Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T19:04:14.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Principles of HyperNietzsche

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Paolo d'Iorio
Paolo d'Iorio*
Affiliation:
ITEM- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘One thing, however, seems certain: the manuscripts should be completely deciphered and transcribed, and studied as a group, as an individual manuscript, as an individual page (in many cases!), and then put in chronological order.

For example: yesterday I carefully examined the results of the page by page transcription of the manuscripts of Daybreak. I drew a sort of diagram of all the aphorisms in Daybreak following their appearance in the different manuscripts. Two things came out of this, which are basically the two sides of the same coin, that is: 1) the evolution of Daybreak, and 2) the exact chronology of each manuscript.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 49 , Issue 196 , December 2002 , pp. 58 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Allow me to refer on this matter to Paolo D'Iorio, Frank Simon-Ritz, ‘Multimedia catalogue of Nietzsche's library', in Paolo D'Iorio and Daniel Ferrer (eds.), Bibliothèques d'écrivains, Paris, Éditions du CNRS 2001, pp. 145-169.

2 See Jean-Louis Lebrave, ‘La critique génétique: une discipline nouvelle ou un avatar moderne de la philologie?', in Genesis I (1992) pp. 33-72; Louis Hay (ed.), Les Manuscrits des écrivains, Paris, Hachette- CNRS Éditions 1993; Almuth Gresillon, Éléments de critique génétique. Lire les manuscrits modernes, Paris, PUF 1994.

3 See Alfredo Stussi, Introduzione agli di filologia italiana, Bologna, Il Mulino 1994, p. 155 et seq.

4 See Wolfram Groddeck, Friedrich Nietzsche ‘Dionysos-Dithyramben', Berlin-New York, de Gruyter 1991. On these questions, see also Paolo D'Iorio, Nathalie Ferrand (eds.), Genesi, critica, edizione, Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore 1998.

5 Mazzino Montinari, 'La Volonté de puissance' n'existe pas, text edited and with an afterword by Paolo D'Iorio, translated from the Italian by Patricia Farazzi and Michel Valensi, Paris, Éditions de l'éclat 1996. Also available at internet address: <http://www.Lyber-eclat.net/Lyber/montinari/volonte.html>.

6 Introduced for the first time in 1996 at the École Normale Supérieure in Pisa during the conference Genesi, Critica, Edizione (organized by Paolo d'Iorio, Armando Petrucci and Alfredo Stussi), the development of the HyperNietzsche project began in the autumn of 1998 within the framework of the Institut des Textes et Manuscrits Modernes of the CNRS, thanks to financial aid from the Archives de la Création programme and the GIS ‘Sciences de la cognition' (Jean-Gabriel Ganascia). In 2000 HyperNietzsche was financed within the framework of Aides à Projet Nouveau (APN) and in 2001 by ACI ‘Jeunes chercheurs' of the Ministère de la Recherche. From autumn 2001 development will continue in the University of Munich within the framework of the Sofya Kovalevskaya Prize awarded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (see <http://www.avh.de/en/aktuelles/presse/pn_archiv2001/2001_25.htm>). A description of the project was published in autumn 2000 in the book: HyperNietzsche. Modèle d'un hypertexte savant sur Internet pour la recherche en sciences humaines. Questions philosophiques, problèmes juridiques, outils informatiques, edited by Paolo D'Iorio, Paris, PUF 2000.

7 <http://www.fsf.org>.

8 <http://www.opensource.org>.

9 Eric Steven Raymond, ‘Homesteading the Noosphere', para.6, <http://tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/homesteading/>, 25.08.2000, © Eric S. Raymond, also published in Eric S. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, London, O'Reilly and Associates Inc. 2001.

10 Richard Barbrook, ‘The Hi-Tech Gift Economy' in First Monday, Vol.3, no.12, December 1998, <http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_12/barbrook/>.

11 See the website <http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org>.

12 A preliminary discussion of this concept is scheduled to take place during the conference L'Open Source dans les Sciences Humaines. Modèles ouverts de recherche et de publication sur Internet organized at the École Normale Supérieure in Paris by the Maison des sciences de l'homme (Programme Numérisation pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche), the Fabula Association and the HyperNietzsche Association in January 2002 (see <http://www.hypernietzsche.org/events/os/>).

13 The first meeting was held from 4-8 May 2001 at the Fondation des Treilles de Tourtour, at the conference Un esprit libre sur Internet. See <http://www.item.ens.fr/nietzsche/cosmopolis/>. The scientific committee of the HyperNietzsche Association is made up at the moment by: Paolo D'Iorio, ITEM-CNRS, Paris; Günter Abel, Technische Universität, Berlin; Sandro Barbera, University of Pisa; Marco Brusotti, University of Munich; Ernani Chaves, University of Belem (Brazil); Mathieu Kessler, University of Orleans; Jean-François Mattéi, University of Nice; Germán Mélendez, Universidad nacional, Colombia, Bogota; Glenn W. Most, ENS, Pisa/University of Chicago; Renate Müller-Buck, Technische Universität, Berlin; Diego Sanchez Meca, University of Madrid; Paul J.M. van Tongeren, University of Nijmegen (Holland).

14 See Wolfgang Müller-Lauter's article, ‘Zwischenbilanz. Zur Weiterführung der Montinari mitbegründeten Nietzsche-Editionen nach 1986', Nietzsche-Studien, 23 (1994), pp. 307-316.