Shaping citizen’s freedom of social media interaction in Tanzania: The role of city policy experts in digital policy-making | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-199X
  • E-ISSN: 1751-7974

Abstract

Digital communication, especially social media interaction, has emerged as a key domain for civic debates specifically in urban areas of Tanzania. However, how policy-makers perceive these as opportunities for societal development is rarely assessed in research. This study will fill this gap through semi-structured interviews with policy-makers in Dar es Salaam and focus on assessing their perception of the role of social media in digital policy-making in society. Based on the study results, we suggest a new strategic approach for policy collaboration across African regions for building sustained policy capacity and to enable resilient public spheres as a core component of societal development in digital Africa.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00034_1
2021-03-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brunotti, I.. ( 2019;), ‘ From baraza to cyberbaraza: Interrogating publics in the context of the 2015 Zanzibar electoral impasse. ’, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 13:1, pp. 1834.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CIPESA ( 2019), Despots and Disruptions: Five Dimensions of Internet Shutdowns in Africa, Kampala:, 18 March, https://cipesa.org/2019/03/despots-and-disruptions-five-dimensions-of-internet-shutdowns-in-africa/. Accessed 4 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. The Citizen ( 2018;), ‘ What new regulations mean to social media users. ’, The Citizen, http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/1840340-4375404-386h1hz/index.html. Accessed 8 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Conteh, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Strategic interorganizational cooperation in complex environments. ’, Public Management Review, 15:4, pp. 50121.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Denscombe, M.. ( 2010), The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects, , 4th ed.., New York:: Open University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Giest, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack?. ’, Policy Sciences, 50:3, pp. 36782.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Grant, A. M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Bringing the daily mail to Africa: Entertainment websites and the creation of a digital youth public in post-genocide Rwanda. ’, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 13:1, pp. 10623.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gumede, W.. ( 2016;), ‘ Rise in censorship of the internet and social media in Africa. ’, Journal of African Media Studies, 8:3, pp. 41321.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hormia-Poutanen, K., and Forsström, P. L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Collaboration at international, national and institutional level – vital in fostering open science. ’, LIBER Quarterly, 26:1, pp. 312.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Irumana, B. A.,, Haruna, R. K., and Kofi, A.-B. N.. ( 2014;), ‘ The politics of public policy and problems of implementation in Africa: An appraisal of Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme in Ga East District. ’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4:4, pp. 196207.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ITU ( 2017a), ICT Facts and Figures 2016, Geneva:: Telecommunication Development Bureau;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ITU ( 2017b), ICT Regulatory Tracker 2017, International Telecommunication Union;, Geneva:, https://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/irt/#/tracker-by-country/regulatory-tracker/2017. Accessed 29 August 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kasadha, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ Does social media matter in developing democracies? Examining its impact on citizen political participation and expression in Uganda. ’, Journal of Public Affairs, 20:1, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pa.1981. Accessed 19 November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LHRC ( 2017;), ‘ Tanzania: Freedom of expression in peril. ’, Dar es Salaam, https://www.humanrights.or.tz/assets/images/upload/files/Tanzania-jointpositionnote_LHRC_FIDH.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Linde, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Evaluative study of Tanzania’s public policies: Special focus on education, health and the environment. ’, Linnaeus University;, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:767021/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Livingston, S., and Lunt, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ The mass media, democracy and the public sphere. ’, in S. Livingston, and P. Lunt. (eds), Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate, London:: LSE Research Online;, pp. 935.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Masele, J. J., and Magova, G. B.. ( 2017;), ‘ Towards social media usage for promotional activities in Tanzanian pension schemes. ’, Business Management Review, 20:1, pp. 3852.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mohammed, A. K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Ghana’s policy making: From elitism and exclusion to participation and inclusion?. ’, International Public Management Review, 16:1, pp. 4366.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nanfuka, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ How social media taxes can burden news outlets: The case of Uganda. ’, CIPESA, 16 May, https://cipesa.org/2019/05/how-social-media-taxes-can-burden-news-outlets-the-case-of-uganda/. Accessed 15 January 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ndlela, M. N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Social media algorithms, bots, and elections in Africa. ’, in M. N. Ndlela, and W. Mano. (eds), Social Media and Elections in Africa, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 1337.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ndlela, M. N., and Mano, W.. (eds) ( 2020), Social Media and Elections in Africa, Volume 1: Theoretical Perspectives and Election Campaigns, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. OECD ( 2020;), ‘ Digital transformation and the futures of civic space to 2030. ’, OECD Development Policy Papers, 29, https://doi.org/10.1787/79b34d37-en. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Oginni, S. O., and Moitui, J. N.. ( 2015;), ‘ Social media and public policy process in Africa: Enhanced policy process in digital age. ’, Consilience Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 14:2, pp. 15872.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ogola, G.. ( 2019;), ‘ #Whatwouldmagufulido? Kenya’s digital “practices” and “individuation” as a (non)political act. ’, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 13:1, pp. 12439.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Percy, K. E.. ( 2016;), ‘ Internet shutdown in Zimbabwe: What happened?. ’, accessnow, 7 July, https://www.accessnow.org/internet-shutdown-zimbabwe-happened/. Accessed 18 August 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pfeiffer, C.,, Kleeb, M.,, Mbelwa, A., and Ahorlu, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ The use of social media among adolescents in Dar es Salaam and Mtwara, Tanzania. ’, Reproductive Health Matters, 22:43, pp. 17886.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Piester, H. N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Transnational digital collaboration in the Baltic sea region. ’, Baltic Development Forum, https://www.bdforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/WEB_Baltic-Sea-Working-Paper.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sampedro, V., and Avidad, M. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ The digital public sphere: An alternative and counterhegemonic space? The case of Spain. ’, International Journal of Communication, 12, pp. 2344.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Senthil Kumar, N.,, Saravanakumar, K., and Deepa, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ On privacy and security in social media: A comprehensive study. ’, Procedia Computer Science, 78, pp. 11419.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Srinivasan, S.,, Diepeveen, S., and Karekwaivanane, G.. ( 2019;), ‘ Rethinking publics in Africa in a digital age. ’, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 13:1, pp. 217.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tanzania Cybercrime Act ( 2015;), ‘ Tanzania: Cybercrime Act 2015. ’, Article 19 , London:: Free Word Centre;, p. 27, https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38058/Tanzania-Cybercrime-Bill-TO.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. TCRA ( 2019), Quarterly Communications Statistics: July-September Operators’ Submissions, September, Dar es Salaam;, Tanzania:, https://www.tcra.go.tz/images/documents/telecommunication/TelCom_Statistics_Sept_2019.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tudor, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Information literacy practices of young Internet users related to the production of religious content: 2019 Algerian protests case. ’, Journal of African Media Studies, 12:2, pp. 97122.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. UNESCO ( 2015), World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: Special Digital Focus 2015, Paris:: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. URT ( 2017), The Electronic and Postal Communications Act, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania:: Ministry of Information, Culture, Arts and Sports;, https://www.tcra.go.tz/document/The%20Electronic%20and%20Postal%20Communications%20(Online%20Content)%20Regulations,%202018. Accessed 1 March 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Volkmer, I.. ( 2014), The Global Public Sphere: Public Communication in the Age of Reflective Interdependence, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Walter, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Three models of the European public sphere: An analysis of the actor structure in EU news. ’, Journalism Studies, 18:6, pp. 74970.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. WEF ( 2017), Digital Policy Playbook 2017 Approaches to National Digital Governance, September, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/White_Paper_Digital_Policy_Playbook_Approaches_National_Digital_Governance_report_2017.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. WEF ( 2018), Agile Governance Reimagining Policy-Making in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, January, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Agile_Governance_Reimagining_Policy-making_4IR_report.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Churk, Josephine Philip, and Volkmer, Ingrid. ( 2021;), ‘ Shaping citizen’s freedom of social media interaction in Tanzania: The role of city policy experts in digital policy-making. ’, Journal of African Media Studies, 13:1, pp. 7387, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00034_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jams_00034_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error