Intermediary roles in the transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive into domestic legislation: Evidence from Spain

References

1. Abbott, Kenneth W.,, Levi-Faur, David, and Snidal, Duncan. ( 2017;), ‘ Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. ’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670:1, pp. 14–35.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barata, Joan Mir. ( 2020;), ‘ Regulating content moderation in Europe beyond the AVMSD. ’, LSE Blog, 25 February, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2020/02/25/regulating-content-moderation-in-europe-beyond-the-avmsd/. Accessed 1 January 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blauberger, Michael, and Rittberger, Berthold. ( 2015;), ‘ Conceptualizing and theorizing EU regulatory networks. ’, Regulation & Governance, 9:4, pp. 367–76.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Börzel, Tanja A.. ( 2005;), ‘ Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:2, pp. 217–36.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Broughton Micova, Sally. ( 2021;), ‘ The Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Balancing liberalisation and protection. ’, in E. Brogi, and P. L. Parcu. (eds), Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, Cheltenham:: Edward Elgar Publishing;, pp. 264–81.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. ( 1983;), ‘ The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. ’, American Sociological Review, 48:2, pp. 147–60.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eberlein, Burkard, and Grande, Edgar. ( 2005;), ‘ Beyond delegation: Transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:1, pp. 89–112.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eberlein, Burkard, and Newman, Abraham L.. ( 2008;), ‘ Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. ’, Governance, 21:1, pp. 25–52.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Evens, Tom,, Donders, Karen, and Afilipoaie, Adelaida. ( 2020;), ‘ Platform policies in the European Union: Competition and public interest in media markets. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11:3, pp. 283–300.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fernandez Alonso, Isabel. ( 2016;), ‘ Independent audiovisual regulators in Spain: A unique case in Europe. ’, International Journal of Communication, 10, pp. 359–76.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Flew, Terry,, Martin, Fiona, and Suzor, Nicolas. ( 2019;), ‘ Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10:1, pp. 33–50.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Graeme, Auld, and Renckens, Stefan. ( 2017;), ‘ Rule-making feedbacks through intermediation and evaluation in transnational private governance. ’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670:1, pp. 93–111.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Havinga, Teddy, and Verbruggen, Paul. ( 2017;), ‘ Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation: The RIT model as a theoretical lens. ’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670:1, pp. 58–77.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Herold, Anna. ( 2013;), ‘ From independence of audiovisual media regulators to Europeanization of audiovisual media regulation: Reaching for the apples of the Hesperides?. ’, in E. K. Donders,, C. Pauwels, and J. Loisen. (eds), Private Television in Western Europe: Content, Markets, Policies, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 260–72.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jordana, Jacint. ( 2017;), ‘ Transgovernmental networks as regulatory intermediaries: Horizontal collaboration and the realities of soft power. ’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670:1, pp. 245–62.
    [Google Scholar]
16. König, Thomas, and Luetgert, Brooke. ( 2008;), ‘ Troubles with transposition? Explaining trends in Member-State notification and the delayed transposition of EU directives. ’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, pp. 163–94.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Levi-Faur, David. ( 2011;), ‘ Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Toward a single European regulatory space. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:6, pp. 810–29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Levi-Faur, David, and Starobin, Shana M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Transnational politics and policy: From two-way to three-way interactions. ’, Jerusalem Papers in Regulation and Governance, 62, pp. 2–38.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mastenbroek, Ellen. ( 2005;), ‘ EU compliance: Still a “black hole?”. ’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:6, pp. 1103–20.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mutu, Adriana. ( 2018;), ‘ The regulatory independence of audiovisual media regulators: A cross-national comparative analysis. ’, European Journal of Communication, 33:6, pp. 619–38.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mutu, Adriana. ( 2021;), ‘ The determinants of independence of audiovisual media regulators: The scope of Article 30. ’, in E. Brogi, and P. L. Parcu. (eds), Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, Cheltenham:: Edward Elgar Publishing;, pp. 352–64.
    [Google Scholar]
22. O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr. ( 2003;), ‘ Multi-organizational policy implementation: Some limitations and possibilities for rational choice contributions. ’, in F. W. Scharpf. (ed.), Games in Hierarchy and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions, vol. 2, Frankfurt am Main and Boulder, CO:: Campus Verlag and Westview Press;, pp. 27–64.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Papadopoulos, Yannis. ( 2018;), ‘ How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting. ’, Regulation & Governance, 12:4, pp. 431–50.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rozgonyi, Krisztina. ( 2019;), ‘ The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10:1, pp. 67–87.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rozgonyi, Krisztina. ( 2020;), ‘ Negotiating new audiovisual rules for video sharing platforms: Proposals for a responsive governance model of speech online. ’, Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, 61, pp. 83–98.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Scott, Colin. ( 2001;), ‘ Analyzing regulatory space: Fragmented resources and institutional design. ’, Public Law, 1, pp. 283–305.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Hale, Thomas. ( 2010;), ‘ Transgovernmental networks. ’, in M. Bevir. (ed.), The Handbook of Governance, Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE;, pp. 342–51.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation and State Secretariat for Telecommunications and Digital Infrastructure ( 2020), Legislative Impact Analysis Report for the Draft General Law on Audiovisual Media, Madrid:: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Steunenberg, Bernard, and Rhinard, Mark. ( 2010;), ‘ The transposition of European law in EU Member States: Between process and politics. ’, European Political Science Review, 2:3, pp. 495–520.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stone, Diane, and Ladi, Stella. ( 2015;), ‘ Global public policy and transnational administration. ’, Public Administration, 93:4, pp. 839–55.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Van der Heijden, Jeroen. ( 2017;), ‘ Brighter and darker sides of intermediation: Target-oriented and self-interested intermediaries in the regulatory governance of buildings. ’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670:1, pp. 207–24.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Weinand, Jenny. ( 2018;), ‘ Implementing the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive selected issues in the regulation of AVMS by national media authorities of France, Germany and the UK. ’, Luxemburger juristische Studien, 1, pp. 177–291.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mutu., Adriana ( 2021;), ‘ Intermediary roles in the transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive into domestic legislation: Evidence from Spain. ’, Punk & Post-Punk, 12:3, pp. 489–505, https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00077_1
    [Google Scholar]