Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Setting the stage for creative new products: Investigating the idea fruition process

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article attempts to understand the idea fruition process, or the fuzzy front-end set of activities that an organization may informally engage in before it adopts a formal process for developing a new product. The authors propose that the idea fruition process consists of three sub-processes: idea creation, idea concretization, and idea commitment. They also propose and test the individual and organizational factors that influence the idea’s degrees of creativity, concretization, and commitment to further the understanding of the phenomenon and, thus, boost the creation and harnessing of worthwhile ideas in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1983.The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. “How to Kill Creativity.”Harvard Business Review 76 (5): 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Regina Conti, Heather Coon, Jeffrey Lazenby, and Michael Herron. 1996. “Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity.”Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Karl Hill, Beth Hennessey, and Elizabeth Tighe. 1994. “The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (5): 950–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Jonlee and Daniel Smith. 1996. “In Search of the Marketing Imagination: Factors Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products.”Journal of Marketing Research 33 (2): 174–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begetter, Carl and Marlene Scardamalia. 1993.Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry Into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. Chicago: OpenCourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, Gaurab, Rajiv Grover, and Ravindranath Madhavan. 2005. “The Role of Social Capital in the New Product Development Process.” Working paper. University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, Rajesh and Gerard Tellis. 1998. “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize.”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November): 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, James and Jerry Porras. 1994.Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robert and Elko Kleinschmidt. “An Investigation Into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 3 (2): 71-85.

  • Crawford, Merle C. 1994.New Products Management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1990.Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, Edward. 1971. “Creativity and Lateral Thinking.” InCreativity in Communications. Ed. Robert Adams. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, Rohit and Fredrick Webster Jr. 1989. “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda.”Journal of Marketing 53 (1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Jane E. and Susan J. Ashford. 1993. “Selling Issues to Top Management.”Academy of Management Review 18 (3): 397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, Regina M. O’Neill, and Katherine A. Lawrence. 2001. “Moves That Matter: Issue Selling and Organizational Change.”Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 716–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen. 1989. “Building Theories From Case Study Research.”Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, Peter and Gerald Tellis. 1993. “Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (2): 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Robert. 1995.Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Abbie and John Hauser. 1996. “Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (3): 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Ashok K., S. P. Raj, and David Wilemon. 1986. “A Model for Studying R&D-Marketing Interface in the Product Development Process.”Journal of Marketing 50 (April): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • {FnHolland}, John and Leonard Baird. 1968. “The Preconscious Activity Scale: The Development and Validation of an Originality Measure.”Journal of Creative Behavior 2 (3): 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Mnut. 1988. “The Role of the User in Product Innovation.”Technovation 1 (4): 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Benoy. 1982. “The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review.”Journal of Advertising 11 (3): 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, Lynn and Pamela Homer. 1985. “Physical Attractiveness of the Credibility Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (4): 954–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, John Kao, and Fred Wiersema. 1997.Breakthrough Thinking at 3M, duPont, GE, Pfizer, and Rubbermaid: Innovation. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian, Harold. 1977. “Content Analysis in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 4 (1): 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, Anil and Stephen Rosenthal. 1998. “Towards Holistic ‘Front Ends’ in New Product Development.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 15 (1): 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, Arthur. 1964.The Act of Creation. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Gary, Mario Mazzuca, Joseph Morone, and Albert Paulson. 1996. “Learning Is the Critical Success Factor in Developing Truly New Products.”Research-Technology Management 41 (3): 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, Ravindranath and Rajiv Grover. 1998. “From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management.”Journal of Marketing 62 (4): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Craig. 2003. “Judgment and Decision Making.” InHandbook of Cognition. Eds. K. Lamberts and R. L. Goldstone. London: Sage, 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Anil, Sundar Bharadwaj, Phani Tej Adidam, and Steven W. Edison. 1999. “Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making: A Model and a Test.”Journal of Marketing 63 (2): 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Arthur. 1969.Invention, Discovery, and Creativity. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes, Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. Ranganath and John Ketteringham. 1986.Breakthroughs. Toronto: Collier Macmillan Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990.Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2d ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, Joseph. 1964.Industrial Creativity: The Psychology of the Inventor. New York: University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, John, Dean Whitney, and Teresa Amabile. 1998. “Looking Inside the Fishbowl of Creativity: Verbal and Behavioral Predictors of Creative Performance.”Creativity Research Journal 11 (3): 4243–4263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, Rajesh, Daniel C. Smith, and C. Whan Park. 2001. “Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (February): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert. 1986. “What We Know About the Creative Process.” InFrontiers in Creative and Innovative Management. Ed. Robert Kuhn. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, Linda. 1983. “Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis.”Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (3): 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Barry S. 1989. “Memory and Creativity.” InHandbook of Creativity. Eds. J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, and C. R. Reynolds. New York: Plenum, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Robert. 1985. “Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (3): 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Todd Lubart. 1991. “An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development.”Human Development 34:1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew. 1986. “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation.”Management Science 32 (5): 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Richard, John Sawyer, and Ricky Griffin. 1993. “Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity.”Academy of Management Review 18 (2): 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yenne, Bill and Morton Grosser. 1993.100 Inventions That Shaped World History. San Francisco: Bluewood Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert. 1994. {tCase Study Research: Design and Methods}. 2d ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, James Webb. 1960.A Technique for Producing Ideas. Chicago: Advertising Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, Robert B. 1965. “Social Facilitation.”Science 149:269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, Georgia

    Rajiv Grover

Authors
  1. Janice Griffiths-Hemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajiv Grover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Astra Zeneca

Janice Griffiths-Hemans (jaiuce.griffith-hermans@astrazeneca.com) holds a Ph.D. in business administration (marketing strategy and new product development) and a master’s in market research from the University of Georgia, an MBA in marketing from the University of Miami, and a bachelor of science degree in pure and applied chemistry from the University of the West Indies, Jamaica. Janice is currently a Senior Manager of Consumer Insights with Astra Zeneca, Wilmington, Delaware.

Rajiv Grover (rgrover@terry.uga.edu) is the head of the department and holder of the Terry Chair of Marketing at the Terry College of Business, the University of Georgia in Athens, Georgia. He has received several honors for his research and teaching efforts—the O’Dell award for the Best Paper in theJournal of Marketing Research and the Hugh O. Nourse Outstanding MBA Teacher Award. He has authored the bookTheory and Simulation of Market-Focused Management, published by Dry den Press. He is currently editingThe Handbook of Marketing Research: Do’s and Don’ts, which will be published by Sage Publications. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 1983.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffiths-Hemans, J., Grover, R. Setting the stage for creative new products: Investigating the idea fruition process. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 34, 27–39 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305281777

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305281777

Keywords

Search

Navigation