Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Handgrip Strength Predicts Postoperative Pneumonia After Thoracoscopic–Laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Patients with Esophageal Cancer

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite advances in minimally invasive surgery, postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy remains a frequent complication. Sarcopenia, defined as low muscle strength and quantity, has been associated with adverse surgical outcomes in numerous cancers. The recent definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia have emphasized muscle strength rather than muscle quantity as the primary indicator of sarcopenia, although most studies have focused only on muscle quantity. This study aimed to determine the association of muscle strength and quantity with postoperative pneumonia after thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE).

Methods

This retrospective, single-center, observational study investigated 161 men undergoing TLE for esophageal cancer between May 2017 and October 2019. Handgrip strength (HGS) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) were used respectively as proxy for muscle strength and quantity. The SMI was assessed using preoperative computed tomography at the L3 vertebral level. Predictors of postoperative pneumonia were determined using multivariate analysis.

Results

The study subjects had TLE performed for squamous cell carcinoma (n = 131), adenocarcinoma (n = 24), and other cancers (n = 6). Postoperative pneumonia developed in 28 patients (17.4%). In the multivariate analysis, HGS was significantly associated with postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–1.35; p = 0.001]. No association was found between SMI and postoperative pneumonia (p = 0.964). Comparison of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for postoperative pneumonia prediction showed that the value for HGS was significantly higher than for SMI (0.79 vs 0.65, respectively; p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Low HGS was a significant predictor of postoperative pneumonia after TLE for esophageal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND. Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg. 2014;259:413–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds JV, Donohoe CL, McGillycuddy E, et al. Evolving progress in oncologic and operative outcomes for esophageal and junctional cancer: lessons from the experience of a high-volume center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1130–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;269:291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ataseven B, Luengo TG, du Bois A, et al. Skeletal muscle attenuation (sarcopenia) predicts reduced overall survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing primary debulking surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:3372–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simonsen C, de Heer P, Bjerre ED, et al. Sarcopenia and postoperative complication risk in gastrointestinal surgical oncology: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018;268:58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takamori S, Toyokawa G, Okamoto T, et al. Clinical impact and risk factors for skeletal muscle loss after complete resection of early non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakashima Y, Saeki H, Nakanishi R, et al. Assessment of sarcopenia as a predictor of poor outcomes after esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;267:1100–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shichinohe T, Uemura S, Hirano S, Hosokawa M. Impact of preoperative skeletal muscle mass and nutritional status on short- and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective observational study: impact of psoas muscle mass and body mass on esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1301–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliott JA, Doyle SL, Murphy CF, et al. Sarcopenia: prevalence, and impact on operative and oncologic outcomes in the multimodal management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;266:822–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ida S, Watanabe M, Yoshida N, et al. Sarcopenia is a predictor of postoperative respiratory complications in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386:266–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sato S, Nagai E, Taki Y, et al. Handgrip strength as a predictor of postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Esophagus. 2018;15:10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266:232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gomez-Perez SL, Haus JM, Sheean P, et al. Measuring abdominal circumference and skeletal muscle from a single cross-sectional computed tomography image. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2015;40:308–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scholtemeijer MG, Seesing MFJ, Brenkman HJF, Janssen LM, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: incidence, management, and impact on short- and long-term outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 8):S868–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Law S, Wong K-H, Kwok K-F, Chu K-M, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240:791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Avendano C, Flume P, Silvestri G, King L, Reed C. Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:922–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Izawa KP, Watanabe S, Oka K, et al. Respiratory muscle strength in relation to sarcopenia in elderly cardiac patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28:1143–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Butler SG, Stuart A, Leng X, et al. The relationship of aspiration status with tongue and handgrip strength in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66:452–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishigori T, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Hisamori S, Sakai Y. Sarcopenia as a predictor of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:678–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boden I, Skinner EH, Browning L, et al. Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery: pragmatic, double-blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2018;360:j5916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zylstra J, Boshier P, Whyte GP, Low DE, Davies AR. Perioperative patient optimization for oesophageal cancer surgery: from prehabilitation to enhanced recovery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;36–37:61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yip C, Goh V, Davies A, et al. Assessment of sarcopenia and changes in body composition after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and associations with clinical outcomes in oesophageal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:998–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Awad S, Tan BH, Cui H, et al. Marked changes in body composition following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:74–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults: current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working Group on Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12:249–56.

  35. Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40:423–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jane Charbonneau, DVM, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Daiko MD, PhD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurita, D., Oguma, J., Ishiyama, K. et al. Handgrip Strength Predicts Postoperative Pneumonia After Thoracoscopic–Laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 3173–3181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08520-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08520-8

Keywords

Navigation