Skip to main content
Log in

Instituting the marketing concept in a multinational setting: The role of national culture

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing concern among international marketing managers is how to increase the market orientation and thereby performance of their transnational organizations. This study broaches this issue by investigating how the marketing concept, the heart of the market orientation, may be established in a multinational setting and the effects of national culture on that process. From a wide array of literature, the authors construct a theoretical framework and propositions on how global organizations may transform this philosophy from an abstract platitude to an operational reality. Their findings suggest that the process consists of complex, interdependent steps—interpretation, adoption, and implementation of the marketing concept. Cultural values shape interpretation and facilitate or impede adoption and implementation. The overall framework and findings can be used to guide institutionalization of the marketing concept across the organizational span, in particular by anticipating culture-based reactions from international subsidiaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Neil R., Henry W. Lane, Hirohisa Nagai, and Haruo Takagi. 1993. “A Comparison of Canadian and Japanese Cognitive Styles: Implications for Management Interaction.”Journal of International Business Studies 24 (3): 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Nancy J. 1991.International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. 2d ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Susan Bartholomew. 1992. “Academic and Professional Communities of Discourse: Generating Knowledge on Transnational Human Resource Management.”Journal of International Business Studies 23 (3): 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, Michael and Jerald Hage. 1966. “Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis.”American Sociological Review 31 (August): 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Barton Weitz. 1989. “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads.”.Marketing Science 8 (4): 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah-Adu, Kwaku and Ashok Ranchhod. 1999. “Market Orientation and Performance in the Biotechnology Industry: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis.”Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (June): 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Danny R. and Louis M. Capella. 1985a. “The Elusive Marketing Concept.”Public Utilities Fortnightly 116 (September 19): 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and — 1985b. “Managing Change to Adopt and Implement the Marketing Concept.”Public Utilities Fortnightly 116 (November 14): 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, William E. and James Sinkula. 1999. “The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Organization on Organizational Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (Fall): 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Jeffrey and Scott Miller. 2000. “DaimlerChrysler’s U.S. Auto Unit Has $528 Million Operating Loss.”Wall Street Journal, September 28, p. A10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beechler, Schon and John Zhuang Yang. 1994. “The Transfer of Japanese-Style Management to American Subsidiaries: Contingencies, Constraints, and Competencies.”Journal of International Business Studies 25 (3): 467–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Janice M. and Harrison M. Trice. 1978.Implementing Change: Alcoholism Policies in Work Organizations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and — 1982. “The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings”Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (December): 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Michael H., H. Akhtar, P. Ball, D. Bhanthumanavin, P. Boski, W. Carment, J. H. Cha, D. Dutton, J. Forgas, K. Forss, H. Giles, S. Iwawaki, A. Kisiel, B. Latane, K. Leung, S. Moghni, D. Munro, R. Naugta, S. H. Ng, E. Protacio Marcelino, A. Rodrigues, P. Sinha, and C. Ward. 1987. “Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18 (June): 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyacigiller, Nakiye Avdan and Nancy J. Adler. 1991. “The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context”Academy of Management Review 16 (April): 262–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, Chris. 1995. “Towards a ‘European’ Model of Human Resource Management.”Journal of International Business Studies 26 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittan, Arthur. 1977.The Privatized World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, Robert A. 1985. “Managing the New Venture Division: Research Findings and Implications for Strategic Management.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (January/March): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Thomas and George M. Stalker. 1994.The Management of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, Gordon, Jr. 1988. “Is Your Company Marketing Oriented.”Journal of Business Strategy 9 (May/June): 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, Noel and Rashi Glazer. 1987. “Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Co-Alignment.”Journal of Marketing 51 (July): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Hui-Ching and G. Richard Holt. 1996. “An Exploration of Interpersonal Relationships in Two Taiwanese Computer Firms.”Human Relations 49, 12 (December): 1489–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, Jennifer A. and Sigal G. Barsade. 1995. “Personality, Organizational Culture, and Cooperation: Evidence From a Business Simulation.”Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (September): 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Terry. 1990. “International Marketing and National Character: A Review and Proposal for an Integrative Theory.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, Ronald G. and Karen Seashore Louis. 1982. “Organizational Barriers to the Utilization of Research.”Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (December): 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, David W. and Shannon H. Shipp. 1991. “Market-Driven Strategies for Competitive Advantage.”Business Horizons 34 (January/February): 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J. and Associates. 1981.Toward Reform in Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpan, Refik and Orsay Kucukemiroglu. 1993. “A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Management Styles and Unit Effectiveness.”Management International Review 33 (1): 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Donald P. and Sarah Sanderson King. 1985. “National and Organizational Cultures in Conflict Resolution: Japan, the United States, and Yugoslavia.” InCommunication, Culture, and Organizational Processes. Eds. William B. Gudycunst, Lea P. Stewart, and Stella Ting-Toomey. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 114–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadzie, Kofi Q., Boonghee Yoo, and Edward A. Riordan. 1997. “Is There a Contingency Theory of Market Orientation: An Investigation of Cross-National Contextual Factors.”1997 AMA Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings 5: 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. and Karl E. Weick. 1984. “Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems.”Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “DaimlerChrysler’s Wrong Turns.” 2000.Wall Street Journal, July 26, pp. A18–22.

  • D’Andrade, R. G. 1981. “The Cultural Part of Cognition.”Cognitive Science 5: 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. 1990.Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994a. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1994b. “Continuous Learning About Markets.”California Management Review 30 (Summer): 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1999.The Market-Driven Organization: Understanding, Attracting, and Keeping Valuable Customers. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFrank, Richard S., Michael T. Matteson, David M. Schweiger, and John M. Ivancevich. 1985. “The Impact of Culture on the Management Practices of American and Japanese CEOs.”Organizational Dynamics 13 (Spring): 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Shengliang and Jack Dart. 1995. “The Impact of Economic Liberalization on Marketing Practices in the People’s Republic of China.”European Journal of Marketing 29 (2): 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Alan R. 1996. “Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can’t Make It Think.”MIS Quarterly 20 (December): 433–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, Rohit. 1982. “The Organizational Context of Market Research Use.”Journal of Marketing 46 (Fall): 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and John Farley. 1998. “Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis.”Journal of Market Focused Management 2 (3): 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1989. “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda.”Journal of Marketing 53 (January): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Gerald Zaltman. 1982. “Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (February): 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1984. “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Researcher and Manager Perceptions of Market Research Use.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (February): 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —., 1987. “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Marketing Information in Consumer and Industrial Firms”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February): 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, John U. Farley, and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and — 1997. “Factors Affecting Organizational Performance: A Five-Country Comparison.” Report No. 97-108, May, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Peter Reid. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality.”Journal of Marketing 56 (January): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. “The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan’s Comparative Advantage Theory.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, Michael and Wolfgang Stroebe. 1987. “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (September): 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, Ed and Marissa Diener. 1995. “Cross-Cultural Correlates of Life Satisfaction and Self-Esteem.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doktor, Robert H. 1990. “Asian and American CEOs: A Comparative Study.”Organizational Dynamics 18 (Winter): 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan and Bernard Dubois. 1977. “Looking at the Cultural Environment for International Marketing Opportunities.”Columbia Journal of World Business 12 (Winter): 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Peter, John Saunders, and Veronica Wong. 1986. “Japanese Marketing Strategies in the U.K.: A Comparative Study.”Journal of International Business Studies 17 (Spring): 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter F. 1954.The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Robert. 1972. “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.”Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (3): 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1995.Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, John B. and Earl D. Honeycutt, Jr. 1992. “Japanese National Culture as a Basis for Understanding Japanese Business Practices.”Business Horizons 35 (November–December): 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. 1981. “Structure, Culture and Intellectual Style: An Essay Comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic Approaches.”Social Science Information 20 (6): 817–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, Meric S. 1995. “Being There: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies.”Economic Geography 71 (January): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, Benjamin. 1989. “The Role of Organized Competitive Intelligence in Corporate Strategy.”Columbia Journal of World Business 24 (Winter): 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Ian and Woods Gordon. 1986. “Exit ‘Marketing Concept’—Enter ‘Competitive Concept’.”Business Quarterly 51 (Summer): 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenley, Gordon E. 1995. “Forms of Market Orientation in U.K. Companies.”Journal of Management Studies 32 (January): 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Ricky W. 1989. “Work Redesign Effects on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors: A Long-Term Field Experiment.”Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, August, pp. 216–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, Evert. 1987. “The New Marketing—Developing Long-Term Interactive Relationships”Long Range Planning 20(4): 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Ashok, S. P. Raj, and David Wilemon. 1985. “The R&D-Marketing Interface in High Technology Firms.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 2 (March): 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and —. 1986. “R&D and Marketing Managers in High-Tech Companies: Are they Different?”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM 33 (February): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jerald. 1980.Theories of Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halal, William E. 1994. “From Hierarchy to Enterprise: Internal Markets Are the New Foundation of Management.”Academy of Management Executive 8 (November): 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Edward T. 1976.Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Gary G. and Nicole Woolsey Biggart. 1988. “Market, Culture, and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East.”American Journal of Sociology 94 (Suppl.): S52-S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Stephen C. 1988. “Now That the Dust Has Settled: Learning From Japanese Management.”Business Horizons 31 (July/August): 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, Paul and Joseph C. Miller. 1991. “The Effect of Culture on Innovativeness: A Comparison of United States and Japan Sourcing Capabilities.”Journal of International Consumer Marketing 3 (3): 7–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John S. and Arthur W. Allaway. 1993. “How U. S.-Based Companies Manage Sales in Foreign Countries.”Industrial Marketing Management 22 (February): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerr, John and Leah Nathan Spiro. 1990. “Culture Shock at Home: Working for a Foreign Boss.”Business Week, N3192, December 17, pp. 80–84.

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1980.Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. “The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories.”Journal of International Business Studies 14 (Fall): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. “The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept.”Academy of Management Review 9 (July): 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. “Management Scientists Are Human.”Management Science 40 (June): 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Michael H. Bond. 1988. “The Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth Source.”Organizational Dynamics 16 (Spring): 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, David H., David A. Ralston, and Robert H. Terpstra. 1994. “Constraints on Capitalism in Russia: The Managerial Psyche, Social Infrastructure, and Ideology.”California Management Review 36 (Spring): 124–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, Franklin S. 1986. “The Marketing Concept: What It Is and What It Is Not.”Journal of Marketing 50 (April): 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Francis L. 1970.Americans and Chinese: Purpose and Fulfillment in Great Civilization. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Michael Y.. 1986. “An Experimental Study of Managers’ and Researchs’ Use of Consumer Market Research.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 14 (Fall): 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, George. 1982. “Organizational Information Systems: Determinants of Their Performance and Behavior.”Management Science 2 (February): 138–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. Tomas and O. C. Ferrell. 1997. “A Global Learning Organization Structure and Market Information Processing.”Journal of Business Research 40 (October): 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, Robert F. and G. Tomas Hult. 1998. “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination.”Journal of Marketing 62 (July): 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K., Ikujiro Nonaka, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1985. “Managing the New Product Development Process: How Japanese Firms Learn and Unlearn.” InThe Uneasy Alliance. Eds. K. Clark, R. Hayes, and C. Lorenz. Boston: Harvard Business School, 337–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. B. A. 1979. “Preliminary Model of Particularistic Ties in Chinese Political Alliances: Kan-ch’ing and Kuan-hsi in a Rural Taiwanese Township.”China Quarterly 78: 237–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, Alfred M. 1986. “Organization Development and National Culture: Where’s the Fit?”Academy of Management Review 11 (January): 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1996. “Market Orientation: Review, Refinement, and Roadmap.”Journal of Market Focused Management 1 (3): 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers. 1988. “Japanese-Style Management in America.”California Management Review 30 (Summer): 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jean, Tomoaki Sakano, and Naoto Onzo. 1990. “Behavioral Relations in Across-Culture Distribution Systems: Influence, Control, and Conflict in U.S.-Japanese Marketing Channels.”Journal of International Business Studies 21 (4): 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jusdanis, Gregory. 1995. “Beyond National Culture?”Boundary 2 22 (Spring): 23–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, Sudhir H. and John W. Barnes. 1992. “Understanding the Domain of Cross-National Buyer-Seller Interactions.”Journal of International Business Studies 23: 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1989.When Giants Learn to Dance. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, Warren J. and Mark C. Green. 1996.Principles of Global Marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, Thomas C. and James R. Taylor. 1983.Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1951. “Values and Value Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification.” InToward a General Theory of Action. Eds. T. Parsons and E. A. Shils. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 388–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Florence Rockwood and Fred L. Strodbeck. 1973.Variations in Value Orientations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Harbir Singh. 1988. “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode.”Journal of International Business Studies 19 (Fall): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Ajith Kumar. 1993. “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, Suresh, Roger L. Dunbar, and Allan Bird. 1995. “Strategic Action Generation: A Comparison of Emphasis Placed on Generic Competitive Methods by U.S. and Japanese Managers.”Strategic Management Journal 16 (March): 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip. 1988.Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. “Reconceptualizing Marketing: An Interview With Philip Kotler.”European Journal of Marketing 12 (4): 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, Ran, Albert Nedd, and Bob Hinings 1994. “Analyzing Cross-National Management and Organizations: A Theoretical Framework.”Management Science 40 (January): 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H. and G. Trommsdorff. 1973. “Group Versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming): A Review.”European Journal of Social Psychology 3 361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, Andre. 1983. “The Cultural Diversity of Western Conceptions of Management.”International Studies of Management and Organization 13 (Spring–Summer): 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, William, Shoji Murata, and Hiroshi Kosaka. 1985. “Japanese Marketing: Towards a Better Understanding.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Spring): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hanjoon, Frank Acito, and Ralph L. Day. 1987. “Evaluation and Use of Marketing Research by Decision Makers: A Behavioral Simulation.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (May): 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Kwok and Michael Harris Bond. 1984. “The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (October): 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, David I. 1990. “Participation, Productivity, and the Firm’s Environment.”California Management Review 32 (4): 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Haiyang and Kwaku Atuahene-Gima. 1999. “Marketing’s Influence and New Product Performance in Chinese Firms.”Journal of International Marketing 7 (1): 34–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthal, J. David and David T. Wilson. 1992. “Becoming Market Oriented.”Journal of Business Research 3 (May): 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, Rensis and Jane Likert. 1976.New Ways of Managing Conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Min Hua, Christian N. Madu, Chu-hua Kuei, and Dena Winokur. 1994. “Integrating QFD, AHP, and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing.”Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 9 (1): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, Robert F. and Gene R. Laczniak. 1987. “The Evolving Marketing Concept, Competitive Intensity and Organizational Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 15 (Fall): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath, Allan J. and Kenneth G. Hardy. 1994. “Building Customer Partnership.”Business Horizons 37 (January–February): 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, Jeremy. 1984. “The Trouble With Managing Japanese-Style.”Fortune 109 (April 2): 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, Elliot and Ajay K. Kohli. 1996. “Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries.”Journal of Marketing Research 33 (February): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Lynn W. and Rosann L. Spiro. 1988. “The Marketing Concept in Perspective”Business Horizons 31 (May–June): 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Anil and P. Rajan Varadarajan. 1992. “A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use Within Firms.”Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Scott and Jeffrey Ball. 2000. “Daimler Posts Strong Quarter, Plans Cost Cuts.”Wall Street Journal July 27, p. A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry. 1979a. “An Emerging Strategy of ‘Direct’ Research.”Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (Special Issue): 582–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979b.The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “The Innovative Organization”. InThe Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases, 2d ed. Eds. Henry Mintzberg and James Brian Quinns. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 731–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misawa, Mitsuru. 1987. “New Japanese-Style Management in a Changing Era.”Columbia Journal of World Business 22 (Winter): 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ivor S. 1984. “Marketers’ Attitudes Toward the Marketing Concept in Nigerian Business and Non-Business Operations.”Columbia Journal of World Business 19 (Fall): 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Jakki and John R. Nevin 1990. “Communications Strategies in Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, R. Bruce. 1996. “Marketing Industrial Services in Japan and the United States: It’s Not Just Who You Know.” Report No. 96-106, May, Marketing Science Institute Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.

  • Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Gerald Zaltman, and Rohit Deshpande. 1992. “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations.”Journal of Market Research 24 (August): 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Rohit Deshpande, and Gerald Zaltman. 1993. “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Michael H. and Leyland F. Pitt. 1994. “Implementing Marketing Strategies in the U.S. and South Africa.”Long Range Planning 27 (February): 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Duane L. Davis, and Jeffrey W. Allen. 1994. “Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Importance of Individualism Versus Collectivism.”Journal of International Business Studies 25 (1): 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, Cheryl and K. Sivakumar. 1996. “National Culture and New Product Development: An Integrative Review.”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October: 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1998. “Additional Thoughts on the Measurement of Market Orientation: A Comment on Deshpande and Farley.”Journal of Market-Focused Management 2 (3): 233–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Brian Tietje. 1998. “Creating a Market Orientation.”Journal of Market-Focused Management 2 (3): 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Andrew J. 1976.Peking Politics, 1918–1923. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, Earl and Patrick Shannon. 1992. “What Is Customer-Driven Marketing?”Business Horizons 35 (November/December): 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Donald W. Jackson, Jr. and William G. Wolfe. 1994. “Examining the Practices of United States and Japanese Market Research Firms.”California Management Review 36 (4): 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noricks, Jay Smith, L. Helen Agler, Margaret Bartholomew, Susan Howarth-Smith, David Martin Steve Pyles, and William Shapiro. 1987. “Age, Abstract Thinking, and the American Concept of Person.”American Anthropologist 89 (September): 667–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, Charles A. 1982. “Variations in Decision Makers’ Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information.”Academy of Management Journal 25 (4): 756–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, Michael Q. 1978.Utilization Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavett, Cynthia and Tom Morris. 1995. “Management Styles Within a Multinational Corporation: A Five Country Comparative Study.”Human Relations 48 (October) 1171–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, Adrian F. 1988. “Developing a Marketing-Oriented Organization.”Business Horizons 31 (3): 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, Dean. 1985.National Characteristics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, Alfred M. and David T. Wilson. 1996. “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (Winter): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, W. Stevens and Ram C. Rao 1990. “The Role of Experience in Information Use and Decision Making by Marketing Managers.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (February): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard B. 1993.Managers and National Culture: A Global Perspective. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkley, Robin L., Terri L. Griffith, and Gregory B. Northcraft. 1995. “‘Fixed Pie’ a la Mode: Information Availability, Information Processing, and the Negotiation of Suboptimal Agreements.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62 (April): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, James B. 1985. “Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos.”Harvard Business Review 63 (May/June) 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffield, Barney T., III and Frank G. Bingham, Jr. 1989. “Balancing Product Quality, Costs, and Profits.”Industrial Marketing Management 18 (November): 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, Eun, James S. Uleman, and Hoon Koo Lee. 1996. “Variations in Collectivism and Individualism by Ingroup and Culture: Confirmatory Factor Analyses.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (November): 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1983.Diffusion of Innovation. 3d ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Martin. 1995. “The Effects of Culture and Socioeconomics on the Performance of Global Brand Image Strategies.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (May): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W. Glenn and James G. Barnes. 1998. “Relationship Marketing and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Market-Focused Management 2 (3): 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, Stephen B. and Frederick Niswander. 1995. “Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally: A Test of Gray’s (1988) Theory.”Journal of International Business Studies 26 (2): 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samli, A. Coskun, Kristian Palda, and A. Tansu Barker. 1987. “Toward a Mature Marketing Concept.”Sloan Management Review 28 (Winter): 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Susan C. and Arnoud De Meyer. 1991. “Interpreting and Responding to Strategic Issues: The Impact of National Culture.”Strategic Management Journal 12 (May): 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 1994. “Culture and the Integration of National Societies.”International Social Science Journal 46 (February): 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, Fred, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Ajay K. Kohli. 1997. “Market Orientation in U.S. and Scandinavian Companies: A Cross-Cultural Study.”Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, Report No. 97-107, Cambridge, MA.

  • shane, Scott. 1992. “Why Do Some Societies Invent More Than Others?”Journal of Business Venturing 7 (January): 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “Cultural Influences on National Rates of Innovation.”Journal of Business Venturing 8 (January): 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. “Uncertainty Avoidance and the Preference for Innovation Championing Roles.”Journal of International Business Studies 26 (1): 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanklin, W. L. and J. K. Ryans, Jr. 1984. “Organizing for High-Tech Marketing.”Harvard Business Review 84 (6): 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Byron. 1991. “Marketing Orientation: More Than Just Customer Focus.”International Marketing Review 8 (4): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimaguchi, Mitsuaki. 1978.Marketing Channels in Japan. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, Richard A. and Edmund J. Bourne. 1982. “Does the Concept of the Person Vary Cross-Culturally?” InCultural Conceptions of Mental Health and Therapy. Eds. A. J. Marsella and G. M. White. Philadelphia: Reidel, 97–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, James M. and Ronald D. Hampton. 1988. “Centralization and Information Acquisition by In-House Market Research Department.”Journal of Business Research 16 (June): 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. 1996. “The Challenge of Sustaining Competitive Advantage.”Industrial Marketing Management 25 (January): 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and John C. Narver. 1994a. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1994b. “Market Orientation, Customer Value, and Superior Performance.”Business Horizons 37 (March/April): 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Ken G., Curtis M. Grimm, Martin J. Gannon, and Ming-Jer Chen. 1991. “Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry.”Academy of Management Journal 34 (March): 60–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondergaard, Mikael. 1994. “Research Note: Hofstede’s Consequences: A Study of Reviews, Citations and Replications.”Organization Studies 15 (3): 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder, William E. 1988. “Managing Relations Between R&D and Marketing in New Product Development Projects.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 5 (1): 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., Frankel ter Hofstede, and Michel Wedel. 1999. “A Cross-National Investigation Into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, Christine, Rohit Deshpande, and John U. Farley. 2000. “Beyond Market Orientation: When Customers and Suppliers Disagree.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (Winter): 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Edward C. 1985. “Culture and Decision-Making.” InCommunication, Culture, and Organizational Processes. Eds. William B. Gudykunst, Lea P. Stewart, and Stella Ting-Toomey. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, H. B. and Z. Block. 1989. “Corporate Venturing Obstacles: Sources and Solutions.”Journal of Business Venturing 4 (3): 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takezawa, Shin-Ichi and Arthur M. Whitehall. 1981.Work Ways Japan and America. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, James B. and Rueben R. McDaniel, Jr 1990. “Interpreting Strategic Issues: Effects of Strategy and the Information Processing Structure of Top Management Teams.”Academy of Management Journal 33 (June): 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Michael and Aaron Wildavsky. 1986. “A Cultural Theory of Information Bias in Organizations.”Journal of Management Studies 23 (May): 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, Harold C. 1989. “Cross-Cultural Studies of Individualism-Collectivism.” InNebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 37. Ed. J. Berman. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 44–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, David K., Kam-hon Lee, Ilan Vertinsky, and Donald A. Wehrung. 1988. “Does Culture Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness, and Risk Adjustment in International Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 52 (October): 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, John A. 1995. “Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in Groups.”Academy of Management Journal 38 (February): 152–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Orville C. Jr. and Robert W. Ruekert. 1987. “Marketing’s Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework.”Journal of Marketing 51 (July): 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Anthony F. C. 1970.Culture and Personality. 2d ed New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, James P. and Gerardo Rivera Ungson. 1991. “Organizational Memory.”Academy of Management Review 16 (January): 57–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, Frank S. 1999. “DaimlerChrysler: Some Key People Depart; Is Daimler Running the Show?”Ward’s Auto World 35 (May): 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E. 1988. “The Rediscovery of the Marketing Concept.”Business Horizons 31 (May/June): 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. and Richard L. Daft. 1983. “The Effectiveness of Interpretation Systems.” InOrganizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. Eds. K. S. Cameron and D. A. Whetten. New York: Academic Press, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, D. H., F. Luthans, and S. Sommer. 1993. “Managing Russian Factory Workers: The Impact of U.S.-Based Behavior and Participative Techniques.”Academy of Management Journal 36 (1): 58–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Leslie A. 1975.The Concept of Cultural Systems: A Key to Understanding Tribes and Nations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, Harold L. 1967.Organizational Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsted, Kathryn Frazer. 1997. “The Service Experience in Two Cultures: A Behavioral Perspective.”Journal of Retailing 73 (Fall): 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcher, Barry J. 1990. “Total Marketing: Total Quality and the Marketing Concept.”The Quarterly Review of Marketing 15 (Winter): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, Toshio. 1988. “Exit From the Group as an Individualistic Solution to the Free Rider Problem in the United States and Japan.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 (6): 530–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, John Z., John Farley, and Scott Hoenig. 1999. “When MNCs Come to China, Who Changes Whom?”China Business Review 26 (March/April): 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Kuo-shu. 1981. “Societal Orientation and Individual Modernity Among Chinese Students in Taiwan.”Journal of Social Psychology 113: 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Kosaku. 1989. “Deming Management Philosophy: Does It Work in the U.S. as Well as in Japan?”Columbia Journal of World Business 24 (Fall): 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Robert Duncan, and Jonny Holbeck. 1973.Innovations and Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, George M., Erich A. Joachimsthaler, and Thomas Kinnear. 1987. “Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (May): 208–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Cheryl Nakata is an assistant professor of marketing at the University of Illinois at Chicago and received her doctorate from the same institution in 1997. Her work appears in theJournal of Marketing, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Product Innovation and Management, Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, International Marketing Review, and other publications. Her primary interests are in global marketing and marketing management and strategy.

K. Sivakumar (Ph.D., Syracuse University, 1992) is the Arthur Tauck Professor of international marketing and logistics at Lehigh University. His research interests include pricing, international marketing, and technology management. His research has been published or is forthcoming in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, International Marketing Review, Journal of Business Research, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Marketing Letters, Pricing Strategy & Practice, and other journals. He has won several awards for research and is on the editorial boards of six scholarly journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakata, C., Sivakumar, K. Instituting the marketing concept in a multinational setting: The role of national culture. JAMS 29, 255–275 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994623

Keywords

Navigation