Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:45:25.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Micrographic Studies of Clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

M. S. Taggart Jr.
Affiliation:
Humble Oil & Refining Co. and The Rice Institute, USA
W. O. Milligan
Affiliation:
Humble Oil & Refining Co. and The Rice Institute, USA
H. P. Studer
Affiliation:
Humble Oil & Refining Co. and The Rice Institute, USA

Abstract

In order to provide a set of reference photographs to be used in identification studies, electron micrographs at relatively high magnification (40,000 to 132,000 diameters), together with some electron diffraction patterns, have been obtained of a group of (a) kaolinites, (b) halloysites, and (c) South Texas outcrop soil samples. Some of the kaolinites consist of well-formed hexagonal crystal plates with edges still sharp at a magnification of 132,000 diameters. Other kaolinites consist of irregular, relatively thin crystal sheets, which may be bent or folded. In one instance it has been possible to demonstrate that the average thickness of the sheets is only 10 Å. At high magnification the halloysite clay minerals exhibit a structure consisting of rolled sheets, rather than hollow rods. In some cases, it is evident that several separate crystal sheets are coaxially rolled to form multiple concentric hollow tubes. In the South Texas outcrop samples, the morphology is very complex, as the samples do not consist of one uniform type of particle. Matted sheets composed of interlaced bundles of lath-like particles have been observed. These oriented particles exhibit typical “fiber” type electron diffraction patterns. Kikuchi lines were observed in a thin quartz crystal plate, examined for comparative purposes.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

von Ardenne, M., Endell, G., and Hoffman, U. (1940) Ber. dtch. kerma. Ges., vol. 21, pp. 209227.Google Scholar
Bates, T. F., Hildebrand, F. A., and Swineford, A. (1950) Am. Mineral., vol. 35, pp. 463484.Google Scholar
See also Grim, R. E. (1953) Clay mineralogy: McGraw-Hill, pp. 107125.Google Scholar
Electron micrographs of reference clay minerals (April 1950): Preliminary Report No. 6. Clay Mineral Standards, Project 49. American Petroleum Institute, Columbia University, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Humbert, R. P., and Shaw, B. T. (1941) Soil Sci., vol. 52, pp. 481487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. E., Humbert, R. P., Shaw, B. T., and Caldwell, O. G. (1942) Soil Sci., vol. 54, pp. 148158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. E., and Caldwell, O. G. (1947) J. Phys. Chetn., vol. 51, pp. 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, B. T. (1942) J. Phys. Chem., vol. 46, pp. 10321043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, M. S., and Simons, L. H. (1953) Paper, Clay mineral content of gulf coast outcrop samples, presented at Second National Clay Minerals Conference.Google Scholar