Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the Effect of Chromatographic Conditions on Retention of Organic Acids in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Using a Design of Experiment

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small organic acids have shown significant retention on various stationary phases, such as amide, amino, aspartamide, silica and sulfobetaine phase commonly used in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). This study investigated the effect of chromatographic conditions on the retention behavior of organic acids in HILIC using the tool of design of experiment (DOE). The results of the DOE study indicated that both the content of organic solvent (i.e., acetonitrile) and salt concentration in the mobile phase had significant effects on the retention of organic acids. Higher content of organic solvent in the mobile phase led to a significant increase in retention on all types of stationary phases. Increasing salt concentration also resulted in a moderate increase in retention; however, the effect of salt concentration varied with the type of stationary phase. The study also revealed that column temperature had less impact on retention than organic solvent content and salt concentration in HILIC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hemstrom P, Irgum K (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1784–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Naidong W (2003) J Chromatogr B 796:209–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajad SU, Lu W, Kimball EH, Yuan J, Peterson C, Rabinowitz JD (2006) J Chromatogr A 1125:76–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xue YJ, Liu J, Unger S (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:979–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavin PF, Olsen BA, Wirth DD, Lorenz KT (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:1251–1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Risley DS, Yang WQ, Peterson JA (2006) J Sep Sci 29:256–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang X, Li W, Rasmussen HT (2005) J Chromatogr A 1083:58–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciminiello P, Dell’Aversano C, Fattorusso E, Forino M, Martino M, Magno S, Santelia F, Tsoukatou M (2006) Toxicon 47:174–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dell’Aversano C, Hess P, Quilliam MA (2005) J Chromatogr A 1081:190–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlichtherle-Cerny H, Affloter M, Cerny C (2004) Food Sci Tech 131:363–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlichtherle-Cerny H, Affloter M, Cerny C (2003) Anal Chem 75:2349–2354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li AC, Chen YL, Junga H, Shou WZ, Jiang X, Naidong W (2003) Chromatographia 58:723–731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiseh Y, Chen J (2005) Rapid Comm Mass Spec 19:3031–3036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Appelblad P, Abrahamsson P (2005) In: The application book March 2005 LC-GC Europe, pp 47–48

  15. Delinsky AD, Delinsky DC, Muralidhara S, Fisher JW, Bruckner JV, Bartlett MG (2005) Rapid Comm Mass Spec 19:1075–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo Y, Gaiki S (2005) J Chromatogr A 1074:71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grumbach ES, Wagrowski-Diehl DM, Mazzeo JR, Alden B, Iraneta PC (2004) LC-GC North America 7:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mathews P (2005) In: Design of Experiments with MiniTAB, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  19. Ye C, Liu J, Ren F, Okafo N (2000) J Pharm Biomed Anal 23:581–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferreiros N, Iriate G, Alonso RM, Jimenez RM (2006) Talanta 69:747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dejaegher B, Jimidar M, De Smet M, Cockaerts P, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Vander Heyden Y (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 42:155–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Belfast M, Lu R, Capen R, Zhong J, Nguyen M, Gimenez J, Sitrin R, Mancinelli R (2006) J Chromatogr B 832:208–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alpert AJ (1999) Size exclusion chromatography of small solutes. In: Wu CS (eds) Column handbook for size exclusion chromatography. Academic, San Diego, pp 249–266

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alpert AJ (1990) J Chromatogr 499:177–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Naidong W, Chen Y-L, Shou WZ, Jiang X (2001) J Biomed Anal 26:753–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott RPW The Thermodynamics of Chromatography http://www.chromatography-online.org/Thermodynamics

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Global ChemPharm management for supporting the co-op program, in which Sriram Srinivasan participated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Srinivasan, S. & Gaiki, S. Investigating the Effect of Chromatographic Conditions on Retention of Organic Acids in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Using a Design of Experiment. Chroma 66, 223–229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0264-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0264-0

Keywords

Navigation