http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-1000
Figures
Abstract
One of the most important clinical signs of dengue virus infection is the reduction of white blood cells and platelets in human peripheral blood (leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively), which may significantly impair the clearance of dengue virus by the immune system. The cause of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia during dengue infection is still unknown, but may be related to severe suppression of bone marrow populations including hematopoietic stem cells and megakaryocytes, the progenitors of white blood cells and platelets respectively. Here, we explored the possibility that bone marrow suppression, including ablation of megakaryocyte populations, is caused by dengue virus infection of megakaryocytes. We used three different models to measure dengue virus infection and replication: in vitro, in a human megakaryocyte cell line with viral receptors, ex vivo, in primary human megakaryocytes, and in vivo, in humanized mice. All three systems support dengue virus infection and replication, including virus strains from serotypes 1, 2, and 3, and clinical signs, in vivo; all assays showed viral RNA and/or infectious viruses 7–14 days post-infection. Although we saw no significant decrease in cell viability in vitro, there was significant depletion of mature megakaryocytes in vivo. We conclude that megakaryocytes can produce dengue viruses in the bone marrow niche, and a reduction of cell numbers may affect bone marrow homeostasis.
Author summary
Dengue virus is the most common cause of viral hemorrhagic fever in humans. Over half of the world’s population lives in an at risk area for dengue virus infection, and this number will continue to grow as climate change allows the mosquito vectors of dengue virus to expand their breeding ranges to more temperate climates. Currently, there are no specific treatments for dengue virus infection. Understanding how dengue virus causes hemorrhagic fever could inform the development of these much needed treatments. Populations of important immune system mediators, such as white blood cells and platelets, are significantly dysregulated during dengue virus infection. These cells originate in the bone marrow, which experiences significant suppression, including a complete ablation of megakaryocytes (platelet progenitor cells), during DENV infection. Here, we add to the knowledge on how dengue virus induces bone marrow suppression by investigating whether dengue virus infects human megakaryocytes. We discovered that dengue virus infects human megakaryocytes in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of dengue virus infection; however, dengue virus infection does not appear to directly affect viability of human megakaryocytes. Future studies will investigate whether infected megakaryocytes are still able to perform their functions of producing platelets and maintaining bone marrow homeostasis.
Citation: Vogt MB, Lahon A, Arya RP, Spencer Clinton JL, Rico-Hesse R (2019) Dengue viruses infect human megakaryocytes, with probable clinical consequences. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13(11): e0007837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007837
Editor: Duane J. Gubler, Duke-NUS GMS, SINGAPORE
Received: May 16, 2019; Accepted: October 10, 2019; Published: November 25, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Vogt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files except for the flow cytometry raw data which are available from the Flow Repository under the accession number FR-FCM-Z2B4.
Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants to RR-H (R01 A1098715, R01 A1099483). This project was supported by the Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core at Baylor College of Medicine with funding from the NIH (P30 A1036211, P30 CA125123, and S10 RR024575) and by the Integrated Microscopy Core at Baylor College of Medicine with funding from the NIH (P30 CA125123, P30 DK56338-13/15) and the Cancer Prevention and Resource Institute of Texas (RP150578). The funders did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Dengue virus (DENV; Flavivirus) is the most common cause of hemorrhagic fever in humans, worldwide. Each year, approximately 390 million DENV infections occur [1], with an estimated 50 million becoming symptomatic, 500,000 progressing to hemorrhagic fever, and 50,000 resulting in death [2, 3]. In addition, DENV causes a significant economic burden, with an estimated $9 billion (USD) spent each year treating DENV infections [4]. Furthermore, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over half of the world’s population (4.5 billion people) live in an area at-risk for DENV infection, including residents of the southern United States and US territories [5]. This number is expected to increase as climate change allows for the expansion of the host range of DENV’s primary vector, the Aedes aegypti mosquito [2]. There are currently no DENV vaccines approved for all persons, and no specific anti-DENV treatments [6, 7]. Understanding the mechanisms leading to DENV disease will allow for the production of more effective DENV vaccines and treatments.
The onset of DENV symptoms occur 5 to 8 days following an infected mosquito bite [8]. Most symptomatic DENV infections result in a self-limiting febrile illness that lasts 3 to 7 days and is characterized by maculopapular rash, retro-orbital pain, arthralgia, and myalgia. Approximately 1% of symptomatic DENV infections will progress to hemorrhagic fever upon defervescence and clearance of DENV from the blood [8]. Dengue hemorrhagic fever is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by excessive bruising, plasma leakage, organ hemorrhaging, bloody vomit and stool, and hypovolemic shock. These hemorrhagic manifestations are likely not caused by severe damage to the endothelium, because endothelial damage has not been observed upon autopsy of humans who succumbed to DENV infection [8].
Platelets are crucial in maintaining vascular homeostasis and preventing spontaneous bleeding in otherwise healthy individuals [9]. A significant reduction in platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) often occurs during DENV infection and ranges from mild (50,000–150,000 platelets/μL blood) in cases of dengue fever to severe (<50,000 platelets/μL blood) in cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever [5, 6]. Peak thrombocytopenia occurs simultaneously with defervescence and the onset of dengue hemorrhagic fever [8, 10]. Thus, severe thrombocytopenia in DENV infections may play a crucial role in the development of hemorrhagic manifestations. However, platelet transfusions are contraindicated for treatment of dengue hemorrhagic fever and may increase severity of disease [5, 11]. Platelet functions are dysregulated during DENV infection, including increased platelet activation, clot formation, apoptosis, and inflammatory cytokine production, all of which contribute to thrombocytopenia [12–17]. Instead of contributing to hemorrhagic manifestations, thrombocytopenia during DENV infection may indicate widespread hematological dysregulation.
Platelets are not the only hematopoietic population dysregulated during DENV infection. Leukopenia (decreased white blood cell counts) and lymphocytosis (increased lymphocyte counts), especially of atypical B and T cell populations, also occur during DENV infection and are particularly severe in dengue hemorrhagic fever [8, 18]. Like peak thrombocytopenia, peak leukopenia and lymphocytosis occur coincident with defervescence and onset of dengue hemorrhagic fever [8]. The development of hematopoietic cells occurs in the bone marrow. Bone marrow suppression occurs in DENV infection and peaks approximately 2–3 days before peak thrombocytopenia and leukopenia [10]. This suppression affects all cell populations in the bone marrow including a complete ablation of mature megakaryocytes, platelet progenitor cells [10]. While the primary role of megakaryocytes is to produce platelets, recent studies indicate that megakaryocytes are integral to maintaining the homeostasis of various processes within the bone marrow including hematopoiesis, plasma cell (terminally differentiated, antibody secreting B cells) maintenance, and skeletal homeostasis [19–23]. Thus, megakaryocyte suppression during DENV infection may impact counts of platelets and other hematopoietic cells, potentially impacting disease severity. Understanding how DENV infection causes megakaryocyte suppression may allow for the creation of preventive or treatment measures for DENV.
Previous studies investigating bone marrow and megakaryocyte suppression during DENV infection have found that DENV reduces the number of human megakaryocytes and their progenitor cells in infected humanized mice [24], megakaryocytes from non-human primates are susceptible to DENV infection in vivo and ex vivo [25], and DENV infects bone marrow cells in both humanized mice and non-human primate models [24, 26]. Infection of human megakaryocytes in vivo has not yet been confirmed, although CD61+ cells (megakaryocytes) isolated from healthy human bone marrow are susceptible for DENV infection ex vivo [25]. An additional study discovered large, DENV+, CD61+ cells in peripheral blood in humans infected with DENV [27]; however, a literature review found no other instances of human megakaryocytes found in peripheral blood. These CD61+ cells are likely infected platelets adhered to leukocytes [28].
We hypothesized that DENV causes megakaryocyte suppression, in part, through direct infection of megakaryocytes; therefore, the goal of this study was to measure DENV infection of megakaryocytes in different systems. We used in vitro (UT-7 cells), ex vivo (megakaryocytes differentiated from human CD34+ cells) and in vivo (humanized NOD/SCID/IL-2γ-/- (hu-NSG) mice) models of human megakaryocytes and DENV infection. The results of this study provide insights into the mechanisms behind bone marrow and megakaryocyte suppression during DENV infection and sets the stage for future studies of whether DENV directly impairs hematopoietic cell populations.
Materials and methods
Dengue virus strains
Dengue serotype 1 (DENV-1) strain VN/BID-V1792 was obtained from BEI (NR44083) at C6/36 passage 1, and we passaged twice in C6/36 cells. Dengue serotype 2 (DENV-2) strain K0049 was isolated from serum of a DENV patient in Thailand in 1995, and has been used extensively in our laboratory (BEI NR12215). It has been passaged three times in C6/36 cells. Dengue serotype 2 strain 16681 is a laboratory-adapted strain of DENV and was obtained from Richard Kinney (CDC); it has been passaged through monkey kidney cells >10 times, live rhesus macaque p.1, whole mosquito p.2, and C6/36 cells p.5. Dengue serotype 3 (DENV-3) strain 7431/98 is a clinical isolate from a DENV outbreak in Nicaragua in 1998, obtained from Dr. Eva Harris (UC Berkeley). It was passaged twice in C6/36 cells. All virus strains were propagated in C6/36 cells and frozen in 30% gelatin.
UV-inactivated K0049 was used as a negative control in all cell culture experiments. Five hundred microliters of K0049 was transferred to each well of a 6-well plate. The plate was then positioned in the center of UV-Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene) and the lid removed. Using the energy setting, 0.9J UV was applied to the virus four times, for a total of 3.6J UV exposure. Fresh UV-inactivated virus was prepared for each infection. Following preparation, UV-inactivation was confirmed by endpoint dilution assay (described below).
Humanized-NSG mice
Humanized NOD/SCID/IL-2γ-/- (hu-NSG) mice were prepared as described previously [29]. Briefly, male and female NSG mice were obtained from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, ME) and were bred at Baylor College of Medicine, in the Transgenic Mouse Facility (TMF). When pups were 1 day old, they were sublethally irradiated with 100 centigrays from a cesium source at TMF, and injected intrahepatically with 300,000 human CD34+ stem cells obtained from human umbilical cord vein blood (University of Texas MD Anderson Cord Blood Bank).
Eight weeks following injection, mice were checked for human immune cell engraftment via flow cytometry. Approximately 100μL of blood were obtained via retroorbital bleed. Antibodies against human CD45 (clone HI30; APC; BD Biosciences) and mouse CD45 (30F11; FITC; Miltenyi Biotec) were added to blood samples and incubated 30 minutes. Red blood cells were lysed using BD FACS Lysing Solution (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were run on an LSRII flow cytometer (BD) and analyzed using FlowJo software (v10, TreeStar). Human engraftment percentage was determined by dividing the number of human CD45+ cells by the sum of human and mouse CD45+ cells. Only mice with a human engraftment percentage of at least 20% were used in this study.
Dengue infection of humanized mice
Hu-NSG mice were infected with 106 plaque forming units of virus delivered via subcutaneous injection. Clinical signs of infection were assessed on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 post infection. Mice were anesthetized via isoflurane inhalation, and temperature and erythema were measured via rectal thermometer and DSMII Colormeter (Cortex Technologies), respectively. Approximately 20μL of blood were obtained via retroorbital bleed to quantify viremia. Blood was transferred to microcentrifuge tubes and allowed to clot before centrifuging at 500g for 15 minutes to separate out serum. Trizol LS (Ambion) was added to serum samples according to manufacturer’s instructions, and samples were stored at -70°C until RNA extractions and qRT-PCR were performed. On day 10 post infection, blood was collected via retroorbital bleed to perform platelet counts.
On days 8 and 14 post infection, mice were euthanized via isoflurane overdose. Femurs were dissected out of euthanized mice, and bone marrow was flushed out of femurs using a 5/8 inch 25 gauge needle and sterile PBS with 2% FBS. Marrow was forced through a 0.45μM filter to create a single cell suspension. Cells were treated with red blood cell lysis solution (eBioscience) and washed with sterile PBS/FBS. Infected megakaryocytes were identified using flow cytometry.
Isolation and differentiation of human CD34+ cells
Human umbilical cord vein blood was obtained from the MD Anderson Cancer Center Cord Blood Bank. Blood was diluted 1:2 in sterile PBS and separated using Leucosep tubes (Grenier Bio-One) and Lymphocyte Separation Media (Corning) according to the manufactures’ instructions. Following separation, the lymphocyte layer was treated with red blood cell lysis solution (eBioscience) and washed in PBS/FBS. CD34+ stem cells were isolated using the EasySep Human CD34 Positive Selection Kit (Stem Cell Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Isolated CD34+ cells were plated in 24 well plates at 40,000 cells/mL in IMDM media (Gibco) containing 20% BIT Serum substitute (Stem Cell Technologies), 20μg/mL Human LDL (Stem Cell Technologies), 100μM 5x10-2M β-Mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen), and 1× StemSpan Megakaryocyte Expansion Supplement. Cells were incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Four days post isolation, cells were split 1:2. Seven days post isolation, cells were replated at 3 to 5x105 cells/ml. Differentiation was assessed on days 4, 7, 11, and 14 post isolation using flow cytometry [30].
Growth and maintenance of cell lines
UT-7 cells (human megakaryocytic cell line) were obtained from DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, Germany; Catalog number: ACC-137). Cells were grown according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, following revival from liquid nitrogen, cells were cultured in MEMα–no nucleosides (Gibco) containing 40% FBS and 5ng/mL GM-CSF (Peprotech) for 6 days, after which FBS was reduced to 20%. Cells were split every three days, and replated at 5x105 cells/mL in fresh media. Cells were incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. All UT-7 cells used for experiments were below passage 25.
C6/36 cells (Aedes albopictus cell line) were obtained from ATCC (CRL-1600). Cells were cultured in Minimum Essential Media (HyClone) containing 10% FBS, 1% Sodium Pyruvate (Sigma), 1% MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids (Sigma), and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin/L-Glutamine solution (Sigma). Cells were incubated at 29°C at 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
Infection of human megakaryocytes and UT-7 cells
Human megakaryocytes were infected at day 7 post isolation; at this time point the cell population was comprised mostly of immature megakaryocytes, based on flow cytometry for cell surface marker expression. UT-7 cells were infected at least three days after FBS in the media was reduced from 40% to 20%. Both cell types were infected in a similar method. Cells were transferred to 96 well plates with 2x105 cells/well. Cells were centrifuged at 200g for 5 minutes, and cell culture media was discarded. Cells were resuspended in 100μL of DENV diluted to the appropriate multiplicity of infection (MOI) in cell culture media containing 2% FBS or BIT Serum Substitute. Cells were incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator for 2 hours, rocking every 15 minutes. Following incubation, cells were washed three times in sterile PBS and resuspended in 200μL of appropriate cell culture media containing 2% FBS or BIT Serum Substitute. UT-7 cells were transferred to 48 well plates. Human megakaryocytes were transferred to 24 well plates and media was added to each well for a final volume of 500μL media per well. Both cell types were incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
Daily, following infection, 10% of total media volume was removed from both cell types, treated with Trizol LS (Ambion), and stored at -70°C for later quantification of viral RNA via qRT-PCR. Fresh media was added in a volume equaling the amount removed. Supernatants from UT-7 cells were collected daily for later assessment of infectious virus. The entire well volume was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and cells were pelleted by centrifuging at 200g for 5 minutes. Supernatants were transferred to a new tube, and 30% gelatin was added. Samples were stored at -70°C until presence of infectious virus could be determined via end point dilutions on C6/36 cells. The remaining cell pellet was used to assess cell viability and percentage of infected cells via flow cytometry.
Quantification of viral RNA
RNA was extracted from serum samples from hu-NSG mice and cell supernatants from human megakaryocyte and UT-7 cells according to Trizol LS (Invitrogen) manufacturer instructions. RNA pellets were resuspended in 50μL DEPC treated water (Ambion). Viral RNA was quantified via a one-step qRT-PCR [31] using TaqMan fast virus one step master mix (Applied Biosystems) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Ten microliters of RNA were used per reaction. Table 1 lists the primer and probe sequences and concentrations. Cycling conditions are described in Table 2. The amplification products are approximately 100bp regions of the capsid protein that are unique to each serotype. An absolute standard curve of in vitro transcribed RNA standards from DENV-2 was used to determine concentration of viral RNA in samples. This assay can detect a minimum concentration of 240 RNA copies per mL or 1.2 μL per reaction.
Flow cytometry assays
Counting platelets in hu-NSG mice.
On day 10 post infection, 10μL of blood were collected in heparinized tubes from each mouse via retroorbital bleed for counting platelets. Blood was transferred to 5mL round bottom tubes (BD Falcon) containing 600μL megakaryocyte buffer (0.1mM theophylline (Sigma), 15mM sodium citrate (Sigma), 1% BSA (Sigma) in sterile PBS) [30]. Antibodies against human CD41 (clone HIP8; PE; Biolegend) and mouse CD41 (clone MWReg30, BV510, Biolegend) were added, and samples were incubated 25 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Twenty-five microliters of CountBright absolute counting beads (Invitrogen) were added to each sample, and samples were incubated 60 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Samples were run on a LSRII (BD) flow cytometer, making sure to capture at least 1000 counting bead events per sample. Data were analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar).
Identification of infected megakaryocytes in hu-NSG mice.
Bone marrow cells isolated from hu-NSG mice were blocked with normal mouse serum (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Samples were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with antibodies against human CD45 (clone 2D1, Amcyan, BD Biosciences), human CD41a (clone HIP8, PE, Biolegend), and human CD42b (clone HIP1, PerCP, Biolegend) diluted in megakaryocyte buffer. Then, samples were fixed and permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with antibody against DENV envelope protein (clone 4G2, FITC, Millipore). Samples were run on an LSRII (BD) and data were analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar).
Determination of megakaryocyte differentiation status.
Cells differentiated from human CD34+ cells were blocked with normal mouse serum (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Samples were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with antibodies against human CD34 (clone 581, AF700, Biolegend), human CD41a (clone HIP8, PE, Biolegend), human CD42b (clone HIP1, FITC, Biolegend), and human CD62L (clone AK4, AF647, Biolegend) diluted in megakaryocyte buffer. Samples were run on an LSRII (BD) cytometer and data were analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar). Cells that were CD41a+ CD42b- were considered immature megakaryocytes and cells that were CD41a+/- CD42b+ were considered mature megakaryocytes.
Determination of putative DENV receptors on UT-7 cells.
UT-7 cells were blocked with normal mouse serum (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Samples were singly incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with antibody against human CD206 (clone 19.2, PE, BD Biosciences), human DC-SIGN (clone 120507, AF647, R&D Systems), human DC-SIGNR (clone 120604, AF594, R&D Systems), human Axl (clone MM0098-2N33, AF488, Novus Biologicals), human CD300a (MEM260, AF647, BD Biosciences), human TIM1 (clone 219211, AF700, Novus Biologicals), or Tyro3 (polyclonal, AF405, Novus Biologicals) diluted in PBS/FBS. Samples were run on an LSRII (BD) cytometer and data were analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar).
Determination of UT-7 infection status and viability.
UT-7 cells were stained with Ghostdye UV450 (Tonbo) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were blocked with normal mouse serum (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Then, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were then incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with antibody against DENV envelope (4G2, FITC, Millipore). Samples were run on an LSRII cytometer (BD) and data were analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar). Viability was also assessed via trypan blue exclusion. A sample of infected UT-7 cells were collected every other day post infection and diluted in cell culture media with trypan blue (final dilution 1:10). Total cells, trypan blue stained cells, and unstained cells were counted via hemocytometer. Viable cells were those that were unstained by trypan blue. The percentage of viable cells was calculated by dividing the number of unstained cells by the number of total cells.
Gating strategies for all flow cytometry assays are described in S1 Text. All data are available at the flow cytometry repository: https://flowrepository.org/id/FR-FCM-Z2B4
Immunofluorescence assay for detection of viral proteins in infected UT-7 cells
Labtek II CC2 coated chamber slides (Nunc) were treated with poly-D-lysine (300μL each well) and incubated 30 minutes at room temperature. Treated slides were left to dry overnight in a sterile environment. UT-7 cells were infected as described above. One day post infection, UT-7 cells were transferred to treated chamber slides. To assist in cell adherence, chamber slides were centrifuged at 200g for 5 minutes then incubated for 2 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Chamber slides were centrifuged again and media was gently removed via pipette. Cells were fixed with 200ul per well of Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Next, cells were blocked in TBS Superblock (ThermoFisher) diluted 1:2 in TBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Then, cells were incubated overnight at 4°C in antibody against DENV envelope (4G2, mouse IgG, Novus Biologicals) diluted 1:50 in Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences).
The next day, cells were washed twice in PBS (BD Biosciences) and incubated for 2 hours at 4°C in the dark in anti-mouse IgG (AF488, ThermoFisher). Cells were washed twice and then incubated 10 minutes at room temperature in the dark with NucBlue ReadyProbes Reagent (Invitrogen) diluted 1:10 in PBS. Cells were washed once more. Chambers were removed from the chamber slide, and the slide dried for 10 minutes at room temperature to remove excess liquid. Approximately 15μl of Prolong Anti-Fade Mounting Media (Cell Signaling Technologies) were added per well. Bubbles were gently removed using a pipette tip. A glass coverslip was laid over the slide, and any air bubbles were gently pushed out. The slide was left to cure overnight at room temperature before sealing with clear nail polish. Images were taken using a Nikon A1SR microscope with NIS Elements software.
Endpoint dilutions to measure infectious virus in cell supernatants
C6/36 cells were seeded at 1x105 cells per well in a 48 well plate and incubated overnight at 29°C, 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The next day, UT-7 cell supernatants were thawed and ten-fold serially diluted in C6/36 growth media containing 2% FBS. C6/36 cells were infected by removing growth media and treating with 100μL of appropriate supernatant dilution per well. Cells were incubated for 2 hours at 29°C, 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Then, supernatants were pipetted off, and fresh C6/36 media (2% FBS) was added to each well. Cells were reincubated for 7 days.
Infected C6/36 cells were visualized via immunofluorescence against DENV envelope protein. Cell media were removed from wells, and cells were fixed and permeabilized using a 1:1 mix of ice-cold acetone (Fisher Scientific) and methanol (Fisher Scientific). Cells were incubated 20 minutes at -20°C before aspirating off acetone/methanol and drying for 20 minutes at room temperature in a chemical fume hood. Cells were blocked for 20 minutes at 37°C with TBS Superblock (ThermoFisher) diluted 1:2 in TBS. Then, cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with antibody against DENV envelope (4G2, mouse IgG, Novus Biologicals) diluted 1:50 in blocking buffer. The following day, cells were washed twice in TBS and incubated 2 hours at 37°C with antibody against mouse IgG (AF488, ThermoFisher). Then, cells were washed twice in TBS and incubated 10 minutes at room temperature in NucBlue Live ReadyProbes Reagent (Invitrogen) diluted 1:10 in TBS. Cells were washed again in TBS and left to dry overnight at room temperature. Results were visualized on a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss). A well was considered positive for infectious virus if there were any cells that had stained with 4G2. The endpoint dilution was noted as the highest dilution of supernatant that still yielded infected cells.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v8.0. Most data in this study were analyzed via two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons t-test using the Holm-Sidak correction. Infectious virus immunofluorescent results were analyzed by hand using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test as described in [32].
Ethics statement
All experiments involving mice were done in accordance with guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Baylor College of Medicine (IACUC Protocol AN-6151), and the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 2011). The Institutional Review Board at Baylor College of Medicine determined that our use of human blood products in this study did not constitute human subjects research.
Results
Dengue virus infects and replicates in an in vitro model of human megakaryocytes
We began our investigation into whether DENV infects human megakaryocytes by using the UT-7 cell line as an in vitro model of human megakaryocytes. UT-7 cells are a human megakaryocytic cell line derived from bone marrow cells of a male who was suffering from acute megakaryoblastic leukemia [33]. UT-7 cells are similar to immature megakaryocytes in that they are polyploid and express the cell surface marker CD41a UT-7 cells may express CD42b, although expression is variable and dependent on spontaneous maturation of UT-7 cells[33]. We preferred the UT-7 cell model to other human megakaryocyte-like cell lines, Meg-01 and K562, because the latter cell lines are more closely related to common myeloid progenitor cells. Meg-01 and K562 cells do not express classical megakaryocyte cell surface markers (CD41a or CD42b) and can only be stimulated to be more like immature megakaryocytes through treatment with phorbol myristrate acetate (PMA) [34]. In addition, we focused on using DENV-2 strains, because this serotype was associated with the emergence of dengue hemorrhagic fever in the western hemisphere and has a long history of associated severe disease outbreaks [35–37].
We first wanted to determine whether DENV can enter UT-7 cells. The specific receptor that DENV uses to enter cells has yet to be determined; however, putative DENV receptors include C-type lectins (DC-SIGN, DC-SIGNR, and CD206) and phosphatidyl serine receptors (Axl, TIM-1, Tyro3, CD300a) [38, 39]. We used flow cytometry to determine that UT-7 cells express CD300a, Axl, TIM-1, and Tyro3 (Fig 1A) at levels consistent with human megakaryocytes in vivo [40–43]. Interestingly, we noted that approximately 15% of UT-7 cells express DC-SIGNR, a homologue of DC-SIGN. Expression of DC-SIGN but not DC-SIGNR has been observed in human megakaryocytes and platelets; however, this study uses reagents that do not distinguish between DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR [43]. In our study, we used clones of antibodies that are specific to DC-SIGN or DC-SIGNR and do not cross-react with the other receptor (R&D Systems). To determine whether DENV enters UT-7 cells, UT-7 cells were infected with DENV-2 K0049 or DENV-2 16681 at various multiplicities of infection (MOI). Daily, post infection, UT-7 cells were collected, permeabilized, and stained for DENV envelope protein using the 4G2 monoclonal antibody. Dengue virus envelope protein was visualized in UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 1, 16681 MOI 0.1, and K0049 MOI 1 with the peak occurring at day 1 post infection (Fig 1B). To eliminate the possibility that these results were reflective of the viral inoculum and not infected cells, we performed flow cytometry on UT-7 cells immediately post infection and cell washing (2 hours post infection). DENV envelope protein was not observed at this time point, indicating that the observed positive results are indeed due to DENV infection and not persistence of the initial inoculum. To corroborate our flow cytometry results, we performed immunofluorescence on infected UT-7 cells. Once again, we saw DENV envelope protein in UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 1 and, to a lesser extent, in cells infected with K0049 MOI 1 (Fig 2). In both assays, UV inactivated K0049 was used as controls; UV inactivated 16681 was not used because UV inactivated K0049 represents a better negative control as K0049 is a more realistic viral strain for infection. No DENV envelope protein was detected in cells exposed to the UV inactivated K0049 control. Together these results indicate that DENV can enter and infect UT-7 cells.
(A) Using flow cytometry, UT-7 expression of putative DENV receptors were interrogated. Data from three independent experiments are represented as the mean percentage of the UT-7 cell population that was positive for a given receptor. Error bars are 1 standard error of the mean (SEM). (B) UT-7 cells infected with DENV-2 strains K0049 and 16681 were fixed, permeabilized, and incubated with antibody against DENV envelope protein. Samples were interrogated via flow cytometry, and data from three independent experiments are represented as the percentage of the UT-7 cell population that was infected (positive for DENV envelope). Error bars are 1 SEM. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons t-test (with Holm-Sidak correction). Statistical significance next to the virus strain name indicate that that infection was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control as assessed by two-way ANOVA. Significance at a specific timepoint indicates that the condition at that timepoint was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control via t-test but that the overall infection was not significantly different via ANOVA. * p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.005; ****p<0.001.
Representative immunofluorescence images of UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 1, K0049 MOI 1, or UV-inactivated K0049 at day one post infection. Blue represents nuclei stained with DAPI. Green represents DENV envelope protein stained with the 4G2 monoclonal antibody. Scale bars are 50μM. Images were obtained using a Nikon A1SR microscope using NIS elements software.
To determine whether DENV replicates in UT-7 cells, UT-7 cells were infected with DENV-2 16681 or DENV-2 K0049 at various MOIs. Each day post infection, cell supernatants were collected, and concentrations of viral RNA within these supernatants were determined via qRT-PCR. DENV RNA was present in the supernatants of UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 1, 16681 MOI 0.1, and K0049 MOI 1 at a significantly higher amount than cells exposed to the K0049 UV inactivated control (Fig 3). Furthermore, the amount of DENV RNA present increased over time in the aforementioned conditions. Additionally, we observed persistence of viral RNA in the supernatants of UT-7 cells exposed to the K0049 UV inactivated control, and we were concerned that our results for all experimental groups may just reflect input virus. To distinguish between persistence of input virus and replication of viral genome, we “infected” cell-free tissue culture dishes in the same manner as the infection of UT-7 cells and assayed for viral RNA over time. Viral RNA concentrations from supernatants of UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 1, 16681 MOI 0.1, K0049 MOI 1, and K0049 MOI 0.1 were significantly increased compared to levels found in cell-free wells (S1 Fig). Thus, we concluded that replication of the DENV genome occurred in UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 1, 16681 MOI 0.1, and K0049 MOI 1.
UT-7 cells were infected with DENV-2 16681 or DENV-2 K0049 at various MOIs. UT-7 cells incubated with UV-inactivated K0049 served as a control. Immediately following infection and daily post infection, supernatant samples were collected and DENV RNA was quantified via qRT-PCR. Data from three independent experiments are represented as the mean number of RNA copies per milliliter of cell supernatant. Error bars are 1 SEM. The arrow points to the timepoint at which we tested for and found infectious virus in all supernatants, except for those from cells treated with UV-inactivated K0049. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons t-test (with Holm-Sidak correction). Statistical significance next to the virus strain name indicate that that infection was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control as assessed by two-way ANOVA. Significance at a specific timepoint indicates that the condition at that timepoint was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control via t-test but that the overall infection was not significantly different via ANOVA. * p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.005; ****p<0.001.
The presence of DENV RNA in the supernatant does not indicate that infectious virus was present. To test whether infected UT-7 cells produced infectious virus, we performed endpoint dilution assays of UT-7 supernatants at peak infection (day 2 post infection) onto C6/36 cells. Following a 7 day incubation, infected C6/36 cells were visualized via immunofluorescence against the DENV envelope protein. Infectious virus was found in supernatants from UT-7 cells infected with either strain at either MOI, with the endpoint dilutions being 1:10,000 for 16681 MOI 1; 1:1,000 for 16681 MOI 0.1; 1:1,000 for K0049 MOI 1; and 1:100 for K0049 MOI 1. We were concerned that this infectious virus might have been inoculum that persisted in the media. Thus, we also looked for infectious virus immediately post infection and cell washing (2 hours post infection). Infectious virus was found at this timepoint with the endpoint dilutions being 1:1000 for 16681 MOI 1; 1:100 for 16681 MOI 0.1; 1:10 for K0049 MOI 1, and 1:10 for K0049 MOI 0.1. No infectious virus was found at either timepoint in supernatants from UT-7 cells exposed to K0049 UV inactivated virus. Infectious virus present in supernatants at 2 days post infection was significantly higher than infectious virus found in supernatants collected immediately post infection (2 hours post infection), indicating that the amount of DENV produced by infected UT-7 cells increased over time. These results indicate that DENV undergoes productive infection in UT-7 cells.
Dengue virus infects primary human megakaryocytes
After determining that DENV infects and replicates in an in vitro model of human megakaryocytes (UT-7), we investigated whether DENV infects primary human megakaryocytes differentiated ex vivo. For this model, human CD34+ stem cells (obtained from human umbilical cord vein blood) were differentiated using a cytokine cocktail containing human thrombopoietin, SCF, IL-9, and IL-6 (Stem Cell Technologies) into immature megakaryocytes (determined by flow cytometry) [44]. These immature megakaryocytes were infected with DENV-2 K0049 at various MOIs, and DENV RNA was quantified in the cell supernatant via qRT-PCR. DENV-2 RNA was found in megakaryocyte supernatants up to 7 days post infection at significantly higher levels than megakaryocytes treated with UV-inactivated virus (Fig 4). The amount of viral RNA does not increase over time; however, viral RNA does persist in supernatants of infected cells while viral RNA concentration decreases over time in cells treated with UV-inactivated virus. This indicates that persistent infection and replication of DENV genome occurs in human megakaryocytes. We were unable to titrate for infectious virus as samples were limited due to cell longevity and size (a minimum of 200 μL sample is needed for infectious virus detection).
Human megakaryocytes were differentiated ex vivo from human CD34+ stem cells treated with TPO and other cytokines. Immature megakaryocytes (as determined by flow cytometry) were infected with DENV-2 K0049 at various MOIs. Following infection, cell supernatants were collected daily, and DENV RNA was quantified using qRT-PCR. Data from three independent experiments are represented as the mean number of RNA copies per milliliter of cell supernatant. Error bars are 1 SEM. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons t-test (with Holm-Sidak correction). Statistical significance next to the virus strain name indicate that that infection was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control as assessed by two-way ANOVA. Significance at a specific timepoint indicates that the condition at that timepoint was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control via t-test but that the overall infection was not significantly different via ANOVA. * p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.005; ****p<0.001.
Dengue virus infects human megakaryocytes in an in vivo model of infection
After discovering that DENV infects human megakaryocytes in both in vitro and ex vivo models, we then used the hu-NSG mouse model, which possesses human immune cells, human megakaryocytes, and human platelets. Furthermore, hu-NSG mice exhibit clinical signs of dengue fever similar to those of humans [29, 45]. We infected hu-NSG mice via subcutaneous injection of DENV-1/VN/BiD-V1792 (n = 4), DENV-2 K0049 (n = 6), or DENV-3 7341/98 (n = 9). Preliminary studies using a DENV-4 strain at higher passage lever did not cause viremia or clinical signs. We were unable to obtain a low passage strain of DENV-4; therefore DENV-4 infected mice were not included in this study. Six saline-inoculated mice were used as controls. Sex, age, and engraftment levels of these mice are summarized in S1 Table. Mice were monitored every other day over the course of infection for viremia, fever, and erythema (Fig 5). DENV RNA was found in the blood of hu-NSG mice at all timepoints tested (Fig 5A). Infected mice consistently had a temperature above baseline and trended towards an increase over time, while the uninfected control mice showed the opposite (Fig 5B). Infected mice also maintained consistent erythema over the course of infection compared to baseline, while uninfected mice showed a significant decrease in erythema compared to infected mice (Fig 5C). We were unable to titrate infectious virus in serum because samples from the hu-NSG mice are too small for virus titration (a minimum of 200μL is need for infectious virus titration).Together, these results indicate that these mice were indeed infected by DENV and they showed clinical signs of infection.
(A-C) Hu-NSG mice were infected subcutaneously with 106 PFU DENV/mouse. Viremia (n = 17 DENV infected) (A), temperature change (n = 25 DENV infected, n = 10 control) (B), and erythema change (n = 25 DENV infected, n = 10 control) (C) were measured throughout the infection. Data are represented as the mean number of RNA copies per milliliter of serum (A), mean change in temperature (°C) from baseline (B), or mean change in erythema index (O.D.) from baseline (C). Error bars are 1 SEM. (B-C) Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons t-test (with Holm-Sidak correction). Statistical significance next to the virus strain name indicate that that infection was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control as assessed by two-way ANOVA. Significance at a specific timepoint indicates that the condition at that timepoint was significantly different from the UV-inactivated control via t-test but that the overall infection was not significantly different via ANOVA. * p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.005; ****p<0.001.
We next investigated whether thrombocytopenia occurred in infected hu-NSG mice by using flow cytometry to count both human and mouse platelets at 10 days post infection, which is when peak thrombocytopenia occurs based on our previous studies using this model [29, 46]. There were no significant differences in human or mouse platelet counts between infected or control mice (Fig 6A). In past studies by our lab and others, thrombocytopenia does occur in DENV-2-infected hu-NSG mice [24, 29, 45, 46]. The clinical signs we observed in these mice did appear to be milder than those of our previous studies, using dengue serotype 2 viruses alone, and here we included serotype 1 and 3 infections, which seemed to produce less severe infections. Additionally, the amount of human platelets produced in the hu-NSG mouse model varies by individual animal, and this variation appears to be related to the number and efficacy of mouse derived macrophages that persist in the hu-NSG mice following the engraftment procedure [47, 48]. We were unaware of this before beginning this study and did not take human platelet count into consideration when creating experimental groups of hu-NSG mice. Despite the lack of significant differences in platelet counts, the frequency of human mature megakaryocytes in the bone marrow was significantly decreased in DENV-infected mice. However, the frequencies of total human cells and human immature megakaryocytes were not significantly different between infected and control mice. Sridharan et al also reported a significant decrease in human megakaryocytes in the bone marrow of infected hu-NSG mice but did not distinguish between immature and mature megakaryocytes nor comment on changes in the human cell population in the bone marrow [24]. Finally, we used flow cytometry to determine whether human bone marrow cells and megakaryocytes were targets of DENV during hu-NSG infection. We discovered that 1% of total bone marrow cells, 1.5% of human immature megakaryocytes, and 35% of human mature megakaryocytes were infected with DENV (Fig 6B). Together, these data indicate that DENV does indeed reach the bone marrow and infects mainly mature megakaryocytes during the course of disease.
(A) To assess platelet counts in Hu-NSG mice following DENV infection, blood was collected from mice at 10 days post infection, and platelets were counted via flow cytometry using antibodies specific for human and mouse platelets (n = 14 DENV infected, n = 6 control). The platelet count per milliliter of blood of each hu-NSG mouse are plotted. Horizontal lines depict the group mean. Outliers were removed via ROUT analysis, and statistical significance was assessed using a t-test. (B) To determine whether bone marrow and megakaryocyte suppression occurred in infected hu-NSG mice, bone marrow was collected from mice upon euthanasia. Cell type was determined via flow cytometry (n = 14 DENV infected, n = 6 control). Data are represented as the percentage of either total bone marrow cells or human hematopoietic cells. Values from individual hu-NSG mice are plotted with horizontal lines depicting the group mean. Outliers were removed via ROUT analysis, and statistical significance was assessed using a t-test. (C) To determine whether infected megakaryocytes were in the bone marrow of hu-NSG mice, bone marrow was collected from mice upon euthanasia. Cell type and infectious status were determined via flow cytometry (n = 14 DENV infected, n = 6 control). Data are represented as the percentage of infected cells of a given cell type. Values from individual hu-NSG mice are plotted with horizontal lines depicting the group mean. * p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.005; ****p<0.001 MK, Megakaryocyte.
Dengue virus does not affect megakaryocyte viability in vitro
Since DENV infects human megakaryocytes in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of infection and DENV decreases mature megakaryocyte populations in vivo, we investigated the mechanism of DENV depletion of megakaryocytes. Previous studies showed that exposure to DENV in vivo and in vitro results in reduced viability of megakaryocytes; however, they did not investigate whether reduced viability was due to the direct DENV infection of megakaryocytes or some other mechanism [10, 24, 49]. Thus, we assessed whether DENV infection of megakaryocytes in vitro reduces viability. We first assessed viability of UT-7 cells following K0049 infection via trypan blue exclusion (Fig 7A). Uninfected UT-7 cells served as a negative control. Viability of UT-7 cells infected with K0049 MOI 1 was significantly reduced compared to uninfected controls at 2 and 4 days post infection. We were concerned that trypan blue exclusion may be more susceptible to human error and bias than other viability assays, so we assessed UT-7 cell viability via flow cytometry. UT-7 cells were infected with K0049 or 16681 at various MOIs. Daily, cells were collected and viability was assessed (Fig 7B). Overall, viability of infected cells, as measured by flow cytometry, did not differ significantly compared to the uninfected controls, with the exception of UT-7 cells infected with 16681 MOI 0.1 on day 5 post infection. Cells in all conditions experienced a significant change in viability over time, most like caused by unfavorable culture conditions post infection. During growth, UT-7 cells were split and media changed every 3 days, whereas during infection cells were not split and only 10% of the media were changed daily. These changes were made to prevent removing large amounts of media containing virus post infection but may have inadvertently affected viability. These results are very important because they indicate that DENV alone is not responsible for megakaryocyte depletion and that some other mechanism, perhaps host-mediated, is involved.
Viability of UT-7 cells infected with DENV was assessed every other day via trypan blue (A) or daily via flow cytometry (B). Data from three independent experiments are represented as the mean percentage of viable UT-7 cells. Error bars are 1 SEM. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons t-test (with Holm-Sidak correction). Statistical significance next to the virus strain name indicates that that infection was significantly different from the uninfected control as assessed by two-way ANOVA. Significance at a specific timepoint indicates that the condition at that timepoint was significantly different from the uninfected control via t-test. * p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.005; ****p<0.001.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to investigate a mechanism for DENV-induced megakaryocyte suppression by addressing whether DENV directly infects human megakaryocytes. We determined that DENV indeed infects human megakaryocytes in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of infection. We observed that DENV significantly decreases populations of mature megakaryocytes in vivo, in humanized mice bone marrow. We also observed that DENV does not affect cell viability in vitro, indicating that the depletion of megakaryocytes in vivo is likely due to a mechanism other than direct induction of cell death. To our knowledge, this is the first report of DENV infection of human megakaryocytes in an in vivo model. While other studies have observed DENV infected cells in the bone marrow and investigated the effects of DENV infection on the viability of other human megakaryocyte-like cells, none of them investigated whether DENV infects human megakaryocytes in an animal model. A recent study showed DENV infection of human megakaryocytes that were differentiated ex vivo; however, infection was only assessed at 18 hours post infection, with DENV-2 strain 16681 and focused on measuring upregulation of interferon stimulated genes [50]. In contrast, our study characterized DENV infection in human megakaryocytes in 3 different model systems, and brings novel findings and conclusions to the field of DENV pathogenesis research.
Sridharan et al are the only group to have previously measured human megakaryocytes and platelets in the hu-NSG model of DENV infection [24]. In their study, hu-NSG mice experienced a significant decrease in human, but not mouse, platelets and human megakaryocytes following infection, which is consistent with other reports of DENV infection in various humanized mouse models [51–56]. In our study, neither human nor mouse platelets were significantly decreased in DENV-infected Hu-NSG; however, we used different strains of DENV, low passage clinical isolates, compared to Sridharan et al, who used New Guinea C. New Guinea C, is a highly-passaged, lab-adapted strain that differs structurally from wild-type viruses, including a heat stability phenotype. [57]. Repeated passaging modifies viral virulence, pathogenesis, and tropism, thus rendering these strains clinically irrelevant [58, 59]. Furthermore, we used DENV strains from three different serotypes (DENV-1,2,3); these serotypes differ in their propensity to cause severe disease in humans [60–62], possibly explaining why we did not detect significant thrombocytopenia in some of our mice.
In our study, we observed a decrease in mature megakaryocytes in the bone marrow following DENV infection. Sridharan et al concluded that DENV infection reduces megakaryocyte populations, but did not distinguish between immature and mature megakaryocytes [24]. This distinction is important because immature and mature megakaryocytes are functionally different; immature megakaryocytes produce large amounts of RNA and proteins for platelet production and begin platelet assembly, while mature megakaryocytes finish platelet assembly and release platelets into the blood [9]. Furthermore, the number of immature and mature megakaryocytes in the bone marrow may differ over the course of human infection. Bierman and Nelson reported that bone marrow from patients with severe DENV infection had little to no megakaryocytes upon hospitalization [10], and during convalescence, populations of immature megakaryocytes rebounded before mature megakaryocytes [10]. The kinetics of megakaryocyte depletion upon DENV infection, specifically in regards to immature and mature megakaryocytes, are currently unknown.
In this study, we determined that DENV infection decreases populations of mature megakaryocyte in the bone marrow of hu-NSG mice, which is consistent with other studies in humans, rhesus macaques and mice [10, 24, 26]. Additional studies have shown that exposure to DENV reduces viability and proliferation of megakaryocytes in cell culture [25, 49]. However, when we infected human megakaryocytes in vitro (UT-7 cells), we did not notice a significant change in viability compared to uninfected controls, with the exception of DENV-2 16681 at MOI 0.1 (Fig 7). Basu et al and Clark et al reported reduced viability and proliferation following DENV infection of human megakaryocytes differentiated ex vivo and unfractionated bone marrow samples obtained from healthy humans and rhesus macaques, respectively [25, 49]. The virus strains used were either cultured in mouse brains or highly passaged, which are likely to be pathogenic in ways that are not reflective of natural infection. Even though we did not observe reduced viability of DENV infected megakaryocytes in vitro, this does not preclude the possibility that DENV infection indirectly reduces megakaryocyte viability, perhaps through immune responses. For example, megakaryocyte-like cells infected with Hantaan virus upregulated MHC class I to the cell surface, potentially allowing for increased killing of infected megakaryocytes by cytotoxic T lymphocytes [63]. Additionally, IFNγ, which is found at significantly high levels in the serum of DENV infected individuals [64–66], has been associated with exhaustion of hematopoietic stem cells and bone marrow suppression [67]. Immune reactions like these may have occurred in the aforementioned in vivo DENV infections and to a certain extent in ex vivo DENV infections of bone marrow samples, whereas they would not have occurred in our in vitro infection of human megakaryocytes.
In addition to DENV, other hemorrhagic fever viruses such as Hantaan virus and Junín virus (the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and Argentine hemorrhagic fever, respectively) infect megakaryocytes. In humans, Hantaan virus antigen has been found in the bone marrow of individuals suffering from hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, with approximately 20% of their megakaryocytes expressing this viral antigen [68]. Further experiments revealed that Hantaan virus infected primary human megakaryocytes and resulted in the upregulation of MHC Class I on infected megakaryocytes, promoting megakaryocyte death by cytotoxic T lymphocytes [63]. In human cases of Argentine hemorrhagic fever, infected megakaryocytes in the bone marrow have not yet been reported; however, in a guinea pig model of Junín virus infection, infected megakaryocytes were visualized by immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy [69, 70]. Further, human primary megakaryocytes have successfully been infected with Junín virus [71].
Infection of megakaryocytes may be beneficial to DENV and other hemorrhagic fever virus replication. Megakaryocytes modulate hematopoietic stem cell quiescence, regeneration, and proliferation through the production of various cytokines [19–21]. Additionally, megakaryocytes maintain plasma cell (terminally differentiated, antibody-secreting B cells) niches in the bone marrow [22, 23]. If infection suppresses or alters megakaryocyte function, then differentiation of immune cells and production of antibodies needed to clear the infection may be affected. Lastly, platelets, themselves, can act as immune mediators. Platelets can recruit white blood cells, bind and present pathogens to antigen presenting cells, and produce pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory, or activating cytokines [72–75]. If infection of megakaryocytes reduces platelet counts or causes platelet dysfunction, then the immune system functions of platelets may be diminished. Thus, infection of megakaryocytes may suppress the immune system, ultimately leading to increased viral replication or pathogenesis.
Dengue virus is a significant global health burden that will increase in scope as climate change and international travel continue, yet we do not have a complete understanding of the mechanisms behind DENV pathogenesis. In this study, we showed that DENV infects human megakaryocytes in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo, potentially explaining how megakaryocyte suppression occurs during DENV infection. These results will help inform the development of specific DENV therapies, which may also be useful for other viral hemorrhagic fevers that target megakaryocytes. The results presented here serve as a starting point for future studies into the mechanisms and consequence of DENV-induced bone marrow suppression.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Hu-NSG mice used in DENV infection of megakaryocytes study.
This table describes the sex, age, and engraftment levels of hu-NSG mice used in this study. Hu-NSG mice are sorted by experimental group.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007837.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Text. Gating strategies for flow cytometry experiments.
This appendix lists the gating strategies for all flow cytometry experiments within this dissertation, with the exception of the putative DENV receptor flow cytometry in UT-7 cells. (In the receptor flow cytometry assay, cells were singly stained for receptors; thus, no gating strategy was needed). Gating strategies are presented as leveled lists. Each level represents a gated population of cells. Indented populations are contained entirely within the previous population of a higher order. For example, in the gating strategy for UT-7 infection and viability, the SSC singlet population is comprised only of cells within the FSC singlet population. The populations 4G2+ and 4G2- are comprised only of cells that were ghost-dye negative. Levels that contain two markers (e.g. CD41a+CD42b+) were gated via quadrant gate, while the others were gated via histogram or single gates on a two-dimensional plot. All cell surface markers mentioned are human unless otherwise designated (m = mouse; h = human).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007837.s002
(DOCX)
S1 Fig. Persistence of DENV RNA in cell free media.
An infection identical to UT-7 cell infection, with the exception that there were no cells, was set up. Samples from these cell-free infections were collected daily, and DENV RNA was assessed via qRT-PCR. These data are compared to data from UT-7 cell infections. Data from three independent experiments are represented as the mean number of RNA copies per milliliter of cell supernatant. Error bars are 1 SEM. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA, and statistical significance is marked next to the virus strain.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007837.s003
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core at Baylor College of Medicine and the expert assistance of Joel M. Sederstrom. Additionally, this project was supported by the Integrated Microscopy Core at Baylor College of Medicine and the expert assistance of Fabio Stossi.
The authors would like to acknowledge Enid Mondragon for assistance with the humanized mice and Alexander Kneubehl for help with the limiting dilution assays.
References
- 1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7. Epub 2013/04/09. pmid:23563266; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3651993.
- 2. Murray NE, Quam MB, Wilder-Smith A. Epidemiology of dengue: past, present and future prospects. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:299–309. Epub 2013/08/31. pmid:23990732; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3753061.
- 3. Rodriguez-Roche R, Gould EA. Understanding the dengue viruses and progress towards their control. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:690835. Epub 2013/08/13. pmid:23936833; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3722981.
- 4. Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Halasa YA, Stanaway JD. The global economic burden of dengue: a systematic analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(8):935–41. Epub 2016/04/20. pmid:27091092.
- 5.
World Health Organization, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control2009.
- 6. Wilder-Smith A, Ooi EE, Horstick O, Wills B. Dengue. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):350–63. Epub 2019/01/31. pmid:30696575.
- 7. Dengue vaccine: WHO position paper, September 2018—Recommendations. Vaccine. 2018. Epub 2018/11/15. pmid:30424888.
- 8. Srichaikul T, Nimmannitya S. Haematology in dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2000;13(2):261–76. Epub 2000/08/16. pmid:10942625.
- 9. George JN. Platelets. Lancet. 2000;355(9214):1531–9. Epub 2000/05/09. pmid:10801186.
- 10. Bierman HR, Nelson ER. Hematodepressive Virus Diseases of Thailand. Ann Intern Med. 1965;62:867–84. Epub 1965/05/01. pmid:14283387.
- 11. Lee TH, Wong JG, Leo YS, Thein TL, Ng EL, Lee LK, et al. Potential Harm of Prophylactic Platelet Transfusion in Adult Dengue Patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(3):e0004576. Epub 2016/03/26. pmid:27015272; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4807876.
- 12. Ojha A, Nandi D, Batra H, Singhal R, Annarapu GK, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Platelet activation determines the severity of thrombocytopenia in dengue infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41697. Epub 2017/02/01. pmid:28139770; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5282509.
- 13. de Azeredo EL, Monteiro RQ, de-Oliveira Pinto LM. Thrombocytopenia in Dengue: Interrelationship between Virus and the Imbalance between Coagulation and Fibrinolysis and Inflammatory Mediators. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:313842. Epub 2015/05/23. pmid:25999666; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4427128.
- 14. Hottz ED, Oliveira MF, Nunes PC, Nogueira RM, Valls-de-Souza R, Da Poian AT, et al. Dengue induces platelet activation, mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death through mechanisms that involve DC-SIGN and caspases. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(5):951–62. Epub 2013/02/26. pmid:23433144; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3971842.
- 15. Hottz ED, Bozza FA, Bozza PT. Platelets in Immune Response to Virus and Immunopathology of Viral Infections. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:121. Epub 2018/05/16. pmid:29761104; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5936789.
- 16. Assinger A. Platelets and infection—an emerging role of platelets in viral infection. Front Immunol. 2014;5:649. Epub 2015/01/08. pmid:25566260; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4270245.
- 17. Srichaikul T, Nimmannitya S, Sripaisarn T, Kamolsilpa M, Pulgate C. Platelet function during the acute phase of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1989;20(1):19–25. Epub 1989/03/01. pmid:2772702.
- 18. Boonpucknavig S, Lohachitranond C, Nimmanitya S. The pattern and nature of the lymphocyte population response in dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1979;28(5):885–9. Epub 1979/09/01. pmid:314757.
- 19. Malara A, Abbonante V, Di Buduo CA, Tozzi L, Currao M, Balduini A. The secret life of a megakaryocyte: emerging roles in bone marrow homeostasis control. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(8):1517–36. Epub 2015/01/13. pmid:25572292; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4369169.
- 20. Bruns I, Lucas D, Pinho S, Ahmed J, Lambert MP, Kunisaki Y, et al. Megakaryocytes regulate hematopoietic stem cell quiescence through CXCL4 secretion. Nat Med. 2014;20(11):1315–20. Epub 2014/10/20. pmid:25326802; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4258871.
- 21. Zhao M, Perry JM, Marshall H, Venkatraman A, Qian P, He XC, et al. Megakaryocytes maintain homeostatic quiescence and promote post-injury regeneration of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2014;20(11):1321–6. Epub 2014/10/20. pmid:25326798.
- 22. Kometani K, Kurosaki T. Differentiation and maintenance of long-lived plasma cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;33:64–9. Epub 2015/02/14. pmid:25677584.
- 23. Winter O, Moser K, Mohr E, Zotos D, Kaminski H, Szyska M, et al. Megakaryocytes constitute a functional component of a plasma cell niche in the bone marrow. Blood. 2010;116(11):1867–75. Epub 2010/06/12. pmid:20538807.
- 24. Sridharan A, Chen Q, Tang KF, Ooi EE, Hibberd ML, Chen J. Inhibition of megakaryocyte development in the bone marrow underlies dengue virus-induced thrombocytopenia in humanized mice. J Virol. 2013;87(21):11648–58. Epub 2013/08/24. pmid:23966397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3807371.
- 25. Clark KB, Noisakran S, Onlamoon N, Hsiao HM, Roback J, Villinger F, et al. Multiploid CD61+ cells are the pre-dominant cell lineage infected during acute dengue virus infection in bone marrow. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52902. Epub 2013/01/10. pmid:23300812; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3531377.
- 26. Noisakran S, Onlamoon N, Hsiao HM, Clark KB, Villinger F, Ansari AA, et al. Infection of bone marrow cells by dengue virus in vivo. Exp Hematol. 2012;40(3):250–9 e4. Epub 2011/12/24. pmid:22193689; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3415316.
- 27. Noisakran S, Onlamoon N, Pattanapanyasat K, Hsiao HM, Songprakhon P, Angkasekwinai N, et al. Role of CD61+ cells in thrombocytopenia of dengue patients. Int J Hematol. 2012;96(5):600–10. Epub 2012/09/19. pmid:22987294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3606877.
- 28. Rinder HM, Bonan JL, Rinder CS, Ault KA, Smith BR. Activated and unactivated platelet adhesion to monocytes and neutrophils. Blood. 1991;78(7):1760–9. Epub 1991/10/01. pmid:1717070.
- 29. Mota J, Rico-Hesse R. Humanized mice show clinical signs of dengue fever according to infecting virus genotype. J Virol. 2009;83(17):8638–45. pmid:19535452; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2738212.
- 30. Robert A, Cortin V, Garnier A, Pineault N. Megakaryocyte and platelet production from human cord blood stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;788:219–47. Epub 2011/12/02. pmid:22130711.
- 31. Wang WK, Sung TL, Tsai YC, Kao CL, Chang SM, King CC. Detection of dengue virus replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from dengue virus type 2-infected patients by a reverse transcription-real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(12):4472–8. Epub 2002/11/28. pmid:12454138; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC154639.
- 32.
Glantz SA. pmid:Alternatives to analysis of variance and the t test based on ranks. In: Diedrich C, Pancotti R, editors. Primer of Biostatistics. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2012. p. 207–11.
- 33. Komatsu N, Nakauchi H, Miwa A, Ishihara T, Eguchi M, Moroi M, et al. Establishment and characterization of a human leukemic cell line with megakaryocytic features: dependency on granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin 3, or erythropoietin for growth and survival. Cancer Res. 1991;51(1):341–8. Epub 1991/01/01. pmid:1824823.
- 34. Saito H. Megakaryocytic cell lines. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1997;10(1):47–63. Epub 1997/02/01. pmid:9154315.
- 35. Gubler DJ, Clark GG. Dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever: the emergence of a global health problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1(2):55–7. Epub 1995/04/01. pmid:8903160; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2626838.
- 36. Kouri G, Guzman MG, Bravo J. Hemorrhagic dengue in Cuba: history of an epidemic. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1986;20(1):24–30. Epub 1986/01/01. pmid:3768589.
- 37. Rico-Hesse R, Harrison LM, Salas RA, Tovar D, Nisalak A, Ramos C, et al. Origins of dengue type 2 viruses associated with increased pathogenicity in the Americas. Virology. 1997;230(2):244–51. Epub 1997/04/14. pmid:9143280.
- 38. Perera-Lecoin M, Meertens L, Carnec X, Amara A. Flavivirus entry receptors: an update. Viruses. 2013;6(1):69–88. Epub 2014/01/02. pmid:24381034; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3917432.
- 39. Carnec X, Meertens L, Dejarnac O, Perera-Lecoin M, Hafirassou ML, Kitaura J, et al. The Phosphatidylserine and Phosphatidylethanolamine Receptor CD300a Binds Dengue Virus and Enhances Infection. J Virol. 2016;90(1):92–102. Epub 2015/10/16. pmid:26468529; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4702537.
- 40. Machlus KR, Italiano JE Jr. The incredible journey: From megakaryocyte development to platelet formation. J Cell Biol. 2013;201(6):785–96. Epub 2013/06/12. pmid:23751492; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3678154.
- 41. Neubauer A, Fiebeler A, Graham DK, O'Bryan JP, Schmidt CA, Barckow P, et al. Expression of axl, a transforming receptor tyrosine kinase, in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Blood. 1994;84(6):1931–41. Epub 1994/09/15. pmid:7521695.
- 42. Wang H, Chen S, Chen Y, Wang H, Wu H, Tang H, et al. The role of Tyro 3 subfamily receptors in the regulation of hemostasis and megakaryocytopoiesis. Haematologica. 2007;92(5):643–50. Epub 2007/05/10. pmid:17488688.
- 43. Boukour S, Masse JM, Benit L, Dubart-Kupperschmitt A, Cramer EM. Lentivirus degradation and DC-SIGN expression by human platelets and megakaryocytes. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):426–35. Epub 2006/01/20. pmid:16420576.
- 44.
Robert A, Cortin V, Garnier A, Pineault N. Megakaryocyte and Platelet Production from Human Cord Blood Stem Cells. In: Gibbins JM, Mahaut-Smith MP, editors. Platelets and Megakaryocytes. 3. New York: Springer Science; 2012.
- 45. Mota J, Rico-Hesse R. Dengue virus tropism in humanized mice recapitulates human dengue fever. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20762. pmid:21695193; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3112147.
- 46. Cox J, Mota J, Sukupolvi-Petty S, Diamond MS, Rico-Hesse R. Mosquito bite delivery of dengue virus enhances immunogenicity and pathogenesis in humanized mice. J Virol. 2012;86(14):7637–49. Epub 2012/05/11. pmid:22573866; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3416288.
- 47. Hu Z, Yang YG. Full reconstitution of human platelets in humanized mice after macrophage depletion. Blood. 2012;120(8):1713–6. Epub 2012/07/10. pmid:22773384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3429310.
- 48. Rongvaux A, Willinger T, Takizawa H, Rathinam C, Auerbach W, Murphy AJ, et al. Human thrombopoietin knockin mice efficiently support human hematopoiesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(6):2378–83. Epub 2011/01/26. pmid:21262827; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3038726.
- 49. Basu A, Jain P, Gangodkar SV, Shetty S, Ghosh K. Dengue 2 virus inhibits in vitro megakaryocytic colony formation and induces apoptosis in thrombopoietin-inducible megakaryocytic differentiation from cord blood CD34+ cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008;53(1):46–51. Epub 2008/03/29. pmid:18371071.
- 50. Campbell RA, Schwertz H, Hottz ED, Rowley JW, Manne BK, Washington AV, et al. Human megakaryocytes possess intrinsic anti-viral immunity through regulated induction of IFITM3. Blood. 2019. Epub 2019/02/07. pmid:30723081.
- 51. Kuruvilla JG, Troyer RM, Devi S, Akkina R. Dengue virus infection and immune response in humanized RAG2(-/-)gamma(c)(-/-) (RAG-hu) mice. Virology. 2007;369(1):143–52. Epub 2007/08/21. pmid:17707071.
- 52. Cui L, Hou J, Fang J, Lee YH, Costa VV, Wong LH, et al. Serum Metabolomics Investigation of Humanized Mouse Model of Dengue Virus Infection. J Virol. 2017;91(14). Epub 2017/05/05. pmid:28468882; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5487573.
- 53. Frias-Staheli N, Dorner M, Marukian S, Billerbeck E, Labitt RN, Rice CM, et al. Utility of humanized BLT mice for analysis of dengue virus infection and antiviral drug testing. J Virol. 2014;88(4):2205–18. Epub 2013/12/18. pmid:24335303; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3911540.
- 54. Jaiswal S, Pearson T, Friberg H, Shultz LD, Greiner DL, Rothman AL, et al. Dengue virus infection and virus-specific HLA-A2 restricted immune responses in humanized NOD-scid IL2rgammanull mice. PLoS One. 2009;4(10):e7251. Epub 2009/10/06. pmid:19802382; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2749937.
- 55. Costa VV, Ye W, Chen Q, Teixeira MM, Preiser P, Ooi EE, et al. Dengue Virus-Infected Dendritic Cells, but Not Monocytes, Activate Natural Killer Cells through a Contact-Dependent Mechanism Involving Adhesion Molecules. MBio. 2017;8(4). Epub 2017/08/03. pmid:28765218; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5539423.
- 56. Robinson LN, Tharakaraman K, Rowley KJ, Costa VV, Chan KR, Wong YH, et al. Structure-Guided Design of an Anti-dengue Antibody Directed to a Non-immunodominant Epitope. Cell. 2015;162(3):493–504. Epub 2015/07/21. pmid:26189681; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4758460.
- 57. Fibriansah G, Ibarra KD, Ng TS, Smith SA, Tan JL, Lim XN, et al. DENGUE VIRUS. Cryo-EM structure of an antibody that neutralizes dengue virus type 2 by locking E protein dimers. Science. 2015;349(6243):88–91. Epub 2015/07/04. pmid:26138979; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4672004.
- 58. Mangada MN, Igarashi A. Molecular and in vitro analysis of eight dengue type 2 viruses isolated from patients exhibiting different disease severities. Virology. 1998;244(2):458–66. Epub 1998/05/28. pmid:9601513.
- 59. Diamond MS, Edgil D, Roberts TG, Lu B, Harris E. Infection of human cells by dengue virus is modulated by different cell types and viral strains. J Virol. 2000;74(17):7814–23. Epub 2000/08/10. pmid:10933688; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC112311.
- 60. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, Suntayakorn S, et al. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(1):2–9. Epub 1999/12/23. pmid:10608744.
- 61. Fried JR, Gibbons RV, Kalayanarooj S, Thomas SJ, Srikiatkhachorn A, Yoon IK, et al. Serotype-specific differences in the risk of dengue hemorrhagic fever: an analysis of data collected in Bangkok, Thailand from 1994 to 2006. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(3):e617. Epub 2010/03/09. pmid:20209155; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2830471.
- 62. Clapham H, Cummings DA, Nisalak A, Kalayanarooj S, Thaisomboonsuk B, Klungthong C, et al. Epidemiology of Infant Dengue Cases Illuminates Serotype-Specificity in the Interaction between Immunity and Disease, and Changes in Transmission Dynamics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(12):e0004262. Epub 2015/12/15. pmid:26658730; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4684242.
- 63. Lutteke N, Raftery MJ, Lalwani P, Lee MH, Giese T, Voigt S, et al. Switch to high-level virus replication and HLA class I upregulation in differentiating megakaryocytic cells after infection with pathogenic hantavirus. Virology. 2010;405(1):70–80. Epub 2010/08/03. pmid:20673746.
- 64. Kurane I, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, Nisalak A, Meager A, Janus J, et al. Activation of T lymphocytes in dengue virus infections. High levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor, soluble CD4, soluble CD8, interleukin 2, and interferon-gamma in sera of children with dengue. J Clin Invest. 1991;88(5):1473–80. Epub 1991/11/01. pmid:1939640; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC295652.
- 65. Chakravarti A, Kumaria R. Circulating levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha & interferon-gamma in patients with dengue & dengue haemorrhagic fever during an outbreak. Indian J Med Res. 2006;123(1):25–30. Epub 2006/03/29. pmid:16567864.
- 66. Sehrawat P, Biswas A, Kumar P, Singla P, Wig N, Dar L, et al. Role of Cytokines as Molecular Marker of Dengue Severity. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2018;10(1):e2018023. Epub 2018/05/15. pmid:29755701; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5937971.
- 67. Matatall KA, Jeong M, Chen S, Sun D, Chen F, Mo Q, et al. Chronic Infection Depletes Hematopoietic Stem Cells through Stress-Induced Terminal Differentiation. Cell Rep. 2016;17(10):2584–95. Epub 2016/12/08. pmid:27926863; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5161248.
- 68. Liang KS, Peng LJ, Yin CB, Zhang JL, Xu CG, Liu XD, et al. [Cellular ultrastructural changes of bone marrow of patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome]. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2004;18(2):165–7. Epub 2004/09/02. pmid:15340508.
- 69. Carballal G, Cossio PM, Laguens RP, Ponzinibbio C, Oubina JR, Meckert PC, et al. Junin virus infection of guinea pigs: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of hemopoietic tissue. J Infect Dis. 1981;143(1):7–14. Epub 1981/01/01. pmid:6260868.
- 70. Carballal G, Rodriguez M, Frigerio MJ, Vasquez C. Junin virus infection of guinea pigs: electron microscopic studies of peripheral blood and bone marrow. J Infect Dis. 1977;135(3):367–73. Epub 1977/03/01. pmid:191539.
- 71. Pozner RG, Ure AE, Jaquenod de Giusti C, D'Atri LP, Italiano JE, Torres O, et al. Junin virus infection of human hematopoietic progenitors impairs in vitro proplatelet formation and platelet release via a bystander effect involving type I IFN signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(4):e1000847. Epub 2010/04/27. pmid:20419155; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2855331.
- 72. Semple JW, Italiano JE Jr., Freedman J. Platelets and the immune continuum. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(4):264–74. Epub 2011/03/26. pmid:21436837.
- 73. Ali RA, Wuescher LM, Worth RG. Platelets: essential components of the immune system. Curr Trends Immunol. 2015;16:65–78. Epub 2015/01/01. pmid:27818580; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5096834.
- 74. Chapman LM, Aggrey AA, Field DJ, Srivastava K, Ture S, Yui K, et al. Platelets present antigen in the context of MHC class I. J Immunol. 2012;189(2):916–23. Epub 2012/06/19. pmid:22706078; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3392496.
- 75. Morrell CN, Aggrey AA, Chapman LM, Modjeski KL. Emerging roles for platelets as immune and inflammatory cells. Blood. 2014;123(18):2759–67. Epub 2014/03/04. pmid:24585776; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4007605.