Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Prognosis and Natural History of In-Transit Melanoma Metastases at a High-Volume Centre

  • Melanoma
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with in-transit melanoma metastases (ITM) experience a diverse spectrum of clinical presentations and a highly variable disease course. There is no standardized treatment protocol for these patients due to the limited data comparing treatment modalities for ITM. This is the first study to describe the disease trajectory and natural history of a large cohort of patients with ITM.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients treated for ITM between 2004 and 2018 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre was performed. Clinical and pathological characteristics for primary and in-transit episodes were analyzed for predictors of relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and melanoma-specific survival.

Results

A total of 109 patients with 303 episodes of ITM were identified: 52 (48%) females, median age 70.1 years (range 35–92). The median RFS for all episodes was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2–5.7). Eighty-seven percent of episodes involving isolated in-transit lesions underwent surgical excision, compared with 17% involving more than five in-transit lesions. A trend was seen between a greater number of lesions and shorter RFS (p = 0.055). The median DMFS was 34.8 months (95% CI 22.8–51.6). Factors associated with shorter DMFS included primary tumor thickness (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.15; p = 0.026), site of primary tumor (p = 0.008), and BRAF mutation (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.14–3.94; p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Locoregional relapse is common in patients with ITM regardless of treatment modality. Characteristics of the ITM may predict for RFS, while primary tumor characteristics remain important predictors of DMFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472–492.

  2. Hayes AJ, Clark MA, Harries M, Thomas JM. Management of in-transit metastases from cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91(6):673–682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pawlik TM, Ross MI, Johnson MM, et al. Predictors and natural history of in-transit melanoma after sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong JH, Cagle LA, Kopald KH, Swisher SG, Morton DL. Natural history and selective management of in transit melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 1990;44(3):146–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Read RL, Haydu L, Saw RP, et al. In-transit melanoma metastases: incidence, prognosis, and the role of lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):475–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Testori A, Ribero S, Bataille V. Diagnosis and treatment of in-transit melanoma metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(3):544–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perone JA, Farrow N, Tyler DS, Beasley GM. Contemporary approaches to in-transit melanoma. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(5):292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson JF, Agarwala SS, Smithers BM, et al. Phase 2 study of intralesional PV-10 in refractory metastatic melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2135–2142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lippey J, Bousounis R, Behrenbruch C, et al. Intralesional PV-10 for in-transit melanoma: a single-center experience. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(3):380–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seegenschmiedt MH, Keilholz L, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Palliative radiotherapy for recurrent and metastatic malignant melanoma: prognostic factors for tumor response and long-term outcome: a 20-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44(3):607–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kroon HM, Moncrieff M, Kam PC, Thompson JF. Outcomes following isolated limb infusion for melanoma. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3003–3013.

  12. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1824–1835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M, et al. Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1813–1823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1789–1801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ascierto PA, McArthur GA, Dreno B, et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(9):1248–1260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1345–1356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Long GV, Eroglu Z, Infante J, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma who received dabrafenib combined with trametinib. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(7):667–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weide B, Faller C, Buttner P, et al. Prognostic factors of melanoma patients with satellite or in-transit metastasis at the time of stage III diagnosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e63137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gassenmaier M, Eigentler TK, Keim U, et al. Serial or parallel metastasis of cutaneous melanoma? A study of the german central malignant melanoma registry. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(12):2570–2577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ascierto PA, Kirkwood JM, Grob JJ, et al. The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma. J Transl Med. 2012;10:85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barbour AP, Tang YH, Armour N, et al. BRAF mutation status is an independent prognostic factor for resected stage IIIB and IIIC melanoma: implications for melanoma staging and adjuvant therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(15):2668–2676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong XD, Tyler D, Johnson JL, DeMatos P, Seigler HF. Analysis of prognosis and disease progression after local recurrence of melanoma. Cancer. 2000;88(5):1063–1071.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dossett LA, Ben-Shabat I, Olofsson Bagge R, Zager JS. Clinical response and regional toxicity following isolated limb infusion compared with isolated limb perfusion for in-transit melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(7):2330–2335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kroon HM, Coventry BJ, Giles MH, et al. Australian Multicenter Study of Isolated Limb Infusion for Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1096–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Melanoma Research Victoria.

Funding

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Gyorki MBBS, MD, FRACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Emilia Nan Tie, Lumine H. Na, Rodney J. Hicks, John Spillane, David Speakman, Michael A. Henderson, and David E. Gyorki have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nan Tie, E., Na, L.H., Hicks, R.J. et al. The Prognosis and Natural History of In-Transit Melanoma Metastases at a High-Volume Centre. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 4673–4680 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07965-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07965-w

Navigation