Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T05:46:33.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Memory Function” in Psychiatric Patients Over Sixty, Some Methodological and Diagnostic Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. B. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London
F. Post
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London
B. Löfving
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London
J. Inglis
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London

Extract

The aim of the research of which this study forms part, is to examine the relationship of certain aspects of mental functioning to the psychiatric illnesses of old age.

One of the apparent deficits of function to which psychiatrists commonly attach importance is “memory impairment“. This is considered part of various clinical syndromes, especially of the “organic” disorders of senility. The assessment of memory is, therefore, of considerable practical importance and most psychiatrists working with elderly patients use some kind of “memory tests”. Such tests are usually unstandardized and lack objective scoring criteria.

There are, in relation to memory assessment, some points of conflict between clinical usage and the evidence of objective psychological investigations. For example, the existence of a “memory function” which could be considered as relatively independent of general mental functioning or intelligence, has not been well substantiated when some such clinical tests have been put to critical examination. Eysenck and Halstead (2) after a brief review of the literature and an experimental attack on this problem, conclude that “… the ability involved in the clinical tests of memory studied in this research was identical with that involved in the intelligence test used, and that, therefore, it was misleading to accept scores on these various tests as estimates of a person's ‘memory’ ability.”

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, L., Instructions for the use of the visual-motor Gestalt test, 1946. New York: Am. Orthopsychiat. Assoc.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Halstead, H., “The Memory Function. I. A factorial study of fifteen clinical tests”, Amer. J. Psychiatr 1945, 102, 174180.Google Scholar
Garrett, H. E., Statistics in Psychology and Education, 1948. 3rd ed. New York: Longmans, Green and Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Hanvik, L. V., and Andersen, A. L., “The Effect of Focal Brain Lesions on Recall and on the Production of Rotations in the Bender Gestalt test”, J. Consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 197198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D., and Gillespie, R. D., A Textbook of Psychiatry for Students and Practitioners, 1952. 7th ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L., “The formation and retention of associations among the insane”, Am. J. Psychol., 1917, 28, 419435.Google Scholar
Jones, H. E., and Kaplan, O. J., in Kaplan, O. J. (Ed.), Mental Disorders in Later Life, 1945. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M., Clinical Psychiatry, 1954. London: Cassell and Company Ltd.Google Scholar
McNemar, Q., Psychological Statistics, 1949. London: Chapman and Hall, Ltd.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. H., Experimental Investigation of Intellectual Speed and Power in Mental Disorders, 1953. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Norris, V., and Post, F., “Treatment of Elderly Psychiatric Patients. Use of a Diagnostic Classification”, Brit. Med. J., 1954, 675679.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., and Merrill, M. A., Measuring Intelligence, 1949. London: George G. Harrap and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1944. 3rd ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.