基于Landsat 8数据的亚热带小流域蒸散发估算及时空特征分析

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.06.006

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 901-907.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.06.006

基于Landsat 8数据的亚热带小流域蒸散发估算及时空特征分析

马秋梅^1,2,3, 刘新亮^1,2, 李勇^1,2, 王毅^1,2, 吴金水^1,2

1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410125;
2. 中国科学院长沙农业环境观测研究站, 湖南长沙 410125;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

出版日期:2016-11-25 发布日期:2016-11-30
通讯作者: 李勇,E-mail:yli@isa.ac.cn E-mail:yli@isa.ac.cn
作者简介:马秋梅(1988-),女,河北衡水人,硕士生,主要从事环境模型不确定性分析研究。E-mail:simonemaqm@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（2012CB417105）；国家自然科学基金青年基金（41301202）

Estimation and Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Evapotranspiration in Small-Scaled Catchments in Subtropics of China Based on Landsat 8 Data

MA Qiu-mei^1,2,3, LIU Xin-liang^1,2, LI Yong^1,2, WANG Yi^1,2, WU Jin-shui^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
2. Changsha Research Station for Agricultural & Environmental Monitoring, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Online:2016-11-25 Published:2016-11-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以亚热带典型小流域——金井流域为研究对象，应用Landsat 8遥感数据基于SEBS模型估算了不同季节4个典型日的蒸散发（ET）值。结果表明，春季（5月12日）、夏季（7月31日）、秋季（9月17日）和冬季（次年1月23日）典型日的日ET均值及90%分位数上界分别为2.69和4.14、2.73和5.41、2.75和5.78、1.33和3.25 mm·d^-1。为研究ET在不同土地利用类型中的分布差异性，统计了研究区不同土地利用类型的日ET值，结果显示水体日ET值最高[（4.21±2.63）mm·d^-1]，稻田[（2.67±1.49）mm·d^-1]次之，再次是林地和茶园[（2.06±1.35）mm·d^-1]，公路和居民地最低[（1.17±1.14）mm·d^-1]。对所选4个典型日的ET和归一化植被指数（NDVI）进行相关分析，表明两者存在显著相关性（r值为0.34~0.63，P<0.05）。将ET遥感估算值与Penman-Monteith公式经验值、涡度相关系统的野外观测值进行对比，3者结果较为一致，表明SEBS模型适用于研究区ET估算。

关键词: 遥感估算, 蒸散发, SEBS模型, 金井流域

Abstract:

Based on the Landsat 8 remote-sensing data of the Jinjing Catchment, typical of the subtropics of China, evapotranspiration (ET) in the catchment on 4 days, typical of the four seasons, was estimated separately, using the SEBS model. Results show that the mean and the upper bound of 90% quantile of ET was estimated to be 2.69 and 4.14 mm on the spring day (May 12, 2013), 2.73 and 5.41 mm on the summer day (July 31, 2013), 2.75 and 5.78 mm on the autumn day (September 17, 2013), and 1.33 and 3.25 mm on the winter day (January 23, 2014), respectively. To study variation of the distribution of ET as affected by land use, statistics were done of ETs varying with type of land use, exhibiting a decreasing order of water body[(4.21±2.63) mm·d^-1]> paddy field[(2.67±1.49) mm·d^-1] >wood land and tea garden[(2.06±1.35) mm·d^-1] >highway and residential land[(1.17±1.14) mm·d^-1]. Pearson correlation analysis shows that ET was significantly related (r=0.34-0.63, P<0.05) to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) on the four typical days. Besides, remote-sensing based estimation of ET was quite consistent with that using the Penman-Monteith equation or the eddy correlation method, and the values acquired in field observation, which suggests that the SEBS model is applicable to estimation of ET in the Jinjing Catchment.

Key words: remote-sensing-based estimation, ET, SEBS model, Jinjing Catchment

中图分类号:

马秋梅, 刘新亮, 李勇, 王毅, 吴金水. 基于Landsat 8数据的亚热带小流域蒸散发估算及时空特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 901-907.

MA Qiu-mei, LIU Xin-liang, LI Yong, WANG Yi, WU Jin-shui. Estimation and Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Evapotranspiration in Small-Scaled Catchments in Subtropics of China Based on Landsat 8 Data[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(6): 901-907.

参考文献

[1] 贾志军,吴文心,赵海亮.三江平原大豆田蒸散量模拟[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(1):50-56.
[2] 宁婷婷,刘文兆,林文,等.近56年来内蒙古东胜矿区潜在蒸散发的时程变化[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):62-66.
[3] BASTIAANSSEN W G M,MENENTI M,FEDDES R A,et al.A Remote Sensing Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL):1.Formulation[J].Journal of Hydrology,1998,212/213(1/2/3/4):198-212.
[4] BASTIAANSSEN W G M,PELGRUM H,WANG J,et al.A Remote Sensing Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL):2.Validation[J].Journal of Hydrology,1998,212/213(1/2/3/4):213-229.
[5] SU Z B.The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for Estimation of Turbulent Heat Fluxes[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2002,6(1):85-100.
[6] SHUTTLEWORTH J W,WALLACE J S.Evaporation From Sparse Crops:An Energy Combination Theory[J].Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,1985,111(469):839-855.
[7] CRUZ-BLANCO M,LORITE I J,SANTOS C.An Innovative Remote Sensing Based Reference Evapotranspiration Method to Support Irrigation Water Management Under Semi-Arid Conditions[J].Agricultural Water Management,2014,131(1):135-145.
[8] LI Y,WHITE R,CHEN D L,et al.A Spatially Referenced Water and Nitrogen Management Model (WNMM) for (Irrigated) Intensive Cropping Systems in the North China Plain[J].Ecological Modelling,2007,203(3):395-423.
[9] NETELER M,MITASOVA H.Open Source GIS:A GRASS GIS Approach[M].New York,USA:Springer Science & Business Media,2013:33-47.
[10] 陈云.基于Landsat 8的城市热岛效应研究初探:以厦门市为例[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2014,37(2):123-128.
[11] 覃志豪,李文娟,徐斌,等.陆地卫星TM 6波段范围内地表比辐射率的估计[J].国土资源遥感,2004,16(3):28-32,36,41.
[12] 辛晓洲.用定量遥感方法计算地表蒸散[D].北京:中国科学院遥感应用研究所,2003.
[13] 倪猛,陈波,岳建华,等.洛河流域蒸散发遥感反演及其与各参数的相关性分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2008,23(6):34-37.
[14] VETTER S H,SCHAFFRATH D,BEMHOFER C.Spatial Simulation of Evapotranspiration of Semi-Arid Inner Mongolian Grassland Based on MODIS and Eddy Covariance Data[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2012,65(5):1567-1574.
[15] 周剑,程国栋,李新,等.应用遥感技术反演流域尺度的蒸散发[J].水利学报,2009,40(6):679-687.
[16] 李明,沈润平,王迪,等.基于像元质量分析的SG滤波重建 MODIS-NDVI[J].生态与农村环境学报,2015,31(3):425-431.
[17] 何延波,SU Z B,JIA L,等.遥感数据支持下不同地表覆盖的区域蒸散[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2):288-296.
[18] 姜朋辉,赵锐锋,赵海莉,等.1975年以来黑河中游地区土地利用/覆被变化时空演变[J].生态与农村环境学报,2012,28(5):473-479.
[19] 宋妮,孙景生,王景雷,等.基于Penman修正式和Penman-Monteith公式的作物系数差异分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(19):88-97.

基于Landsat 8数据的亚热带小流域蒸散发估算及时空特征分析

Estimation and Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Evapotranspiration in Small-Scaled Catchments in Subtropics of China Based on Landsat 8 Data

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价