Proteomic Study Related to Vascular Connections in Watermelon Scions Grafted onto Bottle-Gourd Rootstock under Different Light Intensities

Sowbiya Muneer; Chung Ho Ko; Prabhakaran Soundararajan; Abinaya Manivnnan; Yoo Gyeong Park; Byoung Ryong Jeong

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120899

Abstract

Although grafting is broadly used in the production of crops, no information is available about the proteins involved in vascular connections between rootstock and scion. Similarly, proteome changes under the light intensities widely used for grafted seedlings are of practical use. The objective of this study was to determine the proteome of vascular connections using watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as the rootstock grown under different light intensities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹). Our proteomic analysis revealed 24 and 27 differentially expressed proteins in ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’, respectively, under different light intensities. The identified proteins were largely involved in ion binding, amino acid metabolism, transcriptional regulation and defense response. The enhancement of ion-binding, transcriptional regulation, amino acid metabolism, and defense response proteins suggests a strengthening of the connection between the rootstock and scion under high light intensity. Indeed, the accumulation of key enzymes in the biological processes described above appears to play an important role in the vascular connections of grafted seedlings. Moreover, it appears that 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ results in better protein expression responses in grafted seedlings.

Citation: Muneer S, Ko CH, Soundararajan P, Manivnnan A, Park YG, Jeong BR (2015) Proteomic Study Related to Vascular Connections in Watermelon Scions Grafted onto Bottle-Gourd Rootstock under Different Light Intensities. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899

Academic Editor: Zhilong Bie, Huazhong Agricultural University, CHINA

Received: October 24, 2014; Accepted: January 27, 2015; Published: March 19, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Muneer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All data are fully attached to the paper.

Funding: This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (Project No. 312034-04). SM, CHK, PS, AM and YGP were supported by a scholarship from BK21 programme, Ministry of Education, Korea. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Grafting is widely used in the production of fruit and vegetable crops [1–2] to benefit soil-grown plants with regard to biotic and abiotic stress tolerance for enhanced development [3–4]. In horticulture, grafting is largely used to facilitate crop growth in soil infected with possible soil-borne pathogens [5–6]. A successful grafting is a complex biochemical and structural process that starts with the union of two organisms, followed by callus development and the formation of a functional vascular system [7]. The graft union development is a sophisticated process due to which histological and physiological variations such as initiation and development of organ regeneration are perceived, indeed the exchange of genetic material between different cells of rootstock and scion can also be ensued [8–9]. The morphological and vascular connections using numerous imaging techniques and common histological methods have been extensively studied in several graft union plants [9–12]. At the molecular levels, several recent studies have reported important factors underlying graft union formation [13–16] and have revealed essential genes related to plant hormones, cell cycle, metabolism and signal transduction. The morphological, physiological and few molecular changes during graft union formation have been well documented [10–11]. However, it remains unclear how the two organisms can share a vascular connection after successful grafting. It is possible that a mechanism revealed at the proteome level can provide key information about the proteins/genes involved in the vascular connections of grafted plants.

The fundamental aspect of plant growth is light, which act as an energy source for photosynthesis and an environmental signal which regard to its intensity, wavelength and direction [17]. Light signals also play a key role in regulating plant hormone signaling mechanisms, such as changes in auxin, abscisic acid (ABA), and gibberellic acid (GA) [18–20]. Similarly, at practical point of view the grafted plants also require environmental control especially light quality and intensity during healing and acclimatization process [21–22] to increase chances for vascular bundles of rootstock and scion to come in contact. Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are being used as an efficient source of light for growing high quality of plants in a closed plant growth chambers. Light emitting diodes are suitable for small mass, safety and durability for better growth and development of plants [17, 23–25]. Indeed it has been observed that light emitting diodes (LEDs) mostly red, blue and white have a good special characteristic and spectral width that can match light quality needed for successful grafting [21–22]. However, a major challenge for successful grafting is also supplying an efficient quantity and quality of light. A possible combinations of different light emitting diodes (LEDs) particularly combination of red, blue and white (R:B:W) at different light intensities can reveal an optimal and suitable light intensity for effective grafting.

Although grafting is largely used in the production of vegetable and fruit-bearing crops for adaptation to biotic and abiotic stress, no information is available about the proteins involved in vascular connections between the rootstock and scion when two different species are grafted together. However, proteomic-based studies can significantly help to reveal the possible relationships between rootstock and scion vascular connections. Similarly, it is also important to determine the changes that occur with the light intensities widely used for growing grafted plants and determine optimal light intensity for practical purposes. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the proteome of vascular connections (the connected portion of the rootstock and scion) using watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as the rootstock under different light intensities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD).

Material and Methods

Plant materials, grafting procedure and treatments

The commercial available watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings were collected from Chojeon Nursery Farm, Gyeongsangnamdo Jinju-city Geumsan-Myeon Jungcheon-ri 507, Korea (a private farm which commercially sells grafted plants and no specific permissions are needed for collection of plants). The two scion genotypes grafted on rootstocks were selected as these two cultivars are extensively used for grafting purpose in Korea because of highest rate of germination and fruit quality. Grafting process was implemented by sharp dissecting blade seven days post-germination. Seedlings were selected with uniform length and was cut transversely. The rootstock was cut close to the shoot apical meristem and scion was cut intermediate from the base of the hypocotyl. The forceps were used to retain the seedlings firm while cutting. The wounding were made swiftly to keep the lesions clean and smooth. The scion was up-lifted to bring it to the rootstock, and the rootstock was carefully picked up to approach the scions and connect them together. The rootstock and scion was carefully adjusted at the graft junctions and was carefully sealed with a grafting clips. The grafted plants were grown under combination of white:red:blue light emitting diodes (LEDs) at different photon flux densities of (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD). The different photon flux density was measured using a portable photo/radiometer HD-2102.2 (Delta, OHM, Padova, Italy) and was separately controlled by adjusting both electric currents and number of light bulbs for the LEDs. All treatments were done in a culture room, employing separate plots for the different light intensities. The room was ventilated to maintain the CO₂ level the same as that of the outside atmosphere. The relative humidity was maintained at 98±2% with a 12 h photoperiod and a temperature of 23°C during the light and dark period. After two weeks of grafting grown under different light intensities graft union (vascular portions) were excised smoothly 2–3 cm around the grafted junction and immediately frozen in liquid N₂ and stored in a deep-freezer (-80°C) for further analysis. For physiological measurements the grafted plants were observed 4 days after grafting up to 2 weeks. The time point for physiological observations (4 d-2 weeks) were selected as physiological changes occur after 24–48 h prior to morphological changes such as formation of brownish layers. Proteomic study in graft union was studied 2 weeks after grafting since callus formation occurs after 2–3 weeks prior to grafting and exchange of proteins and genetic material between graft unions are more available at this point.

Measurement of biomass and hardness of vascular connections

The biomass of rootstock and scion (around graft union) harvested from 4 days up to 2 weeks were constantly weighed on weighing balance and were recorded respectively. The hardness of rootstock and scion (around graft union) were observed by pressure tester (DFT-01, Proem, Italy).

Protein sample preparation

The vascular (connected portion between rootstock and scion) portion of rootstock and scion were smoothly cut down 2–3 cm 2 weeks during healing process after grafting with the help of sharp razor and were homogenised in liquid nitrogen in precooled pestle and mortar. The proteins were extracted in commercially available protein extraction buffer kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. About 2–3 ml of extraction buffer contacting 8M urea, 4% CHAPS, 40 mM Tris, 0.2% (w/v) bio-lyte (pI 3–10) were added to 100 mg of powdered frozen samples. The samples were vortexed and placed on ice, then sonicated with an ultrasonic probe to disrupt the cells and fragments of the genomic DNA (S1 Fig.). The sonicated samples were centrifuged at maximum speed in a microcetrifuge for 20 min at 4°C to pellet down the cell debris. The resulting supernatant were transferred to a clean e-tubes and extracted protein samples in the form of supernatant was quantified by Bradford using BSA as a standard curve.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and staining

For isoelectric focussing (IEF), the Multiphor II system (GE Healthcare) and IPG strip (pH 4–7, nonlinear, 11 cm, GE Healthcare) were used according to manufacturer’s instructions with minor modifications. To minimize experimental errors, extracted protein samples from three biological replicates were subjected to focussing at the same time. The dry IPG strips were rehydrated for 12 h in 250 μl rehydration buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) containing 70 μg of protein. Focussing was performed at 20°C at a current limit of 50 μA per IPG strip at 20°C in four steps: 200 V for 0:01 (h:min), 3500 V for 1:00 (h:min), 3500 V for 1:30 (h:min) and a final step 3500 V for 1–2 h until the final volt reaches to 10000 Vh. The gel strips were then equilibrated by incubating on a shaker in 2–3 ml of an equilibration buffer 1 for 30 min [8M urea, 2% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1% DTT] followed by 2–3 ml of an equilibration buffer 2 for 30 min [same content as equilibration buffer 1 except DTT was replaced by 2.5% iodoacetamide]. The second dimension was performed on 12.5% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gels on PROTEAN II (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with a constant voltage of 70 V for 4–5 h until the run was complete. For molecular weight of proteins, commercial pre-stained molecular marker (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam-City, South Korea) were run on one side of the SDS-PAGE gels. Protein spots were visualized by staining 2D gels with silver stain. The stained gels were scanned using a high resolution scanner (EPSON) and gel images were analyzed using PD-Quest basic software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The 2D gels were stored in 1% acetic acid until further analysis.

Image and data analysis

In each treatment, three independent biological replicate plants were taken. Gels were taken under constant settings by a photo imager. The protein spots from all 2-DE gels were matched to have the same number across all gels. A master gel image containing matched spots across all gels was auto-generated. The missing spots from the 2-DE gels were resolved using an extensive analysis ‘landmark’ tool and respective spot volumes were normalized according to the total gel image density as recommended by the PD-Quest software (version 7.2.0; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The gels from all the treatments were compared by creating three different replicate groups, and each replicate group contained the gel images corresponding to a specific treatment. In each group, an average quantity was determined for each spot, and pairwise quantitative and statistical analysis sets were generated by comparing the volume of a given spot across all treatments. The statistical significance of the quantitative data was determined by student’s t-test (n = 3, p <0.05) at a 95% confidence level. Where the identified proteins showed a 1.5-fold or more change in the amount among all treatments.

Protein in gel digestion

The differential protein spots were excised manually from the 2D gels with the help of a clean razor blade and were chopped into small pieces. The excised spots were transferred to 0.5 ml clean microfuge tubes. The gel pieces were destained with freshly-prepared 30 μl of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of the two destained reagents K₃[Fe(CN)₆] (potassium ferricyanide) and Na₂S₂O₃ (sodium thiosulphate pentahydrate) by incubating for 30 min at room temperature with gentle agitation. The destaining solution was removed and gel particles were washed with distill water and 50 mM NH₄HCO₃/ACN (v/v) for 15 min. The gel particles were then covered again with ACN for 2–5 min. The gel particles were then dried in a vacuum centrifuge. After drying the gel particles were rehydrated in 10 mM dithiotreiotol/50 mM NH₄HCO₃ by incubating at 56°C for 45 min. The e-tubes containing gel particles were cooled to room temperature in dark conditions and a rehydrated solution was removed. The gel particles were again washed with 50 mM NH₄HCO₃ and ACN with one or two changes for 15 min per change. The gel particles were covered with ACN to shrink the gel pieces. The gel particles were dried in a vacuum centrifuge. After washing steps, the gel particles were treated with freshly prepared 5 ng of trypsin (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) prepared in 1 M HCl to cover the gel and was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. After incubation the excess enzyme was removed carefully and approximately 2–3 μl 25 mM of NH₄HCO₃ was added to keep gel wet overnight at 37°C. After overnight incubation the microfuge tubes containing gel particles were spun down and resulting supernatants (peptide mixtures) were collected in new microfuge tubes. The resulting peptides were vacuum dried and dried peptides were dissolved in a 3–5 μl of sample solution containing 50% ACN and 0.1% trifluroacetic acid (TFA). The solutions were stored at-20°C until further use.

Protein identification using MALDI-TOF MS and MALDI-TOF/TOF MS

The digested peptide solution (in 50% ACN, 0.1% TFA) was spotted onto the MALDI-TOF/TOF target plate with a pipette. MALDI-MS analysis was performed with a Voyager DE-STR mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA). The peptide fragmentation spectra were detected and collected in the reflection/delayed mode. The data were analyzed with MoverZ (http://www.proteomics.com) and the MASCOT database (http://www.matrixscience.com). All MALDI-TOF MS spectra were searched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) protein database (version 20131215; 35099569 sequences). Single missed cleavage, oxidation of methionine, and cysteine modified by iodoacetamide were allowed for database searching for protein identification. An ABI 4800 Plus TOF–TOF Mass Spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA) was employed for MS and MS/MS analyses of the peptides. The instrument was set at 200 Hz ND: 355 nm YAG laser operations. Signal/noise ratios > 25 and the ten with higher intense ions were used to following MS/MS analysis in 1 kV mode, 1000–1250 consecutive laser exposure. The MS and MS/MS spectra data were analyzed using NCBI and Protein Pilot V.3.0 database software (with the MASCOT V.2.3.02 database search engine) at 50 ppm of mass tolerance. Single missing pick, oxidation of methionines, and carbamidomethylation of cysteines were allowed for the MS/MS spectra search in the databases. Individual peptide ions scores were searched using a statistically significant threshold value of p = 0.05.

Protein functional classifications

The identified proteins were classified into different categories of biological processes in which they are involved according to gene ontology (http://www.geneontology.org/).

Vascular staining (absorbable flower dye blue staining)

Vascular staining method was followed as described previously by Olmstead et al. [11]. Samples were fixed in 0.1% absorbable flower dye blue for 20–30 min and were rinsed with water. The rootstock and scion samples were then cut into transverse and longitudinal section with the help of sharp surgical razor/blade and were observed under light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ci-S/Ci-L, Japan)

Results and Discussion

Physiological response

The physiological responses in vascular connections were studied to select optimal time point for proteomic analysis after grafting under different light intensities. Moreover, physiological responses were studied to support the hypothesis that 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 are optimal light intensity for better plant growth and development after grafting. The physiological responses such as biomass of scion and rootstock (grafted portion/vascular connection) (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D) showed highest values at 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 compare to other light intensities two weeks after grafting. Furthermore, the graft union pressure tester showed highest hardness of graft union at 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 and lowest at 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 light intensity (Fig. 1E and 1F) two weeks after grafting. Generally the non-grafted plants (normal) have also previously shown that 100–200 μmol m^-2 s^-1 light intensity are optimal for increased biomass of plants such as in Lactuca sativa [17] and Cassia angustifolia [26]. Therefore, our results supported the hypothesis that higher light intensity (100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 as shown by our results) might be an optimal light intensity for better graft union formation in watermelon (C. vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (L. siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as the rootstock.

Download:

Fig 1. Scion/ rootstock fresh weight and hardness in watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).

(A-C) scion/rootstock fresh weight of ‘Sambok-Honey’ (B-D) scion/ rootstock fresh weight of ‘Speed’ (E) hardness of ‘Sambok-Honey’ (F) hardness of ‘Speed’.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.g001

Two-dimensional (2-DE) protein profile in the rootstock and scion vascular connection

The protein profile distribution patterns in 2-DE images from the grafted portions of watermelon (C. vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (L. siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as the rootstock grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD) showed considerable variations (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). According to a detailed comparison of 2D images analyzed by PD-Quest software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA USA), at least 455 protein spots were detected on each gel. Among the 455 protein spots, 24 proteins from ‘Sambok Honey’ and 27 from ‘Speed’ were differentially expressed under the different intensities of light. It was observed that under 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1, the protein spots were mostly down-regulated or absent compared to the other light intensities (50 and 75 μmol m^-2 s^-1). Highly up-regulated proteins were observed under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1.

Download:

Fig 2. 2-DE reference maps of vascular connections (connected portions) in watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).

Proteins from vascular connections (70 μg) were elctrofocused on a pH 4–7 IPG strip (11 cm), separated onto 12.5% (w/v) SDS-PAGE. The gels were silver stained and visualized as described in experimental section. Protein spots marked by arrows were identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS as described in experimental sections.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.g002

Download:

Fig 3. 2-DE reference maps of vascular connections (connected portions) in watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).

Proteins from vascular connections (70 μg) were elctrofocused on a pH 4–7 IPG strip (11 cm), separated onto 12.5% (w/v) SDS-PAGE. The gels were silver stained and visualized as described in experimental section. Protein spots marked by arrows were identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS as described in experimental sections.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.g003

A gel-based analysis showed that protein spots were highly down-regulated under 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 light intensity, they were highly up-regulated under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1. The down-regulation of protein spots under 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 showed a progressive depletion of proteins involved in signaling and amino acid biosynthesis, which are important processes for protein synthesis [27–28]. A progressive decrease in protein synthesis under a low light intensity (25 μmol m^-2 s^-1) also suggests that a limited amount of light may be associated with the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the vessels (xylem and phloem) of grafted plants during photosynthesis and transpiration, leading to incorrect protein folding or protein degradation. A reduction in protein synthesis has been observed in several plants [29–31] under abiotic stress. Indeed, protein degradation was previously observed in bottle gourd rootstock-grafted watermelon seedlings [4] under salt stress. Although grafting is being used to protect crop plants from several biotic/abiotic stresses, it is still unclear which light intensity may be optimal for the healing of the mechanical injury suffered during the process of grafting. Based on our results, we propose that 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 can be used as an optimal light intensity to prevent protein loss, especially proteins involved in rootstock-scion vascular connections.

Protein identification and functional classification by MALDI/TOF/TOF-MS

The differentially expressed proteins related to vascular connections (connected grafted portion) between watermelon scions grafted onto bottle gourd rootstock under different light intensities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1) were then identified. Twenty-four ‘Sambok Honey’ protein spots differentially expressed under different light intensities were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS) (Table 1). The seven up-regulated proteins under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 are related to ion binding and identified as Putative DAK2 domain-containing protein (spot 11), RNA recognition motif (spot 17), Receptor kinase LRK10 (spot 18), Maturase K (19), 50S ribosomal protein L2 (spot 20), and Alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (spots 21 and 22).

Download:

Table 1. Proteins identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS in watermelon ‘Sambok Honey’ as the scion and bottle gourd ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.t001

The other 3 proteins are related to amino acid biosynthesis and identified as ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit (spots 5 and 23) and cysteine synthase (spot 6). Another important protein was found to be related to defense response and was identified as disease resistance protein (spot 7). In addition to proteins related to translocation (predicted as translocation of nutrient material through phloem), proteins related to carbohydrate metabolism, beta-galactosidase (spot 3) and beta-amylase (spot 14), were also identified. Another important protein in vascular connections was found to be related to the movement of tubules, Inner arm dynein 3–2 (spots 8 and 13)

Moreover, some of the proteins identified are related to signaling and secondary metabolism: Homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-7 (spot 1) and transcription elongation factor SPT4 homolog (spot 2), and Galactosyltransferase family protein (spot 16). Additionally, some proteins were not identified and were listed under the category of unidentified proteins and uncharacterized proteins (spots 4, 9, 10, 12, 15, and 24).

All identified proteins were classified into different categories based on their biological function (www.geneontology.com) (Fig. 4A). Most of the proteins identified in the vascular connections of bottle gourd rootstock-grafted watermelon fell under the categories of ion binding (22%), amino acid biosynthesis (9%), defense response (5%), carbohydrate metabolism (9%), transcriptional regulation (9%), microtubule-based movement (9%), secondary metabolism (13%) and uncharacterized proteins (18%).

Download:

Fig 4. Functional classification of identified proteins from vascular connections (connected portions) in watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).

(A) ‘Sambok honey’ (B) ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ PPFD). The proteins identified were classified based on their putative biological functions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.g004

The vascular connection proteins identified in the ‘Speed’ cultivar were very similar to those of the ‘Sambok Honey’ cultivar. Twenty-seven proteins were revealed as differentially expressed among 25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1. The up- and down-regulated proteins among the different light intensities are mostly related to ion binding and amino acid biosynthesis (Table 2) and were identified as P-glycoprotein 17 (spot 18), annexin (spot 20), magnesium-protoporphyrin (spot 22), ATP synthase subunit alpha (spot 23), large subunit GTPase (spot 26), phenylacetaldehyde synthase (spot 17) and thiamine biosynthesis family protein (spot 25). Two other important vascular connection proteins were found to be related to defense response: disease resistance family protein (spot 5) and catalase (spot 6).

Download:

Table 2. Proteins identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS in watermelon ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.t002

The other proteins identified from vascular connections (speed cultivar) are associated with transcription and include transcription elongation factor SPT4 homolog (spot 7) and DNA-directed RNA polymerase (spots 11 and 16). Other proteins identified from ‘Speed’ under different light intensities are related to lipid transport (nonspecific lipid transfer, spot 4), DNA binding (DNA-binding bromodomain-containing family protein, spot 8), ATP transport (calcium-binding transporter-like protein, spot 14), biosynthesis process (chalcone synthase, spot 14), signal peptide processing (S24 like peptidase, spot 21), and a most important protein related to protein biosynthesis (isoform cytoplasmic of alanine—tRNA ligase, spot 27).

Proteins related to secondary metabolism were also revealed and identified as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (spots 9 and 10), UDP-glucoronosyl/UDP-glucosyl transferase family protein (spot 12), and AT5g46390/MPL12_19 (spot 13). The remaining proteins were not identified and categorized as predicted protein (spot 3) and uncharacterized proteins (spots 1, 2 and 24).

All the proteins identified from ‘Speed’ were classified into 12 categories according to gene ontology (www.geneontology.com) (Fig. 4B). The identified proteins were grouped in the classifications of amino acid metabolism (11%), ion binding (25%), defense response (7%), transcription factor (14%), DNA binding (3%), protein synthesis (3%), signal peptide processing (3%), Biosynthesis process (3%), ATP transport (3%), lipid transport (3%), secondary metabolism (7%) and uncharacterized proteins (18%).

Amino acid biosynthesis response proteins

Five proteins closely related to amino acid biosynthesis (see Tables 1 and 2, biological function) were identified by the proteomic analysis. The up-regulation of these proteins, particularly under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1, in the vascular connections of grafting suggests that amino acid biosynthesis is promoted via the rootstock [4, 21] and that these proteins might be involved in the transport and accumulation of ions to the scion during the healing process [32–33]. Accordingly, the accumulation of enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis in the vascular portion of grafted watermelon will possibly depend on a strong ability to take up nutrient ions, such as nitrogen and iron, by the root system of bottle gourd. It was also observed that amino acid biosynthetic proteins were largely down-regulated under low light intensities (25, 50, and 70 μmol m^-2 s^-1), in contrast to the up-regulation under higher light intensity (100 μmol m^-2 s^-1). These results indicate that the biosynthesis of proteins related to amino acid metabolism is intensified for transport processes between the rootstock and scion under higher light intensity. Moreover, it was also revealed that 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 light is the optimal condition for successful grafting.

Defense response proteins

Defense response proteins play an important role in ameliorating the effects of several abiotic stresses [34–35]. It is also believed that proteins related to defense responses play a significant role in healing during grafting [6, 15]. The proteins related to defense mechanism group was earlier also observed in xylem [36] and phloem sap [37] depicting a greater contribution for normal translation and translocation of minerals in response to biotic or abiotic stress. Indeed the stress regulated genes was also observed in the transcriptomic analysis of phloem and xylem [38–39]. This indicates that proteins related to defense mechanisms is largely involved in cambial activities. Interestingly, our proteome data revealed proteins related to defense responses in the vascular connections (grafted portion) of rootstock and scion, such as disease resistance proteins (spot 7, Table 1, and spot 5, Table 2) and catalase (spot 6, Table 2). Disease resistance proteins are induced when grafted plants face attack by soil-borne pathogens, and catalase is primarily induced when plants are under abiotic stress [34–35]. Our results showed that defense response proteins were up-regulated in our rootstock-grafted scions. This result indicates that defense response proteins accompany a strong antioxidant mechanism in the vascular portion of a rootstock-grafted scion for successful grafting and tolerance to the mechanical injury produced during the grafting process. Based on our proteome study, we also observed that under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 light intensity, defense proteins were more highly up-regulated compared to the other light intensities, indicating that 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 is the optimal light intensity for the healing process.

Ion-binding response proteins

As ion-binding proteins play an important role in the vascular tissues of plants with regard to the transfer of ions [40–41], it is interesting to examine proteins related to ion binding between the two connected portions in rootstock-grafted scions. A greater number of proteins related to ion binding have been well identified in cambial activities previously in plants, which depicted that these proteins play an important role in translation and translocation of mineral in plants [42–43]. Indeed xylem ionic protein relations have been observed well to stress responses [43]. The proteomic analysis in our study revealed most of the proteins in the vascular connections of both scion cultivars are related to ion binding (see Tables 1 and 2, biological functions). The identification of these proteins revealed that proteins related to ions play key roles in the transfer of ions from the rootstock to scion during the healing process after grafting to achieve healthy growth. It was also observed that rootstock-grafted scions exhibit the up-regulation of ion-binding proteins under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 compared to the other experimental light intensities tested. These results indicate that ion-binding proteins might be a key factor for the healing process after grafting by helping the rootstock transfer ions to the scion. By up-regulating ion-binding proteins under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1, our results also indicate that rootstock-grafted scions heal best at this light intensity.

Transcription-responsive proteins

The proteomic analysis of the rootstock-grafted scion vascular proteome revealed a number of proteins related to transcription factors. Many studies of transcriptional activation have reported that transcription factors play a major role in stress response pathways [44–46]. Indeed a number of xylem and phloem transcriptomes from secondary tissues have identified genes related to transcription factors required for vascular cell differentiation and function [47–49]. Our proteomic analysis showed that proteins identified in the vascular connections of rootstock-grafted scions are related to transcription factors (see Table 1 and Table 2), indicating that transcription factors might play an enhanced role in the defense response produced by mechanical injury during grafting. Correspondingly, a separate groups of proteins related to defense responses have already been described above for their role in rootstock and scion vascular connections. The analysis of transcription factor proteins in vascular connections also suggested that these proteins might be involved in regulating primary meristems and cambial activities during graft union formation. Furthermore, most of the transcription-related proteins were up-regulated under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 and down-regulated under 25, 50 and 75 μmol m^-2 s^-1, which indicated that transcription-responsive proteins in the vascular connections of rootstock bottle gourd grafted with ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ watermelon might be optimally synthesized at 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 light intensity for healthy growth and successful healing after grafting.

Carbohydrate metabolism-related proteins

Carbohydrate metabolism related proteins in vascular cambium exudates long-distance signaling in plants which play an important role in plant growth and development [50–51]. The carbohydrates are indeed main components in plants for all metabolic activities such as glycolytic pathways [51]. The number of proteins belong to carbohydrate group have been identified in vascular sap of plants [52–53]. The present study revealed proteins related to carbohydrate metabolism in rootstock-grafted scions, including beta-galactosidase (spot 3, Table 1) and beta-amylase (spot 17, Table 1). These proteins help to provide plants with carbohydrates and energy during biotic or abiotic stresses and are best known for their expression during fruit development [54]. Therefore, the up-regulation of these proteins at 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 indicates that they might support rootstock-grafted scions for the better development of fruits and mechanical shocks during and after grafting. Moreover, the identification of carbohydrate group proteins indicates a signaling exudation between rootstock and scion for better plant growth and development.

Protein synthesis

Proteins synthesis plays an important role in the plant cell with regard to many physiological processes in response to unfavorable conditions [46]. The expression of isoform cytoplasmic of alanine-tRNA ligase (spot 27, Table 2), which plays a crucial role in protein synthesis, was observed to be up-regulated under 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 in the vascular connections of rootstock-grafted scions. The up-regulation of this enzyme might enhance the translational process or enhance protein synthesis in the two grafted portions. These results indicate that rootstock bottle gourd grafted with ‘Sambok honey’ and ‘Speed’ might optimally synthesize proteins for several other metabolic processes at 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1.

Comparison of differentially expressed proteins among different light intensities

A comparison of the proteome maps of rootstock bottle gourd grafted with the watermelon cultivars ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ were compared under different light intensities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1) and is described by the graphical diagram shown in Fig. 5. For ‘Sambok Honey’, 20 protein spots were down-regulated and 4 were absent when grown (healing period) at 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 compared to the other light intensities (50, 75 and 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1) (Fig. 5A).

Download:

Fig 5. Comparative analysis of vascular connection proteome.

A graphical representation of the number of differentially accumulated proteins in watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).

(A) ‘Sambok honey’ (B) ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock. Numbers correspond to the protein spots present in 2DE patterns under 25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹. The overlapped portions with ‘X’ denote absence of proteins. Upward and downward arrows denote increased or decreased protein expression under combined treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.g005

However, drastic differences between the four light intensities were observed for ‘Speed’ (Fig. 5B). Of 27 differentially expressed protein spots, only 9 were observed under 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1, whereas 21 were observed under 50 μmol m^-2 s^-1 and 24 under 75 μmol m^-2 s^-1. A comparison revealed that 14 proteins were up-regulated and 7 protein spots were down-regulated at 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 compared to 50 μmol m^-2 s^-1. Of the 21 protein spots, 12 were absent at 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 compared to 50 μmol m^-2 s^-1. A comparison revealed that of 24 protein spots, 20 were up-regulated, 5 down-regulated and 15 absent at 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1 compared to 75 μmol m^-2 s^-1. An interesting comparison was made between 25 and 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1; the proteomic maps showed that of 27 proteins spots, only 9 were present at 25 μmol m^-2 s^-1, though they were largely down-regulated.

The comparison of proteomic maps among the different light intensities was performed to reveal the optimal light intensity for healing after grafting and for tolerance to the mechanical injury suffered during the grafting process. Our results suggest that 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 is an optimal light intensity for healing after grafting and for the synthesis of proteins related to amino acid biosynthesis, ion binding, defense response and transcription factors. A comparative analysis of the proteins related to multiprotein complexes also suggested that high light intensity can be optimal for the growth and development of plants [17].

Vascular transport activity in rootstock-grafted scions

To check vascular transport activity between a rootstock and scion, a reliable staining ‘absorbable flower dye blue’ method was utilized in plants grown at 100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 (100 μmol m^-2 s^-1 was selected based on the physiological and proteomic data). The rootstock-grafted scions were dipped in staining solution for 10–20 min, and a longitudinal and transverse cross-section of both the rootstock and scion was analyzed for vascular transport activity. We observed blue coloration in the vascular tissues of both the bottle gourd rootstock and watermelon ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ (Fig. 6).

Download:

Fig 6. Visualization of water uptake and transport in watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad.) ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ as the scion and bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Stanld.) ‘RS Dongjanggun’ as rootstock seedlings grown under different photon flux densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).

The rootstock were submerged in absorbable flower dye blue for 10–20 min and both rootstock and scion were cut into transverse and longitudinal cross section and were observed under light microscope. The arrows in vascular tissues represent the vascular transport activity. (A-B) represents longitudinal section without flower dye blue; (C-D) represents longitudinal section with flower dye blue; (E-F) represents transverse section without flower dye; (G-H) represents transverse section with flower dye blue in rootstock and scion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.g006

The vascular transport activity in the rootstock and scion was classified by staining, as previously observed in grafted sweet cherry [55] and Arabidopsis-grafted plants [56]. The stained areas in the vascular connections of the rootstock-grafted scions indicated the appropriate and effective connections of vessels and the functional transport of nutrients and other important minerals between the rootstock and scion.

Conclusions

Our proteomic analysis of the vascular connections between bottle gourd as the rootstock, ‘Sambok Honey’ and ‘Speed’ watermelon cultivars as the scion revealed interesting proteins that might be involved in strong connections of two organisms during the healing process to provide tolerance against stress conditions. Moreover, a comparative analysis of the proteins also identified the optimal light intensity for successful grafting. The proteins analyzed in rootstock-grafted scions represent only a small portion of the vascular connection proteome, and many other proteins associated with xylem and phloem for transport processes still need to be identified. A deeper proteomic analysis along with a microarray analysis at the vascular connection level can disclose the mechanism by which two organisms share a single transport route of nutrients and minerals for successful grafting.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Diagrammatic representation for protein extraction and strategy for 2D gel electrophoresis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120899.s001

(TIFF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SM BRJ. Performed the experiments: SM CHK. Analyzed the data: SM BRJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SM BRJ. Wrote the paper: SM BRJ. Handled the experimental plants: CHK. Helped in helpful discussions: PS AM YGP. Wrote and finalized the manuscript: SM BRJ.

References

1. Liu Y. Historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Adv in Genetics. 2006; 56: 101–129. pmid:16735156
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, Goldschmidt EE. A history of grafting. In: Janick , ed, Hort reviews, vol. 35, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Pp 2009; 437–493.
3. Abdelmageed AHA, Gruda N. Influence of grafting on growth, development and some physiological parameters of tomatoes under controlled heat stress conditions. Eur J Hort Sci. 2009; 74: 16–20.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Yang Y, Wang L, Tian J, Li J, Sun J, He L, et al. Proteomic study participating the enhancement of growth and salt tolerance of bottle gourd rootstock-grafted watermelon seedlings. Plant Physiol and Biochem. 2012; 58: 54–65. pmid:22771436
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Oka Y, Offenbach R, Pivonia S. Pepper rootstock graft compatibility and response to Meloidogyne javanica and M. incognita. The J of Nematology. 2004; 36: 37–141.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Rivard CL, Louws FJ. Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production. HortScience. 2008; 43: 2104–2111.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Pina A, Errea P. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility—incompatibility. Scientia Hort. 2005; 127: 93–105.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Stegemann S, Bock R. Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science. 2009; 324: 649–651. pmid:19407205
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Fuentes I, Stegemann S, Golczyk H, Karcher D, Bock R. Horizontal genome transfer as an asexual path to the formation of new species. Nature. 2014; 511(7508): 232–235. pmid:24909992
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Soumelidou K, Battey NH, John P, Barnett JR. The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing apple. Annals of Bot. 1994; 74: 605–611.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Olmstead MA, Lang NS, Ewers FW, Owens SA. Xylem vessel anatomy of sweet cherries grafted onto dwarfing and nondwarfing rootstock. J American Society Hort Sci. 2006; 131: 577–585.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Milien M, Renault-Spilmont AS, Cookson SJ, Sarrazin A, Verdeil JL. Visualization of the 3D structure of the graft union of grapevine using X-ray tomography. Scientia Hort. 2012; 144: 130–140.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Aloni B, Karni L, Deventurero G, Levin Z, Cohen R, Katzir N, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes at the rootstock–scion interface in graft combinations between Cucurbita rootstocks and a melon scion. J Hort Sci and Biotech. 2008; 83(6): 777–783.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Cookson SJ, José M, Moreno C, Hevin C, Mendome LZN, Delrot S, et al. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signaling, and secondary metabolism. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 2997–3008. pmid:23698628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Cookson SJ, Clemente Moreno MJ, Hevin C, Mendome LZN, Delrot S, Magnin N, et al. Hetrografting with nonself rootstocks induces genes involved in stress response at the graft interface when compared with auto grafted controls. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 2473–2481. pmid:24692649
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Zheng BS, Chu HL, Jin SH, Huang YJ, Wang ZJ, Chen M, et al. cDNA-AFLP analysis of gene expression in hickory (Carya cathayensis) during graft process. Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 297–303. pmid:20022866
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Muneer S, Kim EJ, Park JS, Lee JH. Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.) Int J of Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 4657–4670. pmid:24642884
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Sorce C, Giovannelli A, Sebastiani L, Anfodillo T. Hormonal signals involved in the regulation of cambial activity, xylogenesis and vessel pattering in trees Plant Cell Rep. 2013; 32: 885–898. pmid:23553557
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Berta M, Giovannelli A, Sebastiani F, Camussi A, Racchi ML. Transcriptome changes in the cambial region of poplar (Populus alba L.) in response to water deficit. Plant Biol. 2010; 12: 341–354. pmid:20398240
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Baba K, Karlberg A, Schmidt J, Schrader J, Hvidsten TR, Bako L, et al. Activity-dormancy transition in the cambial meristem involves stage-specific modulation of auxin response in hybrid aspen. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA. 2011; 108: 3418–3423. pmid:21289280
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Vu NT, Kim YS, Kang HM, Kim II S. Effect of red LEDs during healing process and acclimatization process on the survival rate and quality of grafted tomato seedlings. Protected Hort and Plant Factory. 2014; 23(1): 43–49.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, HoyosEchevarria P, Morra L, et al. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Hort. 2010; 127: 93–105.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Yorio NC, Goins GD, Kagie HR, Wheeler RM, Sager JC. Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. HortScience. 2001; 36: 380–383. pmid:12542027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Yano A, Fujiwara K. Plant lighting system with five wavelength-band light-emitting diodes providing photon flux density and mixing ratio control. Plant Methods. 2012; 8, 46. pmid:23173915
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Kim K, Kook HS, Jang YJ, Lee WH, Kamala Kannan S, Chae JC, et al. The effect of blue-light-emitting diodes on antioxidant properties and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Tomato. Plant Pathology and Microbiol. 2013; 4, 49.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Raju S, Shah S, Gajbhiye N. Effect of light intensity on photosynthesis and accumulation of sennosides in plant parts of Senna (Cassia angustifolia Vahl.). Indian J of Plant Physiol. 2014; 18(3): 285–289.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Yuan K, Ding X, Yang LF, Wang ZH, Lin WF, Cao JH. Proteome analysis of interaction between rootstocks and scions in Hevea brasiliensis. Afr J of Biotech. 2011; 10: 1481–14816.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Muneer S, Hakeem KR, Mohamed R, Lee JH. Cadmium toxicity induced alterations in root proteome of green gram in contrasting response towards iron supplement. Int J of Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 6343–6355. pmid:24739807
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Witzel K, Weidner A, Surabhi GK, Börner A, Mock HP. Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of barley genotypes with contrasting response towards salinity. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60: 3545–3557. pmid:19671579
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Nam MH, Huh SM, Kim KM, Park WJ, Seo JB, Cho K, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress-responsive proteins in roots of SnRK2 transgenic rice. Proteome Sci. 2012; 10, 25. pmid:22462395
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Qureshi MI, Muneer S, Bashir H, Ahmad J, Iqbal M. Nodule physiology and proteomics of stressed legumes. Adv Bot Res. 2010; 56: 1–48.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Martnez-Ballesta MC, Muries B, Mota-Cadenas C, Carvajal M. Physiological aspects of rootstock-scion interactions. Scientia Hort. 2010; 127: 112–118.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Colla G, Rouphael Y, Leonardi C, Bie Z. Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Scientia Hort. 2010; 127: 147–155.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Vitale A, Rocco M, Arena S, Giuffrida F, Cassaniti C, Scaloni A, et al. Tomato susceptibility to fusarium crown and root rot: Effect of grafting combination and proteomic analysis of tolerance expression in the rootstock. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014; 83: 207–216. pmid:25173633
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Muneer S, Kim TH, Qureshi MI. Fe modulates Cd-induced oxidative stress and the expression of stress response proteins in the nodules of Vigna radiata. Plant Growth Regul. 2012; 68: 421–433.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Kehr J, Buhtz A, Giavalisco P. Analysis of xylem sap proteins from Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2005; 21: 5–11.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Anstead JA, Hartson SD, Thompson GA. The broccoli (Brassica oleracea) phloem tissue proteome. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:764. pmid:24195484
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Vilaine F, Palauqui JC, Amselem J, Kusiak C, Lemoine R, Dinant S. Towards deciphering phloem: a transcriptome analysis of the phloem of Apium graveolens. The Plant J. 2003; 36: 67–81. pmid:12974812
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Jensen P, Makalowska I, Altman N, Fazio G, Praul C, Maximova S, et al. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns in apple tree scions. Tree Genet Genomes. 2009; 6: 57–72.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Herald VL, Heazlewood JL, Day DA, Millar AH. Proteomic identification of divalent metal cation binding proteins in plant mitochondria. FEBS Letters. 2003; 537: 96–100. pmid:12606038
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Jensen PJ, Halbrendt N, Fazio G, Makalowska I, Altman N, Praul C, et al. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns associated with fire blight resistance in apple. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13, 9. pmid:22229964
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Zhao F, Song CP, He J, Zhu H. Polyamines improve K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis in barley seedlings by regulating root ion channel activities. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145: 1061–1072. pmid:17905858
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Shabala S, Cuin TA, Pang J, Percey W, Chen Z, Conn S, et al. Xylem ionic relations and salinity tolerance in barley. Plant J. 2010; 61: 839–853. pmid:20015063
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Busch W, Wunderlich M, Schöffl F. Identification of novel heat shock factor dependent genes and biochemical pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant J. 2005; 41: 1–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Henriksson E, Nordin Henrikson K. Salt-stress signaling and the role of calcium in the regulation of the Arabidopsis ATHB7 gene. Plant Cell and Environ. 2005; 28: 202–210.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Wang H, Zheng HQ, Sha W, Zeng R, Xia QC. A proteomic approach to analyzing response of Arabidopsis thaliana callus cells to clinostat rotation. J of Exp Bot. 2006; 57: 827–835. pmid:16449375
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Baima S, Possenti M, Matteucci A, Wisman E, Altamura MM, Ruberti I, et al. The Arabidopsis ATHB-8 HD-zip protein acts as a differentiation-promoting transcription factor of the vascular meristems. Plant Physiol. 2001; 126: 643–655. pmid:11402194
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Kang HG, Singh KB. Characterization of salicylic acid-responsive, Arabidopsis Dof domain proteins: overexpression of OBP3 leads to growth defects. Plant J. 2000; 21: 329–339. pmid:10758484
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Karpinska B, Karlsson M, Srivastava M, Stenberg A, Schrader J, Sterky F, et al. MYB transcription factors are differentially expressed and regulated during secondary vascular tissue development in hybrid aspen. Plant Mol Biol. 2004; 56: 255–270. pmid:15604742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Alluvada J, Fokar M, Holaday AS. Variation in gene transcription and protein for key enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in poplar xylem with respect to growth phase. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014; 36: 2385–2395.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Geigenberger P. Regulation of sucrose to starch conversion in growing potato tubers. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54: 457–465. pmid:12508056
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Walz C, Giavalisco P, Schad M, Juenger M, Klose J, Kehr J. Proteomics of curcurbit phloem exudate reveals a network of defense proteins. Phytochemistry. 2004; 65: 1795–1804. pmid:15276438
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Giavalisco P, Kapitza K, Kolasa A, Buhtz A, Kehr J. Towards the proteome of Brassica napus phloem sap. Proteomics. 2006; 6: 896–909. pmid:16400686
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Smith DL, Gross KC. A family of at least seven ß-galactosidase genes is expressed during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2000; 123:1173–1183. pmid:10889266
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Olmstead MA, Lang NS, Lang GA, Ewers FW, Owens SA. Examining the vascular pathway of sweet cherries grafted onto dwarfing rootstocks. HortScience. 2006; 41: 674–679.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Yin H, Yan B, Sun J, Jia PF, Zhang ZJ, Yan XS, et al. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell–cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 4219–4232. pmid:22511803
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Liu Y. Historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Adv in Genetics. 2006; 56: 101–129. pmid:16735156
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, Goldschmidt EE. A history of grafting. In: Janick , ed, Hort reviews, vol. 35, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Pp 2009; 437–493.

[ref3] 3. Abdelmageed AHA, Gruda N. Influence of grafting on growth, development and some physiological parameters of tomatoes under controlled heat stress conditions. Eur J Hort Sci. 2009; 74: 16–20.
View Article
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Yang Y, Wang L, Tian J, Li J, Sun J, He L, et al. Proteomic study participating the enhancement of growth and salt tolerance of bottle gourd rootstock-grafted watermelon seedlings. Plant Physiol and Biochem. 2012; 58: 54–65. pmid:22771436
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Oka Y, Offenbach R, Pivonia S. Pepper rootstock graft compatibility and response to Meloidogyne javanica and M. incognita. The J of Nematology. 2004; 36: 37–141.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Rivard CL, Louws FJ. Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production. HortScience. 2008; 43: 2104–2111.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Pina A, Errea P. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility—incompatibility. Scientia Hort. 2005; 127: 93–105.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Stegemann S, Bock R. Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science. 2009; 324: 649–651. pmid:19407205
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Fuentes I, Stegemann S, Golczyk H, Karcher D, Bock R. Horizontal genome transfer as an asexual path to the formation of new species. Nature. 2014; 511(7508): 232–235. pmid:24909992
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Soumelidou K, Battey NH, John P, Barnett JR. The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing apple. Annals of Bot. 1994; 74: 605–611.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Olmstead MA, Lang NS, Ewers FW, Owens SA. Xylem vessel anatomy of sweet cherries grafted onto dwarfing and nondwarfing rootstock. J American Society Hort Sci. 2006; 131: 577–585.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Milien M, Renault-Spilmont AS, Cookson SJ, Sarrazin A, Verdeil JL. Visualization of the 3D structure of the graft union of grapevine using X-ray tomography. Scientia Hort. 2012; 144: 130–140.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Aloni B, Karni L, Deventurero G, Levin Z, Cohen R, Katzir N, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes at the rootstock–scion interface in graft combinations between Cucurbita rootstocks and a melon scion. J Hort Sci and Biotech. 2008; 83(6): 777–783.
View Article
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Cookson SJ, José M, Moreno C, Hevin C, Mendome LZN, Delrot S, et al. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signaling, and secondary metabolism. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 2997–3008. pmid:23698628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Cookson SJ, Clemente Moreno MJ, Hevin C, Mendome LZN, Delrot S, Magnin N, et al. Hetrografting with nonself rootstocks induces genes involved in stress response at the graft interface when compared with auto grafted controls. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 2473–2481. pmid:24692649
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Zheng BS, Chu HL, Jin SH, Huang YJ, Wang ZJ, Chen M, et al. cDNA-AFLP analysis of gene expression in hickory (Carya cathayensis) during graft process. Tree Physiol. 2010; 30: 297–303. pmid:20022866
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Muneer S, Kim EJ, Park JS, Lee JH. Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.) Int J of Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 4657–4670. pmid:24642884
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Sorce C, Giovannelli A, Sebastiani L, Anfodillo T. Hormonal signals involved in the regulation of cambial activity, xylogenesis and vessel pattering in trees Plant Cell Rep. 2013; 32: 885–898. pmid:23553557
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Berta M, Giovannelli A, Sebastiani F, Camussi A, Racchi ML. Transcriptome changes in the cambial region of poplar (Populus alba L.) in response to water deficit. Plant Biol. 2010; 12: 341–354. pmid:20398240
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Baba K, Karlberg A, Schmidt J, Schrader J, Hvidsten TR, Bako L, et al. Activity-dormancy transition in the cambial meristem involves stage-specific modulation of auxin response in hybrid aspen. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA. 2011; 108: 3418–3423. pmid:21289280
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Vu NT, Kim YS, Kang HM, Kim II S. Effect of red LEDs during healing process and acclimatization process on the survival rate and quality of grafted tomato seedlings. Protected Hort and Plant Factory. 2014; 23(1): 43–49.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, HoyosEchevarria P, Morra L, et al. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Hort. 2010; 127: 93–105.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Yorio NC, Goins GD, Kagie HR, Wheeler RM, Sager JC. Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. HortScience. 2001; 36: 380–383. pmid:12542027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Yano A, Fujiwara K. Plant lighting system with five wavelength-band light-emitting diodes providing photon flux density and mixing ratio control. Plant Methods. 2012; 8, 46. pmid:23173915
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Kim K, Kook HS, Jang YJ, Lee WH, Kamala Kannan S, Chae JC, et al. The effect of blue-light-emitting diodes on antioxidant properties and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Tomato. Plant Pathology and Microbiol. 2013; 4, 49.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Raju S, Shah S, Gajbhiye N. Effect of light intensity on photosynthesis and accumulation of sennosides in plant parts of Senna (Cassia angustifolia Vahl.). Indian J of Plant Physiol. 2014; 18(3): 285–289.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Yuan K, Ding X, Yang LF, Wang ZH, Lin WF, Cao JH. Proteome analysis of interaction between rootstocks and scions in Hevea brasiliensis. Afr J of Biotech. 2011; 10: 1481–14816.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Muneer S, Hakeem KR, Mohamed R, Lee JH. Cadmium toxicity induced alterations in root proteome of green gram in contrasting response towards iron supplement. Int J of Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 6343–6355. pmid:24739807
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Witzel K, Weidner A, Surabhi GK, Börner A, Mock HP. Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of barley genotypes with contrasting response towards salinity. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60: 3545–3557. pmid:19671579
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Nam MH, Huh SM, Kim KM, Park WJ, Seo JB, Cho K, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress-responsive proteins in roots of SnRK2 transgenic rice. Proteome Sci. 2012; 10, 25. pmid:22462395
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Qureshi MI, Muneer S, Bashir H, Ahmad J, Iqbal M. Nodule physiology and proteomics of stressed legumes. Adv Bot Res. 2010; 56: 1–48.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Martnez-Ballesta MC, Muries B, Mota-Cadenas C, Carvajal M. Physiological aspects of rootstock-scion interactions. Scientia Hort. 2010; 127: 112–118.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Colla G, Rouphael Y, Leonardi C, Bie Z. Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Scientia Hort. 2010; 127: 147–155.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Vitale A, Rocco M, Arena S, Giuffrida F, Cassaniti C, Scaloni A, et al. Tomato susceptibility to fusarium crown and root rot: Effect of grafting combination and proteomic analysis of tolerance expression in the rootstock. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014; 83: 207–216. pmid:25173633
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Muneer S, Kim TH, Qureshi MI. Fe modulates Cd-induced oxidative stress and the expression of stress response proteins in the nodules of Vigna radiata. Plant Growth Regul. 2012; 68: 421–433.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Kehr J, Buhtz A, Giavalisco P. Analysis of xylem sap proteins from Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2005; 21: 5–11.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Anstead JA, Hartson SD, Thompson GA. The broccoli (Brassica oleracea) phloem tissue proteome. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:764. pmid:24195484
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Vilaine F, Palauqui JC, Amselem J, Kusiak C, Lemoine R, Dinant S. Towards deciphering phloem: a transcriptome analysis of the phloem of Apium graveolens. The Plant J. 2003; 36: 67–81. pmid:12974812
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Jensen P, Makalowska I, Altman N, Fazio G, Praul C, Maximova S, et al. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns in apple tree scions. Tree Genet Genomes. 2009; 6: 57–72.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Herald VL, Heazlewood JL, Day DA, Millar AH. Proteomic identification of divalent metal cation binding proteins in plant mitochondria. FEBS Letters. 2003; 537: 96–100. pmid:12606038
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Jensen PJ, Halbrendt N, Fazio G, Makalowska I, Altman N, Praul C, et al. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns associated with fire blight resistance in apple. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13, 9. pmid:22229964
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Zhao F, Song CP, He J, Zhu H. Polyamines improve K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis in barley seedlings by regulating root ion channel activities. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145: 1061–1072. pmid:17905858
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Shabala S, Cuin TA, Pang J, Percey W, Chen Z, Conn S, et al. Xylem ionic relations and salinity tolerance in barley. Plant J. 2010; 61: 839–853. pmid:20015063
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Busch W, Wunderlich M, Schöffl F. Identification of novel heat shock factor dependent genes and biochemical pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant J. 2005; 41: 1–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Henriksson E, Nordin Henrikson K. Salt-stress signaling and the role of calcium in the regulation of the Arabidopsis ATHB7 gene. Plant Cell and Environ. 2005; 28: 202–210.
View Article
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Wang H, Zheng HQ, Sha W, Zeng R, Xia QC. A proteomic approach to analyzing response of Arabidopsis thaliana callus cells to clinostat rotation. J of Exp Bot. 2006; 57: 827–835. pmid:16449375
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Baima S, Possenti M, Matteucci A, Wisman E, Altamura MM, Ruberti I, et al. The Arabidopsis ATHB-8 HD-zip protein acts as a differentiation-promoting transcription factor of the vascular meristems. Plant Physiol. 2001; 126: 643–655. pmid:11402194
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Kang HG, Singh KB. Characterization of salicylic acid-responsive, Arabidopsis Dof domain proteins: overexpression of OBP3 leads to growth defects. Plant J. 2000; 21: 329–339. pmid:10758484
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Karpinska B, Karlsson M, Srivastava M, Stenberg A, Schrader J, Sterky F, et al. MYB transcription factors are differentially expressed and regulated during secondary vascular tissue development in hybrid aspen. Plant Mol Biol. 2004; 56: 255–270. pmid:15604742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Alluvada J, Fokar M, Holaday AS. Variation in gene transcription and protein for key enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in poplar xylem with respect to growth phase. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014; 36: 2385–2395.
View Article
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Geigenberger P. Regulation of sucrose to starch conversion in growing potato tubers. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54: 457–465. pmid:12508056
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] PubMed/NCBI

[179] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Walz C, Giavalisco P, Schad M, Juenger M, Klose J, Kehr J. Proteomics of curcurbit phloem exudate reveals a network of defense proteins. Phytochemistry. 2004; 65: 1795–1804. pmid:15276438
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Giavalisco P, Kapitza K, Kolasa A, Buhtz A, Kehr J. Towards the proteome of Brassica napus phloem sap. Proteomics. 2006; 6: 896–909. pmid:16400686
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Smith DL, Gross KC. A family of at least seven ß-galactosidase genes is expressed during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2000; 123:1173–1183. pmid:10889266
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Olmstead MA, Lang NS, Lang GA, Ewers FW, Owens SA. Examining the vascular pathway of sweet cherries grafted onto dwarfing rootstocks. HortScience. 2006; 41: 674–679.
View Article
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Yin H, Yan B, Sun J, Jia PF, Zhang ZJ, Yan XS, et al. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell–cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 4219–4232. pmid:22511803
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Material and Methods

Plant materials, grafting procedure and treatments

Measurement of biomass and hardness of vascular connections

Protein sample preparation

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and staining

Image and data analysis

Protein in gel digestion

Protein identification using MALDI-TOF MS and MALDI-TOF/TOF MS

Protein functional classifications

Vascular staining (absorbable flower dye blue staining)

Results and Discussion

Physiological response

Two-dimensional (2-DE) protein profile in the rootstock and scion vascular connection

Protein identification and functional classification by MALDI/TOF/TOF-MS

Amino acid biosynthesis response proteins

Defense response proteins

Ion-binding response proteins

Transcription-responsive proteins

Carbohydrate metabolism-related proteins

Protein synthesis

Comparison of differentially expressed proteins among different light intensities

Vascular transport activity in rootstock-grafted scions

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Diagrammatic representation for protein extraction and strategy for 2D gel electrophoresis.

Author Contributions

References