Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

A facile hydrothermal approach for catalytic and optical behavior of tin oxide- graphene (SnO2/G) nanocomposite

  • Suresh Sagadevan ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

    zaira.chowdhury76@gmail.com (ZZC); drsureshnano@gmail.com (SS)

    Affiliations Centre for Nanotechnology, AMET University, Chennai, India, Department of Physics, Center for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Zaira Zaman Chowdhury ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    zaira.chowdhury76@gmail.com (ZZC); drsureshnano@gmail.com (SS)

    Affiliation Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Mohd. Rafie Bin Johan,

    Roles Formal analysis, Validation

    Affiliation Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Ali. A. Khan,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Fauziah Abdul Aziz,

    Roles Methodology, Visualization

    Affiliation Department of Physics, Center for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    ⨯
  • Rahman F. Rafique,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Md Enamul Hoque

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    ⨯

Abstract

A cost-effective, facile hydrothermal approach was made for the synthesis of SnO2/graphene (Gr) nano-composites. XRD diffraction spectra clearly confirmed the presence of tetragonal crystal system of SnO2 which was maintaining its structure in both pure and composite materials’ matrix. The stretching and bending vibrations of the functional groups were analyzed using FTIR analysis. FESEM images illustrated the surface morphology and the texture of the synthesized sample. HRTEM images confirmed the deposition of SnO2 nanoparticles over the surface of graphene nano-sheets. Raman Spectroscopic analysis was carried out to confirm the in-plane blending of SnO2 and graphene inside the composite matrix. The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized sample under UV irradiation using methylene blue dye was observed. Incorporation of grapheme into the SnO2 sample had increased the photocatalytic activity compared with the pure SnO2 sample. The electrochemical property of the synthesized sample was evaluated.

Citation: Sagadevan S, Chowdhury ZZ, Johan MRB, Khan AA, Aziz FA, F. Rafique R, et al. (2018) A facile hydrothermal approach for catalytic and optical behavior of tin oxide- graphene (SnO2/G) nanocomposite. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0202694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694

Editor: Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Institute of Materials Science, GERMANY

Received: April 18, 2018; Accepted: July 27, 2018; Published: October 1, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Sagadevan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work has been conducted under the grants RP044C-17AET and RP044D-17AET of University Malaya, Malaysia to Z.C. The authors F.A and S.S would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by The Ministry of Higher Education under the Niche Research Grant Scheme (NRGS) NRGS/2013/UPNM/PK/P1.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1.Introduction

Recently research interest revolved around the fabrication of semiconductor metal oxide nanoparticles with tunable morphologies and distinct properties. Based on their structure and synthesis strategy, the electrical, optical and catalytic properties can be altered significantly. Tin-oxide (SnO2) with different architectural structure including 1D nanorods, 2D nanosheets and 3D nanostructure can exhibit fast charge transportation properties [1] which enable them to be used as promising candidate for electrode preparation. To date, the reported synthesis process of tin-oxide nanoparticles need multiple steps with manipulation of process variables which is less efficient and time consuming [2, 3].The literature has reported on growing SnO2 nanorods onto the surface of graphene nanosheets that require some organic compounds for their synthesis process. During the synthesis process, these compounds strongly adsorbed over the surface of SnO2 and the surface active sites are blocked resulting in poor performance of the system [4, 5]. Graphene-a 2D nano carbon can provide extra-large surface area which enables them to fabricate hybrid electrode materials with high performance [6–8]. It has attracted a lot of attention of researchers due to its excellent optical [9–11], mechanical [12, 13] and electrochemical properties [14–17]. In addition, SnO2 exhibits good photocatalytic properties for degrading dyes under UV light, particularly for SnO2 nanocomposites due to electron transfer between SnO2 and an additive [18]. Graphene is a good choice as an additive because it is an exciting two-dimensional material with a large specific surface area and perfect electrical properties [19]. Li et al., deposited SnO2 on graphene sheets by reducing graphite oxide with SnCl2 in the presence of hydrochloric acid and urea. The resulting nanocomposite showed good capacitive properties [20]. Kim et al., reported a straightforward method for fabricating graphene-SnO2 composites with high lithium storage capability by adding NH4OH and hydrazine to RGO followed by the oxidation of tin particles with HCl [21]. Most of the research works concentrated on improving various electrode materials such as conducting polymers, metal oxides out of which carbon based materials such as activated carbon, carbon nanotubes and carbon aerogels are given more consideration for energy storage devices [22–36]. Recently research interest has been rapidly growing for the fabrication of semiconductor metal oxide nanoparticles with tunable morphologies and distinct characterization. Based on their structure and synthesis strategy, the electrical, optical and catalytic properties can be altered significantly [37–42].

Herein, we synthesized SnO2/G composites using a facile, cost-effective hydrothermal method whereby all the reaction parameters were carefully optimized to retain the crystalline structure of SnO2 similar to its bare metal oxide. The synthesized composite was used to study the photocatalytic degradation of MO and MB under visible light irradiation. The electrochemical properties were analyzed to observe the synergistic effect of graphene and SnO2 nanomaterials. The electrosorption desalination performance of the synthesized sample was observed. The results showed that the synthesized sample might have a good potential to be used as electrode materials for super capacitor application having high energy.

2.Experimental

2.1.Material

Natural Graphite flakes, Stannous chloride pentahydrate (98%, SnCl4.5H2O), Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and ethanol which was used here were of analytical grade. Thus the chemicals obtained were used without any purification.

2.2.Preparation of SnO2/G nanocomposite

Graphene oxide (GO) was prepared by modified Hummers method. The SnO2/G nanocomposite was synthesized by adding SnCl4.5H2O (0.1 M) in 40 ml of uniformly dispersed GO solution (1mg/ ml) and NaOH was added to adjust the pH up to 9. The prepared mixture was kept in sealed Autoclave at 180°C for 4 hrs which yielded a composite black in colour. The product was further washed by centrifugation in ethanol and water several times at 5000 rpm for maximum purification. The end product was calcined at 300°C for 12 hrs.

2.3.Electrode preparation

The working electrode was prepared by mixing the electro active material of SnO2/G (80 wt %), activated carbon (10 wt %), and polyvinylidene fluoride (10 wt %). Finally, the acquired slurry was coated onto nickel foil (1 cm2) and dried at 100°C in air for 12 h. Every electrode included nearly 1 mg of electro active material. The SnO2/G electrode as the working electrode, Pt wire as counter electrode and the saturated calomel electrode as reference were employed for further study. Aqueous 2 M KOH solution was used as the supporting electrolyte. CVs in the potential range of -0.4 to 1 V at various current densities and electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of amplitude were carried out by using VSP biologic electrochemical system.

3. Results and discussion

Fig 1 illustrates the XRD pattern of the synthesized SnO2/G nano-composite. The tetragonal rutile structure of SnO2 inside the composite matrix was confirmed by the XRD diffraction pattern. The Graphene XRD pattern is shown in the insert Fig 1. The good crystallinity of SnO2 particles were confirmed by the strong intensity of the peak. The diffraction peaks of SnO2/G nanocomposite were indexed with (100), (101), (111), (211), (220), (002), (310), (301), (311), (202), and (321) planes. There were no diffraction peaks because graphene could be identified in the composite. The vanishing of diffraction peaks of graphene layer may be due to the peeling of GO sheets during the hydrothermal process. Besides, the connected SnO2 nanoparticles on graphene sheets keep the aggregation and restacking of graphene and because of the excellent crystallinity of SnO2 in the composite, the diffraction of carbon atoms in graphene is depleted. In this manner, the SnO2 nanoparticles covering the graphene sheets provide strong diffraction in the composite.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of SnO2/G nanocomposite.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694.g001

The FE-SEM images of the synthesized samples are shown by (Fig 2A–2E).The SnO2/G nanocomposite (Fig 2A–2D) showed platelet like structure. It formed like a very thin sheet like structure. Nano-sized SnO2 particles were clearly visible over the surface of the graphene sheets. The sheet-like morphology was retained even after covering the surface of the graphene with an interconnected network of SnO2/G nanocomposite. (Fig 2A–2E) illustrates the homogeneous distribution of SnO2 nanoparticles with a narrow size distribution over the graphene sheets. This indicates strong interaction between SnO2 and graphene nanosheets. The restacking of graphene nano sheets was prevented by the presence of SnO2 nanoparticles. Consequently, it increased the stability of the individual graphene sheets and prevented the aggregation of the SnO2 nanoparticles. Fig 2(F) illustrates the EDS pattern of the SnO2/G nanocomposites where only C, O, and Sn atoms have been observed. The TEM and HR-TEM images of the Graphene, SnO2 and SnO2/G nanocomposites are shown in (Fig 3A–3G). (Fig 3A–3G) demonstrates the TEM and HR-TEM images of the synthesized sample. The homogeneous dispersion of SnO2 nanoparticles over as well as the interlayers of the graphene sheets has been observed from the HR-TEM image as shown in (Fig 3A–3E). The higher magnification image clearly confirms the presence of the layered structure of graphene and SnO2 nanoparticles as shown in (Fig 3C–3E). Fig 3(F) shows the elemental mapping of the SnO2/G Nano-composite. The homogeneous atomic distribution for C, O, and Sn were observed.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2.

FE-SEM images of (a—e) SnO2/G nanocomposite and (f) EDX spectrum of SnO2/G nanocomposite.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3.

(a, b) TEM image of Graphene and SnO2 (c-g) TEM and HR-TEM images of SnO2/G nanocomposite and (f) Elemental mapping of SnO2/G nanocomposite.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694.g003

The surface functional groups over the surface of graphene and SnO2/G nanocomposites were observed using FTIR analysis and the same are shown in Fig 4(A). FTIR spectrum shows the SnO2/G composite, in which the absorption peak at 3435 cm-1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of OH. The characteristic peak observed at 1726 cm-1 was owing to the presence of C = O stretching vibration of carboxyl group. The presence of absorption peak around 1624 cm-1 could be ascribed to C = C aromatic ring vibration. The peak at 1214 cm-1 showed the presence of C-OH stretching bond over the surface of SnO2/G [43]. The small peak at 840 cm-1 could be attributed to O—C = O groups [44]. A peak around 1562 cm-1 represented the vibration of graphene sheets [45]. The peak around 562 cm-1 was assigned to Sn-OH vibration. The peak at 672 cm-1 was ascribed to O-Sn-O stretching vibration of tin-oxide. Both of these peaks confirmed the formation of SnO2 nanoparticles.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4.

(a) FTIR Spectrum of SnO2/G Nanocomposite (b) Raman Spectrum of SnO2/G Nanocomposite (c) UV-Vis spectrum of SnO2/G nanocomposite (d) TGA curve of SnO2/G nanocomposite.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694.g004

The Raman spectrum of the graphene and SnO2/G nanocomposite also confirmed the coating of SnO2 nanoparticles over the graphene sheets and it is illustrated in Fig 4(B). The D and G bands were observed at 1322 cm-1 and 1594 cm-1. These two peaks showed the vibrational modes of SnO2 nanoparticles. The strong peak in the range of 1580–1600 cm-1 for graphene showed the aromatic ring chain vibrations. The D band observed at 1352 cm-1 was ascribed to the plane imperfection related to the breathing mode of aromatic rings and k-point phonon of A1g. The G band that appeared at 1594 cm-1 was reflecting the plane vibration of an E2g phonon of sp2 hybridization of carbon atoms [46]. Basically D band is stronger than G band. The magnitude of D/G ratio increased considerably compared with the pristine graphite sample. This phenomenon supported the presence of graphene nanosheets inside the composite materials. When SnO2 nanoparticles were placed inside the graphene nanosheets–there was a decrease in SP2 carbon species in graphene. Thus D/G ratio for SnO2/G sample was higher than for the pure graphene sample.

UV–visible (UV–Vis.) absorption spectroscopy is widely used as a primary means of assaying concentrations and in characterizing the kinetics of reactions and chemical processes; it is ubiquitously used for chromatographic detection. To confirm the tunability of the optical properties of the SnO2/G nanocomposite, UV absorption spectroscopy was used. While in optical UV–Vis. absorption spectrum of as synthesized SnO2/G nanocomposite was calculated at a wavelength ranging from 200 to 700 nm. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum of the synthesized nanocomposite is illustrated in Fig 4(C). For the graphene, red shift was observed in the range from 290 nm to 270 nm following the reduction. A broad absorption peak was observed with the absorption maximum at 285 nm for SnO2/G nanocomposites with a noticeable red shift in the absorption maximum. This red shift was attributed to the presence of semiconductor SnO2 nanoparticles on the graphene sheet. It is interesting to note that in the case of SnO2/G nanocomposites, the peak at 280 nm associated with graphene red-shifts to 285 nm gradually with increasing centrifugation rate, indicating an increase in the π-electron concentration with reduction of sp3 graphene oxide to sp2-hybridization of carbon atoms [47]. For a smaller size of nanocrystals, the self-assembly process results in a more efficient reduction of graphene due to possible charge transfer in SnO2/G nanocomposites.

Thermo Gravimetric analysis was carried out to analyze the thermal stability of graphene and graphene-tin oxide nanocomposite. The analysis was done at a heating rate of 10°C/min. The temperature range for that analysis was 30 oC to 1000 oC. A major weight loss starting from 180°C to 255°C was observed for G. This was due to the pyrolysis of the same functional groups which would form CO, CO2, and vapour. From Fig 4(D) it is evident that no appreciable weight loss was observed for the SnO2/G nanocomposite up to 1000°C. This demonstrates the high stability and purity of the SnO2/G nanocomposite. Extensive weight loss was observed between 500°C and 630°C. This weight loss was due to the combination of graphene in air. SnO2 inside the composite matrix could withstand up to 1000°C temp. Thus in SnO2/G nanocomposites, 35.2% weight is for SnO2 and 64.8% is for graphene.

Under visible light irradiation, the photocatalytic activity of the prepared samples was evaluated using methylene orange (MO) dye. (Fig 5A and 5B) illustrates the UV-Vis absorption spectra of the SnO2/G nanocomposite with adsorbed MO for different time ranges. However, for SnO2/G nanocomposite showed 100% degradation efficiency under visible light irradiation for the time duration of 6h (Fig 5(A)). The adsorption of MO takes place on the surface of the graphene as well as on the surface of the metal oxides using the synthesized composites. The homogeneous distribution of SnO2 nanoparticles over the surface of graphene sheets provides large surface area of the composite material. The enhanced surface area contributes to the improved photocatalytic activity of the SnO2/G nanocomposites. The C/C0 values were calculated using the equation, C/C0 = kt, where, C and C0 are the preliminary and calculated absorption of the MO solution over the time interval of t. k represented the photo-degradation time constant. The values for C/C0 versus the irradiation time were plotted and Fig 5(B) illustrates it. The synthesized composite showed better photo-degradation efficiency compared with pure SnO2 nanoparticles. The process of electron transfer at the interface of SnO2/RGO nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of MB has been explained by previous researchers [48, 49]. Fig 5(C) explains well the process of electron transfer for MB at normal condition (5.67eV) and excited (MB*) (3.81eV) condition including graphene (4.42eV) and conduction band of SnO2 (4.5eV). The adsorption of MB takes place both over the surface of SnO2 nanoparticles as well as over the surface of graphene. Under UV light irradiation MB is excited to give MB*. The electrons from MB* would get transferred to graphene and give positively charged MB* ions. The electrons over the graphene will recombine with MB*. Overall, it results in slow degradation of MB over the RGO [50]. The conduction band of SnO2 will collect the electrons due to its higher work function than graphene [Fig 5C]. The electrons will be presented to contact with MB* (hole). The dissolved oxygen inside the water would capture the electrons from the surface of the SnO2 nanoparticles. Consequently, it will give highly reactive oxygen species which would oxidize the MB molecules [51]. RGO would work as electron mediator. Presence of RGO would facilitate the electron transfer process from MB* to SnO2. Overall, this would result in higher photocatalytic efficiency of SnO2/RGO nanocomposites compared with bare SnO2 nanoparticles.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5.

(a) Typical UV–vis absorption spectra of MB solutions after a certain time of UV irradiation in the presence of (a) SnO2/G (b) Photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the MB solution of SnO2, G and SnO2/G (c) The illustration of electron transfer among MB, graphene sheets and SnO2 nanoparticles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694.g005

The cyclic voltammetry process was carried out to observe the electrochemical performance of the synthesized SnO2/G nanocomposites for supercapacitor. Cyclic voltammetry behavior of the synthesized sample is illustrated in Fig 6(A). From the figure, it could be observed that all the CV curves for the electrodes are symmetrical in nature. This is basically characteristic curve showing ideal capacitive behavior with quasi rectangular shape. This indicates excellent capacitive behavior including low contact resistance of the super capacitor electrodes. [52]. Different scan rates obtained for the potential range of -0.4 to 1 V, did not exhibit any broad redox peaks. This showed that the electrodes were consecutively charged and discharged over the whole voltammetry cycle [53, 54]. The CV curves obtained for the composite electrodes were more rectangular and showed relative increment of current level compared with pure SnO2 sample. Thus the overall specific capacitance for the synthesized sample was due to the EDLC and pseudo-capacitance behavior of the composite materials. The capacitance obtained for pure SnO2 electrodes was only for pseudo-capacitance. The charge transfer process is illustrated by semi-circular arc. The inclined lines represent the irregular diffusion of charged species towards the modified electrode. When the interfacial charge transfer resistance is high; it gives large semicircular curves. This results from the poor electrical conductivity of the active substances. If the electrode characteristics are closer to the ideal capacitor, then at lower frequency level more vertical lines are observed. The process taking place at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces at higher frequency level showed the depressed arc (Fig 6(A)). The solution resistance (Rs) at higher frequency level could be observed from the intersections of curves at real axis [55]. Basically the solution resistance (Rs) shows the ionic conductivity of electrolyte solution. The absence of semicircular curves at the higher frequency level of the electrodes is due to low Faradic charge transfer resistances [56].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6.

(a) Cyclic voltammetry response of SnO2/G nanocomposites (b) Nyquist Plots of SnO2/G-Nanocomposite (c) Cycling performances of SnO2/G nano composite (d) Schematic illustration of synthesis process and structure of SnO2/G [57].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202694.g006

Fig 6(B) shows the Nyquist plots of SnO2 and SnO2/G nanocomposite. The synthesized composite showed higher conductivity than the pure SnO2 sample. Thus the diameter of the semicircle obtained for the composite was smaller than for the pure SnO2 sample at higher frequency level. The higher frequency region for the impedance plot and the fitting circuit for SnO2/G are shown by the inset figures. Rs and Rct represent the solution and charge transfer resistances respectively. The solution resistance (R) of the cell is calculated from the intercept between the impedance plot and the real impedance of (Z’) axis. The charge transfer resistance (R) of the interface between the electrode and electrolyte is calculated from the diameter of the semi-circle. The ionic and electronic resistances as well as the intrinsic resistance of the modified electrodes and the diffusive and contact resistances at the composite modified electrodes will combine together to give solution resistances. The electrochemical reaction on the electrode/electrolyte interface is more simplistic for SnO2/G and smaller than for the pure SnO2 sample resulting in smaller values of Rct for the composite electrodes. The magnitude of the EIS values also clearly indicates the better capacitive behavior of the composite electrode than the pure one.

Fig 6(C) shows the long-term cycling properties of the SnO2/G nanocomposite, bare graphene nanosheets and SnO2 nanoparticles at a 0.1 C current rate. The highest reversible capacities with the best cycling stability were observed for the SnO2/G composite electrode. The nano composite electrode delivered a discharge capacity in the first cycle and maintained stable capacities from the second cycle for 100 cycles with an excellent capacity retention. Compared with the composite electrode, graphene electrode showed larger irreversible capacity with lower discharge capacities for 100 cycles. The capacities of SnO2 nanoparticles decreased quickly upon cycling. In the experiments, reduced graphene nanosheets and the as-prepared SnO2 nanoparticles were reassembled in ethylene glycol solution to construct a 3-D flexible structure (Fig 6(D)) [57].

4.Conclusions

SnO2/Graphene nanocomposites were synthesized successfully via a facile hydrothermal method. The crystalline phase of SnO2 nanoparticles was observed by XRD analysis. HR-TER images confirmed the presence of SnO2 nanoparticles over the surface of graphene sheets. The uniform distribution of SnO2 nanoparticles was observed over the wrinkled graphene nanosheets. The morphological analysis using FE-SEM studies showed that the pure graphene had a wrinkled paper like structure. However, the SnO2/G nanocomposite showed the island like structure where the SnO2 nanoparticles were coated over the graphene sheets. The synthesized sample showed a red shift in the absorption spectra. The FT-IR results confirmed the functional groups of graphene and SnO2 nanoparticles. Most of the bands containing C = O and C-O functional groups had disappeared from SnO2/G nanocomposites. The presence of G and D band peaks as well as the metal oxide peaks was confirmed by the Raman analysis. The TGA results showed that SnO2/G possessed higher thermal stability. The enhanced photocatalytic performance for the degradation of MO and MB dyes under the visible and UV light for the synthesized sample reflected its potential application for industrial waste water treatment. The electrochemical performance of the synthesized sample was enhanced due to the presence of graphene inside its matrix. The desalination performance for the composite was greatly increased due to excellent adsorption properties and electrical conductivity of the graphene nano sheets. The surface area of the graphene sheets was greatly reduced by its aggregation intensities. Incorporation of SnO2 inside the graphene layers with prevents its aggregation. The amount of SnO2 needs to be carefully optimized to prevent self-agglomeration of SnO2 nanoparticles. This could be attributed to its enhanced specific capacitance, better stability as well as increased wettability of the electrode materials.

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (Suresh Sagadevan) acknowledges the honor, namely the “Visiting fellow” at the Department of Physics, Center for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kem Sg. Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The author wishes to place on record his heartfelt thanks that are due to the authorities concerned.

References

  1. 1. Li Z., Luo W., Zhang M., Feng J., and Zou Z. Photo electrochemical cells for solar hydrogen production: current state of promising photoelectrodes, methods to improve their properties, and outlook. Energy Environ. Sci.2013; 6: 347−370;
  2. 2. Meng X., Zhang Y., Sun S, Li R and Sun X. Three growth modes and mechanisms for highly structure-tunable SnO2 nanotube arrays of template-directed atomic layer deposition. J. Mater. Chem 2011; 21:12321−12330
  3. 3. Zhu Y., Li C C. Strongly coupled mesoporous SnO2–graphene hybrid with enhanced electrochemical and photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv2013;3: 11860−11868;
  4. 4. Cozzoli P., Comparelli R., Fanizza E., Lucia C.M., Agostiano A., and Laub D et al. Photocatalytic synthesis of silver nanoparticles stabilized by TiO2 nanorods: a semiconductor/metal nanocomposite in homogeneous nonpolar solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004;126: 3868−3879; pmid:15038741
  5. 5. Pan X and Xu Y. Defect-Mediated Growth of Noble-Metal (Ag, Pt, and Pd) Nanoparticles on TiO2 with Oxygen Vacancies for Photocatalytic Redox Reactions under Visible Light. J. Phys. Chem. C2013; 117: 17996−18005;
  6. 6. Geim A., Noveselov K. The rise of graphene.Nature Mater 2007;6:183–191; https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849
  7. 7. Castro Neto A., Guinea F., Peres N., Novoselov K., Geim A. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 2009; 81:109–162; https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109
  8. 8. Stankovich S., Dikin D., Dommett G., Kohlhaas K., Zimney E., Stach E., et al. Graphene-Based Composite Materials. Nature 2006; 442:282–286; pmid:16855586
  9. 9. Abergel D and Fal’ko V.Visibility of graphene flakes on a dielectric substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett 2007; 91: 063125; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2768625
  10. 10. Wang F., Zhang Y., Tian C., Girit C., Zettl A., Crommie M., et al. Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene. Science 2008;320: 206–209; pmid:18339901
  11. 11. Nair R., Blake P., Grigorenko A., Novoselov K., Booth T., Stauber T., et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science2008; 320:1308–1314 pmid:18388259
  12. 12. Dresselhaus M and Dresselhaus G. Intercalation compounds of graphite. Adv. Phys 2002; 51:1–186; https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730110113644
  13. 13. Hirata M., Gotou T., Horiuchi S., Fujiwara M., Ohba M., Hirata M., et al. Thin-film particles of graphite oxide 1:: High-yield synthesis and flexibility of the particles. Carbon 2004;42: 2929–2937; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.003
  14. 14. Berger C., Song Z., Li T., Li X., Ogbazghi A, Feng R., et al. Ultrathin Epitaxial Graphite: 2D Electron Gas Properties and a Route toward Graphene-based Nanoelectronics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004; 108: 19912–19916;
  15. 15. Zhang Y, Tan Y, Stormer H & Kim P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature2005;438: 201–204; pmid:16281031
  16. 16. Novoselov K., Geim A., Morozov S., Jiang D., Katsnelson M., Grigorieva I., et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005; 438: 197–200; pmid:16281030
  17. 17. Zhou X., Huang X, Qi X, Wu S., Xue C., Boey F., et al. In Situ Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles on Single-Layer Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009; 113:10842–10846;
  18. 18. Zhang J., Xiong Z and Zhao X. Graphene–metal–oxide composites for the degradation of dyes under visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Chem 2011; 21: 3634–3640;
  19. 19. Singh V., Joung D., Zhai L., Das S., Khondaker S., Seal S. et al. Graphene based materials: Past, present and future. Prog. Mater. Sci 2011; 56:1178–1271;
  20. 20. Li F., Song J., Yang H., Gan S., Zhang Q., Han D., et al. One-step synthesis of graphene/SnO2 nanocomposites and its application in electrochemical supercapacitors. Nanotechnology 2009;20: 455602–455608; pmid:19834246
  21. 21. Kim H., Kim S., Park Y., Gwon H., Seo D., Kim Y., et al. SnO2/graphene composite with high lithium storage capability for lithium rechargeable batteries. Nano Res2010; 3: 813–821;
  22. 22. Tripathi K., Sachan A., Castro M., Choudhary V., Sonkar S., Feller J. et al. Green carbon nanostructured quantum resistive sensors to detect volatile biomarkers. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 2018;16: 1–11DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.01.001
  23. 23. Mishra Y, Adelung R. ZnO tetrapod materials for functional applications. Materials Today 2017; 21: 631–651;
  24. 24. Tripathi K., Singh A., Bhati A., Sarkar S., and Sonkar S. Sustainable Feasibility of the Environmental Pollutant Soot to Few-Layer Photoluminescent Graphene Nanosheets for Multifunctional Applications. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016;4:6399−6408;
  25. 25. Tripathi K., Bhati A., Singh A., Sonker A., Sarkar S., and Sonkar S. Sustainable Changes in the Contents of Metallic Micronutrients in First Generation Gram Seeds Imposed by Carbon Nano-onions: Life Cycle Seed to Seed Study. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng2017;5: 2906−2916
  26. 26. Singh A., Khare P., Verma S., Bhati A., Sonker A., Tripathi K, et al. Pollutant Soot for Pollutant Dye Degradation: Soluble Graphene Nanosheets for Visible Light Induced Photodegradation of Methylene Blue. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng 2017;5: 8860−8869
  27. 27. Khare P., Singh A., Verma S., Bhati A, Sonker A, Tripathi K, et al. Sunlight-Induced Selective Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue in Bacterial Culture by Pollutant Soot Derived Nontoxic Graphene Nanosheets. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng 2018;6:579−589;
  28. 28. Kumar M and Reddy G. Ag:ZrO2 nanocomposite thin films derived using a novel sol–gel technique. Phys. Status Solidi B 2009; 246:2232–2237; https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200844464
  29. 29. Kumar M., Kulriya P., Pivin J and Avasthi D. Evolution and tailoring of plasmonic properties in Ag:ZrO2 nanocomposite films by swift heavy ion irradiation. J. Appl. Phys 2011;109: 044311; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3555593
  30. 30. Kumar M., Sandeep C., Kumar G., Mishra Y., Philip R., Reddy G et al. Plasmonic and Nonlinear Optical Absorption Properties of Ag:ZrO2 Nanocomposite Thin Film. Plasmonics 2014;9: 129–136;
  31. 31. Kumar M and Reddy G. Stability-Inspired Entrapment of Ag Nanoparticles in ZrO2 Thin films. Plasmonics2016; 11: 261–267;
  32. 32. Kumar M., Wen L., Han J.Plasma diagnostic of cup-like magnetron source for transparent conductive oxide thin films.Vacuum 2017; 146:517–523; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.03.002
  33. 33. Muhulet A., Miculescu F.,Voicu S., Schütt F., Thakur V., Mishra Y., et al. (2018) Fundamentals and scopes of doped carbon nanotubes towards energy and biosensing applications. Materials Today Energy2018; 9:154–186;DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.002
  34. 34. Smazna D., Rodrigues J., Shree S., Postica V., Neubüser G., Martins A., et al. Buckminsterfullerene Hybridized Zinc Oxide Tetrapods: Defects and Charge Transfer Induced Optical and Electrical Response. Nanoscale10:1–3;
  35. 35. Tran T., Tripathi K., Kim B., You I., Park B., Han Y., et al. Three-dimensional -MnO2 nanowire–Graphene hybrid hydrogels for high performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Materials Research Bulletin 2017; 96: 395 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.04.012
  36. 36. Kumar M., Kumar T., Avasthi D. Study of thermal annealing induced plasmonic bleaching in Ag:TiO2 nanocomposite thin films. Scripta Materialia 2015; 105:46–49;
  37. 37. Sagadevan S., Chowdhury Z., Johan M., Rafique R and Aziz F. One pot synthesis of hybrid ZnS–Graphene nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic activities using hydrothermal approach. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2018;29:9099–9107; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8937-z
  38. 38. Sagadevan S., Chowdhury Z., Johan M and Rafique F. A facile one-step hydrothermal synthesis of HfO2/graphene nanocomposite and its physio-chemical properties. Mater. Res. Express 52018;DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aab173
  39. 39. Sagadevan S., Chowdhury Z., Hoque M and Podder J. Chemically stabilized reduced graphene oxide/zirconia nanocomposite: synthesis and characterization. Mater. Res. Express. 2017;4: 115031; https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa9a8c
  40. 40. Sagadevan S., Pal K., Chowdhury Z. Controllable synthesis of Graphene/ZnO-nanocomposite for novel switching. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2017; 728:645–654; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.061
  41. 41. Sagadevan S., Pal K., Chowdhury Z. Scalable synthesis of CdS–Graphene nanocomposite spectroscopic characterizations. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28:17193–17201; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7648-1
  42. 42. Sagadevan S., Pal K., Pandurangan K., Subashini A. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2/graphene oxide nanocomposite. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron2017;28: 7892–7898; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6488-3
  43. 43. Baek S., Seung-Ho Y.S., Park S., Andrea Pucci A., Marichy C., Lee D., et al. A one-pot microwave-assisted non-aqueous sol–gel approach to metal oxide/graphene nanocomposites for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 2011; 1: 1687–1690;
  44. 44. Hou C., Zhang Q., Zhu M., Li Y., Wang H. One-step synthesis of magnetically-functionalized reduced graphite sheets and their use in hydrogels. Carbon 2011; 49: 47–53; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.040
  45. 45. Park S, Yu S., Woo S., Jang B., Chung Y., Cho Y., et al. A facile hydrazine-assisted hydrothermal method for the deposition of monodisperse SnO2 nanoparticles onto graphene for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem 2012; 22: 2520–2525;
  46. 46. Stankovich S., Dikin D., Piner R., Kohlhaas K., Kleinhammes A., Jia Y., et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007; 45:1558–65;.
  47. 47. Wang W., Kapitanova O., Ilanchezhiyan P., Xi S., Panin G., Won Kang D., et al. Self-assembled MoS2/rGO nanocomposites with tunable UV-IR absorption. RSC Adv.2018; 8:2410.
  48. 48. Zhang J., Xionga Z and Zhao X. Graphene–metal–oxide composites for the degradation of dyes under visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Chem 2011;21: 3634–3640;
  49. 49. Seema H., Kemp K., Chandra V and Kim K. Graphene-SnO2 Composites for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue under Sunlight. Nanotechnology.2012; 23:355705–355713; pmid:22894878
  50. 50. Xiong Z., Zhang L., Ma J and Zhao X. Photocatalytic degradation of dyes over graphene–gold nanocomposites under visible light irradiation. Chem. Commun 2010; 46: 6099–6101; pmid:20661492
  51. 51. Talebian N., Nilforoushan M. Comparative study of the structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of semiconductor metal oxides toward degradation of methylene blue. Thin Solid Films 2010; 518:2210–2215;
  52. 52. Ramachandran R., Saranya M., Santhosh C., Velmurugan V., Raghupathy B., Jeong S, et al. Co9S8 nanoflakes on graphene (Co9S8/G) nanocomposites for high performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv 2014; 4: 21151–21162;
  53. 53. Xu M., Kong L., Zhou W and Li H. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Pseudocapacitance Properties of α-MnO2 Hollow Spheres and Hollow Urchins. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017; 111: 19141–19147;
  54. 54. Xu M, Zhao D, Bao S, Li H Mesoporous amorphous MnO2 as electrode material for supercapacitor. J. Solid State Electrochem 2007; 11: 1101–1107; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-006-0246-4
  55. 55. Naebe M, Wang J, Amini A, Khayyam H, Hameed N., Li L., et al. Mechanical property and structure of covalent functionalized graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. Scientific Reports (Nature) 2014;4:1–7; pmid:24625497
  56. 56. Li J., Xie H. Synthesis of graphene oxide/polypyrrole nanowire composites for supercapacitors. Mater. Lett 2012; 78:106–109; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.03.013
  57. 57. Paek S., Yoo E and Honma I. Enhanced Cyclic Performance and Lithium Storage Capacity of SnO2/Graphene Nanoporous Electrodes with Three-Dimensionally Delaminated Flexible Structure. Nano Lett 2009; 9: 72–75; pmid:19090687