Pragmatic abilities of high-functioning Greek-speaking children with autism

PDF
Published: Oct 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23544
Keywords:
Autism pragmatics Greek reference Theory of Mind Central Coherence
Theodoros Marinis
Arhonto Terzi
Angeliki Kotsopoulou
Konstantinos Francis
Abstract

This paper reports on the findings of the pragmatic abilities of Greek-speaking children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Twenty high functioning children with ASD and their typically developing age and vocabulary controls were administered a pragmatics task in the context of a larger study targeting the grammar of Greek-speaking children with
autism. The task was based on the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation (DELV) and assessed the children’s abilities in communicative role taking, narrative, and question asking. The children with ASD
showed an uneven profile in their pragmatic abilities. The two groups did not differ in communicative role taking and question asking. However, the children with ASD had difficulties on the narrative task, and more
specifically, on the items assessing reference contrast and temporal links. Yet, they performed similarly on the mental state representations and the false beliefs items. Despite their good performance on mental states and false beliefs, the ASD children’s lower performance on reference contrast can be interpreted via Theory of Mind deficits if we assume that the former involve an additional level of complexity; namely, quantifying the amount of information available to the listener. Lower performance on temporal links is in line with the ASD children’s attested difficulties in organizing events into a coherent gist. Their overall profile, and, in particular, the dissociation between the different sections of the task, does not support single deficit accounts. It rather indicates that the deficits of individuals with ASD stem from distinct deficits in core cognitive processes (Happé & Frith, 2006).

Article Details
  • Section
  • SPECIAL SECTION
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
American Psychiatric Association (1994). DSM-IV
Sourcebook, Volume I. Washington, DC: Ame -
rican Psychiatric Association.
Arnold, J.E., Bennetto, L., & Diehl, J.J. (2009).
Reference production in young speakers with and
without autism: Effects of discourse status and
processing constraints. Cognition, 110, 131-146.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does
the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?
Cognition, 21, 37-46.
Bishop, D.V.M. (1983). Test for Reception of Grammar
(TROG). Manchester: Chapel Press.
Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & van der
Lely, H.K.J. (2008). Narrative discourse in adults
with high-functioning autism or Asperger
syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 38, 28-40.
de Villiers, P.A. (2004). Assessing pragmatic skills in
elicited production. Seminars in Speech and
Language, 25, 57-72.
Dewart, H., & Summers, S. (1988). The pragmatics
profile of early communication skills. London:
NFER-NELSON.
Diehl, J.D., Bennetto, L., & Young, E.C. (2006).
Narrative coherence of high-functioning children
with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of
Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 87-102.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (1997). Peabody Picture
Vocabulary Test. Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN:
American Guidance Service.
Fisher, N., Happé, F.G.E., & Dunn, J. (2005). The
relationship between vocabulary, grammar, and
false belief task performance in children with
autistic spectrum disorders and children with
moderate learning difficulties. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 409–419.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: explaining the Enigma.
Blackwell.
Giannakidou, A. (2012). Greek quantifiers. In E. L.
Keenan & D. Paperno (Eds.), The Handbook of
Quantifiers in Natural Language. (pp. 285-346).
Dordrecht: Springer.
Happé, F.G.E. (1993). Communicative competence
and theory of mind in autism: a test
for Relevance theory, Cognition, 48, 101-119.
Happé, F.G.E. (1995). The role of age and verbal
ability in the theory of mind task performance of
subjects. Child Development, 66, 843-855.
Happé, F.G.E., & Frith, U., (2006). The weak
coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style
in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism
and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5-25.
Lord C., Risi S., Lambrecht L., Cook E. H., Leventhal
B. L., DiLavore P. C., Pickles A., & Rutter M.
(2000). The autism diagnostic observation
schedule-generic: a standard measure of social
and communication deficits associated with the
spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 30, 205-223.
Losh, M., & Capps, L. (2003). Narrative Abilities in
High-functioning Children with Autism or
Asperser’s Syndrome. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 33, 239-251.
Manika, S., Varlokosta, S., & Wexler, K. (2011). The
lack of omission of clitics in Greek children with
SLI: an experimental study. In N. Danis, K. Mesh
& H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual
Boston University Conference on Language
Development (pp. 427-439). Somerville, MA:
Cascadilla Press.
Nadig, A., Vivanti, G., & Ozonoff, S. (2009). Adaptation
of object descriptions to a partner under increasing
communicative demands: a comparison of
children with and without autism. Autism Research,
, 334-347.
Pennington B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive
functions and developmental psychopathology.
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 37, 51-87.
Raven, J. C. (1998). The coloured progressive
matrices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, J. A., Rice, M. L., & Tager-Flusberg, H.
(2004). Tense marking in children with autism.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 429-448.
Seymour, H., Roeper, T., de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P.
(2005). Diagnostic Evaluation of Language
Variation (DELVTM) – Norm Referenced. San
Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.
Smith, N. (2008). Morphosyntactic and Phonological
Short-term memory skills of Greek pre-school
children with Specific Language Impairment. PhD
Dissertation, University of Reading, Reading.
Stavrakaki, S., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2000). Diagnostic
Verbal IQ Test for Greek preschool and school
age children: standardization, statistical analysis,
psychometric properties. Proceedings of the 8th
Symposium of the Panhellenic Association of
Logopedists (pp. 95-106). Athens: Ellinika
Grammata.
Pragmatic abilities of high-functioning Greek-speaking children with autism 335
Stavrakaki, S., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2010).
Production and Comprehension of pronouns by
Greek children with specific language impairment.
British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28,
-216.
Surian, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & van der Lely, H. K. J.
(1996). Are children with autism deaf to
Gricean maxims? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1,
-71.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2000). Language and under -
standing minds: connections in autism. In S.
Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg & D. Cohen.
(Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives
from developmental cognitive neuroscience. (pp
-149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (1994). A second
look at second-order belief attribution in autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
, 577-86.
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (1995). Attributing
mental states to story characters: A comparison of
narratives produced by autistic and mentally
retarded individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics,
, 241-256.
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Francis, K. & Kotsopoulou, A.
(2012). Crosslinguistic Differences in Autistic
Children’s Comprehension of Pronouns: English
vs. Greek. In A. Biller K., E. Chung Y., & A. Kimball
E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston
University Conference on Language Development.
(pp 607-619). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Kotsopoulou, A. & Francis, K.
(2014). Grammatical abilities of Greek-speaking
children with autism. Language Acquisition, 21, 4-44.
Tsimpli, I. M. (2001). LF-interpretability and language
development: a study of verbal and nominal
features in normally developing and SLI Greek
children. Brain & Language, 77, 432-448.
Tsimpli, I. M., & Stavrakaki, S. (1999). The effects of
a morphosyntactic deficit in the determiner
system: the case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua,
, 31-85.
Vogindroukas, Ι. (2005). Πραγματολογικές δεξιότητες
σε παιδιά με αυτισμό [Pragmatic abilities in
children with autism]. Ψυχολογία [Psychology],
, 276-292. [in Greek]
Vogindroukas, Ι. (2010). Κατανόηση Ιδιωματικών Εκ-
φράσεων: Προκαταρκτικά Αποτελέσματα Συ-
γκριτικής Μελέτης σε Παιδιά με Ειδική Γλωσσι-
κή Διαταραχή, σε Παιδιά με Σύνδρομο Asperger
και σε παιδιά με Τυπική Ανάπτυξη.
[Comprehension of idiomatic expressions:
preliminary findings of a comparative study in
children with Specific Language Impairment,
children with Asperger Syndrome, and typically
developing children] In Ι. Vogindroukas, Α.
Okalidou, & S. Stavrakaki (Eds.), Αναπτυξιακές
Γλωσσικές Διαταραχές από τη βασική έρευνα
στην κλινική πράξη. [Developmental language
disorders from basic research to clinical practice]
(pp 57-74). Αθήνα: Επίκεντρο. [in Greek]
World Health Organisation. (1993). The ICD-10
classification of mental and behavioral disorders:
diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva.