Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Flow for Pharmaceutical Powders and Granules

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the present work was to carry out a systematic evaluation of flow of pharmaceutical powders and granules using compendial and non-compendial methods. Angle of repose, bulk density, tapped density, Carr’s compressibility index, and Hausner ratios were evaluated. Additionally, flow was characterized using a powder rheometer in which a sensitive force transducer monitors the forces generated as a result of the sample displacement. The critical attributes such as cohesivity index, caking strength, and flow stability were determined for samples. The samples consisted of different grades of magnesium stearate powder including bovine, vegetable, and food grade, physical mixture powder blend consisting of a model formulation, granules prepared by various methods including slugging, high shear granulator, and fluid bed dryer. Lubricant efficiency was also determined for granules lubricated with various concentrations of magnesium stearate. It was observed that the compendial methods were often non-discriminating for minor variations in powder flow. The additional characterization such as cohesivity, and caking strength were helpful in understanding the flow characteristics of pharmaceutical systems. The flow stability test determined that the powders were not affected by the test conditions on the rheometer. The non-compendial tests were discriminating to even minor variations in powder flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USP. <1174> Powder flow. USP30 NF 25 (2007).

  2. USP. <616> Bulk density and tapped density. USP30 NF 25 (2007).

  3. R. L. Carr. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 72:69–72 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. H. Hausner. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int. J. Powder Metall. 3:7–13 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Faqih, B. Chaudhuri, A. W. Alexander, C. Davies, F. J. Muzzio, and T. M. Silvina. An experimental/computational approach for examining unconfined cohesive powder flow. Int. J. Pharm. 324:116–127 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. C. Hancock, K. E. Vukovinsky, B. Brolley, I. Grimsey, D. Hedden, A. Olsofsky, and R. A. Doherty. Development of a robust procedure for assessing powder flow using a commercial avalanche testing instrument. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 35:979–990 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. W. Jenike. Storage and flow of solids. Utah Eng. Exp. Stn. Bull. 123:1–194 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Ramachandruni, and S. W. Hoag. Design and validation of an annular shear cell for pharmaceutical powder testing. J. Pharm. Sci. 90:531–540 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Dyakowski, S. P. Luke, K. L. Ostrowski, and R. A. Williams. On-line monitoring of dense phase flow using real time dielectric imaging. Powder Technol. 104:287–295 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Weth, M. Hoffman, J. Kuhn, and J. Frick. Measurement of attractive forces between single aerogel powder particles and the correlation with powder flow. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 285:236–243 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Zatloukal, and Z. Sklubalova. Penetrometry and estimation of the flow rate of powder excipients. Pharmazie. 62:185–189 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. H. Kaye, J. Gratton-Limatainen, and J. Lloyd. The effect of flow agents on the rheology of a plastic powder. Part Syst. Charact. 12:194–197 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. O. Lindberg, M. Palsson, A. C. Pihl, T. Freeman, H. Zetzener, and G. Enstad. Flowability measurements of pharmaceutical powder mixtures with poor flow using five different techniques. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30:785–791 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. V. Navaneethan, S. Missaghi, and R. Fassihi. Application of powder rheometer to determine powder flow properties and lubrication efficiency of pharmaceutical particulate systems. AAPS PharmSciTech. 6:E398–E404 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. M. Iles, I. D. Bateson, and J. A. Walker. Rheometer. US Patent 6,481,267B1. Stable Microsystems Ltd (2002).

  16. T. A. Miller, and P. York. Physical and chemical characteristics of some high purity magnesium sterate and palmitate powders. Int. J. Pharm. 23:55–67 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Mazen Hamad, Abhay Gupta, and Christopher Ellison from the division for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Product Quality Research, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA

    Rakhi B. Shah, Mobin A. Tawakkul & Mansoor A. Khan

  2. 10903 New Hampshire Ave, LS Bldg 64, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993-002, USA

    Mansoor A. Khan

Authors
  1. Rakhi B. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mobin A. Tawakkul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mansoor A. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoor A. Khan.

Additional information

The opinions expressed in this work are only of authors, and do not necessarily reflect the policy and statements of the FDA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, R.B., Tawakkul, M.A. & Khan, M.A. Comparative Evaluation of Flow for Pharmaceutical Powders and Granules. AAPS PharmSciTech 9, 250–258 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-008-9046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-008-9046-8

Key words

Search

Navigation