Skip to main content
Log in

Pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of corn fiber

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corn fiber consists of about 20% starch, 14% cellulose, and 35% hemicellulose, and has the potential to serve as a low-cost feedstock for production of fuel ethanol. Several pretreatments (hot water, alkali, and dilute, acid) and enzymatic saccharification procedures were evaluated for the conversion of corn fiber starch, cellulose, and hemicellulose to monomeric sugars. Hot water pretreatment (121°C, 1 h) facilitated the enzymatic sacch arification of starch and cellulose but not hemicellulose. Hydrolysis of corn fiber pretreated with alkali un dersimilar conditions by enzymatic means gave similar results. Hemicellulose and starch components were converted to monomeric sugars by dilute H2SO4 pretreatment (0.5–1.0%, v/v) at 121°C. Based on these findings, a method for pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of corn fiber is presented. It in volves the pretreatment of corn fiber (15% solid, w/v) with dilute acid (0.5% H2SO4, v/v) at 121°C for 1 h, neutralization to pH 5.0, then saccharification of the pretreated corn fiber material with commercial cellulase and β-glucosidase preparations The yield of monomeric sugars from corn fiber was typically 85–100% of the theoretical yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. House, C. (1995), Feedstuffs 67, 21, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grohmann, K. and Bothast, R. J. (1997), Process Biochem. 32, 405–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bothast, R. J. and Saha, B. C. (1997), Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 261–286.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gulati, M., Kohlmann, K., Ladisch, M. R., Hespell, R. B., and Bothast, R. J. (1997) Bioresour. Technol. 56, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, G. L. (1959), Anal. Chem. 31, 426–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Osborn, D. and Chen, L. F. (1984), Starch/Starke 36, 393–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, R. and Reck, D. R. (1970), U.S. Patent 3,535,305.

  8. Hespell, R. B., O'Bryan, P. J., Moniruzzaman, M., and Bothast, R. J. (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 62, 87–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Montgomery, R. and Smith, F. (1957), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 695–697.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chanliaud, E., Saulnier, L., and Thibault, J.-F. (1995), J. Cereal Sci. 21, 195–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saulnier, L., Marot, C., Chanliaud, E., and Thibault, J.-F. (1995), Carbohydr. Polym. 26, 279–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Faulds, C. B., Kroon, P. A., Saulnier, L., Thibault, J.-F., and Williamson, G. (1995), Carbohydr. Polym. 27, 187–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Azhar, A. F., Bery, M. K., Colcord, A. R., Roberts, R. S. and Corbitt, G. V. (1981), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 11, 293–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boyer, L. J., Vega, J. L., Klasson, K. T., Clausen, E. C., and Gaddy, J. L. (1992) Biomass Bioenergy 3, 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olsson, L. and Hahn-Hagerdal, B. (1993), Process Biochem. 28, 249–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ranatunga, T. D., Jervis, J., Helm, R. F., McMillan, J. D., and Hartiz, C. (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 66, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patrick Lee, K. C., Bulls, M., Holmes, J., and Barrier, J. W. (1997), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 66, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saha, B. C., Dien, B. S., and Bothast, R. J. (1998), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 70–72, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badal C. Saha.

Additional information

Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saha, B.C., Bothast, R.J. Pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of corn fiber. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 76, 65–77 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:76:2:65

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:76:2:65

Index Entries

Navigation