Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T17:08:07.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship Between Exchangeable and Total Magnesium in Pennsylvania Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Chung-Ho Chu
Affiliation:
A & L Eastern Agricultural Laboratory, Richmond, Virginia 23237
Leon J. Johnson
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Abstract

The particle size distribution, total and exchangeable Mg, and mineralogical compositions were determined on eight well-drained, noncultivated subsoils from Pennsylvania. No correlation was found between the clay content and total Mg (r =.29), or between the clay content and exchangeable Mg (r =.35). Serpentine, talc, and hypersthene were found in the very fine sand and silt fractions of soils having relatively high exchangeable Mg. Mica and 14-Å clay minerals were the only Mg-bearing minerals noted in the same fractions of soils having relatively low exchangeable Mg. Of the Mg-bearing clay minerals found in the clay fractions (smectite, vermiculite, chlorite, illite, and interstratified chlorite/vermiculite), only smectite decreased as the exchangeable Mg in the soils decreased. Two distinctly different distribution patterns of Mg were found for soils having relatively high and low exchangeable Mg. The former soils showed a decreasing Mg content as the particle size decreased, and the latter soils showed the opposite. Exchangeable Mg correlated significantly with the amount of Mg in whole soil, sand, and silt, but not with the amount of Mg in the clay, an indication that sand and silt but not clay were the important sources of exchangeable Mg in these soils.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Paper No, 6753, Journal Series, Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.

References

Abdel-Kader, F. H., Jackson, M. L. and Lee, G. B., 1978 Soil kaolinite, vermiculite and chlorite identification by an improved lithium DMSO X-ray diffraction test Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 42 163167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiades, C. A., Jackson, M. L. and Bailey, S. W., 1966 Quantitative clay mineralogical analysis of soils and sediments Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 14th Natl. Conf., Berkeley, California, 1966 New York Pergamon Press 3552.Google Scholar
Baker, D.E., 1971 A new approach to soil testing Soil Sci. 112 318384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, C. H. and Johnson, L. J., 1979 Cation-exchange behavior of clays and synthetic alluminosilica gels Clays & Clay Minerals 27 8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J.B., Dixon, J. B. and Weed, S. B., 1977 Kaolinite and serpentine group minerals Minerals in Soil Environments Madison, Wisconsin Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 357403.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. P. and Bremner, J. M., 1967 Dispersion of soil particles by sonic vibration J. Soil Sci. 18 4763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, G.A., 1972 Use of a simultaneous linear equations program for quantitative clay analysis and the study of mineral alterations during weathering Ph.D. thesis Pennsylvania The Pennsylvania State University, University Park (Diss. Abstr. Int. 33:5619, Microfilm No. 73-13994).Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., 1958 Soil Chemical Analysis New Jersey Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. E. and Jeffries, C. D., 1945 The correlation of soil types and parent materials with supplementary information on weathering processes Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 10 397405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medlin, J.H., Suhr, N.H. and Bodkin, J.B., 1969 Analysis of silicates employing LiBO2 fusion Atomic Absorpt. Newsl. 8 2529.Google Scholar
Mehra, O. P., Jackson, M. L. and Swineford, A., 1960 Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 7th Natl. Conf., Washington, D.C., 1958 New York Pergamon Press 317327.Google Scholar
Phan Thi, H. and Brindley, G. W., 1970 Methylene blue absorption by clay minerals—determination of surface area and cation exchange capacities Clays & Clay Minerals 18 203212.Google Scholar
Prince, A. L., Zimmerman, M. and Bear, F. E., 1947 The magnesium supplying power of 20 New Jersey soils Soil Sci. 63 6978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, C.I., 1969 Suction apparatus for mounting clay specimens on ceramic tile for X-ray diffraction Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 38 815816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, C. I., 1975 Amount of clay needed for optimum X-ray diffraction analysis Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 39 161162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, R. C., 1963 Magnesium relationships in soils and plants J. Sci. Food Agric. 14 605610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahlberg, S., 1960 Release of magnesium from clay fractions of minerals and soils Acta Agri. Scand. 10 221225.Google Scholar
Steel, G. D. and Torrie, J. H., 1960 Principles and Procedures of Statistics New York McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Yuan, T.L., 1959 Determination of exchangeable hydrogen in soil by a titration method Soil Sci. 88 164167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar