Figures
Abstract
Background
mRNA for biomarkers of kidney injury extracted from urinary exosomes may reflect or predict levels of the corresponding protein after transplantation and clinical outcomes.
Methods
Urinary exosomes were isolated from patients following renal transplantation, from healthy controls, and patients with CKD. Expression of exosomal mRNA for the injury biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), interleukin-18 (IL-18), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and cystatin C was compared with the concentrations of corresponding urinary proteins, 18S RNA and serum creatinine.
Results
All biomarker protein concentrations increased after transplantation, and urinary NGAL and IL-18 at 24 and 168 h correlated with the day 7 creatinine reduction ratio (CRR). Exosomal18S RNA increased after transplantation, but exosomal mRNA for NGAL, IL-18 and cystatin C did not correlate with the day 7 CRR, or urinary biomarker concentrations at any time after transplantation. Exosomal NGAL mRNA was lower 4 h after transplantation than in control exosomes. In contrast, exosomal mRNA for cystatin C was unchanged after transplantation and in CKD, although urinary cystatin C temporarily increased following transplantation. Urinary KIM-1 increased after transplantation, but exosomal mRNA for KIM-1 remained undetectable. In CKD 18S RNA was raised, and exosomal mRNA for NGAL, IL-18 and cystatin C was detected in all patients. While urinary NGAL was greater in CKD than control subjects, exosomal NGAL mRNA was unchanged. Exosomal IL-18 mRNA was increased in CKD, but not IL-18 protein.
Conclusions
After renal transplantation, urinary NGAL and IL-18 levels reflect the day 7 CRR. However, while mRNA for these biomarkers is present in exosomes, their levels do not reflect or predict urinary biomarker levels or the CRR. This likely reflects the fact that packaging of mRNA in exosomes is selective, and is not necessarily representative of mRNA in the parent cells responsible for biomarker production.
Citation: Peake PW, Pianta TJ, Succar L, Fernando M, Pugh DJ, McNamara K, et al. (2014) A Comparison of the Ability of Levels of Urinary Biomarker Proteins and Exosomal mRNA to Predict Outcomes after Renal Transplantation. PLoS ONE 9(6): e98644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098644
Editor: Nick Ashton, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Received: January 27, 2014; Accepted: May 6, 2014; Published: June 11, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Peake et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by a grant from Kidney Health Australia. Timothy Pianta is the recipient of a Jacquot Research Entry Scholarship and a University of New South Wales Australian Postgraduate Award. Lena Succar is supported by NHMRC Infrastructure Funding, and Zoltan Endre has received research and travel support from Alere and Abbott Corporations. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have received funding from a commercial source (Alere and Abbott Corporations). There are no other competing interests. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials. All authors declare no external parties had any influence on this study in any manner as defined by PLOS ONE policy.
Introduction
Renal transplantation is inevitably associated with a period of renal ischemia and probable exposure to nephrotoxins, and the resulting kidney injury can manifest as delayed or slow graft function. However, creatinine has a long half life and a large volume of distribution, factors which prevent it from providing both a real-time and accurate measure of kidney function and injury [1]. While alternative serum biomarkers have been proposed, including plasma cystatin C for renal function and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) [2], [3], urinary biomarkers may provide more specific evidence of tubular injury, including cystatin C, NGAL, Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1) and interleukin 18 (IL-18). Previous studies show that urinary injury biomarkers, especially IL-18 and NGAL correlate with graft outcome, but only at 24 hours when intervention is unlikely to be helpful or when serum creatinine [sCr] is also predictive [4]. Thus the search for new biomarkers of kidney injury remains ongoing [1], [5]–[7].
Urinary exosomes, small membrane-bound vesicles of 50–130 nm diameter shed by all tubular cells are a potential new source of biomarkers. They contain cytoplasmic mRNA, which is not normally detectable in the RNAase-containing urine [8]–[10], but remains stable within the exosomal lipid bilayer [9], [11]–[14]. We hypothesised that exosomal mRNA for biomarkers of renal injury would reflect or predict the concentrations of the corresponding urinary protein, and/or predict graft outcome [15]–[17]. We examined levels of exosomal mRNA for the inducible proteins NGAL, a renoprotective protein known to bind siderophores, KIM-1, a transmembrane protein which imparts a phagocytic phenotype to proximal tubule cells, and the inflammatory marker IL-18, and compared these levels with those of the corresponding urinary protein. These findings were compared with those for the constitutively produced cystatin C, whose presence in urine reflects impaired low molecular weight protein uptake by the proximal tubule [18]. Levels of urinary protein and exosomal mRNA for these biomarkers were determined in normal subjects and compared with those in patients immediately following renal transplantation, and with the day 7 creatinine reduction ration [CRR] as a measure of clinical outcomes. As a positive control, levels of urinary protein and exosomal mRNA for these biomarkers were compared with the corresponding levels in those with chronic kidney disease [CKD] complicated by significant proteinuria. Levels of NGAL and IL-18 protein, but not exosomal mRNA correlated with the day 7 CRR, and mRNA expression did not predict urinary biomarker concentrations in normal or pathological situations. However, mRNA for IL-18 did detect ongoing pathology in CKD not reflected in levels of the urinary protein. These data suggest levels of exosomal mRNA for three commonly used protein biomarkers of kidney injury were not related to urinary levels of the corresponding proteins, or to clinical outcomes.
Subjects and Methods
Patients
We prospectively consented consecutive patients of the renal transplantation service at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney and normal volunteers. The study was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee [HREC 10/113]. All participants gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Urine samples were obtained from groups of non-oliguric adults aged 18 or older (Table 1).
The Acute Transplant group were recipients of a renal transplant (8 deceased donors, 6 live donors). Before transplant, all these patients were dialysis dependent, and 8/14 were anuric; the remainder had some residual urine output. Induction of immunosuppression consisted of methylprednisolone, mycophenolate sodium and basiliximab in all patients and either cyclosporine (n = 7) or tacrolimus (n = 7) at the treating physician’s discretion. The CRR was defined by the difference between the sCr collected within 1 h after surgery (baseline) and the sCr at day 7 divided by baseline sCr.
A normal (volunteer) group undertook a screening questionnaire and investigations to exclude any CKD. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of hypertension, diabetes, smoking or CKD, the regular use of medications including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; resting blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg; abnormal urinalysis; or estimated glomerular filtration rate (by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD).
A comparator chronic kidney disease group comprised general nephrology patients with CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and proteinuria (>1g/days, see Table 1).
Sample Preparation and Isolation Methods
In brief, urine for exosome analysis was centrifuged at 3,200 g for 10 min to remove cellular debris and then stored at −80°C until analysis [9], [19]. In the Acute Transplantation group, samples were taken at 4, 24 and 168 h post-operatively. Separate urine samples were collected into protease inhibitor solution [Complete protease inhibitor, Roche, Sydney Australia].
Exosome Purification and Analysis
Urine samples were vortexed, then centrifuged at 3200 g for 15 min. The supernatant (25 ml) was centrifuged at 3200 g in Vivaspin 20 nanomembrane concentrators (MWCO 100 kDa; Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) to collect the exosomal fraction [19]. RNA in the retentate was twice purified by Trisure following the manufacturer’s protocol [Bioline, Sydney, Australia]. cDNA was generated using the Tetro cDNA Synthesis kit [Bioline, Sydney, Australia] following the manufacturer’s protocols using random primers. RNA was quantitated with commercially designed Taqman probes and reagents [Applied Biosystems, Melbourne Australia] by PCR performed on a Corbett 3000 real-time machine. All mRNA probes were exon spanning to exclude the possibility of DNA contamination in the preparations, and were Hs00183813_m1 for ALIX, Hs01008571_m1 for NGAL, Hs01038788_m1for IL-18, Hs99999901_s1 for 18S RNA, Hs00273334_m1 for KIM-1, and Hs00264679_m1 for cystatin C.
Quantitation was based upon a dilution series of cDNA from 18S RNA. Results for levels of cDNA for cystatin C, NGAL, KIM-1 and IL-18 were calculated relative to the levels of 18S for each cDNA preparation using the comparative Ct method [20]. Each preparation of RNA from urine was dissolved in 25 µl water, providing sufficient RNA for cDNA synthesis for 5 gene assays in duplicate. Data for mRNA levels in transplant patients were compared with levels of mRNA in normal subjects, and with those in patients with CKD as a positive control.
Assays were accepted for analysis where duplicate values were concordant, the 1/100 dil. of 18S RNA gave Ct <31 and mRNA results for biomarker cDNA gave Ct <37. The lowest detectable concentration based on our data was calculated as 0.000061 for 1/2Ct. cDNA amplification of mRNA showed efficiencies of 100±10%, and between assay CV% was <2%. An experiment utilising HK-2 proximal tubular cells in culture served as a positive control for mRNA detection.
Biomarker Assays
Biomarkers in urine were measured quantitatively by sandwich ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions using commercial ELISA kits (R&D Systems). The urine samples were mixed on collection with Complete protease inhibitor [Roche] in a ratio of 2∶1, and stored at 4°C until collection. On receipt samples were centrifuged, aliquoted to avoid repeated freeze thaw cycles and stored at −80°C. All measurements were done in duplicate, with ELISA plates read at 450 nm. Data collected was analyzed using Prism 6 [GraphPad] curve-fitting equations. The lowest detectable concentration of each antigen was designated to be half the concentration of the lowest standard. Creatinine levels were determined by commercial enzymatic reagents and standards [ThermoFisher, Melbourne Australia].
Statistical Analysis
Data were in general not normally distributed, and non-parametric one way Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Dunn’s post test analyses were performed with significance adjusted for multiple comparisons. Nonparametric Spearman coefficients were calculated to determine relationships between parameters. Prism [Version 6, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA] was used for all statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered significant using two-tailed analyses.
Results
Subjects
The clinical demographics of the groups: normal volunteers, acute transplant, and patients with chronic kidney disease are summarised in Table 1. No transplant patients showed evidence of acute rejection.
Urinary Biomarker Protein Concentrations Increased after Transplantation
Increased urinary concentrations of NGAL and IL-18 at D1 and D7, (but not at 4 h), correlated with the day 7 CRR [Table 2]. Cystatin C and KIM-1 also increased after transplantation but did not correlate with early graft outcome. Urinary NGAL protein rose after transplantation, was higher at 4 and 24 h than in normal volunteers [both p<0.001]. Levels had returned to normal by 168 h [Fig. 1A]. NGAL protein was higher in both CKD patients [p<0.001] and at 168 h after transplantation [p<0.001] than in control subjects.
Samples were taken at 4, 24 and 168[cf.deceased] donors are shown as triangles. Significant differences between groups [p<0.05] are denoted by horizontal lines.
Urinary KIM-1 increased after transplantation peaking at 24 h and remained higher than in control subjects168 h after transplantation [p<0.001 and p<0.01 respectively] [Fig. 2 ]. Levels 24 and 168 h after transplantation were higher than in CKD patients with proteinuria [p<0.01 and p<0.05 respectively].
Samples were taken at 4, 24 and 168-1 was not detected in most subjects. For the transplant patients, the data for those who received kidneys from live donors [cf. deceased] are shown as triangles. The geometric mean is shown. Significant differences between groups [p<0.05] are denoted by horizontal lines.
Levels of urinary cystatin C protein were higher 4 h after transplantation than in control subjects, [p<0.05] but were not increased at other points in time, or in CKD patients with proteinuria [Fig. 3A].
Samples were taken at 4, 24 and 168[cf. deceased] are shown as triangles. The geometric mean is shown. Significant differences between groups [p<0.05] are denoted by horizontal lines.
The median urinary IL-18 protein concentration increased after transplantation, and was higher 4 and 24 h after transplantation compared to CKD patients [both p<0.05] [Fig. 4A].
Samples were taken at 4, 24 and 168[cf. deceased] donors are shown as triangles. The geometric mean is shown. Significant differences between groups [p<0.05] are denoted by horizontal lines.
Exosome Production Increased after Transplantation and in CKD with Proteinuria
Exosomal 18S RNA was present in urine from all subjects. Levels in acute transplant patients at 4 h and in CKD patients were greater than in control subjects, [p<0.05 for both] suggesting increased exosome production [Fig. 5]. However, levels did not correlate with the day 7 CRR. 18S RNA was generally present 100 fold or more times the concentration of mRNA for each biomarker. Exosomal mRNA for the inducible proteins NGAL, IL-18 and cystatin C was detected in all subjects with CKD. In each population, mRNA levels were normalised to those of 18S RNA, with results similar to those seen when raw Ct PCR values from RNA preparations were compared. In each case RNA preparations were derived from 25 ml urine. To confirm the identity of the source of the RNA preparations, mRNA for the exosome biomarker ALIX [ = programmed cell death 6–interacting protein] was demonstrated to be present [not shown].
Samples were taken at 4, 24 and 168[cf. deceased] are shown as triangles. The geometric mean is shown. Significant differences between groups [p<0.05] are denoted by horizontal lines.
NGAL Exosomal mRNA Decreased after Transplantation
Exosomal mRNA for NGAL was decreased at 4 and 24 h post transplantation compared with controls, but had increased to control levels by 168 h [p<0.05] [Fig. 1B]. All CKD subjects had exosomal mRNA for NGAL, and this was present at levels equivalent to controls. There was no correlation between levels of mRNA for NGAL and CRR, or with the corresponding levels of protein 4 h after transplantation or at later times, regardless of whether absolute levels of mRNA or levels adjusted for 18S RNA were used.
Exosomal mRNA for KIM-1 was Undetectable after Transplantation
mRNA for KIM-1 was not detected in normal volunteers and was detected [at low levels] in only three subjects in other groups. Assay performance was verified by ready detection of mRNA for KIM-1 in positive control HK-2 proximal tubular cells (data not shown).
Cystatin C Exosomal mRNA Remained Unchanged after Transplantation
There were no significant differences between exosomal mRNA levels for cystatin C in all groups [Fig. 3B], and no significant correlation between levels of mRNA and CRR or with cystatin C protein.
IL-18 Exosomal mRNA Remain Unchanged after Transplantation
Exosomal IL-18 mRNA was significantly higher in CKD patients than in normal volunteers [p<0.05], and higher than in transplant recipients at 4 h [p<0.05], 24 h [p<0.01] and 168 h [p<0.05] [Fig. 4B]. There were no significant differences between mean levels in transplant patients at different times. There was no significant correlation between levels of mRNA for IL-18 and the D7 CRR, or the corresponding levels of protein.
Discussion
This study demonstrates for the first time that mRNAs for biomarkers of renal cellular injury including NGAL, cystatin C and IL-18 were present in urinary exosomes from normal subjects, patients at various times after renal transplantation, and in subjects with CKD. After renal transplantation, free urinary protein concentrations of NGAL and IL-18 correlated with the day 7 CRR. However, there was a poor correlation between exosomal mRNA for the same injury biomarkers and the day 7 CRR, and with biomarker protein levels.
18S RNA, a ‘house-keeping’ gene product, was detected in all preparations of urinary exosomes, at levels 100 fold or more higher than biomarker mRNA concentrations. 18S RNA concentrations were higher after acute transplantation and in CKD patients with proteinuria than in normal volunteers, a finding consistent with an increased production of exosomes. Such data parallel the increased concentrations of serum exosomes observed in patients with cancer, hypoxia or inflammatory disease compared with those in healthy individuals [9], [21], [22], and with the recently observed increase in 18S RNA in urinary cells collected prior to and during episodes of renal transplant rejection [23].
As expected, the urinary protein concentrations of KIM-1, NGAL, cystatin C and IL-18 increased soon after kidney transplantation and then declined. The KIM-1 peak was delayed (24 h) compared with NGAL and cystatin C, both of which peaked 4 h after clamp release. Levels of NGAL and IL-18 correlated with the day 7 CRR at 24 and 168 h post transplantation, a finding reported in other kidney transplantation studies [4]. By contrast, exosomal mRNA for NGAL fell immediately after renal transplantation, then rose to normal levels after 168 h, but levels did not correlate with the day 7 CRR. In contrast, exosomal mRNA for NGAL was high in normal volunteers, especially given the low concentration of NGAL protein in the same urine.
NGAL mRNA is largely synthesized in the distal nephron [24], from where most urinary NGAL protein derives [25], and rises in acute injury [26]. While NGAL protein is freely filtered by the glomerulus, it is normally reabsorbed by the proximal tubule, but urine levels may be affected by competition with other proteins for megalin-cubulin uptake in the proximal tubule [18], [27].
Our finding that levels of exosomal NGAL mRNA do not reflect urinary NGAL is consistent with reports that constituents in exosomes from the same cell may vary over time [28], and represent only a subset of the constituents of the parent cell [9], [11]. For example, urinary exosomes contain many apical but few basolateral membrane proteins, and exosomes from Jurkat cells in which mRNA for IL-2 is upregulated have an absence of detectable mRNA for IL-2 in their exosomes [29]. Such selectivity may reflect a role for exosomes in cell-cell communication [12], [30]: studies have established physiological effects on target cells as a result of the incorporation of exosomal content, including both protein and RNA [9], [22].
The disconnection between urinary protein and exosomal mRNA was also observed in KIM-1 and IL-18. Exosomal mRNA for KIM-1 remained undetectable in most subjects although KIM-1 mRNA has been detected in cells from the urinary sediment of patients with kidney graft dysfunction [31]. However, this source did not include exosomes and has a different mRNA profile to that found in exosomes [32]. Similarly, while levels of mRNA for IL-18 rose after transplantation, they did not correlate with levels of the corresponding protein, or with the day 7 CRR. The latter study also demonstrated mRNA was internal to exosomes, given the presence of RNAases in the urine, and the resistance of exosomal RNA to the experimental addition of RNAases during isolation of exosomes.
The data for these inducible proteins, which largely derive from renal synthesis, may be contrasted with the constitutively produced cystatin C, which is produced at a constant rate by all nucleated cells [33]. Serum cystatin C is freely filtered at the glomerulus and usually completely reasborbed in the proximal tubule. Increases in urinary cystatin C protein observed after transplantation therefore reflect proximal tubular injury [34] as well as competition by other proteins for megalin-cubulin uptake [18], [27]. In this study, urinary cystatin C protein had increased by 4 h post transplantation. However, exosomal cystatin C mRNA levels remained stable after transplantation. The relatively constant amounts of exosomal mRNA for cystatin C may reflect differences in the way constitutively produced ‘housekeeping’ mRNA is packaged into exosomes compared with mRNA for inducible biomarkers of kidney injury.
In CKD patients with proteinuria, urinary levels of both NGAL protein and exosomal mRNA for NGAL were increased. These subjects expressed the highest observed levels of NGAL protein. However, NGAL protein concentrations did not correlate with exosomal mRNA levels. In comparison, levels of IL-18 were low, while exosomal mRNA for IL-18 was detectable in all patients with CKD and at higher levels than acutely after transplantation. However, exosomal mRNA for IL-18 was detectable in only two of 11 healthy control subjects. The raised levels of mRNA for IL-18 in the proteinuric subjects therefore suggest that in CKD raised exosomal IL-18 mRNA reflected ongoing [chronic] renal injury, while urinary IL-18 protein itself did not. The fact that exosomal mRNA for NGAL, IL-18 and cystatin C was detected in all subjects with CKD served as a positive control, and suggested that a failure to detect exosomal mRNA implies very low exosomal levels of biomarker mRNA in these subjects.
In summary, a range of physiological processes independently influences levels of urinary protein and exosomal mRNA, but only urinary biomarker protein correlated with clinical outcomes, such as the day 7 CRR. The data suggest that the incorporation of mRNA for biomarkers into urinary exosomes after renal transplantation does not reflect production of protein biomarkers by renal cells lining the lumen.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: PP ZE. Performed the experiments: PP TP LS. Analyzed the data: PP TP LS MF DP KM ZE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PP TP LS MF DP KM ZE. Wrote the paper: PP TP LS MF DP KM ZE.
References
- 1. Endre ZH, Pickering JW, Walker RJ (2011) Clearance and beyond: the complementary roles of GFR measurement and injury biomarkers in acute kidney injury (AKI). Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 301: F697–707.
- 2. Makris K, Rizos D, Kafkas N, Haliassos A (2012) Neurophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a new biomarker in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 50: 1519–1532.
- 3. Peralta CA, Shlipak MG, Judd S, Cushman M, McClellan W, et al. (2011) Detection of chronic kidney disease with creatinine, cystatin C, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and association with progression to end-stage renal disease and mortality. JAMA 305: 1545–1552.
- 4. Hall IE, Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Wang Z, Doshi M, et al. (2010) IL-18 and urinary NGAL predict dialysis and graft recovery after kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 189–197.
- 5. Endre ZH, Pickering JW (2013) Acute kidney injury clinical trial design: old problems, new strategies. Pediatr Nephrol 28: 207–217.
- 6. Devarajan P (2011) Biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Pediatr 23: 194–200.
- 7. Lameire NH, Bagga A, Cruz D, De Maeseneer J, Endre Z, et al. (2013) Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern. Lancet 382: 170–179.
- 8. Chaput N, Thery C (2011) - Exosomes: immune properties and potential clinical implementations. Semin Immunopathol 33: 419–440.
- 9. van Balkom BW, Pisitkun T, Verhaar MC, Knepper MA (2011) Exosomes and the kidney: prospects for diagnosis and therapy of renal diseases. Kidney Int 80: 1138–1145.
- 10. Vlassov AV, Magdaleno S, Setterquist R, Conrad R (2012) Exosomes: current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Biochim Biophys Acta 1820: 940–948.
- 11. Dear JW, Street JM, Bailey MA (2013) Urinary exosomes: A reservoir for biomarker discovery and potential mediators of intra-renal signaling. Proteomics 13: 1572–1580.
- 12. Fang DY, King HW, Li JY, Gleadle JM (2013) Exosomes and the kidney: Blaming the messenger. Nephrology (Carlton) 18: 1–10.
- 13. Ohno S, Ishikawa A, Kuroda M (2013) Roles of exosomes and microvesicles in disease pathogenesis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65: 398–401.
- 14. van Ham SM, Heutinck KM, Jorritsma T, Bemelman FJ, Strik MC, et al. (2010) Urinary granzyme A mRNA is a biomarker to diagnose subclinical and acute cellular rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int 78: 1033–1040.
- 15. Alachkar N, Rabb H, Jaar BG (2011) Urinary biomarkers in acute kidney transplant dysfunction. Nephron Clin Pract 118: c173–181 discussion c181.
- 16. Fassett RG, Venuthurupalli SK, Gobe GC, Coombes JS, Cooper MA, et al. (2011) Biomarkers in chronic kidney disease: a review. Kidney Int 80: 806–821.
- 17. Martensson J, Martling CR, Bell M (2012) Novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury and failure: clinical applicability. Br J Anaesth 109: 843–850.
- 18. Nejat M, Hill JV, Pickering JW, Edelstein CL, Devarajan P, et al. (2012) Albuminuria increases cystatin C excretion: implications for urinary biomarkers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27 Suppl 3iii96–103.
- 19. Cheruvanky A, Zhou H, Pisitkun T, Kopp JB, Knepper MA, et al. (2007) Rapid isolation of urinary exosomal biomarkers using a nanomembrane ultrafiltration concentrator. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292: F1657–1661.
- 20. Fleige S, Walf V, Huch S, Prgomet C, Sehm J, et al. (2006) Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol Lett 28: 1601–1613.
- 21. Moon PG, You S, Lee JE, Hwang D, Baek MC (2011) Urinary exosomes and proteomics. Mass Spectrom Rev 30: 1185–1202.
- 22. Chaput N, Thery C (2011) Exosomes: immune properties and potential clinical implementations. Semin Immunopathol 33: 419–440.
- 23. Suthanthiran M, Schwartz JE, Ding R, Abecassis M, Dadhania D, et al. (2013) Urinary-cell mRNA profile and acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts. N Engl J Med 369: 20–31.
- 24. Devarajan P (2010) Review: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a troponin-like biomarker for human acute kidney injury. Nephrology (Carlton) 15: 419–428.
- 25. Paragas N, Qiu A, Zhang Q, Samstein B, Deng SX, et al. (2011) The Ngal reporter mouse detects the response of the kidney to injury in real time. Nat Med 17: 216–222.
- 26. Schmidt-Ott KM, Mori K, Li JY, Kalandadze A, Cohen DJ, et al. (2007) Dual action of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 407–413.
- 27. Hvidberg V, Jacobsen C, Strong RK, Cowland JB, Moestrup SK, et al. (2005) The endocytic receptor megalin binds the iron transporting neutrophil-gelatinase-associated lipocalin with high affinity and mediates its cellular uptake. FEBS Lett 579: 773–777.
- 28. Waldenstrom A, Genneback N, Hellman U, Ronquist G (2012) Cardiomyocyte microvesicles contain DNA/RNA and convey biological messages to target cells. PLoS One 7: e34653.
- 29. Wang F, Xu Z, Zhou J, Lo WS, Lau CF, et al. (2013) Regulated Capture by Exosomes of mRNAs for Cytoplasmic tRNA Synthetases. J Biol Chem 288: 29223–29228.
- 30. Camussi G, Deregibus MC, Bruno S, Cantaluppi V, Biancone L (2010) Exosomes/microvesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication. Kidney Int 78: 838–848.
- 31. Nogare AL, Dalpiaz T, Veronese FJ, Goncalves LF, Manfro RC (2012) Noninvasive analyses of kidney injury molecule-1 messenger RNA in kidney transplant recipients with graft dysfunction. Transplant Proc 44: 2297–2299.
- 32. Miranda KC, Bond DT, McKee M, Skog J, Paunescu TG, et al. (2010) Nucleic acids within urinary exosomes/microvesicles are potential biomarkers for renal disease. Kidney Int 78: 191–199.
- 33. Ferguson MA, Waikar SS (2012) Established and emerging markers of kidney function. Clin Chem 58: 680–689.
- 34. Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, Thadhani R, Bonventre JV (2002) Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int 62: 237–244.