Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor Burden Dictates Prognosis Among Patients Undergoing Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Tool to Guide Post-Resection Adjuvant Chemotherapy?

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

While tumor burden (TB) has been associated with outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the role of overall TB in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains poorly defined.

Methods

Patients undergoing curative-intent resection of ICC between 2000 and 2017 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impact of TB on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated in the multi-institutional database and validated externally.

Results

Among 1101 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of ICC, 624 (56.7%) had low TB, 346 (31.4%) medium TB, and 131 (11.9%) high TB. OS incrementally worsened with higher TB (5-year OS; low TB: 48.3% vs medium TB: 29.8% vs high TB: 17.3%, p < 0.001). Similarly, patients with low TB had better DFS compared with medium and high TB patients (5-year DFS: 38.3% vs 18.7% vs 6.9%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, TB was independently associated with OS (medium TB: HR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.14–1.71; high TB: HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.46–2.45) and DFS (medium TB, HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.33–1.96; high TB: HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.56–2.64). Survival analysis revealed an excellent prognostic discrimination using the TB among the external validation cohort (3-year OS; low TB: 44.8%, medium TB: 29.3%; high TB: 23.3%, p = 0.03; 3-year DFS: low TB: 32.7%, medium TB: 10.7%; high TB: 0%, p < 0.001). While neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with survival across the TB groups, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased survival among patients with high TB (5-year OS: 24.4% vs 13.4%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Overall TB dictated prognosis among patients with resectable ICC. TB may be used as a tool to help guide post-resection treatment strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singal AK, Vauthey JN, Grady JJ, Stroehlein JR. Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma—frequency and demographic patterns: thirty-year data from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137(7):1071–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu L, Tsilimigras DI, Paredes AZ, et al. Trends in the incidence, treatment and outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the USA: facility type is associated with margin status, use of lymphadenectomy and overall survival. World J Surg. 2019;43(7):1777–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(23):3140–3145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Endo I, Gonen M, Yopp AC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsilimigras DI, Sahara K, Wu L, et al. Very early recurrence after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: time to adopt a new treatment approach? JAMA Surg. 2020 (In Press).

  6. Tsilimigras DI, Moris D, Hyer JM, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma tumour burden score to stratify prognosis after resection. Br J Surg. 2020;107(7):854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasaki K, Morioka D, Conci S, et al. The tumor burden score: a new “metro-ticket” prognostic tool for colorectal liver metastases based on tumor size and number of tumors. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):693–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, et al. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsilimigras DI, Mehta R, Moris D, et al. A machine-based approach to preoperatively identify patients with the most and least benefit associated with resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1146 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(4):1110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bagante F, Spolverato G, Merath K, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor burden: a classification and regression tree model to define prognostic groups after resection. Surgery. 2019;166(6):983–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsilimigras DI, Moris D, Mehta R, et al. The systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.825.

  14. Tsilimigras DI, Mehta R, Aldrighetti L, et al. Development and validation of a laboratory risk score (LabScore) to predict outcomes after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(4):381–391 e382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):351–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach—the ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):550–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsilimigras DI, Hyer JM, Moris D, et al. Prognostic utility of albumin-bilirubin grade for short- and long-term outcomes following hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 706 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(2):206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spolverato G, Vitale A, Cucchetti A, et al. Can hepatic resection provide a long-term cure for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Cancer. 2015;121(22):3998–4006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinna AD, Yang T, Mazzaferro V, et al. Liver Transplantation and hepatic resection can achieve cure for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018;268(5):868–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vitale A, Lai Q, Farinati F, et al. Utility of tumor burden score to stratify prognosis of patients with hepatocellular cancer: results of 4759 cases from ITA.LI.CA study group. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(5):859–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(5):663–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(8):658–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ke Q, Lin N, Deng M, Wang L, Zeng Y, Liu J. The effect of adjuvant therapy for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0229292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma KW, Cheung TT, Leung B, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(5):e14013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan AWH, Zhong J, Berhane S, et al. Development of pre- and post-operative models to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. J Hepatol. 2018;69(6):1284–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy M. Pawlik MD, MPH, PhD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This study was accepted as an Oral Presentation at the American College of Surgeons 106th Annual Clinical Congress, Scientific Forum, Chicago, IL, October 2020

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsilimigras, D.I., Hyer, J.M., Paredes, A.Z. et al. Tumor Burden Dictates Prognosis Among Patients Undergoing Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Tool to Guide Post-Resection Adjuvant Chemotherapy?. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 1970–1978 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09393-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09393-7

Navigation