Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benchmarking the Study Initiation Process

  • Clinical Trials
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study start-up phase of a trial is an area that pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are focusing on in order to reduce delays and improve efficiency. To better understand and examine metrics within study start-up, the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, in collaboration with 11 pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, examined a comprehensive set of metrics and analyzed study data from 105 global clinical trials. The results indicate that the early stages of the site initiation process are areas that accounted for the majority of cycle time. An examination of cycle time to the first patient in by therapeutic area also reveals variation. Variations in cycle time to the first patient occur by site type as well as by region. Academic institutions and government-funded sites were longest to the first patient in, while physician practices were fastest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sullivan L. Defining “quality that matters” in clinical trial study startup activities. Monitor. 2011;25:22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li G, Harper B, Sirabella L. Activating investigative sites in a staggered process: challenges and solutions. In: Parexel Biopharmaceutical R&D Statistical Sourcebook 2011/2012. Waltham, MA; PAREXEL International Corp; 2011:175–177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manak D, Chung J, Reuter S. Study startup 2.0: reinventing how clinical trials begin. Monitor. 2011;25:33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Panzitta D. Avoiding the 5 common mistakes at study startup. Available at: http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com. Accessed July 27, 2010.

  5. Korieth K. Budding relationships. In: European Pharmaceutical Contractor. London, UK; Samedan Ltd Publishers; 2011:10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lamberti M, Zuckerman R, Howe D, Shapiro L, Getz K. Factors influencing site willingness and ability to participate in clinical trials. Drug Information Journal. 2011;45:3:377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korieth K, Anderson A. Sites rate NovoNordisk, Roche, Amgen on top. CenterWatch. June 2011.

  8. Kroll J ed. An Industry in Evolution. 2nd ed. Boston:CenterWatch Publications; 1999:175–176.

  9. Taylor N. Latin American sites recruit 91% more patients than US. Available at: http://www.outsourcing-pharma.com. Accessed November 23, 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Jo Lamberti PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamberti, M.J., Brothers, C., Manak, D. et al. Benchmarking the Study Initiation Process. Ther Innov Regul Sci 47, 101–109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479012469947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479012469947

Keywords

Navigation