Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparison of Surgical Complications Between Immediate Breast Reconstruction and Mastectomy: The Impact on Delivery of Chemotherapy—An Analysis of 391 Procedures

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the postoperative complications after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) versus mastectomy alone and to examine the impact on the delivery of chemotherapy.

Methods

In this prospective series, there were 391 consecutive women who underwent mastectomy (243 mastectomy alone and 148 mastectomy and IBR). The outcome measures were complications (within 3 months after surgery) and time to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Compared to the IBR group, patients in the mastectomy alone group were significantly older (P < 0.0001), smokers (P = 0.007) and less likely to have had previous radiation or lumpectomy (P < 0.0001). Overall, the complication rate was significantly greater in the IBR group than mastectomy alone (27.0% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.009). Univariate analyses revealed that mastectomy with IBR [odds ratio (OR) = 2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–2.30]; bilateral procedure (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.07–3.16); previous radiotherapy (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.29–4.47); and previous lumpectomy (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.11–3.03) were significant predictors of increased complications. With multivariable analysis, none of these variables were significantly associated with increased complications. 106 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy; median time from mastectomy to chemotherapy was 6.8 (0.71–15) weeks in the mastectomy alone group (n = 96) compared to 8.5 (6.3–11) weeks in the IBR group (n = 10) (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Although the incidence of overall and major postoperative complications was higher after IBR than mastectomy alone, there were no significant relationships in the multivariable analysis. IBR was associated with a modest increase in time to chemotherapy that was statistically but not clinically significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast. 2005;14:201–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Howard MA, Polo K, Pusic AL, et al. Breast cancer local recurrence after mastectomy and TRAM flap reconstruction: incidence and treatment options. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1381–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy RX Jr, Wahhab S, Rovito PF, et al. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vandeweyer E, Hertens D, Nogaret JM, Deraemaecker R. Immediate breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants: no interference with the oncologic outcome? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1409–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patani N, Devalia H, Anderson A, Mokbel K. Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Surg Oncol. 2008;17:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1590–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Desch CE, Penberthy LT, Hillner BE, et al. A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery. Surgery. 1999;125:441–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joslyn SA. Patterns of care for immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1289–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM. Advances and surgical decision-making for breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2006;107:893–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman RE. Current and future status of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Cancer. 2003;97:880–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Valero V, et al. Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1073–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:387–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rainsbury RM. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:276–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allweis TM, Boisvert ME, Otero SE, et al. Immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer does not prolong the time to starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:218–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortenson MM, Schneider PD, Khatri VP, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications; however, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg. 2004;139:988–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alderman AK, Collins ED, Schott A, et al. The impact of breast reconstruction on the delivery of chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116:1791–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bostwick J 3rd, Carlson GW. Reconstruction of the breast. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1997;6:71–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thornton J, Sorokin ES. Optimal timing of breast reconstruction—an algorithm for management based on a review of the literature. Breast Dis. 2002;16:31–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cold S, During M, Ewertz M, et al. Does timing of adjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis after early breast cancer? Results of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Br J Cancer. 2005;93:627–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K, et al. Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4888–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Brien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1993;166:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Zehring RD. Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy is as safe as mastectomy alone. Arch Surg. 1990;125:1303–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peled AW, Itakura K, Foster RD, et al. Impact of chemotherapy on postoperative complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2010;145:880–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zweifel-Schlatter M, Darhouse N, Roblin P, et al. Immediate microvascular breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: complication rates and effect on start of adjuvant treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2945–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchem J, Herrmann D, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on rate of tissue expander/implant loss and progression to successful breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2008;196:519–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Woerdeman LAE, Hage JJ, Hofland MMI, Rutgers EJT. A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:455–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhong T, Neinstein R, Massey C, et al. Intravenous fluid infusion rate in microsurgical breast reconstruction: important lessons learned from 354 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. (in press).

  30. Rao SS, Parikh PM, Goldstein JA, Nahabedian MY. Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:17–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni Zhong MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhong, T., Hofer, S.O.P., McCready, D.R. et al. A Comparison of Surgical Complications Between Immediate Breast Reconstruction and Mastectomy: The Impact on Delivery of Chemotherapy—An Analysis of 391 Procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 560–566 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1950-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1950-6

Keywords

Navigation