Biophysical Characterization of the Strong Stabilization of the RNA Triplex poly(U)•poly(A)*poly(U) by 9-O-(ω-amino) Alkyl Ether Berberine Analogs

Debipreeta Bhowmik; Suman Das; Maidul Hossain; Lucy Haq; Gopinatha Suresh Kumar

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037939

Abstract

Background

Binding of two 9-O-(ω-amino) alkyl ether berberine analogs BC1 and BC2 to the RNA triplex poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) was studied by various biophysical techniques.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Berberine analogs bind to the RNA triplex non-cooperatively. The affinity of binding was remarkably high by about 5 and 15 times, respectively, for BC1 and BC2 compared to berberine. The site size for the binding was around 4.3 for all. Based on ferrocyanide quenching, fluorescence polarization, quantum yield values and viscosity results a strong intercalative binding of BC1 and BC2 to the RNA triplex has been demonstrated. BC1 and BC2 stabilized the Hoogsteen base paired third strand by about 18.1 and 20.5°C compared to a 17.5°C stabilization by berberine. The binding was entropy driven compared to the enthalpy driven binding of berbeine, most likely due to additional contacts within the grooves of the triplex and disruption of the water structure by the alkyl side chain.

Conclusions/Significance

Remarkably higher binding affinity and stabilization effect of the RNA triplex by the amino alkyl berberine analogs was achieved compared to berberine. The length of the alkyl side chain influence in the triplex stabilization phenomena.

Citation: Bhowmik D, Das S, Hossain M, Haq L, Suresh Kumar G (2012) Biophysical Characterization of the Strong Stabilization of the RNA Triplex poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) by 9-O-(ω-amino) Alkyl Ether Berberine Analogs. PLoS ONE 7(5): e37939. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939

Editor: Haiwei Song, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore

Received: March 7, 2012; Accepted: April 26, 2012; Published: May 29, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Bhowmik et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by the grants from Network Project NWP 0036 of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, University Grants Commission, Government of India fellowship (to DB) and CSIR Research Associateship (to MH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Triple helix formation has been proposed as a means for sequence-specific recognition and binding by a relatively short single stranded DNA or RNA to either a double-stranded DNA or RNA [1]–[7] originally discovered by Rich and coworkers as early as in 1957 [8]. The binding of the third strand on the duplex to form the triplex occurs essentially by Hoogsteen base paired H-bonding interactions in the major groove of the duplex. The antiparallel arrangement of a purine strand flanked by two pyrimidine strands is termed as the ‘pyrimidine-purine_*pyrimidine’ (YRY, Y is pyrimidine and R is purine) motif that yields C.G_*C⁺, T.A_*T (DNA triplexes) or the U.A_*U triplex (RNA triplex) (symbols . and _* represent Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen base pairing strands of the triplex). Triplex nucleic acids may have functional roles in many cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional RNA processing, modification of chromatin structure, DNA repair etc. For example, DNA triplex formation may be involved the c-myc proto-oncogene regulation [9] and RNA triplexes may exist within transfer RNA [10], [11] the Tetrahymena group I intron [12]–[14], the human immunodeficiency virus TAR RNA [15]–[17] HIV frame shift signal etc [18]. The discovery of the triplex-unwinding helicases [19] as well as the recent revelation of the genomics and many critical biological roles of the non-coding RNAs [20] necessitate the speculation of the involvement of triple-helices in many critical roles in the cell [21]–[24]. The potential in vivo roles and importance of nucleic acid triple helical structures have been reviewed in great details recently [25].

Due to Hoogsteen base pairing, stability of the triplex structure is relatively lower compared to the corresponding duplex and the third strand dissociates at a much lower temperature compared to the duplex denaturation temperature. This is a critical limitation in their utility and application in vivo as probes of structure, inhibitors of protein synthesis as well as therapeutic agents. Therefore, molecules having the ability to recognize, bind and stabilize specific sequences of triple helical nucleic acid structures are of particular interest in antigene therapy. Recently several biophysical studies on the properties of DNA triple helices [2], [3], [26], [27] and many small molecules that can enhance the stability of triplexes have been described [28]–[31]. But most of these are limited to DNA triplexes and studies on the stabilization of RNA triplexes and correlating thermodynamic factors to the structural aspects that actually account for the observed differences in stability are scarce. Our laboratory has shown that many isoquinoline alkaloids can bind and significantly stabilize RNA triplexes [32].

Berberine is a natural alkaloid with remarkable biological relevance and utility, and represents a potential molecule for drug screening and development. The antiproliferative property and sensitivity enhancement of berberine to various cancer cell lines [33]–[39] have led to significant interest in this molecule as a prospective anticancer drug candidate [40], [41]. The potential biotargets of berberine may include DNA topoisomerases, telomerase, and DNA or RNA structures. In particular, DNA and RNA have long been thought to be the target in manifesting its anticancer activities, and accordingly, the binding properties to single strands, duplex, triplex, and quadruplex structures have been described in many recent publications and reviews [42]–[44]. Notably, these studies have revealed an unusually high affinity and induction of self-structure formation by berberine to poly(A) [45], [46]. Currently, RNA molecules are thought to be involved in many cellular activities and RNA triplex structures may be a potential structural motif for therapeutic intervention.

In order to improve the efficacy of berberine and make it a viable therapeutic agent many synthetic strategies have been adopted recently [47]–[50]. Substitution on the isoquinoline moiety has been an important approach and the enhanced effect of 9-substituted analogs on drug-topoisomerase II interactions is well documented several years ago [51]. The 9-substituent within the domain has a major influence, presumably by facilitating drug interaction with enzyme and/or enzyme-DNA complexes and many were synthesized to enhance the DNA binding as well as pharmacological activities [52]–[56]. In this manuscript we describe the triplex-binding affinities and the associated thermodynamic aspects of the interaction of two new 9-amino alkyl analogs (Figure 1) in comparison to berberine. These functional substituents depending on the number of CH₂ group have been documented to increase duplex DNA binding affinities and also induce self-structure formation in poly(A) [46], [57]. Thus, the interaction studies on these berberine derivatives with structural alteration at the 9-position may provide key insights into the different aspects of association process of berberine with RNA. In the light of remarkably strong affinity of these molecules to various nucleic acid structures as mentioned above in this study we investigated the structural aspects in conjunction with energetics of the interaction of two representative analogs with the RNA triplex poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) (RNA triplex hereafter).

Download:

Figure 1. Chemical structures of BC, analogs and the base triplet of poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U).

(A) BC (B) BC analogs and (C) triplex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g001

Materials and Methods

Biochemicals

Polynucleotide samples of double stranded poly(A)_•poly(U) and single stranded poly(U) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA) and were used as received. Berberine was obtained from Aldrich and its analogs were prepared and characterized as described in [58].

Preparation of Stock Solutions

The RNA triplex was prepared as reported earlier [32]. Concentration was determined using molar extinction coefficients (ε) reported in the literature [59]. For this study two 9-amino alkyl berberine analogs (Figure 1) with chain length of 3 and 6 CH₂ groups were used. They were fairly soluble in aqueous buffers, and hence their solutions were freshly prepared each day and kept protected in the dark until use. The concentration of berberine was determined by an ε value of 22,500 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 345 nm and that of the 9-analogs using a common ε value of 22,500 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 345 nm. No deviation from Beer’s law was observed for the alkaloids in the concentration range employed in this study. All experiments were performed in 10 mM sodium cacodylate buffer containing 25 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM Na₂EDTA, pH 7.0 (total [Na⁺] = 35 mM). Glass distilled deionized water and analytical grade reagents were used for the preparation of the buffer. All buffer solutions were filtered through Millipore filters (Millipore India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India) of 0.22 µm pore size before use. The triplex structure was characterized by circular dichroic spectral pattern and biphasic optical melting profile [59]–[60].

Absorbance Spectroscopy

Spectrophotometric titration of alkaloid analogs with the triplex was performed on a Jasco V660 double beam double monochromator spectrophotometer (Jasco, Hachioji, Japan) at 25±0.5°C using the methodologies described previously [61], [62]. Matched quartz cuvettes of 1 cm path length were used. A typical titration was carried out by keeping a fixed known concentration of the triplex solution in the sample and reference cuvettes and adding successively small aliquots of a known concentrated stock of the alkaloid into the sample cuvette and equivalent amount of buffer into the reference cuvette. After each addition, the system was allowed to equilibrate for at least 5 min. before noting the absorbance at the wavelength maximum (A_max) of the alkaloid and the isosbestic point (A_iso). The data obtained from these titrations were quantified by constructing Scatchard plots [63].

Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Fluorescence titrations were performed on either a Shimadzu RFPC fluorimeter (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) or Hitachi F4010 unit (Hitachi, Tolyo, Japan) in fluorescence free quartz cuvettes of 1 cm path length in sample holder thermo regulated at 25±0.5°C using an Eyela Uni Cool U55 water bath (Tokyo Rikakikai Co. Ltd. Tokyo, Japan). The uncorrected emission spectra of the alkaloid and analogs were at first recorded and then titrated with aliquots of triplex solution of high concentration to prevent dilution effects. The samples were excited at 350 nm and all the measurements were performed under conditions of stirring.

Evaluation of Binding Affinity from Spectroscopic Results

In absorption spectroscopy, following each addition of the alkaloid to the RNA triplex solution (50 µM), the total alkaloid concentration (C_t) present was calculated as from the absorbance at the respective isosbestic point (A_iso) where ε_iso is the molar extinction coefficient at the isosbestic point. The expected absorbance (A_exp) at the wavelength maximum was calculated using the relation where ε_max is the molar extinction coefficient at the wavelength maximum. The difference in A_exp and the observed absorbance (A_obsd) was then used to calculate the amount of bound alkaloid as . The concentration of the free alkaloid was determined by the difference, . The extinction coefficient of the completely bound alkaloid was determined by mixing a large excess of the RNA triplex to a known quantities of the alkaloids assuming total binding, . From the fluorescence data, C_b was calculated using the relation _, where C_t is the total alkaloid concentration, I is the observed fluorescence intensity, I_o is the fluorescence intensity of identical concentration of the alkaloid in the absence of the triplex, and V_o is the experimentally determined ratio of the fluorescence intensity of totally bound alkaloid to that of the free alkaloid. Free alkaloid concentrations (C_f) were obtained from the relationship. The binding ratio r is defined as .

These data were cast into Scatchard plots of r/C_f versus r. The binding isotherms with negative slopes at low r values were analyzed according to the excluded site model for a non-linear non-cooperative ligand binding system using the following equation(1)where K_i is the intrinsic binding constant to an isolated binding site, and n is the number of nucleotides excluded by the binding of a single alkaloid molecule. All the binding data were analyzed using Origin 7.0 software (Microcal Inc., Northampton, MA, USA) to determine the best-fit parameters of K_i and n as described in details earlier [64].

Optical Thermal Melting Experiments

Optical thermal melting of the triplex and triplex-alkaloid complexes was monitored by UV absorption at 260 nm and was performed using a Shimadzu Pharmaspec 1700 unit equipped with a peltier controlled TMSPC–model accessory (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) monitoring the absorbance change at 260 nm as described earlier [65], [66]. The temperature of the sample was increased at a rate of 1.0°C /min, typically starting at 20°C and ending at 70°C when both transitions were completed.

Measurement of Energy Transfer

Energy transfer from the triplex to the bound alkaloid was measured from the excitation spectra of the complex in the wavelength range 220–310 nm [67]–[69]. Excitation spectra were recorded at an emission wavelength of 520 nm for BC and analogs. The ratio , where q_b and q_f are the quantum efficiencies of bound and free alkaloid, respectively, was calculated for each wavelength using the equation where I_b and I_f are the fluorescence intensities of the alkaloids in the presence and absence of the triplex, respectively, and ε_b and ε_f are the corresponding alkaloid molar extinction coefficients. A plot of the ratio, Q_λ/Q₃₁₀ against wavelength was constructed. The wavelength of 310 nm was chosen as the normalization wavelength due to the negligible absorbance for triplex at this wavelength.

Fluorescence Polarization Anisotropy Measurements

Fluorescence polarization anisotropy measurements of alkaloids and triplex complexes were executed on a Hitachi F4010 fluorimeter (Hitachi Ltd. Tokyo, Japan) at 25^o. Steady state polarization anisotropy ‘A’ is defined as(2)where G is the ratio I_hv/I_hh used for instrumental correction. I_vv, I_vh, I_hv and I_hh represent the fluorescence signal for excitation and emission with the polarizer positions set at (0°, 0°), (0°, 90°), (90°, 0°) and (90°, 90°), respectively.

Fluorescence Quenching Experiments

Fluorescence quenching experiments were performed by mixing, in different ratios, two solutions, viz. KCl and K₄[Fe(CN₆], at a fixed total ionic strength. At a constant P/D (RNA triplex/alkaloid molar ratio) fluorescence intensity was monitored as a function of varying concentration of the ferrocyanide as described previously [32], [70], [71]. The data were plotted as Stern-Volmer plots of relative fluorescence intensity (F_o/F) versus [Fe(CN₆]⁴⁻ concentration according to the Stern-Volmer equation, , where F_o and F denote the fluorescence emission intensities in the absence and presence of [Fe(CN₆]⁴⁻ and [Q] is the quencher concentration. K_SV is the Stern-Volmer quenching constant, which gives an estimate of the efficiency of quenching by the quencher.

Viscosity Measurements

A Cannon-Manning semi micro capillary viscometer (size 75, Canon Instruments Co. State College, PA, USA) kept thermostated at 25±1.0°C was used to measure the time required for flow to calculate the viscosity of the RNA triplex-alkaloid complexes. Relative viscosities for RNA triplex either in presence or absence of the alkaloids were calculated as reported earlier [72]. The relative increase in length, L/L_o, may be obtained from the corresponding increase in relative viscosity with the use of the equation, , where L and L_o are the contour lengths of triplex in presence and absence of the alkaloids, η and η_o are the corresponding values of intrinsic viscosity (approximated by the reduced viscosity , where C is the triplex concentration). β is the slope of a plot of L/L_o versus r where a slope of ∼2 may suggest true intercalative binding.

Circular Dichroism Studies

Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured on a PC controlled spectropolarimeter, JASCO J815 unit (Jasco, Hachioji, Japan) equipped with a temperature programmer (model PFD 425L/15) at 25±0.5^o. A rectangular strain free quartz cuvette of 1 cm path length was used. Each spectrum, averaged from four successive accumulations at a scan rate of 100 nm/min. keeping a bandwidth of 1.0 nm at a sensitivity of 100 milli degrees, was baseline corrected, smoothed and normalized to nucleotide phosphate concentration in the region 220–400 nm. The molar ellipticity (θ) values are expressed in deg. cm² dmol⁻¹.

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was performed on a MicroCal VP-ITC microcalorimeter (MicroCal, Inc., Northampton, MA, USA). Instrument control data acquisition, and analysis were carried out using the in built Origin software 7.0 package using standard protocols reported earlier [66], [70], [73]. All experiments were conducted at 25°C. Aliquots (10 µL) of the alkaloid solution were injected from the rotating syringe (286 r.p.m) into the isothermal sample chamber containing 1.4235 ml of the triplex solution (25 µM). Control experiments to estimate the heat of dilution of the alkaloids were performed by titrating the alkaloid solutions to the buffer kept in the calorimeter cell under the same experimental conditions and protocols. Heat of dilution of the triplex titration into buffer was found to be negligible. Analysis of the integrated heat data was performed using Origin 7.0.

Experimental data were fitted using a non-linear least-squares minimization algorithm to a theoretical titration curve using model of one site binding site Levenberg- Marquardt non-linear least squares curve fitting algorithm equations included in the software package of Origin 7.0 to estimate the binding affinity (K_a), the binding stoichiometry (N) and the enthalpy of binding (ΔH^o). The binding Gibbs energy (ΔG^o) and the entropic contribution (TΔS^o) to the binding were subsequently calculated from standard relationships described earlier [65], [73].

Results and Discussion

Electronic Absorption Spectral Studies of the Binding

The binding of the berberine analogs to the RNA triplex was at first investigated by absorption spectral measurements. Berberine and its analogs have characteristic visible absorption spectra with intense peaks around 345 and 420 nms (Curve 1 of Fig. 2). As aliquots of the triplex was added to the spectrophotometric cuvette containing berberine and analogs, the intensity of the peaks decreased with concomitant red shift of the peak maxima generating sharp isosbestic points. Typical absorption spectral changes for BC, BC1 and BC2 in presence of increasing concentrations of the triplex are presented in Figure 2. Hypochromic and bathochromic shifts of ligand centered transitions for aromatic ligands typically arise from π-stacking interactions which may result from intercalation with the base triplets. Berberine has been revealed to intercalate between DNA bases from the recent X-ray crystal structure data [43]. Similarly, berberine analogs (Figure 1) should be able to intercalate between the base triplets without large steric constraints and the alkyl side chain may provide additional interaction modules in the grooves or with the functional groups on the base triplets. The presence of clear isosbestic points suggest that the alkaloid analogs bind to triplex by equilibrium enabling the estimation of the binding affinity by Scatchard analysis in comparison to BC. A summary of the optical properties of free and poly(U).poly(A)*poly(U) bound alkaloid analogs are presented in Table S1.

Download:

Figure 2. Absorption spectral change of alkaloids in presence of triplex.

(A) BC (B) BC1 (C) BC2 each of 5.0 μM treated with increasing concentrations of poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U). P/D saturation for BC, BC1 and BC2 were 28.0, 20.0 and 15.0, respectively. Inset: respective non-cooperative Scatchard isotherms of the binding.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g002

Spectrofluorimetric Studies

Berberine and its 9-amino alkyl analogs are weak fluorophores with low fluorescence emission intensity that enhanced several-fold on binding to nucleic acids [46], [47]. In the presence of the triplex, the intrinsic fluorescence of the analogs registered remarkably large enhancement of the fluorescence intensity reaching a saturation that can be used to evaluate the binding affinities. The large enhancements may also be in support of the hydrophobic position of the bound molecules between the base triplets. Typical fluorescence spectral changes of BC, BC1 and BC2 in presence of the RNA triplex are presented in Figure 3.

Download:

Figure 3. Fluorescence spectra of BC and BC analogs in presence of triplex.

(A) BC (B) BC1 (C) BC2 (2.0 μM each) treated with increasing concentration of RNA triplex. P/D saturation for BC, BC1 and BC2 were 32.0, 24.0 and 18.0, respectively. Inset: respective non-cooperative Scatchard plots of binding.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g003

Evaluation of the Binding Affinities from Absorbance and Fluorescence Titration Data

The spectral changes in the absorption and fluorescence titration data were expressed as Scatchard plots and they are depicted in the inset of Fig. 2 and 3. The Scatchard plots had negative slopes at low r values enabling further analysis of the curved isotherms by the McGhee-von Hippel methodology [74] for non-cooperative binding for evaluation of the binding constants and the number of excluded sites on binding of a single alkaloid molecule. From this analysis, it was found that the binding affinity values (K_i) of BC, BC1 and BC2 to the triplex were 2.88±0.02×10⁵ M⁻¹, 8.65±0.34×10⁵ M⁻¹, and 3.87±0.41×10⁶ M⁻¹, respectively, from absorption spectra. The number of excluded sites was around 4.2, 4.2 and 4.3, respectively, for BC, BC1 and BC2. Similarly spectrofluorimetric analysis of the binding resulted in values with magnitudes close to that obtained from absorption spectroscopy and these are presented in Table 1. It can be seen that the binding affinity BC1 and BC2 to the RNA triplex was higher by 3 and 15 times than that of BC suggesting that the alkyl chain remarkably influence the triplex binding.

Download:

Table 1. Binding parameters for poly(U)•poly(A)_*poly(U) triplex-alkaloid complexation obtained from McGhee-von Hippel analysis of the Scatchard plot from the spectrophotometric and fluorimetric titration data at 25°C^a.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.t001

Complex Formation Stoichiometry (Job plot)

The binding stoichiometry of association of these analogs with the RNA triplex and the possible number of binding sites were determined independently by continuous variation analysis (Job plot) [75], [76] in fluorescence. In Job plot, the ligand: RNA molar ratio was varied while the total molar concentration remains constant. The stoichiometry of binding is determined by the molar ratio where maximal binding is observed. The plot of difference fluorescence intensity (ΔF) at respective λ_max, for BC, BC1 and BC2, versus their mole fractions presented in Figure S1, revealed a single binding mode for both these molecules on the RNA-triplex. From the inflection points χ = 0.190, 0.186 and 0.178 (indicated by arrow), the number of nucleotides bound per BC, BC1and BC2 can be estimated to be around 4.26, 4.37 and 4.6, respectively. This is in good agreement with the number of binding sites obtained from the non-cooperative McGhee-von Hippel analysis of the spectrophotometric data (Table 1).

Optical Thermal Denaturation Studies and Analysis of the Stabilization Effects

A thermal denaturation experiment can determine the stability of the triplex and duplex structures. T_m is defined as temperature of melting or, more accurately, as temperature of mid-transition. Beyond a simple numerical value (the T_m), a thermal denaturation experiment, that depicts the variation of the absorbance plotted vs. temperature, yields important thermodynamic information. The third strand [poly(U)] separation from the triplex occurs at 35°C while the duplex strand denaturation occurs at 45°C under the present experimental conditions and this is in agreement with the literature data [32]. The stability of triplex in presence of BC and the analogs was monitored by UV thermal melting curves that are presented in Figure 4. It can be seen that the analogs effected remarkable stabilization of the third strand. The extent of stabilization was high for BC1 and higher for B2 compared to BC suggesting a delayed strand separation with bound analogs. The stabilization temperature for the third strand in presence of BC, BC1 and BC2 were 17.5, 18.1 and 20.5°C, respectively. Detailed melting data is presented in Table 2.

Download:

Figure 4. Thermal melting profiles of triplex with BC and BC analogs.

Poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) (30.0 μM) treated with (A) BC (B) BC1 and (C) BC2. Curves 1–6 represent D/P in the range 0–0.6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g004

Download:

Table 2. Effect of alkaloids on the thermal stability of the poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) triplex^a.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.t002

Binding Mode of Berberine Analogs from Fluorescence and Viscosity Studies

Although the above experiments indirectly suggest intercalation model of interaction, additional experiments aimed at the elucidation of intercalation mode were performed by fluorescence energy transfer, quenching, and viscosity studies. Energy transfer from the base triplets to the bound alkaloid analogs can be used as an evidence for intercalative binding. Efficient energy transfer manifested by an increased quantum yield can occur only when the bound alkaloid molecules are oriented parallel to the base triplets in an intercalated manner. In Figure 5A the variation of Q_λ/Q₃₁₀ with wavelength for the complexation of BC and analogs at a D/P (alkaloid/RNA triplex molar ratio) of 1.0 is presented. An increase in the quantum yield is revealed in the 230–280 nm region with maximum around 258 nm which is the RNA absorbing region. The increase in quantum yield was higher for BC1 and the highest for BC2 compared to BC indicating that the binding of these molecules results in significant energy transfer to the base triplets providing clear evidence for a better intercalated orientation of the analogs compared to BC.

Download:

Figure 5. Variation of the relative fluorescence quantum yields, anisotropy and visocisty.

(A) Variation of the relative fluorescence quantum yield of BC (▪), BC1 (•), and BC2 (▴) in the presence of poly(U)_•.poly(A)_*poly(U) as a function of excitation wavelength. (B) A plot of the variation of anisotropy values versus P/D ratio for the complexation of BC (▪), BC1 (•), BC2 (▴) with poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U). (C) A plot of increase in helix contour length (L/Lo) versus r for the complexation of BC (▪), BC1 (•), BC2 (▴) with poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) at 25±0.5°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g005

Further support for stronger intercalation of the analogs was gathered from fluorescence polarization anisotropy experiments. The polarization of the complexes enhanced as the D/P increased (Figure 5B) and the values were 0.15, 0.18 and 0.21 confirming the intercalated binding and the higher binding of BC over BC1 and BC2.

The mode of binding was subsequently confirmed to be intercalative from viscosity studies also. Intercalation of molecules between DNA bases is known to increase the viscosity of the solution owing to unwinding and elongation of the double helix as proposed by Lerman [77]. This is due to the fact that intercalation leads to enhancement of the axial length of the nucleic acid resulting in more rigidity due to enhancement of the frictional coefficient. The binding mode of the BC analogs to the RNA triplex was probed by measuring the viscosity of the triplex solution in the presence of increasing concentrations of the alkaloids, and estimating the changes in relative viscosities with varying D/P ratio. The change was found to be more rapidly pronounced (not shown) for the analogs compared to berberine complexes, and the saturation was achieved at a much lower D/P ratio indicating tighter intercalative binding of the analogs. It is evident from Figure 5C that the binding of the analogs results in an increase in the relative viscosity of the solution. Viscosity results are expressed as length enhancements with respect to a standard value (β) of 2.0 for a true intercalator resulting in a theoretical length enhancement of 0.34 nm. The β values for BC1 and BC2 triplex complexes were 1.60, and 1.76, respectively, against a value of 1.51 for BC. Thus, a better intercalation model may be envisaged for BC1 and 2 binding to the triplex, whereas weak intercalation may be assigned to the binding of BC. Although BC and analogs have partial saturation in the ring structure resulting in buckled structure a better intercalation appears to be feasible with the analogs contributed by the anchoring of the side chain and the above described experiments unequivocally confirm a better intercalation geometry for the analogs compared to BC.

Additionally, fluorescence quenching experiments [78] which is also a reliable method for studying the binding mode of small molecules to nucleic acids were performed to lend support to the intercalation mode. Generally, the molecules bound to the surface of the triplex by electrostatic interaction will be easily accessible to a quencher while those bound inside the helix will be protected from the quencher [78], [79]. It is known that anionic quenchers like [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ cannot access the inside of the helix due to the strong electrostatic repulsion from the negatively charged phosphate groups and consequently very little quenching will be observed for fluorescent small molecules bound in the interior of the triplex. Consequently, the magnitude of the Stern-Volmer quenching constant (K_sv) of ligands that are bound inside by intercalation will be lower than that of the free molecules. In Figure S2, the data on the fluorescence quenching of the berberine analogs in presence of K₄[Fe(CN)₆] is presented. K_sv values of free BC1 and BC2 with [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ were 217 M⁻¹, respectively, while that of bound ones were 73.0 and 42.0 M⁻¹, respectively, indicating that the bound berberine analogs are considerably protected and sequestered away from the solvent. This result further suggests an intercalative or similar kind of binding for the analogs inside the triplex.

Determination of Quantum Efficiency

The quantum efficiency (Q) ligand of a binding to nucleic acid is a measure of the energy transferred from to the ligand upon complexation. This is obtained from the ratio of the quantum efficiency of ligand complexed to nucleic acid (q_b) to the quantum efficiency of the free ligand (q_f). Quantum efficiency values are important information that may support the strong binding of the analogs to the RNA triplex. A plot of ΔA against the inverse of RNA triplex concentration gave an exponential plot (not shown) from which quantum efficiency values of 60.0, 44.9 and 22.8, respectively, for BC, BC1, and BC2 have been determined. Since Q is >1.0 this indicates enhancement of fluorescence intensity and greater retention of fluorescence energy by the bound alkaloid due to shielding within the binding site from quenching by solvent.

Conformational Aspects of the Binding

Conformational changes associated with the binding of these analogs in comparison to berberine were studied from circular dichroism studies. The circular dichroic spectrum of the triplex was characterized by a positive band around 270 nm followed by a small negative band around 240 nm. (Curve 1, Figure 6A). The spectrum is in conformity with the literature report. In the presence of BC an enhancement and red shift of the positive band and a small change in the ellipticity of the negative band occurs. A small induced CD band is developed in the 320–360 nm with a maximum around 345 nm. In the presence of BC1, the positive ellipticity of the triplex decreased with a concomitant red shift of the maximum (Figure 6B). There was a small decrease of the negative band maximum around 240 nm. The overall changes in the CD spectrum were more pronounced compared to the changes with BC. An induced CD band appeared in the 320–360 nm, but was of an excision split type with a negative and positive ellipticity around 340 and 365 nms. For the binding of BC2, the intrinsic CD band ellipticity of the triplex around 270 nm decreased significantly with a concomitant red shift of the peak maximum (Figure 6C). The 240 nm band ellipticity also reduced in intensity. The appearance of the induced CD bands was similar to that with BC1, but the intensity was more pronounced. From the comparative CD curves it is clear that the binding induced CD perturbation of the triplex structure was highest with BC2 and followed the order BC2>BC1>BC. Furthermore, the pronounced induced CD band and the differences in their appearance indicate the analogs bind strongly to the triplex and are in line with the 15 times higher binding affinity of the latter. It also appears that the bound orientation of BC analogs on the triplex structure is significantly different from that of BC as revealed by different induced CD patterns that reflects the interaction of the transition moments of the bound molecule and the base triplets.

Download:

Figure 6. Circular dichroic spectral titration of triplex with BC and BC analogs.

Titration data of poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) (30 µM) treated with (A) 0.0, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 12.0, 18.0 µM of BC (B) 0.0, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 12.0, 15.0, 18.0, 24.0 µM of BC1 and (C) 0.0, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 12.0, 15.0, 18.0, 24.0 µM of BC2. Inset: A magnified representation of the induced CD spectra in the region 300–400 nm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g006

Download:

Figure 7. Representative isothermal titration calorimetry profiles for the titration of BC and analogs to triplex.

Titration profiles are shown for poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) with (A) BC (B) BC1 and (C) BC2 at 25°C. The top panels represent raw data for the sequential injection of the alkaloid into the triplex solution. The lower panels represent the corresponding normalized heat signals versus molar ratio. The data points (▪) reflect the experimental injection heat while the solid lines represent the calculated fit of the data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.g007

Download:

Table 3. ITC Derived Thermodynamic parameters for the binding of BC, BC1 and BC2 with poly(U)_•poly(A)_*poly(U) triplex at 25°C.^a

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.t003

Binding Thermodynamics: Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Thermodynamic characterization of the binding was performed from isothermal titration calorimetry. The calorimetric profiles for the binding of BC1 and BC2 to the RNA triplex are presented in Figure 7. Binding in each case was characterized by the presence of exothermic peaks that followed each injection of the alkaloid to the triplex solution. Fits of the integrated heat data were carried out using a model of single set of identical sites that yielded a fairly good fitting of the experimental data. The thermodynamic parameters elucidated for the binding of the alkaloids to the triplex are collated in Table 3. The ITC data for the binding of BC to the triplex yielded an association constant of (1.50±0.04×10⁵m⁻¹). This is in close agreement to the value reported previously [32]. The binding of BC1 yielded a six times higher association constant of (9.73±0.09×10⁵m⁻¹) while the binding of BC2 was remarkably stronger compared to BC and BC1 with a K_a value of (2.30±0.1×10⁶m⁻¹) showing almost fifteen times stronger binding than BC. The affinity values are in excellent agreement with the values from spectroscopic results. The number of binding sites obtained from ITC as reciprocal of stoichiometry were closely comparable to the number of excluded sites from spectroscopic data and also the stoichiometry data from Job plot. The Gibbs energy change (ΔG^o) was found to ∼−7.1 kcal/mol for BC but higher at −8.22 kcal/mol for BC1 and 8.73 kcal/mol for BC2 showing the spontaneity of the interaction in all cases in general and more for BC1 and BC2. The binding of BC to triplex was predominantly enthalpy driven with a small favorable entropy change as reported previously [32]. On the other hand, binding of BC1 to the triplex was driven by a large positive entropy change (5.92 kcal/mol) and a small enthalpy change. It may be recalled that CD spectroscopy had indicated remarkable conformational changes of triplex on binding of BC1 and BC2 compared to BC. The overall entropy change may be expected from this conformational change. Binding of BC1 and BC2 has been revealed to result in stronger intercalation complex compared to BC and consequently a larger lengthening, stiffening, and rigidifying of the triplex may be the most likely explanation for the entropic cost as suggested by Chaires [80]. This was also confirmed from our viscosity studies where the length enhancement of the triplex due to unwinding with BC1 and BC2 was much higher than with BC.

In conclusion, we report here a remarkably higher binding affinity of two new 9-substituted berberine analogs to the RNA triplex of poly(U).poly(A)_*poly(U). This has also been complemented by higher melting stabilization of the third stand, stronger conformational changes of the triplex structure and generation of stronger induced CD bands for the triplex bound analogs. The overall higher affinity and stabilization by the analogs were clearly reflected in the thermodynamic parameters of the complexation elucidated from calorimetry. Results suggest that the length of the alkyl side chain clearly influence in the triplex stabilization phenomena of BC analogs. These results may be useful for formulating effective antigene strategies involving new berberine derivatives and the RNA triplex.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Job plot for the complexation of BC, BC1 and BC2 with the RNA triplex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Stern-Volmer plots for the quenching of BC, BC1 and BC2 by RNA triplex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.s002

(TIF)

Table S1.

Optical properties of free and triplex bound alkaloid analogs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037939.s003

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Srinivas Hotha and Dr. Gopalsamy Sureshkumar of CSIR-NCL, Pune for the gift of the samples of berberine analogs. The help and cooperation of the members of the Biophysical Chemistry Laboratory throughout this study are also gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GSK SD DB. Performed the experiments: DB SD MH LH. Analyzed the data: GSK DB SD MH LH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GSK. Wrote the paper: GSK SD DB.

References

1. Escudé C, Francois JC, Sun JS, Ott G, Sprinzl M, et al. (1993) Stability of triple helices containing RNA and DNA strands: Experimental and molecular modeling studies. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 5547–5553.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Holland JA, Hoffman DW (1996) Structural features and stability of an RNA triple helix in solution. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 2841–2848.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Han H, Dervan PB (1993) Sequence-specific recognition of double helical RNA and RNA.DNA by triple helix formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 3806–3810.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Roberts RW, Crothers DM (1992) Stability and properties of double and triple helices: Dramatic effects of RNA or DNA backbone composition. Science 258: 1463–1466.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Maher LJ, Wold B, Dervan PB (1989) Inhibition of DNA binding proteins by oligonucleotide-directed triple helix formation. Science 245: 725–730.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Doan T Le, Perrouault L, Praseuth D, Habhoub N, Decout JL, et al. (1987) Sequence-specific recognition, photocrosslinking and cleavage of the DNA double helix by an oligo-(α]-thymidylate covalently linked to an azidoproflavine derivative. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 7749–7760.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Moser HE, Dervan PB (1987) Sequence-specific cleavage of double helical DNA by triple helix formation. Science 238: 645–650.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Felsenfeld G, Davies DR, Rich A (1957) Formation of a three-stranded polynucleotide molecule. J Am Chem Soc 79: 2023–2024.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Kinniburgh AJ, Firulli AB, Kolluri R (1994) DNA triplexes and regulation of the c-myc gene. Gene 149: 93–100.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Kim SH, Quigley GJ, Suddath FL, McPherson A, Sneden D, et al. (1973) Three-dimensional structure of yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA: Folding of the polynucleotide chain. Science 179: 285–288.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Robertus JD, Ladner JE, Finch JT, Rhodes D, Brown RS, et al. (1974) Structure of yeast phenylalanine tRNA at 3 Å resolution. Nature 250: 546–551.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Michel F, Ellington AD, Couture S, Szostak JW (1990) Phylogenetic and genetic evidence for base-triples in the catalytic domain of group I introns. Nature 347: 578–580.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Green R, Szostak JW (1994) In vitro genetic analysis of the hinge region between helical elements P5-P4-P6 and P7-P3-P8 in the sunY group I self-splicing intron. J Mol Biol 235: 140–155.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Chastain M, Tinoco I (1992) A base-triple structural domain in RNA. Biochemistry 31: 12733–12741.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Puglisi JD, Tan R, Calnan BJ, Frankel AD, Williamson JR (1992) Conformation of the TAR RNA-arginine complex by NMR spectroscopy. Science 257: 76–80.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Puglisi JD, Chen L, Frankel AD, Williamson JR (1993) Role of RNA structure in arginine recognition of TAR RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 3680–3684.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Aboul-ela F, Karn J, Varani G (1995) The structure of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 TAR RNA reveals principles of RNA recognition by Tat protein. J Mol Biol 253: 313–332.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Dinman JD, Richter S, Plant EP, Taylor RC, Hammell AB, et al. (2002) The frameshift signal of HIV-1 involves a potential intramolecular triplex RNA structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 5331–5336.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Jain A, Bacolla A, Chakraborty P, Grosse F, Vasquez KM (2010) Human DHX9 helicase unwinds triple-helical DNA structures. Biochemistry 49: 6992–6999.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Mattick JS, Taft RJ, Faulkner GJ (2010) A global view of genomic information-moving beyond the gene and the master regulator. Trends Genet 26: 21–28.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Martianov I, Ramadass A, Barros AS, Chow N, Akoulitchev A (2007) Repression of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene by a non-coding interfering transcript. Nature 445: 666–670.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Schmitz KM, Mayer C, Postepska A, Grummt I (2010) Interaction of noncoding RNA with the rDNA promoter mediates recruitment of DNMT3b and silencing of rRNA genes. Genes Dev 24: 2264–2269.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Kanak M, Alseiari M, Balasubramanian P, Addanki K, Aggarwal M, et al. (2010) Triplex-forming microRNAs form stable complexes with HIV-1 provirus and inhibit its replication. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 18: 532–545.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Zheng R, Shen Z, Tripathi V, Xuan Z, Freier SM, et al. (2010) Polypurine-repeat-containing RNAs: A novel class of long non-coding RNA in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 123: 3734–3744.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Buske FA, Mattick JS, Bailey TL (2011) Potential in vivo roles of nucleic acid triple-helices. RNA Biol 8: 427–439.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Klinck R, Guittet E, Liquier J, Taillandier E, Gouyette C, et al. (1994) Spectroscopic evidence for an intramolecular RNA triple helix. FEBS Lett 355: 297–300.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Liquier J, Taillandier E, Klinck R, Guittet E, Gouyette C, et al. (1995) Spectroscopic studies of chimeric DNA-RNA and RNA 29-base intramolecular triple helices. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 1722–1728.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Fox KR, Raj D (2004) Small molecule DNA and RNA binders: From synthesis to nucleic acid. In: Demeunynck M, Bailly C, Wilson WD, editors. Triple Helix-Specific Ligands. pp. 360–383.
29. Keppler MD, Read MA, Perry PJ, Trent JO, Jenkins TC, et al. (1999) Stabilization of DNA triple helices by a series of mono- and disubstituted amido anthraquinones. Eur J Biochem 263: 817–825.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Song Y, Feng L, Ren J, Qu X (2011) Stabilization of unstable CGC+ triplex DNA by single-walled carbon nanotubes under physiological conditions. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 6835–6843.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Arya DP (2011) New approaches toward recognition of nucleic acid triple helices. Acc Chem Res 44: 134–146.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Sinha R, Suresh Kumar G (2009) Interaction of isoquinoline alkaloids with an RNA triplex: Structural and thermodynamic studies of berberine, palmatine, and coralyne binding to poly(U).poly(A)*poly(U). J Phys Chem B 113: 13410–13420.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Choi MS, Yuk DY, Oh JH, Jung H, Han SB, et al. (2008) Berberine inhibits human neuroblastoma cell growth through induction of p53-dependent apoptosis. Anticancer Res 28: 3777–3784.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Ho YT, Lu CC, Yang JS, Chiang JH, Li TC, et al. (2009) Berberine induced apoptosis via promoting the expression of caspase-8, -9 and -3, apoptosis-inducing factor and endonuclease G in SCC-4 human tongue squamous carcinoma cancer cells. Anticancer Res 29: 4063–4070.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Hsu WH, Hsieh YS, Kuo HC, Teng CY, Huang HI, et al. (2007) Berberine induces apoptosis in SW620 human colonic carcinoma cells through generation of reactive oxygen species and activation of JNK/p38 MAPK and FasL. Arch Toxicol 81: 719–728.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Patil JB, Kim J, Jayaprakasha GK (2010) Berberine induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) through mitochondrial-dependent pathway. Eur J Pharmacol 645: 70–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Auyeung KK, Ko JK (2009) Coptis chinensis inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth through nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene activation. Int J Mol Med 24: 571–577.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Yu FS, Yang JS, Lin HJ, Yu CS, Tan TW, et al. (2007) Berberine inhibits WEHI-3 leukemia cells in vivo. In Vivo 21: 407–412.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. James MA, Fu H, Liu Y, Chen DR, You M (2011) Dietary administration of berberine or phellodendron amurense extract inhibits cell cycle progression and lung tumorigenesis. Mol Carcinogen 50: 1–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Kim DW, Ahan SH, Kim TY (2007) Enhancement of arsenic trioxide (As2O3)-mediated apoptosis using berberine in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42: 392–399.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Tan W, Li Y, Chen M, Wang Y (2011) Berberine hydrochloride: Anticancer activity and nanoparticulate delivery system. Int J Nanomedicine 6: 1773–1777.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Sharma NK, Lunawat P, Dixit M (2011) Binding studies of natural product berberine with DNA G-Quadruplex. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 7: 130–134.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Ferraroni M, Bazzicalupi C, Bilia AR, Gratteri P (2011) X-Ray diffraction analyses of the natural isoquinoline alkaloids berberine and sanguinarine complexed with double helix DNA d(CGTACG). Chem Commun 47: 4917–4919.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Bhadra K, Suresh Kumar G (2011) Therapeutic potential of nucleic acid-binding isoquinoline alkaloids: Binding aspects and implications for drug design. Med Res Rev 31: 821–862.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Giri P, Suresh Kumar G (2010) Isoquinoline alkaloids and their binding with polyadenylic acid: Potential basis of therapeutic action. Mini Rev Med Chem 10: 568–577.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Islam MM, Basu A, Suresh Kumar G (2011) Binding of 9-O-(ω-amino) alkyl ether analogues of the plant alkaloid berberine to poly(A): Insights into self-structure induction. Med Chem Comm 2: 631–637.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Ma Y, Ou TM, Tan JH, Hou JQ, Huang SL, et al. (2009) Synthesis and evaluation of 9-O-substituted berberine derivatives containing aza-aromatic terminal group as highly selective telomeric G-quadruplex stabilizing ligands. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19: 3414–3417.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Shan WJ, Huang L, Zhou Q, Meng FC, Li XS (2011) Synthesis, biological evaluation of 9-N-substituted berberine derivatives as multi-functional agents of antioxidant, inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and amyloid-β aggregation. Eur J Med Chem 46: 5885–5893.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Huang L, Luo Z, He F, Lu J, Li X (2010) Synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of berberine derivatives as dual inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. Bioorg Med Chem 18: 4475–4484.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Shi A, Huang L, Lu C, He F, Li X (2011) Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling of novel triazole-containing berberine derivatives as acetylcholinesterase and β-amyloid aggregation inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 19: 2298: 2305.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Krishnan P, Bastow K (2000) Mechanistic study of 9-ethoxyberberine as a unique DNA topoisomerase II poison. Anti-Cancer Drug Des 15: 255–264.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Pang JY, Qin Y, Chen WH, Luo GA, Jiang ZH (2005) Synthesis and DNA-binding affinities of monomodified berberines. Bioorg Med Chem 13: 5835–5840.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Long YH, Bai LP, Qin Y, Pang JY, Chen WH, et al. (2006) Spacer length and attaching position-dependent binding of synthesized protoberberine dimers to double-stranded DNA. Bioorg Med Chem 14: 4670–4676.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Zhang WJ, Ou TM, Lu YJ, Huang YY, Wu WB, et al. (2007) 9-Substituted berberine derivatives as G-quadruplex stabilizing ligands in telomeric DNA. Bioorg Med Chem 15: 5493–5501.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Ma Y, Ou TM, Hou JQ, Lu YJ, Tan JH, et al. (2008) 9-N-Substituted berberine derivatives: Stabilization of G-quadruplex DNA and down-regulation of oncogene c-myc. Bioorg Med Chem 16: 7582–7591.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Basu A, Jaisankar P, Suresh Kumar G (2012) Synthesis of novel 9–0-N-aryl/aryl-alkyl amino carbonyl methyl substituted berberine analogs and evaluation of DNA binding aspects. Bioorg Med Chem 20: 2498–2505.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Islam MM, Basu A, Hossain M, Sureshkumar G, Hotha S, et al. (2011) Enhanced DNA binding of 9-ω-amino alkyl ether analogs from the plant alkaloid berberine. DNA Cell Biol 30: 123–133.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Halimani M, Chandran SP, Kashyap S, Jadhav VM, Prasad BLV, et al. (2009) Dendritic effect of ligand-coated nanoparticles: Enhanced apoptotic activity of silica–berberine nanoconjugates. Langmuir 25: 2339–2347.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Ray A, Suresh Kumar G, Das S, Maiti M (1999) Spectroscopic studies on the interaction of aristololactam-β-D-glucoside with DNA and RNA double and triple helices: A comparative study. Biochemistry 38: 6239–6247.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Das S, Suresh Kumar G, Ray A, Maiti M (2003) Spectroscopic and thermodynamic studies on the binding of sanguinarine and berberine to triple and double helical DNA and RNA structures. J Biomol Struct Dyn 20: 703–714.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Bhadra K, Maiti M, Suresh Kumar G (2007) Molecular recognition of DNA by small molecules: AT base pair specific intercalative binding of cytotoxic plant alkaloid palmatine. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 1071–1080.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Islam MM, Roy Chowdhury S, Suresh Kumar G (2009) Spectroscopic and calorimetric studies on the binding of alkaloids berberine, palmatine and coralyne to double stranded RNA polynucleotides. J Phys Chem B 113: 1210–1224.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Scatchard G (1949) The attraction of proteins of small molecules and ions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 51: 660–672.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Sinha R, Hossain M, Suresh Kumar G (2007) RNA targeting by DNA binding drugs: Structural, conformational and energetic aspects of the binding of quinacrine and DAPI to A-form and HL-form of poly(rC).poly(rG). Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 1636–1650.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Sinha R, Islam MM, Bhadra K, Suresh Kumar G, Banerjee A, et al. (2006) The binding of DNA intercalating and non-intercalating compounds to A-form and protonated form of poly(rC).poly(rG): Spectroscopic and viscometric study. Bioorg Med Chem 14: 800–814.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Bhowmik D, Hossain M, Buzzetti F, D’Auria R, Lombardi P, et al. (2012) Biophysical studies on the effect of the 13 position substitution of the anticancer alkaloid berberine on its DNA binding. J Phys Chem B 116: 2314–2324.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
67. Sari MA, Battioni JP, Dupre D, Mansuy D, Le Pecq JB (1990) Interaction of cationic porphyrins with DNA: Importance of the number and position of the charges and minimum structural requirements for intercalation. Biochemistry 29: 4205–4215.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
68. Reinhardt CG, Roques BP, Le Pecq JB (1982) Binding of bifunctional ethidium intercalators to transfer RNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 104: 1376–1385.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
69. Scaria PV, Shafer RH (1991) Binding of ethidium bromide to a DNA triple helix. J Biol Chem 266: 5417–5423.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
70. Giri P, Suresh Kumar G (2008) Binding of protoberberine alkaloid coralyne with double stranded poly(A): A biophysical study. Mol BioSyst 4: 341–348.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
71. Islam MM, Pandya P, Kumar S, Suresh Kumar G (2009) RNA targeting through binding of small molecules: Studies on t-RNA binding by the cytotoxic protoberberine alkaloid coralyne. Mol BioSyst 5: 244–254.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
72. Islam MM, Sinha R, Suresh Kumar G (2007) RNA binding small molecules: Studies on t-RNA binding by cytotoxic plant alkaloids berberine, palmatine and the comparison to ethidium. Biophys Chem 125: 508–520.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
73. Giri P, Suresh Kumar G (2008) Self-structure induction in single stranded poly(A) by small molecules: Studies on DNA intercalators, partial intercalators and groove binding molecules. Arch Biochem Biophys 474: 183–192.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
74. McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1974) Theoretical aspects of DNA-protein interactions: Co-operative and non-co-operative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional homogeneous lattice. J Mol Biol 86: 469–489.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
75. Job P (1928) Formation and stability of inorganic complexes in solution. Ann Chim 9: 113–203.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
76. Huang CY (1982) Determination of binding stoichiometry by the continuous variation method: The Job plot. Methods Enzymol 87: 509–525.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
77. Lerman LS (1961) Structural considerations in the interaction of DNA and acridines. J Mol Biol 3: 18–30.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
78. Lakowicz JR (1983) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. New York: Plenum press. pp. 257–295.
79. Kumar CV, Asuncion EH (1992) Sequence dependent energy transfer from DNA to a simple aromatic chromophore. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 6: 470–472.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
80. Chaires JB (2006) A thermodynamic signature for drug–DNA binding mode. Arch Biochem Biophys 453: 26–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Escudé C, Francois JC, Sun JS, Ott G, Sprinzl M, et al. (1993) Stability of triple helices containing RNA and DNA strands: Experimental and molecular modeling studies. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 5547–5553.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Holland JA, Hoffman DW (1996) Structural features and stability of an RNA triple helix in solution. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 2841–2848.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Han H, Dervan PB (1993) Sequence-specific recognition of double helical RNA and RNA.DNA by triple helix formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 3806–3810.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Roberts RW, Crothers DM (1992) Stability and properties of double and triple helices: Dramatic effects of RNA or DNA backbone composition. Science 258: 1463–1466.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Maher LJ, Wold B, Dervan PB (1989) Inhibition of DNA binding proteins by oligonucleotide-directed triple helix formation. Science 245: 725–730.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Doan T Le, Perrouault L, Praseuth D, Habhoub N, Decout JL, et al. (1987) Sequence-specific recognition, photocrosslinking and cleavage of the DNA double helix by an oligo-(α]-thymidylate covalently linked to an azidoproflavine derivative. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 7749–7760.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Moser HE, Dervan PB (1987) Sequence-specific cleavage of double helical DNA by triple helix formation. Science 238: 645–650.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Felsenfeld G, Davies DR, Rich A (1957) Formation of a three-stranded polynucleotide molecule. J Am Chem Soc 79: 2023–2024.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kinniburgh AJ, Firulli AB, Kolluri R (1994) DNA triplexes and regulation of the c-myc gene. Gene 149: 93–100.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Kim SH, Quigley GJ, Suddath FL, McPherson A, Sneden D, et al. (1973) Three-dimensional structure of yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA: Folding of the polynucleotide chain. Science 179: 285–288.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Robertus JD, Ladner JE, Finch JT, Rhodes D, Brown RS, et al. (1974) Structure of yeast phenylalanine tRNA at 3 Å resolution. Nature 250: 546–551.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Michel F, Ellington AD, Couture S, Szostak JW (1990) Phylogenetic and genetic evidence for base-triples in the catalytic domain of group I introns. Nature 347: 578–580.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Green R, Szostak JW (1994) In vitro genetic analysis of the hinge region between helical elements P5-P4-P6 and P7-P3-P8 in the sunY group I self-splicing intron. J Mol Biol 235: 140–155.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Chastain M, Tinoco I (1992) A base-triple structural domain in RNA. Biochemistry 31: 12733–12741.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Puglisi JD, Tan R, Calnan BJ, Frankel AD, Williamson JR (1992) Conformation of the TAR RNA-arginine complex by NMR spectroscopy. Science 257: 76–80.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Puglisi JD, Chen L, Frankel AD, Williamson JR (1993) Role of RNA structure in arginine recognition of TAR RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 3680–3684.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Aboul-ela F, Karn J, Varani G (1995) The structure of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 TAR RNA reveals principles of RNA recognition by Tat protein. J Mol Biol 253: 313–332.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Dinman JD, Richter S, Plant EP, Taylor RC, Hammell AB, et al. (2002) The frameshift signal of HIV-1 involves a potential intramolecular triplex RNA structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 5331–5336.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Jain A, Bacolla A, Chakraborty P, Grosse F, Vasquez KM (2010) Human DHX9 helicase unwinds triple-helical DNA structures. Biochemistry 49: 6992–6999.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Mattick JS, Taft RJ, Faulkner GJ (2010) A global view of genomic information-moving beyond the gene and the master regulator. Trends Genet 26: 21–28.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Martianov I, Ramadass A, Barros AS, Chow N, Akoulitchev A (2007) Repression of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene by a non-coding interfering transcript. Nature 445: 666–670.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Schmitz KM, Mayer C, Postepska A, Grummt I (2010) Interaction of noncoding RNA with the rDNA promoter mediates recruitment of DNMT3b and silencing of rRNA genes. Genes Dev 24: 2264–2269.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Kanak M, Alseiari M, Balasubramanian P, Addanki K, Aggarwal M, et al. (2010) Triplex-forming microRNAs form stable complexes with HIV-1 provirus and inhibit its replication. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 18: 532–545.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Zheng R, Shen Z, Tripathi V, Xuan Z, Freier SM, et al. (2010) Polypurine-repeat-containing RNAs: A novel class of long non-coding RNA in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 123: 3734–3744.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Buske FA, Mattick JS, Bailey TL (2011) Potential in vivo roles of nucleic acid triple-helices. RNA Biol 8: 427–439.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Klinck R, Guittet E, Liquier J, Taillandier E, Gouyette C, et al. (1994) Spectroscopic evidence for an intramolecular RNA triple helix. FEBS Lett 355: 297–300.
View Article
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Liquier J, Taillandier E, Klinck R, Guittet E, Gouyette C, et al. (1995) Spectroscopic studies of chimeric DNA-RNA and RNA 29-base intramolecular triple helices. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 1722–1728.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Fox KR, Raj D (2004) Small molecule DNA and RNA binders: From synthesis to nucleic acid. In: Demeunynck M, Bailly C, Wilson WD, editors. Triple Helix-Specific Ligands. pp. 360–383.

[ref29] 29. Keppler MD, Read MA, Perry PJ, Trent JO, Jenkins TC, et al. (1999) Stabilization of DNA triple helices by a series of mono- and disubstituted amido anthraquinones. Eur J Biochem 263: 817–825.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Song Y, Feng L, Ren J, Qu X (2011) Stabilization of unstable CGC+ triplex DNA by single-walled carbon nanotubes under physiological conditions. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 6835–6843.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Arya DP (2011) New approaches toward recognition of nucleic acid triple helices. Acc Chem Res 44: 134–146.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Sinha R, Suresh Kumar G (2009) Interaction of isoquinoline alkaloids with an RNA triplex: Structural and thermodynamic studies of berberine, palmatine, and coralyne binding to poly(U).poly(A)*poly(U). J Phys Chem B 113: 13410–13420.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Choi MS, Yuk DY, Oh JH, Jung H, Han SB, et al. (2008) Berberine inhibits human neuroblastoma cell growth through induction of p53-dependent apoptosis. Anticancer Res 28: 3777–3784.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Ho YT, Lu CC, Yang JS, Chiang JH, Li TC, et al. (2009) Berberine induced apoptosis via promoting the expression of caspase-8, -9 and -3, apoptosis-inducing factor and endonuclease G in SCC-4 human tongue squamous carcinoma cancer cells. Anticancer Res 29: 4063–4070.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Hsu WH, Hsieh YS, Kuo HC, Teng CY, Huang HI, et al. (2007) Berberine induces apoptosis in SW620 human colonic carcinoma cells through generation of reactive oxygen species and activation of JNK/p38 MAPK and FasL. Arch Toxicol 81: 719–728.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Patil JB, Kim J, Jayaprakasha GK (2010) Berberine induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) through mitochondrial-dependent pathway. Eur J Pharmacol 645: 70–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Auyeung KK, Ko JK (2009) Coptis chinensis inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth through nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene activation. Int J Mol Med 24: 571–577.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Yu FS, Yang JS, Lin HJ, Yu CS, Tan TW, et al. (2007) Berberine inhibits WEHI-3 leukemia cells in vivo. In Vivo 21: 407–412.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. James MA, Fu H, Liu Y, Chen DR, You M (2011) Dietary administration of berberine or phellodendron amurense extract inhibits cell cycle progression and lung tumorigenesis. Mol Carcinogen 50: 1–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Kim DW, Ahan SH, Kim TY (2007) Enhancement of arsenic trioxide (As2O3)-mediated apoptosis using berberine in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42: 392–399.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Tan W, Li Y, Chen M, Wang Y (2011) Berberine hydrochloride: Anticancer activity and nanoparticulate delivery system. Int J Nanomedicine 6: 1773–1777.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Sharma NK, Lunawat P, Dixit M (2011) Binding studies of natural product berberine with DNA G-Quadruplex. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 7: 130–134.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Ferraroni M, Bazzicalupi C, Bilia AR, Gratteri P (2011) X-Ray diffraction analyses of the natural isoquinoline alkaloids berberine and sanguinarine complexed with double helix DNA d(CGTACG). Chem Commun 47: 4917–4919.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Bhadra K, Suresh Kumar G (2011) Therapeutic potential of nucleic acid-binding isoquinoline alkaloids: Binding aspects and implications for drug design. Med Res Rev 31: 821–862.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Giri P, Suresh Kumar G (2010) Isoquinoline alkaloids and their binding with polyadenylic acid: Potential basis of therapeutic action. Mini Rev Med Chem 10: 568–577.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Islam MM, Basu A, Suresh Kumar G (2011) Binding of 9-O-(ω-amino) alkyl ether analogues of the plant alkaloid berberine to poly(A): Insights into self-structure induction. Med Chem Comm 2: 631–637.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Ma Y, Ou TM, Tan JH, Hou JQ, Huang SL, et al. (2009) Synthesis and evaluation of 9-O-substituted berberine derivatives containing aza-aromatic terminal group as highly selective telomeric G-quadruplex stabilizing ligands. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19: 3414–3417.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Shan WJ, Huang L, Zhou Q, Meng FC, Li XS (2011) Synthesis, biological evaluation of 9-N-substituted berberine derivatives as multi-functional agents of antioxidant, inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and amyloid-β aggregation. Eur J Med Chem 46: 5885–5893.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Huang L, Luo Z, He F, Lu J, Li X (2010) Synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of berberine derivatives as dual inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase. Bioorg Med Chem 18: 4475–4484.
View Article
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Shi A, Huang L, Lu C, He F, Li X (2011) Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling of novel triazole-containing berberine derivatives as acetylcholinesterase and β-amyloid aggregation inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 19: 2298: 2305.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Krishnan P, Bastow K (2000) Mechanistic study of 9-ethoxyberberine as a unique DNA topoisomerase II poison. Anti-Cancer Drug Des 15: 255–264.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Pang JY, Qin Y, Chen WH, Luo GA, Jiang ZH (2005) Synthesis and DNA-binding affinities of monomodified berberines. Bioorg Med Chem 13: 5835–5840.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Long YH, Bai LP, Qin Y, Pang JY, Chen WH, et al. (2006) Spacer length and attaching position-dependent binding of synthesized protoberberine dimers to double-stranded DNA. Bioorg Med Chem 14: 4670–4676.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Zhang WJ, Ou TM, Lu YJ, Huang YY, Wu WB, et al. (2007) 9-Substituted berberine derivatives as G-quadruplex stabilizing ligands in telomeric DNA. Bioorg Med Chem 15: 5493–5501.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Ma Y, Ou TM, Hou JQ, Lu YJ, Tan JH, et al. (2008) 9-N-Substituted berberine derivatives: Stabilization of G-quadruplex DNA and down-regulation of oncogene c-myc. Bioorg Med Chem 16: 7582–7591.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Basu A, Jaisankar P, Suresh Kumar G (2012) Synthesis of novel 9–0-N-aryl/aryl-alkyl amino carbonyl methyl substituted berberine analogs and evaluation of DNA binding aspects. Bioorg Med Chem 20: 2498–2505.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Islam MM, Basu A, Hossain M, Sureshkumar G, Hotha S, et al. (2011) Enhanced DNA binding of 9-ω-amino alkyl ether analogs from the plant alkaloid berberine. DNA Cell Biol 30: 123–133.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Halimani M, Chandran SP, Kashyap S, Jadhav VM, Prasad BLV, et al. (2009) Dendritic effect of ligand-coated nanoparticles: Enhanced apoptotic activity of silica–berberine nanoconjugates. Langmuir 25: 2339–2347.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Ray A, Suresh Kumar G, Das S, Maiti M (1999) Spectroscopic studies on the interaction of aristololactam-β-D-glucoside with DNA and RNA double and triple helices: A comparative study. Biochemistry 38: 6239–6247.
View Article
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Das S, Suresh Kumar G, Ray A, Maiti M (2003) Spectroscopic and thermodynamic studies on the binding of sanguinarine and berberine to triple and double helical DNA and RNA structures. J Biomol Struct Dyn 20: 703–714.
View Article
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Bhadra K, Maiti M, Suresh Kumar G (2007) Molecular recognition of DNA by small molecules: AT base pair specific intercalative binding of cytotoxic plant alkaloid palmatine. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 1071–1080.
View Article
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Islam MM, Roy Chowdhury S, Suresh Kumar G (2009) Spectroscopic and calorimetric studies on the binding of alkaloids berberine, palmatine and coralyne to double stranded RNA polynucleotides. J Phys Chem B 113: 1210–1224.
View Article
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Scatchard G (1949) The attraction of proteins of small molecules and ions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 51: 660–672.
View Article
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Sinha R, Hossain M, Suresh Kumar G (2007) RNA targeting by DNA binding drugs: Structural, conformational and energetic aspects of the binding of quinacrine and DAPI to A-form and HL-form of poly(rC).poly(rG). Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 1636–1650.
View Article
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Sinha R, Islam MM, Bhadra K, Suresh Kumar G, Banerjee A, et al. (2006) The binding of DNA intercalating and non-intercalating compounds to A-form and protonated form of poly(rC).poly(rG): Spectroscopic and viscometric study. Bioorg Med Chem 14: 800–814.
View Article
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Bhowmik D, Hossain M, Buzzetti F, D’Auria R, Lombardi P, et al. (2012) Biophysical studies on the effect of the 13 position substitution of the anticancer alkaloid berberine on its DNA binding. J Phys Chem B 116: 2314–2324.
View Article
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Sari MA, Battioni JP, Dupre D, Mansuy D, Le Pecq JB (1990) Interaction of cationic porphyrins with DNA: Importance of the number and position of the charges and minimum structural requirements for intercalation. Biochemistry 29: 4205–4215.
View Article
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Reinhardt CG, Roques BP, Le Pecq JB (1982) Binding of bifunctional ethidium intercalators to transfer RNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 104: 1376–1385.
View Article
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Scaria PV, Shafer RH (1991) Binding of ethidium bromide to a DNA triple helix. J Biol Chem 266: 5417–5423.
View Article
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Giri P, Suresh Kumar G (2008) Binding of protoberberine alkaloid coralyne with double stranded poly(A): A biophysical study. Mol BioSyst 4: 341–348.
View Article
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. Islam MM, Pandya P, Kumar S, Suresh Kumar G (2009) RNA targeting through binding of small molecules: Studies on t-RNA binding by the cytotoxic protoberberine alkaloid coralyne. Mol BioSyst 5: 244–254.
View Article
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] Google Scholar

[ref72] 72. Islam MM, Sinha R, Suresh Kumar G (2007) RNA binding small molecules: Studies on t-RNA binding by cytotoxic plant alkaloids berberine, palmatine and the comparison to ethidium. Biophys Chem 125: 508–520.
View Article
Google Scholar

[213] View Article

[214] Google Scholar

[ref73] 73. Giri P, Suresh Kumar G (2008) Self-structure induction in single stranded poly(A) by small molecules: Studies on DNA intercalators, partial intercalators and groove binding molecules. Arch Biochem Biophys 474: 183–192.
View Article
Google Scholar

[216] View Article

[217] Google Scholar

[ref74] 74. McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1974) Theoretical aspects of DNA-protein interactions: Co-operative and non-co-operative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional homogeneous lattice. J Mol Biol 86: 469–489.
View Article
Google Scholar

[219] View Article

[220] Google Scholar

[ref75] 75. Job P (1928) Formation and stability of inorganic complexes in solution. Ann Chim 9: 113–203.
View Article
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] Google Scholar

[ref76] 76. Huang CY (1982) Determination of binding stoichiometry by the continuous variation method: The Job plot. Methods Enzymol 87: 509–525.
View Article
Google Scholar

[225] View Article

[226] Google Scholar

[ref77] 77. Lerman LS (1961) Structural considerations in the interaction of DNA and acridines. J Mol Biol 3: 18–30.
View Article
Google Scholar

[228] View Article

[229] Google Scholar

[ref78] 78. Lakowicz JR (1983) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. New York: Plenum press. pp. 257–295.

[ref79] 79. Kumar CV, Asuncion EH (1992) Sequence dependent energy transfer from DNA to a simple aromatic chromophore. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 6: 470–472.
View Article
Google Scholar

[232] View Article

[233] Google Scholar

[ref80] 80. Chaires JB (2006) A thermodynamic signature for drug–DNA binding mode. Arch Biochem Biophys 453: 26–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[235] View Article

[236] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Methodology/Principal Findings

Conclusions/Significance

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Biochemicals

Preparation of Stock Solutions

Absorbance Spectroscopy

Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Evaluation of Binding Affinity from Spectroscopic Results

Optical Thermal Melting Experiments

Measurement of Energy Transfer

Fluorescence Polarization Anisotropy Measurements

Fluorescence Quenching Experiments

Viscosity Measurements

Circular Dichroism Studies

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Results and Discussion

Electronic Absorption Spectral Studies of the Binding

Spectrofluorimetric Studies

Evaluation of the Binding Affinities from Absorbance and Fluorescence Titration Data

Complex Formation Stoichiometry (Job plot)

Optical Thermal Denaturation Studies and Analysis of the Stabilization Effects

Binding Mode of Berberine Analogs from Fluorescence and Viscosity Studies

Determination of Quantum Efficiency

Conformational Aspects of the Binding

Binding Thermodynamics: Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Figure S2.

Table S1.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References