Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A 5-year follow-up study of aggression at work and psychological health

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a longitudinal cohort study, organizational climate and long-term effects of exposure to nasty teasing (aggression) at work were investigated. The baseline consisted of a representative sample of Danish employees in 1995 with a response rate of 80% (N = 5,652). Of these, 4,647 participated in the follow-up in 2000 (response rate 84%). In 1995, 6.3% were subjected to nasty teasing with no significant gender difference. At baseline, we found significant associations among nasty teasing, a negative organizational climate, and psychological health effects. In the follow-up analyses, associations were found between exposure to nasty teasing at baseline and psychological health problems at follow-up, even when controlled for organizational climate and psychological health at baseline and nasty teasing at follow-up. Stratified for gender, the follow-up associations were significant for women but not for men. Low coworker support and conflicts at baseline and teasing at follow-up mediated the effects on men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1998). Workplace aggression-the iceberg beneath the tip of workplace violence: Evidence of its forms, frequency, and its targets. Public Administration Quarterly, 21, 446–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Aggression: Definition and perspectives. In Human aggression (2nd ed., pp. 1–38). New York and London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehr, T. A. (1995). Role ambiguity and role conflict in the workplace. In T. A. Beehr (Ed.), Psychological stress in the workplace (pp. 55–82). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehr, T. A., Jex, S. M., Stacy, B. A., & Murray, M. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekker, M. H. J. (2003). Investigating gender within health research is more than sex disaggregation of data: A multi-facet gender and health model. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 8, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørner, J., Damsgaard, M. T., Watt, T., & Groenvold, M. (1998). Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1001–1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørner, J., Thunedborg, K., Kristensen, T. S., Modvig, J., & Bech, P. (1998). The Danish SF-36 health survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 991–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., Milich, R., & Georgeson, J. C. (2003). Taking offence: Effects of personality and teasing on behavioral and emotional reactions to teasing. Journal of Personality, 71, 557–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brøgger, J., Bakke, P., Eide, G. E., & Gulsvik, A. (2002). Comparison of telephone and postal survey modes on respiratory symptoms and risk factors. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 572–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bültmann, U., Kant, I., Kasl, S. V., Schröder, K. A. P., Swan, G. M. H., & van den Brandt, P. A. (2002). Lifestyle factors as risk factors for fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: Prospective results from the Maastrict Cohort Study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44, 116–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bültmann, U., Kant, I., van den Brandt, P. A., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for the onset of fatigue and psychological distress: Prospective results from the Maastricht Cohort Study. Psychological Medicine, 32, 333–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kristensen, T. S., Tüchsen, F., & Bach, E. (2003). Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990–2000 and their associations with labor-force changes. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 29, 270–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. Y., & Spector, P. E. (1992). Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: An exploratory study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Longhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2000). Mobning i arbejdslivet: Hvad er det og hvad ved vi om det? [Bullying at work: What is it and what do we know about it?]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 2, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationship to work environment quality-an exploratory study. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 4, 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, W., Tomic, W., & Brouwers, A. (2002). Aggressive behaviour and burnout among staff of homes for the elderly. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 11, 2–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L., & Barling, J. (1999). Predicting employee aggression against coworkers, subordinates and supervisors: The roles of person behaviors and perceived workplace factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 897–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. L. (2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Manchester, England: Manchester School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Hogh, A., & Dofradottir, A. (2001). Coping with bullying in the workplace. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogh, A., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2005). Is sense of coherence a mediator or moderator of relationships between violence at work and stress reactions? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 429–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Jagatic, K. (2003). By another name: American perspectives on workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 31–61). London and New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9, 341–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 229–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2000). Workplace bullying and sickness absence in hospital staff. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 57, 656–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M. (2000). “I was only kidding!”: Victims’ and perpetrators’ perceptions of teasing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1991). The concept of coping. In A. Monat & R. S. Lazarus (Eds.), Stress and coping. An anthology (3rd ed., pp. 189–206). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, M. M., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 444–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 123–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U. (1996). Influence of paid and unpaid work on psychophysiological stress responses of men and women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 117–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1999). Stress and workload of men and women in high ranking positions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 142–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2001). MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messing, K., Punnett, L., Bond, M., Alexanderson, K., Pyle, J., Zahm, S. et al. (2003). Be the fairest of them all: Challenges and recommendations for the treatment of gender in occupational health research. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43, 618–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2001). Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationship between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints: The role of state negative affectivity and generalized self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 397–405.

  • Moerman, C. J. & Van Mens-Verhulst, J. (2004). Gender-sensitive epidemiological research: Suggestions for a gender-sensitive approach towards problem definition, data collection and analysis in epidemiological research. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 9, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1997). Aggression in the workplace. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 37–67). London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Social antecedents of bullying. A social interactionist perspective. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 185–202). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2001). Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schat, A. C. H., & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Reducing the adverse consequences of workplace aggression and violence: The buffering effects of organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 110–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shingles, R. D. (1985). Causal inference in cross-lagged panel analysis. In H. M. Blalock (Ed.), Causal models in panel and experimental designs (pp. 219–249). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki, J., Campbell, S., Richardson, L., & Aubert, D. (1984). Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys. American Journal of Epidemiology, 120, 302–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (1995). The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 249–274). Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Zouwen, J., & de Leeuw, E. D. (1991). The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 31, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying-psychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, M.-L. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 27, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinton, K. L. (1989). Humor in the workplace. Is it more than telling jokes. Small Group Behavior, 20, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wikman, A., & Ørhede, E. (1988). Pilotprojekterne i Danmark og Sverige [The pilot studies in Denmark and Sweden]. Stockholm, København: Statistika Centralbyrån og Arbejdsmiljø instituttet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, S., & Whittington, R. (2002). Anxiety, burnout and coping styles in general hospital staff exposed to workplace aggression: A cyclical model of burnout and vulnerability to aggression. Work & Stress, 16, 302–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., & Einarsen, S. (2003). Individual antecedents of bullying. Victims and perspectives. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 165–184). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2003). Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 103–126). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996).On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annie Hogh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogh, A., Henriksson, M.E. & Burr, H. A 5-year follow-up study of aggression at work and psychological health. Int. J. Behav. Med. 12, 256–265 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_6

Key words

Navigation