Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:06:01.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generalized Telegraph Process with Random Jumps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Antonio Di Crescenzo*
Affiliation:
Università di Salerno
Antonella Iuliano*
Affiliation:
Università di Salerno
Barbara Martinucci*
Affiliation:
Università di Salerno
Shelemyahu Zacks*
Affiliation:
Binghamton University
*
Postal address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, n. 132, Fisciano (SA) 84084, Italy.
Postal address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, n. 132, Fisciano (SA) 84084, Italy.
Postal address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, n. 132, Fisciano (SA) 84084, Italy.
∗∗∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA. Email address: shelly@math.binghamton.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider a generalized telegraph process which follows an alternating renewal process and is subject to random jumps. More specifically, consider a particle at the origin of the real line at time t=0. Then it goes along two alternating velocities with opposite directions, and performs a random jump toward the alternating direction at each velocity reversal. We develop the distribution of the location of the particle at an arbitrary fixed time t, and study this distribution under the assumption of exponentially distributed alternating random times. The cases of jumps having exponential distributions with constant rates and with linearly increasing rates are treated in detail.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Beghin, L., Nieddu, L. and Orsingher, E. (2001). Probabilistic analysis of the telegrapher's process with drift by means of relativistic transformations. J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal. 14, 1125.Google Scholar
Boxma, O., Perry, D., Stadje, W. and Zacks, S. (2006). A Markovian growth-collapse model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 38, 221243.Google Scholar
Bshouty, D., Di Crescenzo, A., Martinucci, B. and Zacks, S. (2012). Generalized telegraph process with random delays. J. Appl. Prob. 49, 850865.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, A. and Iacus, S. M. (2008). Parametric estimation for standard and geometric telegraph process observed at discrete times. Statist. Infer. Stoch. Process. 11, 249263.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, A. and Iacus, S. M. (2011). Least-squares change-point estimation for the telegraph process observed at discrete times. Statistics 45, 349359.Google Scholar
Di Crescenzo, A. (2001). On random motions with velocities alternating at Erlang-distributed random times. Adv. Appl. Prob. 33, 690701.Google Scholar
Di Crescenzo, A. and Martinucci, B. (2010). A damped telegraph random process with logistic stationary distribution. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 8496.Google Scholar
Di Crescenzo, A. and Martinucci, B. (2013). On the generalized telegraph process with deterministic Jumps. Methodology Comput. Appl. Prob. 15, 215235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Crescenzo, A. and Pellerey, F. (2002). On prices' evolutions based on geometric telegrapher's process. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 18, 171184.Google Scholar
Di Crescenzo, A., Martinucci, B. and Zacks, S. (2012). On the damped geometric telegrapher's process. In Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance, eds Perna, C. and Sibillo, M.. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 175182.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (1951). On diffusion by discontinuous movements, and on the telegraph equation. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 4, 129156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. (2007). Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kac, M. (1974). A stochastic model related to the telegrapher's equation. Rochy Mountain J. Math. 4, 497509.Google Scholar
López, O. and Ratanov, N. (2012). Kac's rescaling for Jump-telegraph processes. Statist. Prob. Lett. 82, 17681776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, O. and Ratanov, N. (2012). Option pricing driven by a telegraph process with random Jumps. J. Appl. Prob. 49, 838849.Google Scholar
Mazza, C. and Rullière, D. (2004). A link between wave governed random motions and ruin processes. Insurance Math. Econom. 35, 205222.Google Scholar
Orsingher, E. (1990). Probability law, flow function, maximum distribution of wave-governed random motions and their connections with Kirchoff's laws. Stoch. Process. Appl. 34, 4966.Google Scholar
Perry, D., Stadje, W. and Zacks, S. (2005). A two-sided first-exit problem for a compound Poisson process with a random upper boundary. Methodology Comput. Appl. Prob. 7, 5162.Google Scholar
Pinsky, M. A. (1991). Lectures on Random Evolutions. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.Google Scholar
Ratanov, N. (2007). A Jump telegraph model for option pricing. Quant. Finance 7, 575583.Google Scholar
Ratanov, N. (2007). Jump telegraph processes and financial markets with memory. J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal. 2007, 19pp.Google Scholar
Ratanov, N. (2010). Option pricing model based on a Markov-modulated diffusion with Jumps. Braz. J. Prob. Statist. 24, 413431.Google Scholar
Ratanov, N. and Melnikov, A. (2008). On financial markets based on telegraph processes. Stochastics 80, 247268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadje, W. and Zacks, S. (2004). Telegraph processes with random velocities. J. Appl. Prob. 41, 665678.Google Scholar
Van Lieshout, M. N. M. (2006). Maximum likelihood estimation for random sequential adsorption. Adv. Appl. Prob. 38, 889898.Google Scholar
Zacks, S. (2004). Generalized integrated telegrapher process and the distribution of related stopping times. J. Appl. Prob. 41, 497507.Google Scholar