Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Cardiovascular Intervention
Comparison of Vascular Response to Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent vs Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation
- Pooled IVUS Results From the ZoMaxx I and II Trials -
Katsuhisa WasedaTakao HasegawaJunya AkoYasuhiro HondaEberhard GrubeRobert WhitbournJohn OrmistonCharles D. O'ShaughnessyTimothy D. HenryPaul OverlieLewis B. SchwartzKrishnankutty SudhirBernard ChevalierWilliam A. GrayAlan C. YeungPeter J. FitzgeraldThe ZoMaxx I and II Trial Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2010 Volume 74 Issue 11 Pages 2334-2339

Details
Abstract

Background: The ZoMaxx I and II trials were randomized controlled studies of the zotarolimus-eluting, phosphorylcholine-coated, TriMaxx stent for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the vessel response between zotarolimus- (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods and Results: Data were obtained from the ZoMaxx I and II trials, in which a standard IVUS parameter was available in 263 cases (baseline and 9-months follow up). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without IVUS-detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. While an increase in vessel and plaque was observed in PES from baseline to follow up, there was no significant change in ZES. At follow up, % neointimal obstruction was significantly higher (15.4±8.8% vs 11.3±9.7%), and minimum lumen area at follow up was significantly smaller in ZES compared to PES. However, the incidence of IVUS-defined restenosis (maximum cross-sectional narrowing >60%) was similar in the 2 groups (3.2% vs 6.7%). Neointima-free frame ratio was significantly lower in ZES. There were 5 cases of late incomplete stent apposition in PES and none in ZES. Conclusions: These IVUS results demonstrate a similar incidence of severe narrowing between these 2 DES. There was a moderate increase in neointimal hyperplasia that was associated with a greater extent of neointimal coverage in ZES compared with PES. (Circ J 2010; 74: 2334-2339)

Content from these authors
© 2010 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top