995. “Retailers With a Future.”Marketing Management 5 (Spring): 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigley, Gregory and Jone Pearce. 1998. “Straining for Shared Meanings in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust.”Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Mary Stanfield Tetreault. 1990. “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. 1964.Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William and Amna Kirmani. 1993. “A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signal of Quality?”Journal of Consumer Research 20: 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttle, Francis. 1996. “Unserviceable Concepts in Service Marketing.”The Quarterly Review of Marketing 11 (3): 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Margaret C. 1999. “Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (May): 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark. 1997.Information and Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, Todd H. and John F. McMackin. 1996. “Integrating Variable Risk Preferences, Trust and Transaction Cost Economics.”Academy of Management Journal 21 (1): 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. and Carol Surprenant. 1982. “An Investigation Into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (November): 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Lawrence A., Kenneth R. Evans, and Deborah Cowles. 1990. “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Alan and Kunal Basu. 1994. “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (2): 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Peter R. and Rosemary Kalapurakal. 1994. “The Use and Perceived Fairness of Price-Setting Rules in the Bulk Electricity Market.”Journal of Economic Psychology 15: 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, Patricia and Joseph P. Cannon. 1997. “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (April): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey and Harbir Singh. 1998. “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Inter-Organizational Competitive Advantage.”Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes, Michael D. Johnson, Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, and Barbara Everitt Bryant. 1996. “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, Shankar and Ron Hess. 1997. “Dimensions and Levels of Trust: Implications for Commitment to a Relationship.”Marketing Letters 8 (4): 439–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, Ellen and Mark Johnson. 1999. “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment in Customer Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassenheimer, Jule, Franklin Houston, and J. Charlene Davis. 1998. “The Role of Economic Value, Social Value, and Perceptions of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationship Retention Decisions.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (4): 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Actions and Social Structure.”American Journal of Sociology 91:481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, Dhruv, Kent Monroe, and R. Krishnan. 1998. “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyer's Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value and Behavioral Intentions.”Journal of Marketing 62 (April): 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, C. 1994. “Quo Vadis, Marketing? Toward a Relationship Marketing Paradigm.”Journal of Marketing Management 10 (5): 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, Kevin P., Dwayne D. Gremler, and Mary Jo Bitner. 1998. “Relational Benefits in Service Industries: The Customer's Perspective.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (2): 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Mark, Robert Hoskisson, and Jay Barney. 1999. “Resolving the Opportunism Minimization-Opportunity Maximization Paradox.” Working Paper. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt. 1980. “Moral Hazard and Observability.”Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Thomas. 1998. “An Empirical Examination of Moral Hazard in the Vehicle Inspection Market.”RAND Journal of Economics 29 (2): 406–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jaccob, Robert W. Chestnut, and William A. Fisher. 1978. “A Behavioral Process Approach to Information Acquisition in Nondurable Purchasing.”Journal of Marketing 15 (November): 532–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachelmeier, Steven J., Stephen T. Limberg, and Michael S. Schadewald. 1991. “A Laboratory Market Examination of the Consumer Price Response to Information About Producers' Costs and Profits.”The Accounting Review 66 (4): 694–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard Thaler. 1986. “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market.”The American Economic Review 76 (4): 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk.”Econometrica 47 (March): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, Priscilla and David Mazursky. 1983. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (November): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, Roy, Daniel McAllister, and Robert Bies. 1998. “Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities.”Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 438–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, Daniel. 1995. “Affect-and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organization.”Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, Richard J. and Wayne Harrison. 1985. “Interdependence in the Service Encounter.” InThe Service Encounter: Managing Employee/Customer Interaction in Service Businesses. Eds. John A. Czepiel, Michael R. Solomon, and Carol F. Suprenant. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, John. 1999. “The Sorry Side of Sears.”Newsweek, February 22, pp. 36–39.

  • Mishra, D.P., J. Heide, and S. Cort. 1998. “Information Asymmetry and Levels of Agency Relationships.”Journal of Marketing Research 35 (August): 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, Vikas, William Ross, and Patrick Baldasare. 1998. “The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions.”Journal of Marketing 62 (January): 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kent B. 1973. “Buyers' Subjective Perceptions of Price.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (February): 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, Ram. 1997. “Insurance or Signals?”Applied Economics 28: 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, Bart. 1996. “Trust, Opportunism and Governance: A Process and Control Model.”Organization Studies 17 (6): 985–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, Terence A., Richard Oliver, and Ian C. MacMillan. 1992. “A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 56 (July): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.”Journal of Marketing Research 17 (November): 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. “Whence Consumer Loyalty?”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osigweh, Chimezie. 1989. “Concept Fallibility in Organization Science.”Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Akshay R. and Mark E. Bergen. 1992. “Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers' Lack of Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December): 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Kent B. Monroe. 1996. “Causes and Consequences of Price Premiums.”Journal of Business 69 (4): 511–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Lu Qu, and Robert W. Ruekert. 1999. “Signaling Unobservable Product Quality Through a Brand Ally.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (May): 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, Frederick F. 1996.The Loyalty Effect. Boston: Bain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Denise, Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald Burt, and Colin Camerer. 1998. “Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.”The Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish and Atul Parvatiyar. 1995. “Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip and Gary Rhoads. 1991. “Boundary Role Ambiguity in Marketing-Oriented Positions: A Multidimensional Multifaceted Operationalization.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August): 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, Sim and Nancy Roth. 1993. “Examining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic ‘Remedies’ for Trust/Distrust.”Organization Science 4 (August): 367–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski, John J. and Donal E. Carlston. 1987. “Social Judgement and Social Memory: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Negativity, Positivity, and Extremity Biases.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (4): 689–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, Richard M., John G. Holmes, Steven E. Hanna, and Ann Sharp. 1995. “Uncertainty Orientation and Trust in Close Relationships: Individual Differences in Cognitive Styles.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tax, Stephen, Stephen Brown, and Murali Chandrashekaran. 1998. “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 60 (April): 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Shelley. 1991. “Asymmetrical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization-Minimization Hypothesis.”Psychological Bulletin 110 (1): 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. G. 1980. “A Theory of Self-Enforcing Agreements.”Journal of Business 53 (1): 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.”Administrative Science Quarterly 42:35–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, Glenn, A. Parasuraman, and Dhruv Grewal. 1998. “The Roles of Price, Performance and Expectations in Determining Satisfaction in Service Exchanges.”Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, Keith and Colin Camerer. 1988. “Reputation and Corporate Strategy: a Review of Recent Theory and Applications.”Strategic Management Journal 9:443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Charles. 1980. “The Nature of Equilibrium in Markets With Adverse Selection.”Bell Journal of Economics 11:108–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Robert S. and Scott E. Gordon. 1982. “The Recall of Information About Persons and Groups.”Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 18:128–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Youjae. 1990. “A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction.” InReview of Marketing 1990. Ed. Valarie A. Zeithaml. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 68–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jagdip Singh is Professor of Marketing at the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. His current research interests include consumer dissatisfaction and complaint responses, O-P-C (organization-person-customer) processes that occur in frontline/boundary roles, and measurement issues in marketing. He has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of International Business Studies, andPsychological Assessment, among others.

Deepak Sirdeshmukh is Assistant Professor of Marketing at the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. His current research involves a multiindustry examination of the role of trust in building consumer-firm relationships. Other research interests include consumer evaluation of brand extensions and consumer information processing. He has published in theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Consumer Research, and theJournal of Consumer Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, J., Sirdeshmukh, D. Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 150–167 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281014

Keywords

Navigation