Skip to main content
Log in

Innovation and Productivity: An Update

  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the existing evidence regarding the effects of technological and non-technological innovations on the productivity of firms and the existence of possible complementarities between these different forms of innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballot, G., Fakhfakh, F., Galia, F., and Salter, A., 2011. The fateful triangle complementarities between product, process and organizational innovation in the UK and France. TEPP Working Paper, 2011-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavente, J.M., 2006. The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in Chile. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), pp.301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, S.E. and Lynch, L.M., 2004. What’s driving the new economy?: The benefits of workplace innovation. The Economic Journal, 114(493), pp.F97–F116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T.F., Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L.M., 2002. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), pp.339–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudnovsky, D., Lopez, A., and Pupato, G., 2006. Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms behavior (1992–2001). Research Policy, 35(2), pp.266–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, B., Duguet, E., and Mairesse, J., 1998. Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), pp.115–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, G., Criscuolo, C., and Haskel, J., 2006. Information technology, organizational change and productivity growth: Evidence from UK firms. CEPR Discussion Paper, 783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criscuolo, C., 2009. Innovation and productivity: Estimating the core model across 18 countries. In: OECD, innovation in firms: A microeconomic perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing. Ch.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E., 1976. Exact and superlative index numbers. Journal of Econometrics, 4(2), pp.115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere, S. and Mairesse, J., 2010. Micro-evidence on rent sharing from different perspectives. NBER Working Paper, 16220.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duguet, E., 2006. Innovation height, spillovers and TFP growth at the firm level: Evidence from French manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), pp.415–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), pp.253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P.A., 1989. Entry, innovation and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4), pp.572–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenan, N. and Guellec, D., 1998. Firm organization, technology and performance: An empirical study. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6(4), pp.313–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., and Peters, B., 2006. Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), pp.483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., 2011. Innovation and productivity. Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2, pp.167–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., Lotti, F., and Mairesse, J., 2009. Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), pp.13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., Mairesse, J., and Mohnen, P., 2010. Measuring the returns to R&D. In: B.H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, eds. Handbook of the economics of innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.1034–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huergo, E. and Jaumandreu, J., 2004. Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), pp.541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, N., Lööf, H., and Peters, B., 2004. Firm level innovation and productivity — Is there a common story across countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 2, pp.184–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G., Bai, H., Guan, X., and Yu, X., 2006. R&D performance in Chinese industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 15(4/5), pp.345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lööf, H., Heshmati, A., Apslund, R., and Naas, S-O., 2003. Innovation and performance in manufacturing industries: A comparison of the Nordic countries. International Journal of Management Research, 2, pp.5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lööf, H. and Heshmati, A., 2006. On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4/5), pp.317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P., 2010. Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. In: B.H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, eds. Handbook of the economics of innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.1130–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., and Kremp, E., 2005. The importance of R&D and innovation for productivity: A reexamination in light of the 2000 French innovation survey. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 79/80, pp.489–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., Zhao, Y., and Zhen, F., 2012. Globalisation, innovation and productivity in manufacturing firms: A study of four sectors of China. ERIA Discussion Paper, 2012-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J. and Robin, S., 2008. Innovation and productivity in France: A firm-level analysis for manufacturing and services (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). In: SYMPOSIUM on innovation at firm level. Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Barcelona, Spain 1 July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Ros, E. and Labeaga, J.M., 2009. Product and process innovation: Persistence and complementarities. European Management Review, 6(1), pp.64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masso, J. and Vahter, P., 2008. Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: Econometric evidence from innovation surveys. European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), pp.240–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miravete, E. and Pernías, J., 2006. Innovation complementarity and scale of production. Journal of Industrial Economics, 54(1), pp.1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musolesi, A. and Huiban, J.P., 2010. Innovation and productivity in knowledge intensive business services. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), pp.63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2005. Oslo Manual, 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, M.L., Schiantarelli, F., and Sembenelli, A., 2006. Productivity, innovation creation and absorption, and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. European Economic Review, 50(8), pp.2037–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polder, M., van Leeuwen, G., Mohnen, P., and Raymond, W., 2009. Productivity effects of innovation modes. Statistics Netherlands Discussion Paper, 09033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffo, J.D., L’huillery, S., and Miotti, L., 2008. Northern and Southern innovativity: A comparison across European and Latin American countries. European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), pp.219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, W., Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., and Palm, F., 2012. Dynamic models of R&D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. In: EEA & ESEM, 27th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association & 66th European Meeting of the Econometric Society. Malaga, Spain 27-31 August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., Du, J., and Love, J.H., 2008. Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37(6-7), pp.961–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. and Rammer, C., 2007. Non-technological and technological innovation: Strange bedfellows? ZEW Discussion Paper, 07-052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedschlag, I., Zhang, X., and Cahill, B., 2010. The effects of the internationalization of firms on innovation and productivity. ESRI Working Paper, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterlacchini, A., 1989. R&D, innovations, and total factor productivity growth in British manufacturing. Applied Economics, 21(11), pp.1549–1562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therrien, P. and Hanel, P., 2009. Innovation and productivity: Extending the core model. In: OECD, Innovation in firms: A Microeconomic perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing. Ch.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, G. and Klomp, L., 2006. On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 15(4-5), pp.367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Mohnen.

Additional information

This paper was in part produced as part of the SCIFI-GLOW Collaborative Project supported by the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, under the Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities theme (Contract no. SSH7-CT-2008-217436). We thank Marco Vivarelli and Ender Demir for their valuable suggestions and comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohnen, P., Hall, B.H. Innovation and Productivity: An Update. Eurasian Bus Rev 3, 47–65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353817

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353817

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation