Abstract
Small organic acids have shown significant retention on various stationary phases, such as amide, amino, aspartamide, silica and sulfobetaine phase commonly used in hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). This study investigated the effect of chromatographic conditions on the retention behavior of organic acids in HILIC using the tool of design of experiment (DOE). The results of the DOE study indicated that both the content of organic solvent (i.e., acetonitrile) and salt concentration in the mobile phase had significant effects on the retention of organic acids. Higher content of organic solvent in the mobile phase led to a significant increase in retention on all types of stationary phases. Increasing salt concentration also resulted in a moderate increase in retention; however, the effect of salt concentration varied with the type of stationary phase. The study also revealed that column temperature had less impact on retention than organic solvent content and salt concentration in HILIC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hemstrom P, Irgum K (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1784–1821
Naidong W (2003) J Chromatogr B 796:209–224
Bajad SU, Lu W, Kimball EH, Yuan J, Peterson C, Rabinowitz JD (2006) J Chromatogr A 1125:76–88
Xue YJ, Liu J, Unger S (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:979–988
Gavin PF, Olsen BA, Wirth DD, Lorenz KT (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:1251–1259
Risley DS, Yang WQ, Peterson JA (2006) J Sep Sci 29:256–264
Wang X, Li W, Rasmussen HT (2005) J Chromatogr A 1083:58–62
Ciminiello P, Dell’Aversano C, Fattorusso E, Forino M, Martino M, Magno S, Santelia F, Tsoukatou M (2006) Toxicon 47:174–181
Dell’Aversano C, Hess P, Quilliam MA (2005) J Chromatogr A 1081:190–201
Schlichtherle-Cerny H, Affloter M, Cerny C (2004) Food Sci Tech 131:363–378
Schlichtherle-Cerny H, Affloter M, Cerny C (2003) Anal Chem 75:2349–2354
Li AC, Chen YL, Junga H, Shou WZ, Jiang X, Naidong W (2003) Chromatographia 58:723–731
Hiseh Y, Chen J (2005) Rapid Comm Mass Spec 19:3031–3036
Appelblad P, Abrahamsson P (2005) In: The application book March 2005 LC-GC Europe, pp 47–48
Delinsky AD, Delinsky DC, Muralidhara S, Fisher JW, Bruckner JV, Bartlett MG (2005) Rapid Comm Mass Spec 19:1075–1083
Guo Y, Gaiki S (2005) J Chromatogr A 1074:71–80
Grumbach ES, Wagrowski-Diehl DM, Mazzeo JR, Alden B, Iraneta PC (2004) LC-GC North America 7:92–98
Mathews P (2005) In: Design of Experiments with MiniTAB, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Ye C, Liu J, Ren F, Okafo N (2000) J Pharm Biomed Anal 23:581–589
Ferreiros N, Iriate G, Alonso RM, Jimenez RM (2006) Talanta 69:747–756
Dejaegher B, Jimidar M, De Smet M, Cockaerts P, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Vander Heyden Y (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 42:155–170
Belfast M, Lu R, Capen R, Zhong J, Nguyen M, Gimenez J, Sitrin R, Mancinelli R (2006) J Chromatogr B 832:208–215
Alpert AJ (1999) Size exclusion chromatography of small solutes. In: Wu CS (eds) Column handbook for size exclusion chromatography. Academic, San Diego, pp 249–266
Alpert AJ (1990) J Chromatogr 499:177–196
Naidong W, Chen Y-L, Shou WZ, Jiang X (2001) J Biomed Anal 26:753–767
Scott RPW The Thermodynamics of Chromatography http://www.chromatography-online.org/Thermodynamics
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Global ChemPharm management for supporting the co-op program, in which Sriram Srinivasan participated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Y., Srinivasan, S. & Gaiki, S. Investigating the Effect of Chromatographic Conditions on Retention of Organic Acids in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Using a Design of Experiment. Chroma 66, 223–229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0264-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0264-0