Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment Intensity Differences According to Participation in a Population Screening Program

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lannin DR. Treatment Intensity for Mammographically Detected Tumours: An Alternative Viewpoint. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(9):2502-2505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elder K, et al. Treatment intensity differences after early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) diagnosis depending on participation in a screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(9):2563–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2014–2015. Cancer series no. 106. Cat. no. CAN 105. Canberra, ACT: AIHW; 2017.

  4. Welch HG, et al. Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1438–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Puliti D, et al. Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review. J Med Screen. 2012;19(Suppl 1):42–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marmot M, et al. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012;380:1778–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beckmann K, et al. Estimates of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to population-based mammography screening in South Australia after adjustment for lead time effects. J Med Screen. 2015;22:127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martelotto LG, et al. Breast cancer intra-tumour heterogeneity. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffy S, et al. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:109–114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bedrosian I. Screening mammography: getting to version 2.0. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(9):2500–01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Esserman L. The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017;3:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Breast Service, Royal Melbourne and Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia

    G. B. Mann PhD & K. Elder PhD

  2. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    C. Nickson PhD

Authors
  1. G. B. Mann PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Nickson PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Elder PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. B. Mann PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mann, G.B., Nickson, C. & Elder, K. Treatment Intensity Differences According to Participation in a Population Screening Program. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 698–699 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07113-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07113-w

Search

Navigation