DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploration of Contents Composition of High School Earth Science for the 2022 Revised Curriculum: Focus on the Area of Astronomy

2022 개정 교육과정 고등학교 지구과학 내용 구성 방안 탐색 -천문 영역을 중심으로-

  • Received : 2021.10.26
  • Accepted : 2021.12.27
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

In this study, we propose the composition of contents on the area of astronomy for high school Earth Science elective courses for the 2022 revised curriculum based on high school students' perceptions of changes in Earth Science core concepts over the curriculum revisions, and analysis of learning elements in the area of astronomy for domestic and foreign Earth Science curriculum. Four Earth Science education experts compared and analyzed the astronomy contents presented in Korea, the US, British Columbia (BC) in Canada, Japan, and the International Baccalaureate Diploma Program (IBDP) curriculum. According to the survey results, high school students who answered that they were most interested in the core concepts of astronomy expressed a lot of regret that the contents related to astronomical observation were eliminated from the 2015 revised curriculum. As a result of comparing domestic and foreign curriculum, Korea and IBDP curriculum dealt with the largest amount of learning elements in astronomy. In the case of BC in Canada and IBDP, astronomy was offered as an independent subject, and the curriculums of Japan and Korea dealt with astronomy in the Earth Science subject. According to the results, it is necessary to develop general elective courses in Earth Science with astronomy-related contents with high discriminating power in order to strengthen astronomy education. Since astronomy requires background knowledge from various disciplines and inter-disciplinary learning was required, it is necessary to organize the career-related elective courses in Earth Science so that astronomy can be dealt with according to the knowledge structure of general Astronomy. Based on the research results, ways to organize astronomy contents for Earth Science elective courses were suggested.

본 연구에서는 교육과정 개정에 따른 지구과학 내용 영역과 핵심개념의 변화에 대한 고등학생의 인식을 조사하고, 국내외 지구과학과 교육과정의 천문 영역 학습 요소 비교·분석을 통해 2022 개정 교육과정 고등학교 지구과학 선택과목의 천문 영역 내용구성(안)을 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2015 개정 교육과정으로 전환하면서 지구과학 교과목에 도입된 내용 영역 및 핵심개념에 대한 고등학생의 인식을 조사하여 분석하였다. 또한, 4명의 지구과학교육 전문가들이 우리나라를 비롯한 미국, 캐나다 British Columbia(BC)주, 일본, 국제 바칼로레아 디플로마 프로그램(IBDP) 교육과정에 제시된 천문 영역 학습 내용을 비교·분석하였다. 설문 조사 결과, 지구과학 내용 영역 중 학생들이 가장 큰 매력을 느끼는 내용은 천문 영역으로 나타났다. 천문 관련 핵심개념에 가장 큰 흥미를 느낀다고 응답한 고등학생들은 2015 개정 교육과정에서 천체관측 관련 내용이 삭제된 것에 대해 많은 아쉬움을 나타내었다. 국내외 교육과정을 비교한 결과, 우리나라와 IBDP 교육과정이 가장 많은 양의 천문 영역 학습 내용을 다루고 있었다. 캐나다 BC주와 IBDP의 경우, 천문 영역을 독립된 과목으로 개설하며, 우리나라와 가장 유사한 일본의 교육과정은 지구과학 과목에서 천문 영역의 내용을 다루고 있다. 연구결과에 따르면, 천문교육 강화를 위해 학생들이 흥미를 가질 수 있는 학습 요소와 변별력을 확보할 수 있는 천문 관련 내용으로 지구과학 일반 선택과목을 구성할 필요가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 천문 영역은 다양한 학문의 배경지식이 요구되며 교과 연계 학습이 필요하므로 일반적인 천문학의 지식체계를 따라 진로 선택과목을 구성할 필요가 있다. 연구결과를 토대로 천문교육을 통한 과학소양교육 실현에 초점을 두고 2022 개정 교육과정 지구과학 선택과목의 천문 영역 내용 구성(안)을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, J. P., & Slater, T. F. (2000). Astronomy in the national science education standards. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-48.1.39
  2. Barnes, J. (Ed.). (2021). IB world schools yearbook 2021. John Catt Educational Ltd.
  3. British Columbia's curriculum of Canada. (2021a). Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/competencies/
  4. British Columbia's curriculum of Canada. (2021b). Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/science/
  5. British Columbia's curriculum of Canada. (2021c). Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/science/11/earth-sciences/
  6. British Columbia's curriculum of Canada. (2021d). Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/science/12/specialized-science/
  7. Bretones, P. S., & Megid. N. J. (2011). An analysis of papers on astronomy education in proceedings of IAU meetings from 1988 to 2006. Astronomy Education Review, v10 n1 p010102-1-010102-9. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2010010
  8. Choi, J., Lee, K., & Park. J. (2019). The development and application of an astronomy education program reflecting astronomical thinking: A case of planetarium class at science museum. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 40(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2018.40.1.86
  9. Choi, H. N., & Shin, D. H. (2021). International comparison of research trends in astronomy education programs. Publications of the Korean Astronomical Society, 36(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.5303/PKAS.2021.36.1.025
  10. Cui, C., & Li, S. (2018). IAU WG, Data-driven astronomy education and public outreach, current status and working plans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.05098.
  11. Embrain Public. (2020). Survey results report for exploring the future education system. Embrain Public (p. 50).
  12. International Baccalaureate Organization (IBO). (2021). Diploma programme curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diplomaprogramme/curriculum/sciences/
  13. Kogure, T. (2021). Education and popularization of astronomy, 1946-2010. In The History of Modern Astronomy in Japan (pp. 249-261). Springer, Cham.
  14. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC). (2015). 2015 revised curriculum draft development research II-Science curriculum. BD15110002.
  15. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2011). Restructuring of high school elective courses according to the 2009 revised curriculum. CRC 2011-1.
  16. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2014). A study on the guidelines for subject curriculum development. PIM 2015-4.
  17. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2017). A study on the direction of mid to long term high school curriculum for response to the intelligent information society: directions and tasks of the learner-centered high school credit system. CRC 2017-9.
  18. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2018a). A study on restructuring high school curriculum to adopt the credit system. RRC 2018-8.
  19. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2018b). Subjects international comparative study: Focusing on Mathematics, Science and Social Studies. CRC 2018-24.
  20. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2021a). 2022 college scholastic ability test implementation basic plan.
  21. Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2021b). Directions for improving the high school curriculum and reorganizing the college admission system for the introduction of the high school credit system. CRC 2021-3.
  22. Kim, Y. (2019). Reconstruction of Earth Science high school selective courses: Centered on the solid earth area. The Korean Society for School Science, 13(3), 283-302.
  23. Kim, Y., & Kwak, Y. (2020). Research on reconstruction of Earth Science elective courses. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 13(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2020.13.1.40
  24. Kim, S. (2019). An analysis of research trends on the International Baccalaureate. Graduate School of Korea University.
  25. Kwak, Y. (2019). Exploration of support plans for 2015 Integrated Science curriculum through the performance evaluation of implemented teacher training programs. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 39(2), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.2.197
  26. Lee, I., & Kwak, Y. (2020). Exploration of the status of course completion and ways to raise selection rates of general elective courses in the 2015 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.217
  27. Lee, I., & Kwak, Y. (2021). Ways to restructure Science elective courses in preparation for the high School credit system and the 2022 revised curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 14(2), 112-122.
  28. Lee, J., & Shin, D. (2021). Development of astronomy education programs using astronomical heritage and exploring its educational possibility. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 42(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2021.42.3.325
  29. Lee, J. E., & Kang, H. S. (2018). Analysis of the IBDP curriculum introduction process and trends of worldwide context: Focusing on curricular issues. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 97-123. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.36.4.5
  30. Lee, M. (2014). Lesson study crosses the pacific: Teacher changes and professional development in the field of history education. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 471-495. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2014.30.4.471
  31. Miley, G. (2015). The IAU strategic plan. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 11(A29A), 380-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174392131600332X
  32. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development (MEHRD). (2007). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2007-79 of the MEHRD. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
  33. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST). (2012). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of the MEST. Seoul: Ministry of Education Science and Technology
  34. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2014). Key point about overview of 2015 integrated national curriculum(draft). Press release.
  35. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015a). The general explanation of 2015 revised national curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 1]. Sejong: Author.
  36. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015b). Overview of elementary and secondary school curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [supplement 1]. Sejong: Author.
  37. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2018a). An inquire into the organization and operate of optional subjects following the 2015 revised curriculum system. 11-1342000-000359-01.
  38. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2018b). Briefing of university entrance system reform in 2022 and high school education innovation plan. Press release.
  39. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021a). Future curriculum promotion plan with the people (plan). Press release.
  40. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021b). 2022 revised curriculum promotion plan. Press release.
  41. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021c). 2025 implementation of high school education for engagement and growth: High school credit system master plan. Press release.
  42. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021d). Comprehensive high school credit system implementation plan for the realization of high school education of inclusiveness and growth implementation plans. Press release.
  43. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021e). 2022 revised curriculum and education for all; 2021 National Curriculum Communication Forum (3rd).
  44. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2021f). General summary of 2022 revised curriculum(plan). Press release.
  45. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan (MOE Japan). (2018a). High school learning guidance guidelines(announced in 2018) commentary. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20200716-mxt_kyoiku02-100002620_1.pdf
  46. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan (MOE Japan). (2018b). High school learning guidance guidelines(announced in 2018) commentary. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20210902-mxt_kyoiku02-100002620_06.pdf
  47. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 Science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  48. NGSS Lead States. (2013a). Next generation science standards: For States, by States. The National Academies Press.
  49. NGSS Lead States. (2013b). Based on the disciplinary core ideas in the NGSS final release. The National Academies Press.
  50. Park, M, J. (2009). Analysis of the characteristics of competence-based curriculum and its critical issues. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(4), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.27.4.200912.004
  51. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2003). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation. OECD Press.
  52. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2014). Competency framework. OECD Press.
  53. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working papers.
  54. Schleigh, S. P. et al. (2015). The new curriculum standards for astronomy in the United States. Revista Latino-Americana de Educacao em Astronomia, (20), 131-151.
  55. Sim, J., Park, H., & Lee, J. (2015). High school students' perceptions on science elective of the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.2.133
  56. Son, H. (2021). Comparative analysis on 2015 revised curriculum of Korean high school Life Science I, II and International Baccalaureate Biology curriculum. Korea University Graduate School of Education.
  57. Song, J. et al. (2018). A development of Korean science education standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
  58. Song, J. et al. (2019). Developing performance expectations, school implementation strategies, evaluation indicators of the Korean science education standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
  59. van Dishoeck, E. F., & Elmegreen, D. M. (2018). The IAU strategic plan for 2020-2030: OAD. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 14(A30), 560-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921319005386
  60. van Dishoeck, E. F., & Elmegreen, D. M. (2021). Science and survival: insights from astronomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.10346.
  61. Zhongming, Z. et al. (2021). ESA's space environment report 2021.