Folia Parasitologica 50[2] 129-134 (2003) | DOI: 10.14411/fp.2003.023

Activity levels and predator detection by amphipods infected with an acanthocephalan parasite, Pomphorhynchus laevis

Bahram S. Dezfuli1, Barbara J. Maynard2, Todd A. Wellnitz2
1 Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara 44100, Italy
2 Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

The acanthocephalan parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Müller, 1776) uses freshwater amphipods as its intermediate host. In order to complete the life cycle, the infected amphipod must be consumed by a fish, where the acanthocephalan will mature and reproduce. Parasite transmission, and therefore fitness, could be enhanced if infected amphipods fail to detect or avoid predatory fish. We compared the activity levels of infected and non-infected amphipods, Echinogammarus stammeri (Karaman, 1931), in both the presence and absence of odours from its natural, definitive host, the fish Leuciscus cephalus (L.). Throughout the experiment, infected amphipods were more active than were non-infected individuals. The non-infected amphipods reduced their activity after the addition of fish odours, but the infected amphipods failed to show a significant decrease. The failure of infected amphipods to reduce activity levels in the presence of fish odour may reflect a parasite strategy to increase its chances of transmission by making its amphipod host more vulnerable to predation by fish.

Keywords: Acanthocephala, Pomphorhynchus laevis, parasitized crustacean, Echinogammarus stammeri, alteration of host activity

Received: May 14, 2002; Accepted: September 10, 2002; Published: June 1, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dezfuli, B.S., Maynard, B.J., & Wellnitz, T.A. (2003). Activity levels and predator detection by amphipods infected with an acanthocephalan parasite, Pomphorhynchus laevis. Folia Parasitologica50(2), 129-134. doi: 10.14411/fp.2003.023
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSSON K.G., BROeNMARK C., HERRMANN J., MALMQVIST B., OTTO C., SJOeRSTROeM P. 1986: Presence of sculpins (Cottus gobio) reduces drift and activity of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda). Hydrobiologia 133: 209-215 Go to original source...
  2. BAKKER T.C.M., MAZZI D., ZALA S. 1997: Parasiteinduced changes in behavior and color make Gammarus pulex more prone to fish predation. Ecology 78: 1098- 1104 Go to original source...
  3. BETHEL W.M., HOLMES J.C. 1973: Altered evasive behavior and responses to light in amphipods harboring acanthocephalan cystacanths. J. Parasitol. 59: 945-956 Go to original source...
  4. DAHL J., NILSSON P.A., PETTERSSON L.B. 1998: Against the flow: chemical detection of downstream predators in running waters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 265: 1339-1344 Go to original source...
  5. HINE P.M., KENNEDY C.R. 1974: Observations of the distribution, specificity, and pathogenicity of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis (Mueller). J. Fish Biol. 6: 521-535 Go to original source...
  6. HOLOMUZKI J.R., HOYLE J.D. 1990: Effect of predatory fish presence on habitat use and diel movement of the stream amphipod, Gammarus minus. Freshwater Biol. 24: 509-517 Go to original source...
  7. JAKOBSEN P.J., WEDEKIND C. 1998: Copepod reaction to odor stimuli influenced by cestode infection. Behav. Ecol. 9: 414-418 Go to original source...
  8. KENNEDY C.R., BROUGHTON P.F., HINE P.M. 1978: The status of brown and rainbow trout, Salmo trutta and S. gairdneri as hosts of the acanthocephalan, Pomphorhynchus laevis. J. Fish Biol. 13: 265-275 Go to original source...
  9. LAFFERTY K.D., MORRIS A.K. 1996: Altered behavior of parasitized killifish increases susceptibility to predation by bird final hosts. Ecology 77: 1390-1397 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. MAYNARD B.J., WELLNITZ T.A, ZANINI N., WRIGHT W.G., DEZFULI B.S. 1998: Parasite-altered behavior in a crustacean intermediate host: field and laboratory studies. J. Parasitol. 84: 1102-1106 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. McCAHON C.P., MAUND S.J., POULTON M.J. 1991: The effect of the acanthocephalan parasite (Pomphorhynchus laevis) on the drift of its intermediate host (Gammarus pulex). Freshwater Biol. 25: 507-513 Go to original source...
  12. MOORE J. 1983: Responses of an avian predator and its isopod prey to an acanthocephalan parasite. Ecology 64: 1000-1015 Go to original source...
  13. MOORE J., GOTELLI N.J. 1990: Phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of altered host behaviours: a critical look at the manipulation hypothesis. In: C.J. Barnard and J.M. Behnke (Eds.), Parasitism and Host Behaviour. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, pp. 193-233
  14. POULIN R., CURTIS M.A., RAU M.E. 1992: Effects of Eubothrium salvelini (Cestoda) on the behaviour of Cyclops vernalis (Copepoda) and its susceptibility to fish predators. Parasitology 105: 265-271 Go to original source...
  15. PULKKINEN K., PASTERNAK A.F., HASU T., VALTONEN E.T. 2000: Effect of Triaenophorus crassus (Cestoda) infection on behavior and susceptibility to predation of the first intermediate host Cyclops strenuus (Copepoda). J. Parasitol. 86: 664-670 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. URDAL K., TIERNEY J.F., JAKOBSEN P.J. 1995: The tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus alters the activity and response, but not the predation susceptibility of infected copepods. J. Parasitol. 81: 330-333 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. WEDEKIND C., MILINSKI M. 1996: Do three-spined sticklebacks avoid consuming copepods, the first intermediate host of Schistocephalus solidus? An experimental analysis of behavioural resistance. Parasitology 112: 371- 383 Go to original source...
  18. WELLNITZ T.A., WARD J.V. 1998: Does light intensity modify the effect mayfly grazers have on periphyton? Freshwater Biol. 39: 135-149 Go to original source...
  19. WILLIAMS D.D., MOORE K.A. 1985: The role of semiochemicals in benthic community relationships of the lotic amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus: a laboratory analysis. Oikos 44: 280-286 Go to original source...
  20. WOOSTER D.E. 1998: Amphipod (Gammarus minus) responses to predators and predator impact on amphipod density. Oecologia 115: 253-259 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...