Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

In Vitro Grown Pollen Tubes of Nicotiana alata Actively Synthesise a Fucosylated Xyloglucan

  • Edwin R. Lampugnani,

    Affiliation School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Isabel E. Moller,

    Current address: ViaLactia, Newmarket Laboratories, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand

    Affiliation Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Andrew Cassin,

    Affiliation Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Daniel F. Jones,

    Current address: School of Biological Sciences, the University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Affiliation Department of Botany, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

  • Poh Ling Koh,

    Affiliation School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Sunil Ratnayake,

    Affiliation School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Cherie T. Beahan,

    Affiliation Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Sarah M. Wilson,

    Affiliation Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Antony Bacic,

    Affiliation Bio21 Institute for Molecular Science & Biotechnology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Ed Newbigin

    edwardjn@unimelb.edu.au

    Affiliation School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Nicotiana alata pollen tubes are a widely used model for studies of polarized tip growth and cell wall synthesis in plants. To better understand these processes, RNA-Seq and de novo assembly methods were used to produce a transcriptome of N. alata pollen grains. Notable in the reconstructed transcriptome were sequences encoding proteins that are involved in the synthesis and remodelling of xyloglucan, a cell wall polysaccharide previously not thought to be deposited in Nicotiana pollen tube walls. Expression of several xyloglucan-related genes in actively growing pollen tubes was confirmed and xyloglucan epitopes were detected in the wall with carbohydrate-specific antibodies: the major xyloglucan oligosaccharides found in N. alata pollen grains and tubes were fucosylated, an unusual structure for the Solanaceae, the family to which Nicotiana belongs. Finally, carbohydrate linkages consistent with xyloglucan were identified chemically in the walls of N. alata pollen grains and pollen tubes grown in culture. The presence of a fucosylated xyloglucan in Nicotiana pollen tube walls was thus confirmed. The consequences of this discovery to models of pollen tube growth dynamics and more generally to polarised tip-growing cells in plants are discussed.

Introduction

Nicotiana pollen tubes (N. tabacum and N. alata) are a widely used and a well-characterised system for studying polar cell growth and cell wall synthesis in plants [1-3]. Nicotiana pollen tubes elongate rapidly in a strictly polar manner via the tip-focused fusion of polysaccharide-laden secretory vesicles and deposition of newly synthesized material into the nascent primary wall that forms at the tube tip or apex. Deposition of more polysaccharide at some distance behind the apex reinforces the primary wall and produces a thicker inner secondary wall [4]. At intervals along distal regions of the pollen tube shank are transverse callose-containing cross-walls called plugs that act to seal the cytoplasmic living portion of the pollen tube, containing the sperm cells, off from spent portions of the tube further back towards the grain. Given this structure, it is apparent that forming the pollen tube cell wall requires precise control over the spatial distribution of the various glycosyl synthases and transferases needed to make the limited number of polysaccharides that are found in the wall, which is predominantly composed of the (1,3)-β-D-glucan callose and lesser amounts of cellulose, a neutral pectic arabinan and acidic pectins [5,6]. Of these polysaccharides, only callose and cellulose have been associated with candidate genes and enzymes in pollen tubes [7,8].

To identify additional genes involved in wall polysaccharide biosynthesis in Nicotiana pollen tubes, an RNA-Seq approach associated with de novo transcriptome reconstruction [9] was used to prepare a draft N. alata pollen grain transcriptome. We were surprised to discover the transcriptome contained several contigs derived from cDNAs related to the synthesis and remodelling of xyloglucan (XyG), a polysaccharide that was not thought to be deposited in Nicotiana pollen tube walls [6]. Using the transcriptome we identified full-length cDNAs for most of the glycosyl synthases and transferases needed to assemble and remodel XyG, and subsequently showed that Nicotiana pollen tubes actively synthesise and deposit in their wall a highly branched XyG that is substituted with fucose: neither the degree of branching nor the presence of fucose is typical of the XyG structures previously reported for solanaceous plants like tobacco (e.g., see 10). Discovering this polysaccharide requires a reassessment of the contribution a network of cellulose microfibrils and interacting XyGs may make to the mechanical properties of Nicotiana pollen tube walls.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Nicotiana alata plants (self-incompatibility genotype S2S3) were grown in soil in a glasshouse as previously described [11]. Pollen was collected and stored at -80°C until used. Growth medium and culture conditions for pollen were as described by Li et al. [12].

de novo transcriptome assembly of N. alata pollen grains

Total RNA from N. alata pollen grains was extracted as described [7] and sent to the Australian Genome Research Facility (service provider; Brisbane, Australia) for mRNA-SEQ library preparation and sequencing. The raw 75 bp reads produced by an Illumina GA-II sequencer from pre-processed using DynamicTrim v 1.9 [13] at a non-stringent filtering PHRED value of 4 (i.e. only reads with a PHRED score >4 were used) to remove very low quality reads and de novo assembled using Trinity v r2011-08-20 [14]. To calculate the RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads) expression value for each contig, the original (unprocessed) reads were mapped onto the assembly generated by Trinity using the proprietary read mapping algorithm of CLC Genomics Workbench (http://www.clcbio.com). The 75 bp reads were mapped to the draft N. benthamiana genome version 0.4.2 [15] using Bowtie version 2.0.6 [16].

Molecular biology and bioinformatics

Total RNA from N. alata leaf, pollen and pollen tubes was extracted using a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) and DNA contamination removed by treating the RNA (5 µg) with 2 U of DNase I (Life Technologies). First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using an oligo dT17 primer and 200 units of Superscript III (Life Technologies) with the further addition of 40 units of RNaseOUT Recombinant RNase Inhibitor (Life Technologies). Sequences of the gene-specific primers used in this experiment are shown in Table S3. PCR was performed with 1 µl of cDNA template in a final volume of 25 µl of 1× PCR buffer containing template DNA, 0.6 µM of each primer, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 2 units of Taq polymerase (Scientifix) on a GeneAmp 2700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). Cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C 2 min, then 35 cycles (95°C, 30 s; 55°C, 30 s; 72°C, 25 s). PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and sequenced directly using the service provided by the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne, Australia).

Sequences alignments were generated with the ClustalW program [17] using Geneious Pro 5.6.3 software (Biomatters) and the resulting alignments were then verified by eye. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; [18]) was used to query NCBI databases for highly similar sequences.

Sequences of the contigs described in the text have been deposited in DDBJ with accession numbers AB844117 - AB844170. These numbers are listed in Tables S2 and S3.

Microscopy

For immuno-fluorescence detection of cell wall polysaccharides, Nicotiana pollen tubes were grown in culture for 4 and 16 hr and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissue was pre-incubated in blocking buffer (3% milk powder in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); 1× PBS is 37 mM NaCl, 10 mM PO4 and 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4) for 1 hr to prevent non-specific antibody binding. Monoclonal antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer as follows: LM15 (PlantProbes, 1/10 dilution Rat IgG2c), CCRC-M1 (CarboSource, 1/200 dilution IgG1), Callose (Biosupplies Australia; 1/100 dilution IgG1), and then incubated for 2.5 hr at 4°C, washed in blocking buffer (×2), before overnight incubation in either a 1:100 dilution of anti-mouse Alexa fluor 488 (Life Technologies). Samples were washed in PBS twice before being mounted on slides and counter-stained with N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)hexatrienyl) pyridinium dibromide (FM4-64; Life Technologies) at 10 μg/ml. Slides were viewed on an inverted Leica SP2 confocal microscope using a 63× PL Apo BL oil objective (n.a. 1.4). A 488 nm laser line, attenuated to 20%, was used to excite both the Alexa Fluor 488 and FM4-64. Emissions were detected simultaneously between 498-530 nm for Alexa fluor 488 and 650-800 nm for FM4-64. Photo-detectors were set at 70 and 30, respectively, offset by -5. All settings were held constant. Images were collected using the average of four optical slices and z-stacks were taken with successive 0.25 μm scans.

Pontamine Fast Scarlet 4B (S4B) was a gift from Prof Chris Somerville (Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California at Berkeley). Pollen tubes were suspended in a 0.01% (w/v) solution of S4B in 1× PBS or 0.003% Aniline Blue fluorochrome (Biosupplies Australia) in water for 30 min, washed twice in 10% glycerol before mounting on slides for imaging with a confocal microscope as described above except that a 405 nm laser line, attenuated to 20%, was used to excite the Aniline Blue fluorochrome and emissions were detected between 415-550 nm and S4B samples were imaged using a 543 nm laser line, attenuated to 20%, and emissions were detected between 550-800 nm.

For detection of XyG by immuno-electron microscopy, pollen tubes were processed by the high-pressure freezing method described in Brownfield et al. [19]. Thin sections were incubated in a 1:50 dilution of LM15 in PBS containing 1% w/v BSA for 1 hr at room temperature and then overnight at 4°C. Grids were washed in PBS and then incubated in a 1:20 dilution of goat anti-rat secondary antibody conjugated to 18-nm gold particles (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Sections were washed, post-stained and viewed by transmission electron microscopy as described [20].

Preparation of cell walls and analysis of XyG oligosaccharides

Fingerprinting of XyG oligosaccharides was done as described by Lerouxel et al. [21]. Nicotiana pollen grain and tube cell wall material (10 mg) was boiled for 10 min in sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5) and incubated with agitation for 24 hr at 37°C with 0.4 units/mg cellulase (endo-1,4-β-D-glucanase; Megazyme, Ireland) in NaOAc buffer (50 mM, pH 5). The enzyme was deactivated by boiling samples for 15 min, any remaining insoluble material was removed by centrifugation and then following the addition of ethanol (4 vols) the XyG oligosaccharides was isolated from the supernatant and vacuum dried.

Samples were mixed in a 1:1 ratio with matrix containing 50% dihydro benzoic acid (DHB) / 50% acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid and analysed using a MicroFlex MALDI-TOF instrument (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). The spectra were acquired using Flex Control software Version 3.3 in positive ion reflector mode using an acceleration of 19.0 kV at ion source 1 and 16.3 kV at ion source 2 with a delay time of 200 ns and greater than 70% laser power. The spectra were calibrated using Bruker Daltonics Peptide Calibration Standard II.

Electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MSn) analysis was performed for the predominant quasi-molecular ions (m/z 1085, 1435 and 1639) using an Agilent LC/MSD ion-trap XCT plus MS (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA). Samples were infused with acetonitrile (50%) through an Agilent HPLC calibration chip into the source at a flow rate of 0.5 µl / min using an automated syringe pump. The ESI source was operated at a voltage of 1950V, and the capillary heater was set to 300 °C. All the experiments were performed in the positive-ion mode.

Results

Identification of XyG-related genes in Nicotiana pollen grains and tubes

RNA-Seq analysis of Nicotiana pollen grain poly (A+) RNA generated more than a 7.6 million 75 bp single-end reads (Table S1). A de novo assembly produced a transcriptome containing 11,049 contigs of 200 bp or more in length. The total length of the reconstructed transcriptome was 5,828,264 bp; the largest contig in the transcriptome was 6,983 bp, the average contig length was 528 bp and the median length was 341 bp (Table S1). Using Bowtie [16] more than 90% of the reads in the assembly could be aligned to the recently published N. benthamiana genome (Table S1; [15]).

To determine the representation of known Nicotiana sequences in the transcriptome, 56 pollen-expressed cDNAs (17 from N. alata and 39 from N. tabacum) were used to query the database (Table S2). Of the 56 cDNAs, 38 (9 from N. alata and 29 from N. tabacum) had a >90% pairwise identity match over most of their length to at least one contig in the assembly. Although this suggests that the transcriptome contained approximately 70% of the known transcripts, this is probably an underestimate as some of the genes in the list, such as N. alata CELLULOSE SYNTHASE1 (NaCESA1), are known to be expressed at very low levels in pollen grains [7]. Consistent with this, no unique reads for NaCESA1 were found in the RNA-Seq data. Of the 8 N. alata cDNAs with no clear match in the assembly, 6 are from a family of F-box protein-encoding genes that are associated with the N. alata self-incompatibility response (DD1-10; [22]). Although the RNA-Seq data contained reads for all the missing DD cDNAs, the contigs assembled from these reads were excluded from the transcriptome because none was over 200 bp in length. RPKM values, a measure of relative expression level between contigs, for the 38 known pollen transcripts ranged from 17 to 37,610, demonstrating that contigs >200 bp in length were successfully assembled for transcripts with expression differences ranging over three orders of magnitude. The transcriptome included contigs matching previously studied pollen-expressed genes from N. alata related to cell wall synthesis such as NaGSL1 (N. alata GLUCAN SYNTHASE-LIKE 1), which encodes the putative callose synthase [8], and NaCSLD1 (N. alata CELLULOSE SYNTHASE-LIKE D1), which encodes the putative cellulose synthase [7].

Searching the transcriptome for cell-wall synthesis related genes identified several contigs that were derived from genes involved in XyG biosynthesis and remodelling. To identify the full complement of XyG-related genes the pollen grain transcriptome was queried using the sequences of relevant Arabidopsis genes [23,24]. The longest open reading frame from each Nicotiana contig was then used to search the non-redundant protein sequence database at TAIR (www.arabidopsis.org) and the top result used as the match for that contig.

Table 1 shows the 8 XyG-related contigs that were identified in the pollen grain transcriptome and their best Arabidopsis matches. All of the contigs could be amplified from pollen grain cDNA (Figure 1). As measured by RPKM values, the 8 XyG-related genes were expressed at levels that were <15% (and in most instances <6%) of the level of NaGSL1 (compare Table 1 and Table S2).

QueryNumber of hitsContig RPKM valueTop reciprocal BLAST hit
LocusPredicted functionLocusAbbreviation
At2g03220(1,2)-α-L-fucosyltransferase0-At2g03220AtFUT1
At3g28180(1-4)-β-D-glucansynthase127At3g28180AtCSLC4
At4g07960(1-4)-β-D-glucansynthase18At4g07960AtCSLC12
At1g74380(1-6)-α-D-xylosyltransferase215/27At1g74380AtXXT5
At2g20370(1-2)-β-galactosyltransferase19At2g20370AtMUR3/AtKAM1
At5g57550endo-(1-4)-β-D-glucanase124At5g57550AtXTH25
At1g32170endo-(1-4)-β-D-glucanase138At1g32170AtXTH30
At1g67830(1-2)-α-L-fucosidase193At1g67830AtFXG1
At5g63810β-galactosidase13,994AT5G63800BGAL6/MUM3

Table 1. Xyloglucan-related genes identified in the N. alata pollen grain transcriptome.

Translated peptide sequences of previously characterised XyG biosynthesis genes from Arabidopsis were used to search for related sequences in the N. alata pollen transcriptome. RPKM is a measure of the level of expression of a contig.
CSV
Download CSV
thumbnail
Figure 1. Expression profiles of XyG-related genes in various N. alata tissues.

RT–PCR was carried out using the indicated cDNA template and primers (see Table S3) specific for each of the XyG-related gene listed in Table 1. RT-PCR for each template using actin-specific primers (positive control) is also shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.g001

The XyG in most flowering plants has a (1,4)-β-glucan backbone decorated at the C(O)6 position of the Glc with α-xylopyranosyl residues that can be extended by subsequent additions of a (1,2)-β-galactopyranosyl unit, often terminating with a (1,2)-α-fucopyranosyl residue. Synthesis of this structure requires at a minimum one (1,4)-β-glucan synthase (synthesising the glucan backbone), a (1,6)-α-xylosyltransferase, a (1,2)-β-galactosyltransferase and a (1,2)-α-fucosyltransferase (synthesising the branches). With the exception of the fucosyltransferase, candidate genes encoding all the other biosynthetic activities were found (Table 1). Specifically there were two separate Cellulose Synthase-Like subfamily C (CSLC) contigs, with the best Arabidopsis match for one of these being AtCSLC4, which encodes the (1-4)-β-glucan synthase that makes the XyG backbone [25]. Additionally, there were two non-overlapping contigs that had best Arabidopsis matches to AtXXT5, a gene for a XyG (1,6)-α-xylosyltransferase shown to form a complex with AtCSLC4 [26,27]. Finally, there was a contig coding for a (1,2)-β-galactosyltransferase that was a best match in Arabidopsis to MUR3, which Madson et al. [28] showed has XyG galactosyltransferase activity.

In addition to synthase/transferase contigs, the pollen grain transcriptome also contained two contigs for XYLOGLUCAN endo-TRANSGLYCOSYLASE/HYDROLASE (XTH) proteins that are associated with XyG remodeling (Table 1). XTH proteins are associated with two distinct catalytic activities: a XyG endo-transglycolase (XET) activity that brings about the cleavage and religation of XyG chains; and a XyG-specific endo-hydrolase (XEH) activity that hydrolytically cleaves and thereby shortens XyG chains [29]. The best Arabidopsis matches for the two pollen grain contigs are to AtXTH25, which falls into XTH group I/II, and AtXTH30, which is a group III-B XTH (classification as described in [29]). XET activity is the only demonstrated activity for proteins in groups I/II and III-B.

Other contigs found in the transcriptome and potentially associated with XyG metabolism encoded an α-fucosidase and a β-galactosidase (Table 1). The α-fucosidase was related to AtFXG1, an apoplastic enzyme from Arabidopsis able to remove terminal Fucp residues from XyG oligosaccharides [30]. However, the best Arabidopsis reciprocal BLAST match for the β-galactosidase was BGAL6/MUM3, an enzyme involved in removing terminal Galp residues from pectin [31].

Figure 1 shows an RT-PCR analysis of the XyG-related contigs, confirming that these genes were also expressed in pollen tubes. Transcripts corresponding to the XyG-related contigs listed in Table 1 were amplified from pollen grain RNA and from the RNA isolated from pollen tubes grown in culture for 4, 8 and 16 hr. In each case, the sequenced amplicon matched the sequence of the contig in the transcriptome. To control for DNA contamination, mock reverse transcription reactions were performed such that reverse transcriptase was omitted from the reaction. In this case no transcripts were detected (data not shown). It is notable that all the XyG-related genes were also expressed in vegetative tissues such as leaves; indeed, in some instances such as the potential MUR3 β-galactosyltransferase ortholog, the level of expression in pollen grains and tubes was noticeably lower than that in leaves. Consistent with previous observations NaGSL1 was predominantly expressed in pollen grains and tubes with little expression in vegetative tissues.

Detection of XyG in Nicotiana pollen grain and pollen tubes

The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) LM15 and CCRC-M1 were used to detect XyG epitopes in Nicotiana pollen tubes grown in culture (Figure 2). LM15 binds to the XXXG motif of XyG and CCRC-M1 to the F (α-L-Fucp-(1,2)-β-D-Galp-(1-)) side chain (XyG oligosaccharide nomenclature as described in [32]). To provide contrast pollen tubes were counterstained with FM4-64 and the inner secondary wall defined using a mAb specific for callose, a known secondary wall polysaccharide in pollen tubes.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Immunofluorescence detection of XyG and callose in Nicotiana pollen tubes grown in vitro for 4 and 16 hr.

Non-galactosylated and fucosylated XyG epitopes were detected (yellow) with the mAbs LM15 and CCRC-M1, respectively, and callose was detected with an anti-callose mAb. Pollen tubes were counter-stained with FM4-64 (red). A-D show 4 hr (A, B) and 16 hr (C, D) grown pollen tube tip (A, C) and shank (B, D) regions labelled with LM15: E-H show 4 hr (E, F) and 16 hr (G, H) tip (E, G) and shank (F, H) regions labelled with CCRC-M1: and I-L show 4 hr (I, J) and 16 hr (K, L) tip (I, K) and shank (J, L) regions labelled with the callose mAb. XyG epitopes were detected at the pollen tube tip and shank whereas callose epitopes were largely restricted to the shank region. Scale bar equals 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.g002

In pollen tubes grown for either 4 or 16 hr, LM15 labelling was evenly distributed along the entire length of the pollen tube including the pollen tube tip (Figure 2A-B, and C-D). Likewise, CCRC-M1 labelling was evenly distributed and covered the apex and shank of 4 hr (Figure 2 E-F) and 16 hr pollen tubes (Figure 2 G-H). The LM15 and CCRC-M1 labelling patterns were consistent with the presence of XyG epitopes in the primary wall and possibly also in the secondary wall of the pollen tube. By contrast, staining with the callose-specific mAb was patchy towards the tip and along the shank of 4 hr pollen tubes (Figure 2 I, J); by 16 hr labelling was absent from the apex but was still detectable along the shank (Figure 2 K, L). This labelling pattern was consistent with previous findings of callose in the secondary wall but not the pollen tube primary wall [4].

Finding XyG was likely being deposited at the pollen tube tip prompted us to re-examine the distribution of cellulose, as cellulose is frequently deposited in the wall along with XyG to form a cellulose/XyG network [33]. The dye Pontamine Fast Scarlet 4B (S4B), which fluoresces more brightly in the presence of cellulose than in the presence of XyG [34], was used to examine the distribution of cellulose in Nicotiana pollen tubes after 4 and 16 hr of growth. Figure S1 shows that S4B fluorescence was present at the apex of 4 hr pollen tubes but absent from the apex of 16 hr pollen tubes. In 16 hr pollen tubes, S4B staining was seen behind the tip but ahead of the point where aniline blue fluorochrome staining, which detects callose, was first evident. Thus, within the limits of this experiment, it appeared that Nicotiana pollen tubes deposit cellulose at their tip during the early stages of growth.

Figure 3 is an immuno-gold transmission electron micrograph of LM15 labelling in a 16 hr pollen tube showing that XyG (specifically the XXXG structure of XyG) was present in the inner, electron-lucent secondary wall layer and the outer fibrillar primary wall layer of the bilayered tube wall, with the intensity of labelling in primary wall being higher than that in the secondary wall.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Immuno-gold transmission electron microscopy detection of XyG in N. alata pollen tubes grown in vitro for 16 hr.

(A) Cross section labelled with mAb LM15 specific to the non-galactosylated (XXXG) motif of XyG. Labelling with gold particles (black dots) was predominantly in the outer, primary cell wall layer. pm=plasma membrane; pcw=primary cell wall; scw=secondary cell wall; v=vacuole.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.g003

Structural analysis of XyG-derived oligosaccharides and chemical analysis of Nicotiana pollen grain and pollen tube walls

To further confirm the presence of XyG in Nicotiana pollen grain and pollen tube walls, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis was performed on the cell wall oligosaccharides released after digestion with the XyG-specific endo-glucanase [21]. The MALDI-TOF MS profiles from pollen grains (Figure 4A) and 16 hr pollen tubes (Figure 4B) are diagnostic of vegetative dicot XyGs and are essentially similar, with two major (m/z 1435.91 and 1639.51; corresponding to XXFG + OAc and XLFG + (OAc)2, respectively) and four minor (m/z 1085.67, 1289.79, 1393.88 and 1598.02; corresponding to XXXG, XXLG + OAc, XXFG and XLFG + OAc, respectively) quasi-molecular ions. The glycosyl sequences, branching patterns and locations of the OAc groups of three oligosaccharides were verified by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MSn, Figure S2).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Analysis of Nicotiana pollen grain and pollen tube XyG.

(A) shows MALDI-TOF MS analysis of endo-glucanase-generated XyG oligosaccharides released from pollen grain cell walls. (B) shows the XyG oligosaccharides released from 16 hr pollen tubes. XyG structures are annotated according to the nomenclature of Fry et al. [32] with underlined structures indicating the presence of an acetate ester group (OAc).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.g004

Linkages diagnostic of XyG were consistently present in methylation analyses of neutral carbohydrates in the walls of Nicotiana pollen grains and pollen tubes harvested at various time of growth in culture (Table 2). The other major neutral polysaccharides reported previously to be in N. alata pollen grains and pollen tube walls, cellulose and arabinan, were also found. Callose was not detected in pollen grains but levels rose rapidly after germination, indicating this polysaccharide is a major component of the pollen tube wall [6]. Low levels of linkages typical of the type II arabinogalactans (AGs), likely attached to proteins in the form of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs), were also detected. This is consistent with the presence of AGPs reported in past immuno-localisation studies of Nicotiana pollen tubes [35,36].

Glycosyl residueDeduced glycosyl linkagePollen-tube growth (hr)Deduced polymer
0248121624
Rhap2,41.21.11.210.90.70.8other
Fucpterminal1.41.61.21.42.90.51.6XyG
Arafterminal4.12.72.32.12.31.51.7arabinan, AGP1.
3-1.51.10.90.90.90.30.8arabinan
5-36.33734.53134.228.426.3arabinan
2,5-1.52.82.83.13.42.42.9arabinan
3,5-0.40.80.91.11.41.31.4arabinan
Arapterminal4.12.72.32.12.31.51.7AGP
Xylp2-5.62.82.922.21.11.4XyG
4-1.40.70.30.50.50.40.7xylan
Galpterminal2.62.11.81.51.411.2XyG
2-4.41.71.81.41.60.21.2XyG
3-0.91.71.50.60.41.20.3AGP
6-1.84.13.83.32.922.1AGP
3,6-2.11.81.40.90.70.70.5AGP
Glcpterminal12.23.16.15.38.28.4callose
3-05.69.816.81224.524callose
4-191716.713.913.714.613.7XyG, cellulose
6-00.10.10.20.20.10.2unknown
3,600.20.40.60.61.61callose
4,675.35.33.63.32.72.8XyG
2,30.10.20.30.40.50.50.6callose

Table 2. Glycosyl-linkage composition (mol%) of the neutral sugars in N. alata pollen-tube walls.

1AGP = arabinogalactan protein.
CSV
Download CSV

Taken together, these data from the MALDI-TOF MS, methylation and immunofluorescence analyses indicate that XyG is present in the walls of Nicotiana pollen grains and is actively synthesised during pollen tube growth.

Discussion

This paper describes how RNA-Seq analysis of N. alata pollen grains led to the discovery of fucosylated XyG in pollen tube walls and clearly demonstrates the advantages of RNA-Seq over previous approaches to gene profiling. The XyG-related transcripts in the transcriptome reported here do not appear among the over 413,000 Nicotiana ESTs currently available (as of June 2013) in GenBank or the over 43,000 unigenes present on the tobacco microarray [37]. Thus, even though the transcriptome was assembled from a single lane of sequence data, it identified many previously undescribed Nicotiana cDNAs.

Nicotiana pollen tube walls are reportedly composed mostly of callose, a (1,3)-β-glucan, with lesser amounts of cellulose and two pectic polysaccharides, an acidic homogalacturonan and a linear neutral (1,5)-α-arabinan, and some AGPs [5,6]. This composition indicated that Nicotiana pollen tube walls are unlike the primary walls that surround vegetative cells of dicots, which have a characteristic framework of cellulose microfibrils and non-covalently cross-linked xyloglucan embedded in a relatively porous matrix of pectic polysaccharides. Indeed, Li et al. [6] suggested XyG was essentially absent from Nicotiana pollen tube walls, with the trace amounts of XyG detectable by chemical analysis being derived from the pollen grain rather than from synthesis by the tube. This view must now change, as Nicotiana pollen tubes not only accumulate transcripts for proteins involved in XyG synthesis and remodelling, but also contain XyG that is predominantly but not exclusively located in the outer primary cell wall. Similarly, Dardelle et al. [38] recently reported XyG as a major component of both the inner and outer layers of Arabidopsis pollen-tube wall. In Arabidopsis pollen tubes, XyG is deposited at the tube apex along with highly methyl esterified homogalacturonan and cellulose, suggesting that the pollen tube primary wall in this species has a load-bearing cellulose-XyG framework as well as a pectic matrix, and thus resembles the primary walls that surround vegetative cells.

The presence and location of microfibrillar cellulose in pollen-tube walls has been discussed many times in the past (e.g., [39]). Based on an electron microscopy study using gold-labelled cellobiohydrolase (CBH1), Ferguson et al. [4] concluded that cellulose was not in the primary wall and tube tip of Nicotiana pollen tubes but was co-located with callose in the inner secondary wall. Derksen et al. [2], however, recently found long fibres that were presumed to be composed of cellulose in a region of primary wall behind the tip. Similarly, Cai et al. [40] used an anti-CESA antibody to detect cellulose synthases in Nicotiana pollen tubes, and found the highest level of protein labelling was at the pollen tube tip. Although this antibody was most likely not detecting a pollen tube CESA but the closely related CSLDs, as CSLDs are suggested to be the cellulose synthases in Nicotiana pollen [7], this observation raised the possibility of cellulose being deposited in the primary wall at the tip as well as in the secondary wall. The staining pattern obtained with pontamine fast scarlet 4B (S4B) is consistent with this interpretation, at least in the early stages of growth. Notably, although S4B also binds weakly to XyG and callose [34], differences in the staining patterns of XyG and callose (Figure 4) and S4B (Figure S1) in 16 hr pollen tubes in particular suggest that the other two polysaccharides were not labelled to a significant extent by S4B. Thus it appears likely that there is cellulose at the Nicotiana pollen tube tip, and hence possibly a cellulose/XyG network as well, during the first few hours of growth. As S4B staining at the apex of 4 hr pollen tubes was strong, it is further possible that cellulose synthesis is not restricted to the plasma membrane but also occurs in vesicles ahead of surface deposition, as has been reported in Arabidopsis pollen tubes [41]. In older pollen tubes cellulose was not present at the apex but was seen behind the tip ahead of the place where callose is deposited, an observation consistent with a previous description of cellulose deposition in Nicotiana pollen tubes [4].

XyGs have a linear backbone of (1,4)-linked β-Glc residues with up to 75% of residues substituted at C(O)6 by Xyl to form a core XXXG structure (nomenclature of [32]). Further substitution of Xyl residues in this core builds up the di- and tri-glycosyl side branches typical of XyGs like the XXFG and XLFG structures seen in Nicotiana pollen grains and pollen tubes (Figure 4). The presence of fucosylated XyGs in Nicotiana pollen grains and tubes was consistent with the immunofluorescence labelling pattern seen with the monoclonal antibody CCRC-M1, which binds terminal Fuc residues linked α-(1,2)- to a galactosyl residue, the epitope found in the F side chain of XyG [42,43] and with other studies of Arabidopsis pollen grains and pollen tubes where fucosylated XyGs are also found [38,43]. However, although XXFG and XLFG are XyG structures found in many dicot cell walls (e.g., see 44), fucoslyated XyGs are not expected in a solanaceous plant like Nicotiana, where previous studies of the XyGs in vegetative tissues have found less Xyl substitution (a XXGG core structure instead of the more usual XXXG) and no Fuc residues [45,46]. Instead of Fuc, the XyG side chains in the Solanaceae have Ara residues attached to some of the Xyl [45]. The major XyG structures expected in Nicotiana are thus XSGG (where S is Ara-(1,3) Xyl) and XXGG [10,47], neither of which was found in pollen grains and tubes (Figure 4).

It is difficult to understand the need for such dissimilar XyG structures in the walls surrounding Nicotiana vegetative cells and pollen grains and tubes. One possibility is that it relates to the different functional requirements for growth of these two cell types: XyG supposedly has a major role in cell growth [33] and there are obvious differences between pollen tubes and vegetative cells in their manner of growth (tip-focussed versus diffuse). For this possibility to be true, however, changes in growth would need to accompany changes to the fine structure of XyG. But the picture that has emerged recently has challenged models of the functional organisation of primary cell walls by showing that growth is largely unaffected by changes to XyG structure. For example, although the XyG made by the Arabidopsis mur1 mutant has less than 2% of the wild-type level of Fuc, no phenotypic consequences are attributed to this change [48,49]. Similarly severe changes in XyG structure are reported for the Arabidopsis mur2 and mur3 mutants yet these plants too appear phenotypically normal [28,50]. Even Arabidopsis mutants with no detectable XyG display only relatively minor phenotypic consequences as a result of the loss, presumably because other wall polysaccharides assume the load-bearing functions of the missing XyG [51-53]. Thus, while the function of XyG in tip-growing cells has not been extensively studied, there is currently no reason to believe that producing fucoslyated XyGs is a mechanically important feature of the wall and plays a key role in the growth of tobacco pollen tubes. The availability of the XyG-related gene sequences described here does, however, allow this possibility to be experimentally tested. More interestingly, these sequences can be used to explore XyG synthesis in Nicotiana vegetative tissues, especially as it appears most of the genes needed to make the XXFG and XLFG structures seen in pollen grains are also expressed in leaves (Figure 1).

As already noted, previous studies of Nicotiana pollen tube have found the biochemical composition of the cell wall changes from tip to shank. This study has confirmed the existence of one of these gradients (for callose) but found evidence that another gradient (for cellulose) may be dependent on growth stage, as S4B fluorescence in 4 hr pollen tubes was at the apex but was behind the apex in 16 hr pollen tubes. There have been several recent attempts to model the elongation of tip-growing cells such as pollen tubes (see 54). Those models are based on growth of a walled cell and often assume that the mechanical properties of the wall remain constant over time, with wall assembly more or less focused at the apex and/or in a region slightly behind the growing point (e.g., see 55,56). Temporal changes to the biochemical composition of the wall have not been considered but may need to be incorporated in future experimental studies and models of tip growth.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Summary statistics for the N. alata pollen grain transcriptome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.s001

(PDF)

Table S2.

Validation of the N. alata pollen grain transcriptome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.s002

(PDF)

Table S3.

List of DNA primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.s003

(PDF)

Figure S1.

Fluorescence detection of cellulose (as detected by S4B staining) and callose (as detected by aniline blue fluorochrome staining) in N. alata pollen tubes. Scale bar equals 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.s004

(PDF)

Figure S2.

ESI-MS/MS analysis of XyG oligosaccharides released by endoglucanase treatment of Nicotiana pollen grains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077140.s005

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Prof Chris Somerville for the gift of Pontamine Fast Scarlet 4B and Dr Steven Read for his helpful and insightful comments. We thank Roshan Cheetamun for his assistance with the carbohydrate linkage analysis and the Victorian Department of Primary Industry and La Trobe University, Melbourne for use of their bioinformatics toolbox for transcriptome assembly.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EN ERL IEM AB. Performed the experiments: ERL IEM AC DFJ PLK CTB SR SMW. Wrote the manuscript: EN ERL IEM AB.

References

  1. 1. Holdaway-Clarke TL, Hepler PK (2003) Control of pollen tube growth: role of ion gradients and fluxes. New Phytol 159: 539–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00847.x.
  2. 2. Derksen J, Janssen GJ, Wolters-Arts M, Lichtscheidl I, Adlassnig W et al. (2011) Wall architecture with high porosity is established at the tip and maintained in growing pollen tubes of Nicotiana tabacum. Plant J 68: 495–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04703.x. PubMed: 21749506.
  3. 3. Mollet J-C, Leroux C, Dardelle F, Lehner A (2013) Cell wall composition, biosynthesis and remodelling during pollen tube growth. Plants 2: 107-147. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/plants2010107.
  4. 4. Ferguson C, Teeri TT, Siika-aho M, Read SM, Bacic A (1998) Location of cellulose and callose in pollen tubes and grains of Nicotiana tabacum. Planta 206: 452-460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050421.
  5. 5. Schlupmann H, Bacic A, Read SM (1994) Uridine diphosphate glucose metabolism and callose synthesis in cultured pollen tubes of Nicotiana alata Link et Otto. Plant Physiol 105: 659-670. PubMed: 12232233.
  6. 6. Li H, Bacic A, Read SM (1999) Role of a callose synthase zymogen in regulating wall deposition in pollen tubes of Nicotiana alata Link et Otto. Planta 208: 528-538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050590.
  7. 7. Doblin MS, De Melis L, Newbigin E, Bacic A, Read SM (2001) Pollen tubes of Nicotiana alata express two genes from different β-glucan synthase families. Plant Physiol 125: 2040–2052. PubMed: 11299383.
  8. 8. Brownfield L, Ford K, Doblin MS, Newbigin E, Read S, Bacic A (2007) Proteomic and biochemical evidence links the callose synthase in Nicotiana alata pollen tubes to the product of the NaGSL1 gene. Plant J 52: 147-156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03219.x. PubMed: 17666022.
  9. 9. Martin JA, Wang Z (2011) Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat Rev Genet 12: 671-682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3068. PubMed: 21897427.
  10. 10. Sims IM, Munro SLA, Currie G, Craik D, Bacic A (1996) Structural characterisation of xyloglucan secreted by suspension-cultured cells of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. Carbohydr Res 293: 147-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(96)00142-5. PubMed: 8938374.
  11. 11. Schlüpmann H, Bacic A, Read SM (1993) A novel callose synthase from pollen tubes of Nicotiana. Planta 191: 470-481.
  12. 12. Li H, Bacic A, Read SM (1997) Activation of pollen-tube callose synthase by detergents. Evidence for different mechanisms of action. Plant Physiol 114: 1255-1265. PubMed: 9276948.
  13. 13. Cox MP, Peterson, DA Biggs PJ (2010); Solexa QA. (2010) At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-485. PubMed: 20875133.
  14. 14. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA et al. (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29: 644–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883. PubMed: 21572440.
  15. 15. Bombarely A, Rosli HG, Vrebalov J, Moffett P, Mueller LA, Martin GB (2012) A draft genome sequence of Nicotiana benthamiana to enhance molecular plant-microbe biology research. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25: 1523-1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0148-TA. PubMed: 22876960.
  16. 16. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human gemone. Genome Biol 10: R25. PubMed: 19261174.
  17. 17. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23: 2947-2948. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. PubMed: 17846036.
  18. 18. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402. PubMed: 9254694.
  19. 19. Brownfield L, Wilson S, Newbigin E, Bacic A, Read S (2008) Molecular control of the glucan synthase-like protein NaGSL1 and callose synthesis during growth of Nicotiana alata pollen tubes. Biochem J 414: 43–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20080693. PubMed: 18462191.
  20. 20. Wilson SM, Bacic A (2012) Preparation of plant cells for transmission electron microscopy to optimize immune-gold labelling of carbohydrate and protein epitopes. Nat Protoc 9: 1716-1727.
  21. 21. Lerouxel O, Choo TS, Séveno M, Usadel B, Faye L et al. (2002) Rapid structural phenotyping of plant cell wall mutants by enzymatic oligosaccharide fingerprinting. Plant Physiol 130: 1754-1763. PubMed: 12481058.
  22. 22. Wheeler D, Newbigin E (2007) Expression of 10 S class SLF-like genes in Nicotiana alata pollen and its implications for understanding the pollen factor of the S locus. Genetics 177: 2171–2180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.076885. PubMed: 17947432.
  23. 23. Yokoyama R, Nishitani K (2001) A comprehensive expression analysis of all members of a gene family encoding cell-wall enzymes allowed us to predict cis-regulatory regions involved in cell-wall construction in specific organs of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 42: 1025-1033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pce154. PubMed: 11673616.
  24. 24. Liepman AH, Wightman R, Geshi N, Turner SR, Scheller HV (2010) Arabidopsis - a powerful model system for plant cell wall research. Plant J 61: 1107-1121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04161.x. PubMed: 20409281.
  25. 25. Cocuron J-C, Lerouxel O, Drakakaki G, Alonso AP, Liepman AH et al. (2007) A gene from the cellulose synthase-like C family encodes a β-1,4 glucan synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U_S_A 104: 8550–8555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703133104. PubMed: 17488821.
  26. 26. Zabotina OA, van de Ven WTG, Freshour G, Drakakaki G, Cavalier D et al. (2008) Arabidopsis XXT5 gene encodes a putative alpha-1,6-xylosyltransferase that is involved in xyloglucan biosynthesis. Plant J 56: 101–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03580.x. PubMed: 18557833.
  27. 27. Chou Y-H, Pogorelko G, Zabotina OA (2012) Xyloglucan xylosyltransferases XXT1, XXT2, XXT5, and the glucan synthase CSLC4 form Golgi-localized multiprotein complexes. Plant Physiol 159: 1355-1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.199356. PubMed: 22665445.
  28. 28. Madson M, Dunand C, Li XM, Verma R, Vanzin GF et al. (2003) The MUR3 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a xyloglucan galactosyltransferase that is evolutionarily related to animal exostosins. Plant Cell 15: 1662-1670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.009837. PubMed: 12837954.
  29. 29. Eklöf JM, Brumer H (2010) The XTH gene family: An update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodelling. Plant Physiol 153: 456-466. PubMed: 20421457.
  30. 30. De la Torre F, Sampedro J, Zarra I, Revilla G (2002) AtFXG1, an Arabidopsis gene encoding α-L-fucosidase active against fucosylated xyloglucan oligosaccharides. Plant Physiol 128: 247-255. PubMed: 11788770.
  31. 31. Walker M, Tehseen M, Doblin MS, Pettolino FA, Wilson SM et al. (2011) The transcriptional regulator LEUNIG_HOMOLOG regulates mucilage release from the Arabidopsis testa. Plant Physiol 156: 46-60. PubMed: 21402796.
  32. 32. Fry SC, York WS, Albersheim P, Darvill A, Hayashi T et al. (1993) An unambiguous nomenclature for xyloglucan-derived oligosaccharides. Physiol Plant 89: 1–3.
  33. 33. Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM (1993) Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J 3: 1–30. PubMed: 8401598.
  34. 34. Anderson CT, Carroll A, Akhmetova L, Somerville C (2011) Real-time imaging of cellulose reorientation during cell wall expansion in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol 152: 787–796. PubMed: 19965966.
  35. 35. Ferguson C, Bacic A, Anderson MA, Read SM (1999) Subcellular distribution of arabinogalactan proteins in pollen grains and tubes as revealed with a monoclonal antibody raised against stylar arabinogalactan proteins. Protoplasma 206: 105-117.
  36. 36. Nguema-Ona E, Coimbra S, Vicré-Gibouin M, Mollet JC, Driouich A (2012) Arabinogalactan proteins in root and pollen-tube cells: distribution and functional aspects. Ann Bot 110: 383-404. PubMed: 22786747.
  37. 37. Edwards KD, Bombarely A, Story GW, Allen F, Mueller LA et al. (2010) TobEA: an atlas of tobacco gene expression from seed to senescence. BMC Genomics 11: 142. PubMed: 20187945.
  38. 38. Dardelle F, Lehner A, Ramdani Y, Bardor M, Lerouge P et al. (2010) Biochemical and immunocytological characterizations of Arabidopsis pollen tube cell wall. Plant Physiol 153: 1563-1576. PubMed: 20547702.
  39. 39. Steer MW, Steer JM (1989) Pollen tube tip growth. New Phytol 111: 323-358.
  40. 40. Cai G, Faleri C, Del Casino C, Emons AMC, Cresti M (2011) Distribution of callose synthase, cellulose synthase, and sucrose synthase in tobacco pollen tube is controlled in dissimilar ways by actin filaments and microtubules. Plant Physiol 155: 1169–1190. PubMed: 21205616.
  41. 41. Chebli Y, Kaneda M, Zerzour R, Geitmann A (2012) The cell wall of the Arabidopsis pollen tube – Spatial distribution, recycling, and network formation of polysaccharides. Plant Physiol 160: 1940–1955. PubMed: 23037507.
  42. 42. Puhlmann J, Bucheli E, Swain MJ, Dunning N, Albersheim P et al. (1994) Generation of monoclonal antibodies against plant cell wall polysaccharides. I. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody to a terminal α-(1,2)-linked fucosyl-containing epitope. Plant Physiol 104: 699–710. PubMed: 7512736.
  43. 43. Freshour G, Clay RP, Fuller MS, Albersheim P, Darvill AG, Hahn MG (1996) Developmental and tissue-specific structural alterations of the cell-wall polysaccharides of Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant Physiol 110: 1413–1429. PubMed: 12226270.
  44. 44. Vanzin GF, Madson M, Carpita NC, Raikhel NV, Keegstra K, Reiter W-D (2002) The mur2 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana lacks fucosylated xyloglucan because of a lesion in fucosyltransferase AtFUT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U_S_A 99: 3340–3345. PubMed: 11854459.
  45. 45. Harris PJ (2005) Diversity if plant cell walls. In: RJ Henry. Plant diversity and evolution: Genotypic and phenotypic variation in higher plants. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International Publishing. pp. 201-227.
  46. 46. Brennan M, Harris PJ (2011) Distribution of fucosylated xyloglucans among the walls of different cell types in monocotyledons determined by immunofluorescence microscopy. Mol Plants 4: 144-156.
  47. 47. York WS, Kolli VSK, Orlando R, Albersheim P, Darvill AG (1996) The structures of arabinoxyloglucans produced by solanaceous plants. Carbohydr Res 285: 99–128. PubMed: 9011379.
  48. 48. Zablackis E, York WS, Pauly M, Hantus S, Reiter W-D et al. (1996) Substitution of L-fucose by L-galactose in cell walls of Arabidopsis mur1. Science 272: 1808-1810. PubMed: 8650583.
  49. 49. O'Neill MA, Eberhard S, Albersheim P, Darvill AG (2001) Requirement of borate cross-linking of cell wall rhamnogalacturonan II for Arabidopsis growth. Science 294: 846-849. PubMed: 11679668.
  50. 50. Perrin RM, Jia ZH, Wagner TA, O’Neill MA, Sarria R et al. (2003) Analysis of xyloglucan fucosylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 132: 1-11. PubMed: 12805606.
  51. 51. Cavalier DM, Lerouxel O, Neumetzler L, Yamauchi K, Reinecke A et al. (2008) Disrupting two Arabidopsis thaliana xylosyltransferase genes results in plants deficient in xyloglucan, a major primary cell wall component. Plant Cell 20: 1519–1537. PubMed: 18544630.
  52. 52. Zabotina OA, Avci U, Cavalier D, Pattathil S, Chou Y-H et al. (2012) Mutations in multiple XXT genes of Arabidopsis reveal the complexity of xyloglucan biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 159: 1367-1384. PubMed: 22696020.
  53. 53. Park YB, Cosgrove DJ (2012) Changes in cell wall biomechanical properties in the xyloglucan-deficient xxt1/xxt2 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 158: 465-475. PubMed: 22108526.
  54. 54. Kroeger J, Geitmann A (2012) The pollen tube paradigm revisited. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15: 618–624. PubMed: 23000432.
  55. 55. Fayant P, Girlanda O, Chebli Y, Aubin CE, Villemure I, Geitmann A (2010) Finite element model of polar growth in pollen tubes. Plant Cell 22: 2579-2593. PubMed: 20699395.
  56. 56. Vogler H, Draeger C, Weber A, Felekis D, Eichenberger C et al. (2013) The pollen tube: a soft shell with a hard core. Plant J 73: 617–627. PubMed: 23106269.