Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:13:34.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contributions to Rehabilitation from Behavioural Psychology: Then and Now

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Gregory C. Murphy*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia
Amanda E. Young
Affiliation:
Center for Disability Research, Liberty Mutual Research Institute, USA
Katharine Reid
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Gregory Murphy, School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. Email: G.Murphy@latrobe.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This paper analyses the contribution of behaviourally-oriented psychologists to the field of rehabilitation. Following a brief description of the prominent contribution of behavioural psychology in the period 1950—1970, an analysis of the contents of four contemporary North American behaviour therapy and rehabilitation journals suggests that there is currently little behaviourally-oriented rehabilitation research being published, even though rehabilitation settings in North America have provided the most positions of employment for psychologists over the recent past. It is concluded that, locally, Australian behavioural psychologists could make a valuable contribution to the nation's public health effort by increasing their prominence as researchers and practitioners within the field of rehabilitation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fordyce, W. (1968). Some implications of learning in the problems of chronic pain. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 21, 179190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fordyce, W. (1976). Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. St Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Frank, R. (1999). Organized delivery systems. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44, 3651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R., & Elliott, T. (2000). Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, J., & Block, B. (1995). Cancer rehabilitation: Concepts and interventions. In A., Goreczny (Ed.), Handbook of health and rehabilitation psychology (pp. 457477). New York: Plenu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, D. (1977). Considerations in the choice of inter-observer reliability estimates. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 10, 103116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, M., & Thoresen, C. (1974). Self-control: Power to the person. Monterey: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Meyerson, L. (1967). Behavior modification. In S., Bijou & D., Bear (Eds.), Child development (pp. 214 –239). New York: Appleton–Century–Croft.Google Scholar
Michael, J. (1969). Rehabilitation. In C., Nueringer & J., Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology (pp. 5885). New York: Appleton– Century–Croft.Google Scholar
Radnitz, C. (2000). Cognitive-behavioral therapies for persons with disabilities. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. (1991). Learned optimism. New York: Knoph.Google Scholar
Walker, C., Peterson, C., Millen, N., & Martin, C. (2003). Chronic illness: New perspectives and new directions. Melbourne: Tertiary Press.Google Scholar
Walker, M. (1995). History of rehabilitation. In A., Dell Orto & R., Marinella (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of disability and rehabilitation (pp. 366371). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmilla.Google Scholar
Wright, B. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. (1997). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Ro.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (1980) Total rehabilitation. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Yeo, J., Walsh, J., Rutkowski, S., Soden, R., Craven, M., & Middleton, J. (1998). Mortality following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 36, 329326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed