Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative Determination of Four Water-Soluble Compounds in Herbal Drugs from Lamiaceae Using Different Chromatographic Techniques

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

HPTLC-densitometric and HPLC–UV techniques were used for qualitative and quantitative determination of luteolin-7-O-glucuronide, lithospermic acid, rosmarinic acid and caffeic acid in several herbal drugs from the Lamiaceae family: Thymi herba, Serpylli herba, Majoranae herba and Menthae piperitae folium. Unmodified silica gel (HPTLC Si60) and silica gel chemically modified with aminopropyl groups (HPTLC NH2) were used during the investigation process. Among HPTLC methods the best resolution and selectivity was achieved with mobile phases: diisopropyl ether–acetone–formic acid–water (50:30:10:10, v/v/v/v) and acetone–formic acid (85:15, v/v), respectively. Plates were densitometrically evaluated. Contents of analyzed compounds in the studied aqueous extracts prepared from herbal drugs were established using both techniques. The results from the HPTLC-densitometric analysis have been compared with those from HPLC–UV on a C18 column with acetonitrile–water–formic acid as a mobile phase. The chromatographic methods were validated for linearity, LOD, LOQ, repeatability, intermediate precision and recovery. An analysis of variance showed that the HPTLC-densitometric and HPLC–UV methods are equivalent and sufficiently precise for the estimation of polyphenolic compounds mentioned above, in investigated herbal drugs. All of the suggested methods (HPTLC NH2, HPTLC Si60 and HPLC RP18) give results with good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu Y, Foo LY (2000) Phytochemistry 55:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Janicsak G, Mathe I, Miklossy-Vari V, Blunden G (1999) Biochem Syst Ecol 27:733–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Okuda T, Yoshida T, Hatano T (2000) Phytochemistry 55:513–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Okuda T (2005) Phytochemistry 66:2012–2031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petersen M, Simmonds MSJ (2003) Phytochemistry 62:121–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu Y, Foo LY (2002) Phytochemistry 59:117–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gumbinger HG, Winterhoff H, Wylde R, Sosa A (1992) Planta Med 58(1):49–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dapkevicius A, van Beek TA, Lelyveld GP, van Veldhuizen A, de Groot A, Linssen JPH, Venskutonis R (2002) J Nat Prod 65:892–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi S, Watanabe J, Fukushi E, Kawabata J, Nakajima M, Watanabe M (2003) Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67(6):1250–1257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou CC, Lin SJ, Cheng JT, Hsu FL (2003) J Nat Prod 66(5):625–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krenn L, Miron A, Pemp E, Petr U, Kopp B (2003) Z Naturforsch C 58(1–2):11–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee MH, Son YK, Han YN (2002) Arch Pharmacol Res 25(6):842–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vanhoenacker G, van Rompaey P, de Keukeleire D, Sandrs P (2002) Nat Prod Lett 16(1):57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teubert H, Wunscher G, Herrmann K (1977) Z Lebensmitteluntersuchung Forsch 165(3):147–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Y, Foo LY (2001) Food Chem 75:197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Beninger CW, Hall J (2005) Biochem Syst Ecol 33(2):103–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harborn JB, Baxter H, Moss GP (1999) In: Phytochemical dictionary, a handbook of bioactive compounds from plants, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London

  18. Dorman HJD, Bachmayer O, Kosar M, Hiltunen R (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:762–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang H, Provan GJ, Helliwell K (2004) Food Chem 87:307–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng W, Wang SY (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:5165–5170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu P, Luo GA, Zhao ZZ, Jiang ZH (2005) Chem Pharm Bul 53:481–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu P, Liang QL, Luo GA, Zhao ZZ, Jiang ZH (2005) Chem Pharm Bull 53:677–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang JL, Cui M, He Y, Yu HL, Guo DA (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 36:1029–1035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fecka I, Kowalczyk A, Cisowski W (2004) J Planar Chromatogr 17:2–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kohda H, Takeda O, Tanaka S, Yamasaki K, Yamashita A, Kurokawa T, Ishibashi S (1989) Chem Pharm Bull 37(5):1287–1290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Harborn JB (1994) In: The flavonoids, advances in research since 1986. Chapman & Hall, London

  27. Lu Y, Foo LY (1999) Phytochemistry 51:91–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support of the Polish Committee for Scientific Research (KBN), Grant NR 3 P05F 05122 and 2 P05F 05129.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Fecka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fecka, I., Raj, D. & Krauze-Baranowska, M. Quantitative Determination of Four Water-Soluble Compounds in Herbal Drugs from Lamiaceae Using Different Chromatographic Techniques. Chroma 66, 87–93 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0233-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0233-7

Keywords

Navigation