Eur. J. Entomol. 98 (4): 445-509, 2001 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2001.065

Dermaptera hindwing structure and folding: New evidence for familial, ordinal and superordinal relationships within Neoptera (Insecta)

Fabian HAAS1, Jarmila KUKALOVÁ-PECK2
1 Section of Biosystematic Documentation, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 20, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
2 Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; e-mail: jkpeck@ccs.carleton.ca

The Dermaptera are a small order of insects, marked by reduced forewings, hindwings with a unique and complicated folding pattern, and by pincer-like cerci. Hindwing characters of 25 extant dermapteran species are documented. The highly derived hindwing venation and articulation is accurately homologized with the other pterygote orders for the first time. The hindwing base of Dermaptera contains phylogenetically informative characters. They are compared with their homologues in fossil dermapteran ancestors, and in Plecoptera, Orthoptera (Caelifera), Dictyoptera (Mantodea, Blattodea, Isoptera), Fulgoromorpha and Megaloptera. A fully homologized character matrix of the pterygote wing complex is offered for the first time. The wing venation of the Coleoptera is re-interpreted and slightly modified. The all-pterygote character analysis suggests the following relationships: Pterygota: Palaeoptera + Neoptera; Neoptera: [Pleconeoptera + Orthoneoptera] + [Blattoneoptera + (Hemineoptera + Endoneoptera)]. Blattoneoptera share at least 15 wing apomorphies with the sistergroup Hemineoptera + Endoneoptera and none with the Orthoneoptera and Pleconeoptera; Blattoneoptera: (Grylloblattodea + (Dermaptera + Dictyoptera)); Dictyoptera: (Mantodea + (Blattodea + Isoptera). Dermaptera share 13 wing apomorphies with the sistergroup Dictyoptera. In order to document the intra-ordinal relationships of Dermaptera, 18 new characters of venation and articulation are added to an existing data set and analyzed cladistically. The following relationships are suggested (43 characters, tree length 72, CI 0.819 and RI 0.935). Dermaptera: Karschiellidae + ("Diplatyidae" + ("Pygidicranidae" + (Allostethus indicum + (Anisolabididae + ("Labiduridae" + [Forficulidae + (Chelisochidae + Spongiphoridae)]))))). The taxa in quotation marks are probably paraphyletic. Fossil Dermaptera and "Protelytroptera" show that wing-folding characters were already present in Permian ancestors. The evolution of the dermapteran wing-folding mechanism is discussed and the hindwing is presented as a working "origami" model, which will fold as in living earwigs. The functional role of the wing base in wing folding is examined. Characters in orders and other higher taxa are not independent and cannot be analyzed out of context with their groundplans. Higher systematics is dealing with diametrally different problems than species-level systematics. The necessity of using a different methodology for species-level and higher-level phylogenetics is discussed and recommendations are made.

Keywords: Dermaptera, higher phylogenetics, Pterygota, insect wings, wing folding, wing articulation, protowing

Received: April 12, 2001; Revised: August 3, 2001; Accepted: October 1, 2001; Published: December 28, 2001  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HAAS, F., & KUKALOVÁ-PECK, J. (2001). Dermaptera hindwing structure and folding: New evidence for familial, ordinal and superordinal relationships within Neoptera (Insecta). EJE98(4), 445-509. doi: 10.14411/eje.2001.065
Download citation

References

  1. Boudreaux B.H. 1979: Arthropod Phylogeny with Special Reference to Insects. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 320 pp
  2. Briceno R.D. & Eberhard W.G. 1995: The functional morphology of male cerci and associated characters in 13 species of tropical earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae, Labiidae, Carcinophoridae, Pygidicranidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 555: 1-63
  3. Brindle A. 1965a: A revision of the subfamily Allostethinae (Dermaptera, Labiduridae). Annals and Magazin for Natural History (Series 13) 8: 575-596
  4. Brindle A. 1965b: A revision of the subfamily Apachyinae (Dermaptera, Labiduridae). Annals and Magazin for Natural History (Series 13) 8: 435-446
  5. Brodsky A. 1994: The Evolution of Insect Flight. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 229 pp Go to original source...
  6. Browne D.J. & Scholtz C.H. 1996: The morphology of the hindwing articulation and the wing base of the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) with some phylogenetic implications. Bonner Zoologische Monographien 40: 1-200
  7. Burr M. 1911: Dermaptera. In P Wytsman (ed.): Genera Insectorum Volume 122. Bruxelles, 112 pp
  8. Carpenter F.M. 1933: The Lower Permian Insects of Kansas. Part 6. Proceedings of the American Academy for Arts and Sciences 68: 411-503
  9. Carpenter F.M. 1939: The Lower Permian Insects of Kansas. Part 8. Proceedings of the American Academy for Arts and Sciences 73: 29-70
  10. Carpenter F.M. 1992: Superclass Hexapoda. In Kaesler R.D. (ed.): Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4. The Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, 655 pp
  11. Carpenter F.M. & Kukalova J. 1964: The structure of the Protelytroptera, with description of a new genus from Permian strata Moravia. Psyche 71: 183-197 Go to original source...
  12. CSIRO 1991: The Insects of Australia. A textbook for Students and Research Workers. Naumann I.D. (chief ed.). Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, 1137 pp
  13. Giles E.T. 1963: The comparative external morphology and affinities of the Dermaptera. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 115: 95-164
  14. Haas F. 1994: Geometry and Mechanics of Hindwing Folding in Dermaptera and Coleoptera. Master of Philosophy Dissertation, University of Exeter, UK, 147 pp
  15. Haas F. 1995: The phylogeny of the Forficulina, a suborder of the Dermaptera. Systematic Entomology 20: 85-98 Go to original source...
  16. Haas F. 1998: Geometrie, Mechanik und Evolution der Fluegelfaltung der Coleoptera. PhD Dissertation, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitaet, Jena, Germany, 105 pp
  17. Haas F. 1999: Mechanische und evolutive Aspekte der Fluegelfaltung bei Blattodea, Dermaptera und Coleoptera. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 215: 97-102
  18. Haas F. & Wootton R.J. 1996: Two basic mechanisms in insect wing folding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 263: 1651-1658
  19. Haas F., Gorb S. & Wootton R.J. 2000: Elastic joints in dermapteran hind wings: materials and wing folding. Arthropod Structure and Development 29: 137-146
  20. Hennig W. 1969: Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main, 436 pp
  21. Hennig W. 1981: Insect Phylogeny. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 514 pp
  22. Jun-feng 1994: Discovery of primitive fossil earwigs (Insecta) from the Late Jurassic of Laiyang, Shandong and its significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 33: 229-246
  23. Klass K.D 2001: The female abdomen of the viviparous earwig Hemimerus vosseleri (Insecta: Dermaptera: Hemimeridae), with a discussion of the postgenital abdomen of Insecta. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 251-307
  24. Kleinow W. 1966: Untersuchungen zum Fluegelmechanismus der Dermapteren. Zeitschrift fuer Morphologie und Okologie der Tiere 56: 363-416
  25. Kristensen N.P. 1995: Forty years' insect phylogenetic systematics. Zoologische Beitraege (NF) 36: 83-124
  26. Kukalova J. 1964a: Permian insects of Moravia. Part II - Liomopteridea. Sbornik Geologickych Vid (Paleontologie) 3: 39-118
  27. Kukalova J. 1964b: Permian Protelytroptera, Coleoptera and Protorthoptera of Moravia. Sbornik Geologickych Vid (Paleontologie) 6: 61-98
  28. Kukalova J. 1966: Protelytroptera from the Upper Permian of Australia, with a discussion of the Protocoleoptera and Paracoleoptera. Psyche 75: 89-111 Go to original source...
  29. Kukalova J. 1969: On the systematic position of Permian beetles, Tshekardocoleidae, with a description of a new collecttion from Moravia. Sbornik Geologickych Vid. (Paleontologie) 11: 139-162
  30. Kukalova-Peck J. 1978: Origin and evolution of insect wings anf their relation to metamorphosis, as documented by the fossil record. Journal of Morphology 15: 53-126 Go to original source...
  31. Kukalova-Peck J. 1983: Origin of the insect wing and wing articulation from arthropodan leg. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61: 1618-1669 Go to original source...
  32. Kukalova-Peck J. 1985: Ephemeroid wing venation based upon new gigantic Carboniferous mayflies and basic morphology, phylogeny, and metamorphosis of pterygote insects (Insecta, Ephemerida). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 993-955 Go to original source...
  33. Kukalova-Peck J. 1991: Fossil History and the Evolution of Hexapod Structure. In Naumann I.D. (chief ed.): The Insects of Australia. A textbooks for Students and Research Workers. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 125-140
  34. Kukalova-Peck J. 1997: Arthropod phylogeny and "basal" morphological structures. In Fortey R.A. & Thomas R.H. (eds): Arthropod Relationships. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 55. Chapmann & Hall, London, pp. 249-268 Go to original source...
  35. Kukalova-Peck J. & Brauckmann C. 1992: Most Palaeozoic Protorthoptera are ancestral hemipteroids: major wing braces as clues to a new phylogeny of Neoptera (Insecta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 2452-2473 Go to original source...
  36. Kukalova-Peck J. & Brauckamnn C. 1990: Wing folding in pterygote insects, and the oldest Diaphanopterodea from the early Late Carboniferous of West Germany. Canadian Journal Zoology 68: 1104-1111 Go to original source...
  37. Kukalova-Peck J. & Lawrence J.F. 1993: Evolution of the hindwing in Coleoptera. Canadian Entomologist 125: 181-258 Go to original source...
  38. Kukalova-Peck J. & Peck S.B. 1993: Zoraptera wing structures: evidence for new genera and relationship with the blattoid orders (Insecta: Blattoneoptera). Systematic Entomology 18: 333-350 Go to original source...
  39. Maddison W.P. & Maddison D.R. 1992: MacClade 3.04. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts. Marshall C.R., Raff E.C. & Raff R.A. 1994: Dollo's law and the death and resurrection of genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 12283-12287
  40. Martynov A.V. 1923: On two basic types of insect wings and their significance for the general classification of insects. In Deryugina K.M. (ed.): Trudy Pervogo Vserossijskogo S'ezda Zoologov, Anatomov i Gistologov 1: 88-89
  41. Martynov A.V. 1925: To the knowledge of fossil insects from the Jurassic beds in Turkestan. Bulletin de l'Academie de Sciences de l'URSS Leningrad 19: 569-598
  42. Martynov A.V. 1940: Permian fossil insects from Tshekarda. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta 11: 1-61
  43. Popham E.J. 1985: The mutual affinities of the major earwig taxa (Insecta, Dermaptera). Zeitschrift fuer Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 23: 199-214
  44. Prendini L. 2001: Species or supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis? Groundplans versus exemplars revisited. Systematic Biology 50: 290-300 Go to original source...
  45. Raff R.A. 1996: The shape of life. Genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 520 pp Go to original source...
  46. Rasnitsyn A.P. 1998: On the taxonomic position of the insect order Zorotypida = Zoraptera. Zoologischer Anzeiger 237: 185-194
  47. Rasnitsyn A.P. & Novokshonov V.G. 1997: On the morphology of Uralia maculata (Insecta: Diaphanopterida) from the Early Permian (Kungurian) of Ural (Russia). Entomologica Scandinavica 28: 27-38 Go to original source...
  48. Rehn J.A.G & Rehn J.W.H. 1935: A study of the genus Hemimerus (Dermaptera, Hemimerina, Hemimeridae). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 87: 457-508
  49. Rentz D.C.F. & Kevan D.K.M. 1991: Dermaptera. In Naumann I.D. (chief ed.): The Insects of Australia. A Textbook for Students and Research Workers. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 360-368
  50. Roth L.M. 1991: Blattodea. In Naumann I.D. (chief ed.): The Insects of Australia. A Textbook for Students and Research Workers. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 320-329
  51. Sakai S. 1996: Notes on the contemporary classification of Dermaptera and recent references on Dermaptera. In S. Sakai (ed.): Taxonomy of the Dermaptera. Proceedings of 20th International Congress of Entomology. Firenze, Italy, pp. 1-10
  52. Smithers C.N. 1991: Zoraptera. In Naumann I.D. (chief ed.): The Insects of Australia. A Textbook for Students and Research Workers. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp. 410-411
  53. Snodgrass R.E. 1935: Principles of Insect Morphology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 667 pp
  54. Steinmann H. 1986: Dermaptera: Catadermaptera I 102. Gruyter, Berlin, 343 pp
  55. Steinmann H. 1989: Dermaptera: Catadermaptera II 105. Gruyter, Berlin, 504 pp
  56. Stenzhorn H.J. 1974: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera) Wilhelm Roux' Archiv fuer Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen 175: 65-86
  57. Stys P. & Bilinski S. 1990: Ovariole types and the phylogeny of Hexapods. Biological Reviews 65: 401-429 Go to original source...
  58. Swofford D.L. 1993: PAUP, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3.1. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Tillyard R.J. 1931: Kansas Permian Insects Pt. 13. The new order Protelytroptera, with a discussion of its relationships. American Journal of Science 21: 232-266 Go to original source...
  59. Vishnyakova V.N. 1980: Earwigs from the Upper Jurassic of the Karatau range. Paleontological Journal 1: 78-95
  60. White M.J.D. 1971: The chromosomes of Hemimerina bouvieri Chopard (Dermaptera). Chromosoma 34: 183-189 Go to original source...
  61. White M.J.D. 1972: The chromosomes of Arixenia esau Jordan (Dermaptera). Chromosoma 36: 338-342 Go to original source...
  62. Willmann R. 1990: Die Bedeutung palaeontologischer Daten fuer die zoologische Systematik. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 83: 277-289
  63. Willmann R. 1997: Advances and problems in insect phylogeny. In Fortey R.A., Thomas R.H. (eds): Arthropod Relationships. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 55. Chapmann & Hall, London. pp. 269-279 Go to original source...
  64. Wootton R.J. 1979: Fuction, homology and terminology in insect wings. Systematic Entomology 4: 81-93 Go to original source...
  65. Wootton R.J., Kukalova-Peck J., Newman J.S. & Muzon J. 1998: Smart engineering in the Mid-Carboniferous: how well could Palaeozoic dragonflies fly? Science 282: 749-751 Go to original source...
  66. Wootton R.J. & Kukalova-Peck J. 2000: Flight adaptations in Palaeozoic Palaeoptera (Insecta). Biological Review 75: 129-167 Go to original source...
  67. Zacher F. 1912: Das maennliche Copulationsorgan und das System der Eudermaptera. Zeitschrift fuer Wissenschaftliche Insektenbiologie: 276-284

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.