Skip to main content
Download PDF

Moxetumomab pasudotox in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL): long-term follow-up from the pivotal trial

Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 14, Article number: 35 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Moxetumomab pasudotox is a recombinant CD22-targeting immunotoxin. Here, we present the long-term follow-up analysis of the pivotal, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01829711) of moxetumomab pasudotox in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hairy cell leukemia (HCL).

Methods

Eligible patients had received ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies, including ≥ 2 purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), or ≥ 1 PNA followed by rituximab or a BRAF inhibitor. Patients received 40 µg/kg moxetumomab pasudotox intravenously on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles. Disease response and minimal residual disease (MRD) status were determined by blinded independent central review. The primary endpoint was durable complete response (CR), defined as achieving CR with hematologic remission (HR, blood counts for CR) lasting > 180 days.

Results

Eighty adult patients were treated with moxetumomab pasudotox and 63% completed six cycles. Patients had received a median of three lines of prior systemic therapy; 49% were PNA-refractory, and 38% were unfit for PNA retreatment. At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, the durable CR rate (CR with HR > 180 days) was 36% (29 patients; 95% confidence interval: 26–48%); CR with HR ≥ 360 days was 33%, and overall CR was 41%. Twenty-seven complete responders (82%) were MRD-negative (34% of all patients). CR lasting ≥ 60 months was 61%, and the median progression-free survival without the loss of HR was 71.7 months. Hemolytic uremic and capillary leak syndromes were each reported in ≤ 10% of patients, and ≤ 5% had grade 3–4 events; these events were generally reversible. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Moxetumomab pasudotox resulted in a high rate of durable responses and MRD negativity in heavily pre-treated patients with HCL, with a manageable safety profile. Thus, it represents a new and viable treatment option for patients with R/R HCL, who currently lack adequate therapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829711; first submitted: April 9, 2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01829711

Background

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell malignancy with high CD22 expression [1]. The mainstay of therapy and recommended first-line treatment is a purine nucleoside analog (PNA) such as pentostatin or cladribine [2,3,4]. Although the majority of patients achieve long-term remission with PNAs, eventual disease relapse and diminishing clinical outcomes in later lines exemplify an important unmet need for therapies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) HCL [4,5,6,7]. Novel targeted therapies such as rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody), ibrutinib (Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor), and vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor) have demonstrated some efficacy in pre-treated patients but have not yet been rigorously evaluated in robust studies with long-term follow-up, nor approved for HCL treatment [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].

Notably, the current treatment options are frequently associated with safety and tolerability concerns. PNA therapy is immunosuppressive and thus associated with opportunistic infections and second malignancies in already vulnerable patients [2, 4, 5, 21]. Cladribine, in particular, is not recommended in those with an active infection, and patients must be closely monitored for symptoms of infection [2]. Rituximab can also lead to severe infections, along with thrombocytopenia, and vemurafenib is associated with cutaneous conditions including photosensitivity and skin papillomas [8, 9, 11, 13, 15].

One growing area of interest with relevance to the treatment of HCL is the concept of minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as the detection of tumor cells below the sensitivity level of conventional cytomorphology using techniques such as cytogenetics, flow cytometry, PCR, and high-throughput sequencing [22, 23]. MRD is widely used as a measure of tumor burden for other hematologic malignancies, serving as a significant prognostic factor for both acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia and informing treatment decisions [22, 24, 25]. In HCL, the implications of MRD remain unclear; some studies report that MRD positivity after PNA therapy is predictive for disease relapse, suggesting that MRD eradication may improve clinical outcomes [26, 27]. Current treatments, including targeted therapies, are unable to completely eradicate MRD in all patients with R/R HCL [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].

In September 2018, moxetumomab pasudotox (CAT-8015), a first-in-class recombinant CD22-directed cytotoxin [28], was approved for the treatment of adult patients with R/R HCL in the USA. The pivotal multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial (NCT01829711) evaluated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics of moxetumomab monotherapy in patients with R/R HCL who had previously received ≥ 2 systemic therapies, including ≥ 1 PNA. To date, this is the largest study in heavily pre-treated HCL (N = 80). It was the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a third-line treatment with long-term follow-up and to report durable complete response (CR) as a primary endpoint. Moreover, it was also one of few studies to prospectively assess MRD status after therapy in HCL.

At a median follow-up of 16.7 months (range: 2.1–48.8 months), the primary analysis showed a durable CR rate of 30% (24 patients), CR rate of 41% (33 patients), and MRD negativity in 82% (27 patients) of complete responders. Furthermore, moxetumomab pasudotox demonstrated acceptable safety and manageable tolerability [29]. In this report, we present the final analysis describing the long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of moxetumomab pasudotox in patients with R/R HCL, with a median follow-up of 24.6 months (range: 1.2–71.7 months).

Methods

Study design and patient eligibility

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients from 32 centers across 14 countries. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with histologically confirmed HCL or variant HCL and an indication for therapy were eligible for this study. An indication for therapy was defined as one or more of the following: neutrophils < 1.0 × 103/µL, platelets < 100 × 103/µL, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, or symptomatic splenomegaly. Patients must have been treated with a minimum of two systemic therapies, including two courses of a PNA, or one course of a PNA followed by rituximab or a BRAF inhibitor. Patients must not have had prior treatment with moxetumomab pasudotox and were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2. Patients with impaired renal or hepatic function, active second malignancies requiring treatment, and uncontrolled intercurrent illnesses such as an ongoing or active infection were excluded. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria can be found in the study protocol.

Study treatment

Moxetumomab pasudotox was administered at a dose of 40 µg/kg by intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 30 min on Days 1, 3, and 5 of a 28-day cycle for up to six cycles, or until documentation of MRD-negative CR, disease progression, initiation of an alternate therapy, or unacceptable toxicity.

If during treatment and prior to completion of 6 cycles of therapy, blood counts were consistent with CR for at least 4 weeks, an interim disease assessment could have been performed at the discretion of the investigator. If a CR without MRD was documented, treatment was discontinued.

Patients were given prophylactic treatments for renal insufficiency (fluids and aspirin), arterial thrombosis (low-dose aspirin), and hypersensitivity reactions (hydroxyzine, acetaminophen, and ranitidine). Details can be found in the study protocol. Patients were encouraged to drink at least 3 L of fluid per day on Days 0–8 of the treatment cycle.

Adequate pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis was provided for patients receiving corticosteroids ≥ 10 mg of prednisone daily or equivalent, CD4 lymphocyte count < 0.2 × 103/µL, or at the discretion of the investigator. Viral prophylaxis was provided for patients receiving chronic corticosteroids or with lymphopenia.

Study endpoints

The primary endpoint was the durable CR rate, defined as CR with hematologic remission (HR) lasting > 180 days; it was calculated as the ratio of the number of patients achieving durable CR over the total number of patients treated. CR was determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) and local investigators based on pathology (no evidence of leukemic cells in both the peripheral blood and bone marrow by routine hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] staining), radiography with CT or MRI (no hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, or lymphadenopathy) and HR (neutrophils ≥ 1.5 × 103/µL, platelets ≥ 100 × 103/µL, and hemoglobin ≥ 11.0 g/dL, without transfusions or growth factors for ≥ 4 weeks). Resolution of splenomegaly required a maximum spleen diameter of < 17 cm or > 25% shorter than at baseline. Relapse was defined as the loss of any criteria needed for best response, including asymptomatic reappearance of hairy cells in the bone marrow by H&E staining. Additional details can be found in the study protocol.

The secondary endpoints included CR rate, objective response (OR) rate, time to and duration of CR and OR, MRD, progression-free survival (PFS) rates, safety/tolerability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics.

MRD was locally assessed during treatment using quantitative flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood samples or bone marrow aspirate, according to the institution’s protocols, and by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on the bone marrow biopsy tissue. Local study sites received instructions on sample collection and submission for analysis. Samples for peripheral blood were collected at screening, prior to Cycles 3 and 5 only, at the end of treatment, at 181 days after end of treatment, 12 and 18 months after end of treatment, and yearly thereafter. Bone marrow aspirate was collected at screening, at the end of treatment for all patients, and 181 days after end of treatment for patients in PR or CR. Local MRD status was then confirmed by BICR evaluation of H&E staining and IHC on the bone marrow biopsy tissue. IHC involved staining for the presence of phenotypical B-cell (CD20) and HCL (CD79a, annexin A1, DBA.44, and PAX-5) antigens. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of HCL phenotype cells in the bone marrow biopsy by IHC and in the bone marrow aspirate/blood by flow cytometry.

Safety was evaluated from enrollment until 30 days after the last moxetumomab pasudotox dose was administered. The evaluation included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, and clinically meaningful changes in laboratory tests. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria v4.03 were used for grading, and the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities v20.0 was used for coding AEs.

Statistical analysis

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, including all patients who received moxetumomab pasudotox, was used to evaluate efficacy, whereas the safety population, including all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of moxetumomab pasudotox, was used to evaluate safety. Both populations included the same 80 patients.

The sample size was based on the historical CR rate of rituximab against relapsed HCL requiring treatment of ≤ 13% [11] and the target durable CR for moxetumomab pasudotox of ≥ 28%. Using the exact binomial test, it was estimated that a sample size of 77 patients would provide 90% power to detect a difference between 13 and 28% durable CR rates, with a two-sided significance level of 0.05. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for durable CR was estimated using the exact probability method (Clopper–Pearson exact interval); if the lower bound of the 95% CI was above 13%, the durable CR rate was deemed significantly higher than the historical control. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the duration of CR, OR, and PFS. In these analyses, patients alive with no documented relapse prior to data cutoff, dropout, or initiation of an alternate therapy, were censored on the last date of disease or hematologic assessment.

Results

Patients

Eighty patients were enrolled and treated with moxetumomab pasudotox (Table 1); the first patient received the first dose of moxetumomab pasudotox on May 2, 2013, and the last patient received the last dose on May 30, 2016 (data cutoff on April 29, 2019). Patients had received a median of three lines of prior systemic therapy. Thirty-nine (49%) patients had PNA-refractory disease, and 30 (38%) patients were unfit for PNA re-treatment (Table 1). Among these 30 patients, 20 patients had grade 4 neutropenia at baseline and 19 patients had a significant ongoing infection in their medical history (i.e., cellulitis, diverticulitis, hepatitis B virus, herpes zoster, sinusitis, and wound infection) and/or experienced a grade ≥ 3 infection (i.e., pneumonia and sepsis) or febrile neutropenia during screening. In all cases, the infections were adequately controlled by the start of treatment.

Table 1 Patient demographics and baseline characteristics
Full size table

Fifty patients (63%) completed six cycles of treatment, and 37 patients (46%) completed the study phase, defined as being followed up to Day 181 after the last treatment (irrespective of whether or not they completed treatment). Of the 30 patients (38%) that did not complete six cycles of treatment, 12 had a CR with MRD negativity; 12 discontinued due to AEs; two had disease progression; one died as a result of septic shock that was unrelated to treatment; and three discontinued for other reasons (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Overall, 43 patients (54%) discontinued the study: Three (4%) withdrew consent, two (3%) were lost to follow up, four (5%) died, and 34 (43%) discontinued for other reasons, mainly due to disease progression or because they started an alternative anti-cancer therapy (Additional file 1: Figure S1). All deaths were considered unrelated to study treatment.

Efficacy

Disease responses, as assessed by BICR and the investigators for the ITT population, are presented in Table 2. At a median follow-up of 24.6 months (range: 1.2–71.7 months), the durable CR rate (CR with HR > 180 days) was 36% (29 patients; 95% CI, 26–48%). This surpassed the target rate of 28% and was significantly higher than the historical control (lower bound of 95% CI > 13%). Moreover, the CR rate with HR ≥ 360 days was 33% (26 patients; 95% CI 22–44%). Thirty-three patients had CR, 8 of whom of had a spleen size > 13 cm (range: 13.2–16.1 cm); all 8 of these patients remained in HR at 180 days, and 7 of them remained in HR at 360 days.

Table 2 Moxetumomab pasudotox was associated with a high response rate and MRD negativity among complete responders
Full size table

In the majority of cases (51 out of 80 patients, 64%), response assessments were concordant between BICR and local settings. Among the 33 BICR-categorized CRs, 29 were also investigator-categorized CRs, including 28 durable CRs; among the 42 investigator-categorized CRs, 13 were not reported as CR by BICR. The discrepancies were due to differences in assessment of bone marrow involvement, technical challenges (e.g., unavailable/unevaluable H&E slides), and incomplete disease assessments by local investigators. Some level of variability is to be expected with low levels of disease (e.g., 1–2% involvement).

Based on BICR, 60 patients (75%; 95% CI, 64–84%) had an OR, of which 33 (41%; 95% CI, 30–53%) had a CR; both the median CR duration and median HR duration from the onset of CR were 62.8 months (Fig. 1a, b). Landmark rates of CR at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months were 94%, 77%, 74%, 70%, 61%, 61%, and 61%, respectively. The median OR duration was 66.7 months, and the median HR duration from the onset of HR was 45.8 months (Fig. 1c). Finally, median PFS was 41.5 months if a progression event was considered as the loss of any CR criteria; median PFS was longer (71.7 months) if a progression event had to be accompanied by loss of HR (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1figure 1

Moxetumomab pasudotox provided durable responses in heavily pre-treated patients. As assessed by BICR in the ITT population, Kaplan–Meier plots of a duration of CR and b duration of HR, in patients with CR, c duration of HR in all patients with HR, and d PFS. HR is defined as hemoglobin ≥ 11.0 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 103/µL, and platelet count ≥ 100 × 103/µL, without receiving transfusions or growth factors within the preceding 4 weeks of assessment. BICR blinded independent central review, CI confidence interval, CR complete response, HR hematologic remission, ITT intent-to-treat population, LR landmark rate, NE not evaluable, NR not reported, OR objective response, PFS progression-free survival

Full size image

Notably, the median estimates for the duration of response (e.g., CR and HR) were only reached at the last event, when a single patient was at risk. For this reason, the landmark analyses provide a more robust measure of treatment efficacy than the median estimates. Nevertheless, these analyses should be interpreted with caution owing to the small number of patients at the later time points.

Overall, 27 (82%) of the 33 patients with a CR also demonstrated MRD negativity (BICR), representing 34% of all patients. Both the median duration of CR (62.8 vs 12.0 months; Fig. 2) and median duration of HR from CR (62.9 [95% CI: NE] vs 12.0 months [95% CI 5.88–NR months]) were longer in MRD-negative patients than in MRD-positive patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

MRD negativity was associated with durable CR. Kaplan–Meier plot for the patients with a complete response in the ITT population, as assessed by BICR (n = 33). The starting point of the observation was from the onset of CR and MRD testing. BICR blinded independent central review, CI confidence interval, CR complete response, ITT intent-to-treat, MRD minimal residual disease, NE not evaluable

Full size image

Safety

For the primary analysis, safety data were collected up to 30 days after the last dose of moxetumomab pasudotox was administered. SAEs were followed until resolution or death. All patients had completed at least 6 months of post-treatment follow-up by the date of the primary analysis cutoff. Therefore, limited safety data were collected after this date (no new information on SAEs), and safety results in this long-term follow-up analysis remain largely unchanged [29].

Overall, 79 subjects (99%) experienced at least one AE, of which the most common were peripheral edema (39%), nausea (35%), and fatigue (34%) (Additional file 2: Table S1). The most commonly occurring grade 3–4 events were decreased lymphocyte count in 16 patients (20%), anemia in 8 patients (10%), and asymptomatic hypophosphatemia in 8 patients (10%). AEs not reported as related to study treatment led to study discontinuation in 4 patients (5%): glioblastoma, grade 5 pneumonia, grade 1 memory impairment, and grade 4 sepsis syndrome. Secondary malignancies were not a safety issue in this study. There was one report of glioblastoma and multiple myeloma each, and six cases of non-melanoma skin cancers (1 basal cell carcinoma, 2 lipomas, 2 seborrheic keratoses, and 1 squamous cell carcinoma), but these were not reported as related to moxetumomab pasudotox treatment.

The most frequent treatment-related AEs were nausea (22 patients, 28%), peripheral edema (21 patients, 26%), headache (17 patients, 21%), and pyrexia (16 patients, 20%) (Table 3). Treatment-related grade 3–4 AEs were reported in 24 patients (30%) and treatment-related SAEs in 14 (18%). Overall, treatment-related AEs led to study drug discontinuation in 8 patients (10%): hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS; 4 patients, 5%), capillary leak syndrome (CLS; 2 patients, 3%), and increased blood creatinine (2 patients, 3%). Notably, HUS and CLS events were generally reversible.

Table 3 Summary of treatment-related AEsa
Full size table

Key laboratory findings are reported in  Additional file 3: Table S2. All serum creatinine laboratory values stayed within normal limits up to 12 months post-treatment, and there was no decline in renal function over time ( Additional file 4: Figure S2). With a median follow-up of 24.6 months, four deaths were reported: two due to HCL progression and two due to an AE (1 each of pneumonia and septic shock). The fatal pneumonia was reported in a 79-year-old female 30 days after the last administration of study medication. Given the long delay between this event and the last administration of study medication, the event was considered not to be related to moxetumomab pasudotox by the investigator. The septic shock was reported in a 70-year-old male, known to have grade 3 neutropenia at baseline. One hundred and twenty-nine days after starting study medication, this patient was hospitalized for septic shock due to Staphylococcus and died 4 days later. In light of the baseline neutropenia and the 4 months of therapy with infectious complications, this event was considered not to be related to moxetumomab pasudotox by the investigator. Therefore, overall no deaths were considered to be related to moxetumomab pasudotox administration.

Discussion

HCL is a rare malignancy, accounting for approximately 2% of all leukemias. Thus, there is a lack of rigorous and prospective studies evaluating therapies, particularly in the relapsed/refractory setting [30, 31]. To date, this is the largest prospective study to evaluate therapy in the third line and beyond for HCL, demonstrating an unprecedented duration of CR (> 5 years), high OR rate (75%), and long-lasting PFS (median of 41.5 months) in heavily pre-treated patients. Consistent with the primary analysis, the durable CR rate was significantly higher than the CR rate of 13% in the largest rituximab trial, which was used as a historical control for this study [11, 29]. Notably, this is also the first trial to both establish and meet the primary endpoint of durable CR (with HR > 180 days) in heavily pre-treated patients, setting an important standard for assessing the clinical benefit of therapies in future trials.

Unfortunately, studies with long-term follow-up for other late-line HCL treatments are scarce. The majority of rituximab studies have included ≤ 10 patients with heavily pre-treated disease and a follow-up of less than 3 years [9, 10, 12, 20]. Hence, the efficacy of rituximab monotherapy has not been well established in this setting (≥ 2 prior therapies). Perhaps the strongest previous data come from small Phase 2 studies of vemurafenib, ibrutinib (including variant HCL), and vemurafenib plus rituximab in patients who had received a median of ≥ 3 prior therapies [8, 17, 19]. These studies have demonstrated CRs lasting around 2 years, but the largest included only 27 evaluable patients. By contrast, the current study estimated that the probability of CRs lasting at least 5 years is > 60% in patients treated with moxetumomab pasudotox. This finding is promising but should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited number of patients at later time points.

The proportion of patients who achieved a durable CR rate with moxetumomab pasudotox in the long-term follow-up analysis, as determined by BICR, was approximately 20% higher than in the primary analysis (29 patients, 36% vs 24 patients, 30%) [29]. This difference was due to some patients having a follow-up of < 180 days at the date of the primary analysis cutoff.

Beyond the conventional efficacy and safety endpoints evaluated, this pivotal study also examined MRD status (using bone marrow IHC) and its influence on outcomes. Published data suggest that MRD is not routinely assessed in clinical trials, and the few trials that have evaluated MRD status after therapy included a limited number of patients and follow-up [1, 2, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. For example, preliminary results from a Phase 2 study of vemurafenib plus rituximab demonstrate encouraging MRD-negativity rates (63% at approximately 30 months) but in only 27 patients [19]. In contrast, none of the patients in an Italian study of vemurafenib monotherapy were reported as MRD-negative [8].

This study of moxetumomab pasudotox is the largest trial to prospectively evaluate MRD with long-term follow-up and found a clear association between negative MRD status and durable remission. The majority of complete responders demonstrated MRD negativity (27 patients, 82%) with moxetumomab pasudotox. Both the median duration of CR and duration of HR from CR were approximately fivefold longer in MRD-negative (62.8 months and 62.9 months, respectively) versus MRD-positive patients (12.0 months and 12.0 months, respectively) treated with moxetumomab pasudotox, highlighting the potential clinical relevance of prospective MRD assessments. This long duration of HR from CR in MRD-negative patients is an important finding, given that the reappearance of cytopenias is of greater clinical relevance than the reappearance of leukemic cells. Indeed, median PFS was longer if progression occurred without the loss of HR (71.7 months vs 41.5 months).

In this long-term follow-up, moxetumomab pasudotox treatment continued to demonstrate the manageable safety profile and acceptable tolerability reported in the primary analysis. Relative to PNAs, this safety profile is largely favorable as moxetumomab pasudotox results in less myelotoxicity and immunosuppression and thus does not increase susceptibility to infection [2, 29, 30]. Notably, this study did not evaluate moxetumomab pasudotox in patients with significant comorbidities such as compromised organ function, nor those with active or ongoing infections; all cases of intercurrent infection were adequately controlled by the start of treatment. Thus, careful patient assessment and selection will be necessary prior to treatment with moxetumomab pasudotox.

Infrequently, HUS and CLS can occur with moxetumomab pasudotox treatment and proactive monitoring of patients for the relevant symptoms is important. However, these conditions are both manageable and reversible with best supportive care. Current prevention strategies for HUS include oral hydration and i.v. fluid supplementation (0.5–1 L) before and after each dose, and the oral use of dexamethasone in those with nausea or pyrexia. Serum creatinine levels remained within the normal range 1 year after treatment, and there was no decline in renal function with moxetumomab pasudotox treatment over time.

Conclusions

Although a larger randomized, controlled trial would ideally be required to confirm the positive effects of moxetumomab pasudotox reported in this open-label trial, patient numbers in this rare condition are small and there are limited treatment options available. Based on the primary analysis [29], which demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable safety data, moxetumomab pasudotox became the first therapy to receive FDA approval for R/R HCL in September 2018. Here, we show that moxetumomab pasudotox provides an unprecedented rate of deep and durable CR with a manageable safety profile in R/R disease. Moreover, the majority of patients with CR also demonstrate MRD negativity and thus may benefit from improved long-term clinical outcomes. The results of this trial represent an important step forward for patients with R/R HCL, providing a clinically meaningful option following initial treatment with a PNA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AEs:

Adverse events

BICR:

Blinded independent central review

CI:

Confidence interval

CLS:

Capillary leak syndrome

CR:

Complete response

CT:

Computed tomography

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

HCL:

Hairy cell leukemia

HR:

Hematologic remission

HUS:

Hemolytic uremic syndrome

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

ITT:

Intent-to-treat

i.v.:

Intravenous

MRD:

Minimal residual disease

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NE:

Not evaluable

OR:

Objective response

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PFS:

Progression-free survival

PNA:

Purine nucleoside analogs

R/R:

Relapsed/refractory

SAEs:

Serious adverse events

References

  1. Grever MR, Blachly JS, Andritsos LA. Hairy cell leukemia: update on molecular profiling and therapeutic advances. Blood Rev. 2014;28:197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grever MR, Abdel-Wahab O, Andritsos LA, et al. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with classic hairy cell leukemia. Blood. 2017;129:553–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robak T, Matutes E, Catovsky D, et al. Hairy cell leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(sup5):v100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson PA, Ravandi F. How I manage patients with hairy cell leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2017;177:543–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreitman RJ. Immunoconjugates and new molecular targets in hairy cell leukemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:660–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg JD, Burian C, Waalen J, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of young hairy cell leukemia patients treated with cladribine: a single-institution series. Blood. 2014;123:177–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Else M, Dearden CE, Matutes E, et al. Long-term follow-up of 233 patients with hairy cell leukaemia, treated initially with pentostatin or cladribine, at a median of 16 years from diagnosis. Br J Haematol. 2009;145:733–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tiacci E, Park JH, De Carolis L, et al. Targeting mutant BRAF with vemurafenib in relapsed or refractory hairy-cell leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1733–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagberg H, Lundholm L. Rituximab, a chimaeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of hairy cell leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:609–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lauria F, Lenoci M, Annino L, et al. Efficacy of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (Mabthera) in patients with progressed hairy cell leukemia. Haematologica. 2001;86:1046–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nieva J, Bethel K, Saven A. Phase 2 study of rituximab in the treatment of cladribine-failed patients with hairy cell leukemia. Haematologica. 2003;102:810–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas DA, O’Brien S, Bueso-Ramos C, et al. Rituximab in relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia. Blood. 2003;102:3906–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Angelopoulou MK, Pangalis GA, Sachanas S, et al. Outcome and toxicity in relapsed hairy cell leukemia patients treated with rituximab. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49:1817–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravandi F, Jorgensen JL, O’Brien SM, et al. Eradication of minimal residual disease in hairy cell leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:4658–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravandi F, O’Brien S, Jorgensen J, et al. Phase 2 study of cladribine followed by rituximab in patients with hairy cell leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:3818–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burotto M, Stetler-Stevenson M, Arons E, et al. Bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed and refractory hairy cell leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:6313–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones J, Andritsos L, Kreitman RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib in patients with hairy cell leukemia: stage 1 results of a phase 2 study. Blood. 2016;128:1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chihara D, Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, et al. Long-term durable remission by cladribine followed by rituximab in patients with hairy cell leukaemia: update of a phase II trial. Br J Haematol. 2016;174:760–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tiacci E, De Carolis L, Simonetti E, et al. The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib plus rituximab produces a high rate of deep and durable responses in relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia: updated results of a phase-2 trial. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37(S2):110–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zenhäusern R, Simcock M, Gratwohl A, et al. Rituximab in patients with hairy cell leukemia relapsing after treatment with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (SAKK 31/98). Haematologica. 2008;93:1426–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Getta B, Woo K, Devlin S, et al. Treatment outcomes and secondary cancer incidence in young patients with hairy cell leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2016;175:402–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Della Starza I, Chiaretti S, De Propris MS, et al. Minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: technical and clinical advances. Front Oncol. 2019;9:726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Oberholzer M, Aschenafi S, et al. Potential predictive patterns of minimal residual disease detected by immunohistochemistry on bone marrow biopsy specimens during a long-term follow-up in patients treated with cladribine for hairy cell leukemia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:374–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Food and Drug Administration, Hematologic Malignancies (2018). https://www.fda.gov/media/117035/download. Accessed November 2019.

  25. Soverini S, De Benedittis C, Mancini M, et al. Best practices in chronic myeloid leukemia monitoring and management. Oncologist. 2016;21:626–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas DA, Ravandi F, Keating M, et al. Importance of minimal residual disease in hairy cell leukemia: monoclonal antibodies as a therapeutic strategy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(sup1):27–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ortiz-Maldonado V, Villamor N, Baumann T, et al. Is there a role for minimal residual disease monitoring in the management of hairy-cell leukaemia? Br J Haematol. 2018;183:127–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreitman RJ, Pastan I. Antibody fusion proteins: anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6398–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kreitman RJ, Dearden C, Zinzani PL, et al. Moxetumomab pasudotox in relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia. Leukemia. 2018;32:1768–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maitre E, Cornet E, Troussard X. Hairy cell leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:1413–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Else M, Dearden C, Catovsky D. Long-term follow-up after purine analogue therapy in hairy cell leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Hematol. 2015;28:217–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Elad Sharon, MD, MPH, for study monitoring during the CTEP-sponsored part of the study and Julie Feurtado and Lacey James, CRNP, for collecting and reporting a portion of the study data and evaluating response. We also thank all the investigators who enrolled patients, the investigational site personnel, and the wider AstraZeneca and MedImmune teams involved. Medical writing support was provided by Arti Sikka, PhD (Real Science), and funded by Innate Pharma.

Funding

MedImmune LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca, funded, administered, and sponsored the study. MedImmune designed the study in association with the authors and was responsible for collecting and analyzing the data. This publication was funded by Innate Pharma who obtained the rights to LUMOXITI from AstraZeneca in the USA, EU, Switzerland, and the UK. Open access funding provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Immunotherapy Section, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA

    Robert J. Kreitman & Ira Pastan

  2. The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, England, UK

    Claire Dearden

  3. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italia

    Pier Luigi Zinzani

  4. Istituto di Ematologia, “Seràgnoli”, Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Università Degli Studi, Bologna, Italia

    Pier Luigi Zinzani

  5. Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain

    Julio Delgado

  6. Medical University of Łódź and Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Pabianicka 62, 90-001, Łódź, Poland

    Tadeusz Robak

  7. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitépl. 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Philipp D. le Coutre

  8. Haukeland University Hospital and University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway

    Bjørn T. Gjertsen

  9. Hospital Center University of Caen Normandie, Avenue de La Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France

    Xavier Troussard

  10. Weill Cornell Medical College, The New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY, USA

    Gail J. Roboz

  11. Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, Lyon, France

    Lionel Karlin

  12. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 401 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Douglas E. Gladstone

  13. AstraZeneca, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

    Nataliya Kuptsova-Clarkson

  14. Acerta Pharma (AstraZeneca), 121 Oyster Point Blvd, South San Francisco, CA, USA

    Shiyao Liu & Priti Patel

  15. Innate Pharma, 117 Avenue de Luminy, BP 30191, 13276, Marseille, France

    Federico Rotolo & Emmanuel Mitry

  16. Developmental Therapeutics Consortium, 175 E Delaware Pl #7204, Chicago, IL, USA

    Francis Giles

Authors
  1. Robert J. Kreitman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Dearden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pier Luigi Zinzani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julio Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tadeusz Robak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philipp D. le Coutre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bjørn T. Gjertsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xavier Troussard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gail J. Roboz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lionel Karlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Douglas E. Gladstone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nataliya Kuptsova-Clarkson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shiyao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Priti Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Federico Rotolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Emmanuel Mitry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ira Pastan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Francis Giles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Study 1053 investigators

Contributions

RJK, NKC, SL, PP, FR, EM, and FG performed the data analysis. All the authors had full access to the results, which they then interpreted cooperatively. All authors reviewed and contributed to the drafts, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript. FG served as study Principal Investigator and Chairman of the Study Scientific Monitoring Committee (SSMC) and had final responsibility for the decision to submit this manuscript for publication. The SSMC included CD, JD, BTG, PlC, TR, GJR, XT, and PLZ. RJK, IP, GJR, and FG contributed to the study conception and design. RJK, CD, PLZ, JD, LK, TR, DEG, PlC, BTG, XT, and FG were study investigators. RJK, CD, PLZ, JD, LK, TR, DEG, PlC, BTG, XT, and FG provided patients for the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Kreitman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Conference on Harmonization/Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and applicable regulatory requirements. The institutional review board of each participating center approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was received from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not available.

Competing interests

RJK is listed as a co-inventor on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) patent for moxetumomab; he has received grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Innate Pharma, and Novartis, and non-financial support from Genentech and Teva. CD is on the advisory board for MedImmune and Innate Pharma. PLZ has received personal fees from Celltrion, MSD, Verastem, Gilead, Astellas, and Kirin Kyowa. TR has received a research grant from AstraZeneca. XT is a consultant for Innate Pharma. GJR is a consultant and on the advisory board or data/safety monitoring committee for AbbVie, Actinium, Agios, Amphivena, Argenx, Array Biopharma, Astex, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Celltrion, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Epizyme, Helsinn, Janssen, Jasper Therapeutics, Jazz, MEI Pharma, Novartis, Orsenix, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sandoz, Takeda, and Trovagene, with research support from Celgene. LK has received personal fees from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda. FR and EM are employees and stakeholders of Innate Pharma. NKC and PP are employees of AstraZeneca. SL was an employee of Acerta Pharma, now Arcus Biosciences. JD, PlC, BTG, DEG, IP, and FG have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1

. Patient disposition. Patient disposition diagram for the 89 patients that were screened. aInformed Consent Form signed. bCompletion of protocol treatment is defined as six cycles of therapy. cCompletion of study phase is defined as being followed up to Day 181 after the last treatment, regardless of the number of doses of moxetumomab received.

Additional file 2: Table S1

. Summary of AEs. Summary of treatment-emergent AEs of all grades and grades 3 to 4 in the Safety population. Adverse events of any grade with an incidence of at least 20%, as well as events of grade 3 or 4 with an incidence of at least 3%. AE, adverse event.

Additional file 3: Table S2

. Summary of changes in laboratory values from baseline. The median changes in hematological laboratory values from baseline are summarized for patients in the Safety population by minimum, maximum, EOT. Baseline indicates assessment prior to first dose. EOT, end of treatment; max, maximum; min, minimum.

Additional file 4: Figure S2

. Mean serum creatinine over time. Creatinine levels over time (mean +/– SD) from the intent-to-treat population are shown; N = 80.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreitman, R.J., Dearden, C., Zinzani, P.L. et al. Moxetumomab pasudotox in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL): long-term follow-up from the pivotal trial. J Hematol Oncol 14, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-01004-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-01004-y

Keywords

Journal of Hematology & Oncology

ISSN: 1756-8722

Contact us