Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Cortisol and adrenal androgens as independent predictors of mortality in septic patients

  • Rocío De Castro ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Rocío De Castro, David Ruiz

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Anesthesiology Service, Sierrallana Hospital, Torrelavega, Spain

  • David Ruiz ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Rocío De Castro, David Ruiz

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    david.ruiz@scsalud.es

    Affiliation Endocrinology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

  • Bernardo-Alio Lavín,

    Roles Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Clinical Analysis Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

  • Jose Ángel Lamsfus,

    Roles Data curation, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Anesthesiology Service, Sierrallana Hospital, Torrelavega, Spain

  • Luis Vázquez,

    Roles Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Endocrinology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

  • Coral Montalban,

    Roles Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Endocrinology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain

  • Gilberto Marcano,

    Roles Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Anesthesiology Service, Sierrallana Hospital, Torrelavega, Spain

  • Raquel Sarabia,

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Nursing Department, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain

  • María Paz-Zulueta,

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Nursing Department, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain

  • Cristina Blanco,

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Nursing Department, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain, Global Health research group, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

  • Miguel Santibáñez

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Nursing Department, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain, Global Health research group, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Abstract

Objective

To determine the prognostic value of cortisol, Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), together with their ratios (cortisol/DHEA and cortisol/DHEAS), as independent predictors of mortality in septic patients.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of 139 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Adrenal hormones were determined within the first 24 hours of the septic process. To determine and compare the predictive ability of each marker for the risk of unfavorable evolution (in-hospital, 28-day and 90-day mortality), ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves were constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. As measures of association, adjusted odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression. Cortisol, DHEA and DHEAS results were compared to lactate, CRP, SOFA and APACHE II Scores.

Results

Cortisol showed the best predictive ability, with AUCs of 0.758, 0.759 and 0.705 for in-hospital mortality, and 28-day and 90-day mortality, respectively; whereas AUCs for 28 days mortality for SOFA and APACHE II scores, and other biomarkers studied, such as Lactate or CRP, were 0.644, 0.618, 0.643 and 0.647, respectively. Associations between high cortisol levels (>17.5 μg/dL) and mortality were strong and statistically significant for in-hospital and 28-day mortality: adjusted ORs 10.13 and 9.45 respectively, and lower for long term mortality (90 days): adjusted OR 4.26 (95% CI 1.34–13.56), p trend 0.014. Regarding adrenal androgens, only positive associations were obtained for DHEAS and most of these positive associations did not yield statistical significance. Regarding Cortisol/DHEA and cortisol/DHEAS ratios, they did not improve the predictive ability of cortisol. The only exception was the cortisol/DHEAS ratio, which was the best predictor of mortality at 90 days (AUC 0.737), adjusted OR for highest cortisol/DHEAS ratio values 6.33 (95%CI 1.77–22.60), p trend 0.002.

Conclusion

Basal cortisol measured within the first 24 hours of the septic process was the best prognostic factor for in-hospital and 28-day mortality, even superior to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores. The cortisol/DHEAS ratio was an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

Introduction

Sepsis is an organic dysfunction caused by an unregulated host response to infection [1]. Currently, it is one of the main causes of admission to an intensive care unit, with a mortality rate of between 25–30%, rising to 40–50% in the case of septic shock [2]. Early identification of patients at a higher risk of death is a major challenge. Despite the existence of multiple risk scales, none of these are sufficiently accurate to predict mortality with adequate sensitivity and specificity [3]. The incorporation of new biomarkers is a fundamental task that can improve the predictive ability and the therapeutic intervention in septic patients.

The activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is an essential component of the general adaptation to illness [4]. During sepsis, an up-regulation of cortisol and adrenal androgens, such as DHEA, has been described, but not of DHEAS [5]. The role of cortisol and adrenal androgens as prognostic factors in the septic patient has shown conflicting results [611]. On the other hand, given their immunomodulatory counteracting actions, it has been proposed that the increase in the cortisol/DHEA and cortisol/DHEAS ratios may represent novel prognostic markers in septic patients [5,7,10].

The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value of a single determination of cortisol, DHEA, DHEAS and their ratios on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission in severe sepsis and septic shock patients, as well as to compare this with the prognostic value of a single determination of classical biomarkers, such as arterial lactate or C-reactive protein (CRP) on ICU admission, and to evaluate whether the addition of the same to SOFA could improve the prognostic accuracy of this severity score.

Material and methods

Study population

In a prospective cohort study conducted in the ICU of the Sierrallana Hospital in Torrelavega (Spain), we analyzed serum samples from 139 consecutive patients included in the first 24 hours of severe sepsis or septic shock diagnosis, between November 2011 and December 2017.

The inclusion criteria consisted of patients aged 18 years or older and admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, according to the 2001 International Sepsis Definitions Conference [12].

The exclusion Criteria were: patients who received corticosteroid treatment or who were treated with drugs that affect adrenal function within a six month period prior to admission; patients with known HPA axis disease or adrenal insufficiency (AI); patients with acute liver failure or chronic stage Child-Pugh B or C liver disease.

All patients included in the study were treated according to the recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 guidelines [13].

Serum hormone measurements

Basal cortisol, DHEA and DHEAS levels were determined between 8:00 and 09:00 a.m. All samples were processed within one hour of extraction.

For the determination of total cortisol, the chemiluminescent immunoassay of microparticles ARCHITECT (Abbot, Wiesbaden, Germany), was used, which has a sensitivity ≤ 1 (μg/dL) and a specificity of 0–0.9%, except for fludrocortisone (36.6%) and prednisolone (12.3%).

The levels of DHEA were quantified in serum using DRG-specific Radioimmunoassay (DRG Instruments, Marburg, Germany). Sensitivity: 0.06 ng/ml. Specificity: Very low cross reactivity <0.001% with DHEAS, isoandrosterone, androstenedione and other related steroids. Intra-assay reproducibility of the method is <3.8% and interassay reproducibility is <8.6%.

DHEAS levels were quantified in serum by competitive solid phase chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay in a Siemens IMMULITE 2000 (Siemens Health Care Diagnostics, Gwynedd, UK). Sensitivity: 10 g/dl. Specificity: Cross reactivity <0.1% with related steroids. Intra-assay reproducibility of the method is 7.1% and interassay reproducibility is 9.8%.

Additional measures

The APACHE II and SOFA scores were determined and samples were extracted for the determination of CRP, arterial lactate and other analyses, according to the routine in place at the unit.

More information at http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.ymxfu7n.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Cantabria (CEIC: 2015–001), requiring signed informed consent from each patient or the responsible family member. This study was observational, and data for each patient were anonymous.

Statistical analysis

For categorical variables, proportions were estimated using the Pearson chi-square test for comparisons or, alternatively, the exact Fisher test. For continuous variables, mean values with their standard deviation (SD) were estimated. The Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney tests were used to analyze the relationship between quantitative variables and dichotomous categorical variables. The condition of normality was previously checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test.

To determine and compare the predictive capabilities of each biomarker and severity scores on the risk of unfavorable evolution (death), ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves were constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. Data were analyzed globally and restricted to patients with low albumin levels (<2.5 g/dl).

To estimate the strength of associations, the biomarkers and severity scores were divided into dichotomous variables (low versus high values) according to the median, and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for mortality were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. The following potential confounders were pre-established to be included in the models: age (as continuous variable), sex, SOFA score (as a continuous variable) and diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. In addition, exposure-response trends (biological gradient) were estimated using a logistic regression model with all potential confounders, categorizing the prognostic factors according to tertiles. The category below was the reference category except for DHEA and DHEAS.

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software package version 22.0 and Stata 13.0 for Windows. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05 and all tests were two-tailed.

Results

Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. A total of 139 patients were included (61.9%, N = 86 men; 38.1%, N = 53 women). The mean age was 67.15±14.27 years and 33.1% had septic shock at admission. Twenty-five (18%) patients died in hospital, twenty-three (16.5%) at 28 days and thirty-one (21.6%) at 90 days. Deaths among female and older patients were more frequent and women were on average 4.89 years older than men, 95%CI (0.01 to 9.77), p = 0.049 (data not shown in tables).

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline characteristics, in relation to in-hospital mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.t001

Among the prognostic factors studied, the best rate of prediction of in-hospital mortality was cortisol in both the total sample and in patients with albumin less than 2.5 g/dL. (AUCs 0.758 and 0.772) (Table 2). On the other hand, the predictive ability of adrenal androgens (DHEA and DHEAS) was lower regarding cortisol, AUCs 0.460 and 0.556 (Table 2). The ROC curve for SOFA, APACHE II, lactate and CRP yielded AUCs of 0.636, 0.561, 0.639 and 0.682, respectively (S1 Table). Adding cortisol to the logistic model increased the predictive capacity in relation to SOFA for in-hospital mortality: SOFA alone (AUC 0.636), SOFA + Cortisol (AUC 0.759) (S1 Table).

thumbnail
Table 2. Area under curve (AUC) for the adrenal function biomarkers in relation to in-hospital mortality, in the overall population and restricted to patients with low albumin levels (<2.5 g/dl).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.t002

Regarding 28-day mortality, the AUC value for Cortisol was 0.759, higher than DHEA and DHEAS (AUCs 0.459 and 0.565) (S2 Table). SOFA and APACHE II AUCs were 0.644 and 0.618; and Lactate and CPR AUCs were 0.643 and 0.647, respectively (S3 Table).

Regarding 90-day mortality, similar AUC values were obtained: 0.705 for Cortisol (S4 Table), and 0.614, 0.612, 0.611 and 0.677, SOFA, APACHE II, Lactate and CPR respectively (S5 Table). The predictive ability of adrenal androgens for both DHEA and DHEAS was again lower when compared to cortisol during this period (S4 Table)

Tables 3, 4 and 5 show the strength of associations (OR) and exposure-response trends (Biological gradient) between adrenal function biomarkers in relation to in-hospital mortality and mortality at 28 and 90 days, respectively. In the regression analysis, the basal cortisol also revealed the strongest association when values were dichotomized according to the median, in relation to in-hospital, 28-day and 90-day mortality, with adjusted ORs of 3.80, 3.24 and 2.37, respectively (Tables 3, 4 and 5). For in-hospital mortality, a significant exposure-response trend was obtained: adjusted OR at the highest tertile (ORa T3) 10.13, 95%CI 2.05–50.04, p trend 0.003 (Table 3). A similar association was found for 28-day mortality: ORa T3 9.45, 95%CI 1.87–47.72, p trend 0.005 (Table 4). In relation to 90-day mortality, the association was lower, although preserving the exposure-response pattern: ORa T3 4.26, 95%CI 1.34–13.56, p trend 0.014 (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 3. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for adrenal function biomarkers on the risk of in-hospital mortality (all-causes).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for adrenal function biomarkers on the risk of 28-day mortality (all-causes).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for adrenal function biomarkers on the risk of 90-day mortality (all-causes).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.t005

Among the severity scores SOFA and APACHE II, crude positive non-significant associations (the higher the score, the higher risk of mortality) were obtained: for in-hospital mortality, crude OR at the highest tertile (OR T3) of APACHE II 1.79, 95%CI 0.58–5.51, p trend 0.319; OR T3 of SOFA 2.10, 95%CI 0.68–6.48, p trend 0.203 (S6 Table). However, after adjusting for age, gender, and severe sepsis or septic shock, these positive associations disappeared for APACHE II and diminished for SOFA (S6 Table). The same patterns were observed for mortality at 28 and 90 days (S7 and S8 Tables).

Regarding Lactate and CRP, the ORa T3 of lactate was 1.26, 95%CI 0.37–4.24, p trend 0.712; and the ORa T3 of CRP was 2.70, 95%CI 0.85–8.56, p trend was 0.074 in relation to in-hospital mortality (S6 Table). Similar associations were obtained for mortality at 28 and 90 days (S7 and S8 Tables).

Regarding adrenal androgens, DHEA and DHEAS, only positive associations were obtained for DHEAS in any of the studied mortality periods. Most of these positive associations did not yield statistical significance (Tables 35).

Regarding Cortisol/DHEA and cortisol/DHEAS ratios, these ratios were also associated with statistically significant increases in mortality risk and exposure response patterns. However, these associations were lower than associations for cortisol alone in relation to “in-hospital and at 28-day mortality” (Tables 3 and 4). On the contrary, for 90-day mortality, the associations for both ratios were greater than those for cortisol alone: ORa T3 of cortisol/DHEA ratio 5.71, 95%CI 1.63–19.99, p trend 0.004; ORa T3 of cortisol/DHEAS ratio 6.33, 95%CI 1.77–22.60, p trend 0.002 (Table 5).

Discussion

Adrenal hormones play a key role in adaptation to stress. Our results support that basal cortisol, measured in the first 24 hours after diagnosis of sepsis, is an important independent prognostic factor for both short (in-hospital) and medium term mortality (28 days). However, the cortisol/DHEAS ratio would have a higher predictive capacity to cortisol alone for long-term mortality (90 days).

The associations between cortisol levels above the median (>17.6 μg/dl) and the increase of in-hospital and 28-day mortality remained after adjusting for the main confounding variables, such as age, sex, SOFA scale value and severe sepsis or septic shock status, supporting the independence of this association. In addition, an exposure-response pattern was obtained, where higher levels revealed a greater risk of mortality. Patients with high levels (third tertile) had about a ten-fold risk of in-hospital 28-day mortality compared with patients with lower levels of cortisol. This suggests causality, as both the independence of the association, and the strength and exposure-response pattern, are Bradford Hill's criteria for causality [14]. Likewise, the predictive capacity of a single cortisol determination, in relation to the AUC determined by the ROC curves, was superior to the more complex severity scores (SOFA and APACHE II), and to the classically used biomarkers (Lactate and CRP), to predict the risk of mortality in the septic patient. The predictive capacity in relation to SOFA, increased by adding cortisol to the logistic models. Thus, cortisol alone could be a useful biomarker to predict in-hospital and 28-day mortality with a greater predictive capacity than the SOFA and APACHE II scores and other biomarkers studied (lactate and CRP).

Our results are consistent with those described by other authors who have identified an association between elevated cortisol levels and an increased risk of mortality in septic patients [510,15]. The septic process has a dynamic course in which a balance between the hyperimmune response and immunosuppression is essential [16]. Cortisol has known anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive actions, mostly triggered by its binding to a glucocorticoid receptor (GR) [17]. Although the complications of sepsis have been associated with an uncontrolled inflammatory response, this hypothesis is largely derived from work on animal models. In fact, the use of anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of sepsis has not been shown to be beneficial in humans and may even cause harmful effects if used during the hypoimmune phase [1820]. Therefore, an excessive increase in cortisol levels in the early stages of the septic process can destabilize the balance towards the hypoimmune state at an inappropriate time and have a negative effect on prognosis [21]. Moreover, it has recently been described how the use of glucocorticoids can decrease the ability of cortisol to bind to GR, which can lead to increased peripheral resistance to its actions [22].

In contrast to cortisol, adrenal androgens have immunostimulatory actions [23]. In our study, adrenal androgens had a lower prognostic capacity for in-hospital and 28-day mortality. Predictive capacity was superior for DHEAS in relation to DHEA. The predictive capacity of the cortisol/DHEA and cortisol/DHEAS ratios was also not greater than that of cortisol alone for short and medium-term mortality. However, concerning long-term mortality, the role for cortisol/adrenal androgens ratios could be greater, especially for the cortisol/DHEAS ratio, since the area under the curve for this index (AUC 0.74) was greater than that of cortisol itself (AUC 0.71).

Few studies have evaluated the role of adrenal androgens in sepsis. Mueller C et al., [7] determined that the values of cortisol/DHEA and cortisol/DHEAS ratios increased significantly in patients with more severe pneumonias. Marx C et al., [10] found lower levels of DHEAS at the beginning and end of sepsis among the non survivors. Arlt et al., [5] reported a dissociation between DHEA and DHEAS levels in septic patients and an increase in mortality associated with increased cortisol/DHEA ratio values.

During sepsis there is an increase in cortisol levels especially in relation to a decrease in its peripheral metabolism [24]. This prolonged sustained increase in cortisol can lead to inhibition of the HPA axis by negative feedback with the consequent risk of developing AI [25].

None of the tests used for the assessment of the integrity of the HPA axis is considered adequate in the early stages of the septic process, as these rely on the determination of serum cortisol and levels of the same are significantly influenced by changes in peripheral metabolism. DHEAS, the most abundant steroid hormone in the circulatory system, is almost entirely secreted by the reticular area of the adrenal cortex under the stimulus of ACTH. For these reasons, it has recently proven its usefulness as an indicator of the integrity of the HPA axis [26]. Our hypothesis is that DHEAS may be an appropriate tool for early diagnosis of septic patients at high risk of developing AI. Elevation of the cortisol/DHEAS ratio may identify patients with increased HPA axis suppression and prolonged loss of the trophic effect of ACTH on the adrenal glands, and thus increased long-term risk of AI. This may explain why the cortisol/DHEAS ratio is a good predictor of long-term mortality in our study. Further prospective studies specifically designed to test this hypothesis would be necessary.

Our study has some limitations. First, we used the determination of total cortisol, whose values are influenced by the levels of transport proteins. In our study, 77% of patients had an albumin level of less than 2.5 (g/dl). However, the predictive ability of cortisol remained constant in this group, supporting the validity of our results. Additionally, free cortisol analysis is a laborious technique performed in very few specialized centers and would therefore, be difficult to apply in routine clinical practice. Another limitation is that we only performed a single measurement. The changes in adrenal hormone values throughout the course of sepsis are well known and, therefore, our results can be reproducible if extraction is performed within the first 24 hours of the septic process. This study also presents important strengths such as its prospective nature, and the thoroughness of the inclusion criteria with a comprehensive exclusion of all patients who had received drugs that interfered with the HPA axis.

Conclusions

In septic patients, serum total cortisol determined at 8–9 a.m. within the first 24 hours of the diagnosis, may be a useful biomarker for predicting in-hospital and 28-day mortality, with a greater predictive ability than the SOFA and APACHE II scores and other biomarkers studied, such as Lactate or CRP. The addition of adrenal androgens to perform the cortisol/androgens ratio would not increase predictive ability and, therefore, its determination for mortality restricted to in-hospital or 28-day periods does not seem clinically useful. Adrenal androgens, especially DHEAS, may have a greater role in long-term mortality. In this case, the predictive capacity of cortisol/DHEAS may be slightly higher than that of cortisol alone.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Area under the curve (AUC) of the rest of biomarkers and SOFA and APACHE II scores in relation to in-hospital mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Area under curve (AUC) for the adrenal biomarkers in relation to 28-day mortality, in the overall population and restricted to patients with low albumin levels (<2.5 g/dl).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s002

(DOC)

S3 Table. Area under the curve (AUC) of the rest of biomarkers and SOFA and APACHE II scores in relation to 28-day mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s003

(DOC)

S4 Table. Area under curve (AUC) for the adrenal biomarkers in relation to 90-day mortality, in the overall population and restricted to patients with low albumin levels (<2.5 g/dl).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s004

(DOC)

S5 Table. Area under the curve (AUC) of the rest of biomarkers and SOFA and APACHE II scores in relation to 90-day mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s005

(DOC)

S6 Table. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for the rest of biomarkers and severity scores on the risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s006

(DOC)

S7 Table. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for the rest of biomarkers and severity scores on the risk of all-cause 28-day mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s007

(DOC)

S8 Table. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for the rest of biomarkers and severity scores on the risk of all-cause 90-day mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214312.s008

(DOC)

References

  1. 1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315 (8): 801–810. pmid:26903338
  2. 2. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA, François B, Martin-Loeches I, Lipman J, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2 (5): 380–386. pmid:24740011
  3. 3. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315 (8): 762–774. pmid:26903335
  4. 4. Widmer IE, Pudder JJ, Köning C, Pargger H, Zerkowski HR, Girard J, et al. Cortisol response in relation to the severity of stress and illness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90 (8): 4579–4586. pmid:15886236
  5. 5. Arlt W, Hammer F, Sanning P, Butcher SK, Lord JM, Allolio B, et al. Dissociation of serum dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in septic shock. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91 (7): 2548–2554. pmid:16608898
  6. 6. Annane D, Sébille V, Troché G, Raphaël JC, Gajdos P, Bellissant E. A 3-level prognostic classification in sepsis shock based on cortisol level and cortisol response to corticotropin. JAMA. 2000; 283 (8): 1038–1045. pmid:10697064
  7. 7. Mueller C, Blum CA, Trummler M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, Mueller C, et al. Association of Adrenal Function and Disease Severity in Community-Acquired Pneumonia. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9 (7): e99518.
  8. 8. Venkatesh B, Imeson L, Kruger P, Cohen J, Jones M, Bellomo R, et al. Elevated Plasma Free Cortisol Concentrations and Ratios Are Associated With Increased Mortality Even in the Presence of Statin Therapy in Patients With Severe Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43 (3): 630–635. pmid:25513788
  9. 9. Zhang Q, Dong G, Zhao X, Wang M, Li CS. Prognostic significance of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones in early sepsis: a study performed in the emergency department. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40 (10): 1499–1508. pmid:25223852
  10. 10. Marx C, Petros S, Bornstein SR, Weise M, Wendt M, Menschikowski M, et al. Adrenocortical hormones in survivors and nonsurvivors of severe sepsis: Diverse time course of dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate, and cortisol. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31 (5): 1382–1388. pmid:12771606
  11. 11. Dimopoulou I, Stamoulis K, Ilias I, Tzanela M, Lyberopoulos P, Orfanos S, et al. A prospective study on adrenal cortex responses and outcome prediction in acute critical illness: results from a large cohort of 203 mixed ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33 (12): 2116–2121. pmid:17684725
  12. 12. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31 (4): 1250–1256. pmid:12682500
  13. 13. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41 (2): 580–637. pmid:23353941
  14. 14. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation?. Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58 (5): 295–300.
  15. 15. Bendel S, Karlsson S, Pettilä V, Loisa P, Varpula M, Ruokonen E. Free Cortisol in Sepsis and Septic Shock. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106 (6): 1813–1819. pmid:18499615
  16. 16. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Eng J Med. 2003; 348 (2):138–150.
  17. 17. Coutinho AE, Chapman KE. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011; 335 (1): 2–13. pmid:20398732
  18. 18. Zeni F, Freeman B, Natanson C. Anti-inflammatory therapies to treat sepsis and septic shock: a reassessment. Crit Care Med. 1997; 25 (7):1095–1100. pmid:9233726
  19. 19. Freeman BD, Natanson C. Anti-inflammatory therapies in sepsis and septic shock. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000; 9 (7): 1651–1663. pmid:11060768
  20. 20. Oberholzer A, Oberholzer C, Moldawer LL. Sepsis syndromes: understanding the role of innate and acquired immunity. Shock. 2001; 16 (2): 83–96. pmid:11508871
  21. 21. Junting A, Ling G, Zhong Z, Shu-Xia W, Bing H, Xiang-An L. Corticosteroid Therapy Benefits Septic Mice With Adrenal Insufficiency But Harms Septic Mice Without Adrenal Insufficiency. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43 (11): e490–e498. pmid:26308430
  22. 22. Bergquist M, Lindholm C, Strinnholm M, Hedenstierna G, Rylander C. Impairment of neutrophilic glucocorticoid receptor function in patients treated with steroids for septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2015; Exp 3: 23.
  23. 23. Hazeldine J, Arlt W, Lord JM. Dehydroepiandrosterone as a regulator of immune cell function. J Steroid Bioch and Molec Biol. 2010; 120 (2–3): 127–136.
  24. 24. Boonen E, Vervenne H, Meersseman P, Andrew R, Mortier L, Declercq PE, et al. Reduced Cortisol Metabolism during Critical Illness. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368 (16): 1477–1488. pmid:23506003
  25. 25. Boonen E, Langouche L, Janssens T, Meersseman P, Vervenne H, De Samblanx E, et al. Impact of duration of critical illness on the adrenal glands of human intensive care patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99 (11):4214–4222. pmid:25062464
  26. 26. Charoensri S, Chailurkit L, Muntham D, Bunnag P. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in assessing the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2017; 7: 42–46. pmid:29067249