Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Improvement Examination Standard for the Limit of changing Current State of the Cultural Properties

문화재 유형별 현상변경 검토기준 마련 연구

  • Cho, Hong-Seok (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with HIPI) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Joon (Research Center of History and Culture affiliated with HIPI) ;
  • Lee, You-Beom (Heritage Conservation Bureau of Cultural Heritage Administration) ;
  • Lee, Cheon-Woo (Heritage Conservation Bureau of Cultural Heritage Administration) ;
  • Kim, Chul-Ju (Heritage Conservation Bureau of Cultural Heritage Administration) ;
  • Park, Jung-Seop (Heritage Conservation Bureau of Cultural Heritage Administration) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Dong (Heritage Conservation Bureau of Cultural Heritage Administration)
  • 조홍석 ((재)에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터) ;
  • 박현준 ((재)에이치아이정책연구원 부설 역사문화연구센터) ;
  • 이유범 (문화재청 문화재보존국) ;
  • 이천우 (문화재청 문화재보존국) ;
  • 김철주 (문화재청 문화재보존국) ;
  • 박정섭 (문화재청 문화재보존국) ;
  • 김상동 (문화재청 문화재보존국)
  • Received : 2015.10.12
  • Accepted : 2015.12.23
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Cultural Properties Protection Law Act 1962 has been achieving its role for systematic preservation, management and application of the cultural heritage under rapid economic growth circumstances through continuing revisions. Introduced the influence review system for cultural heritages in 2000, and legislated the guideline for the state-change allowance standard for the National Cultural Heritage in 2006 in specific, the law has been contributing significantly for the cultural properties and historical/cultural environment preservation, along with increase in administrative efficiency and improvement on settlement environment. However, increase in public awareness about the cultural property's value and the needs for the local revitalization by utilizing the heritages, while some allowance standard not peoperly delivering the surrounding conditions, such as the value of the properties and their substantial characteristics, land utilization, etc. being applied, complaints from the local residents are increasing continuously. Thus this research focuses on clear vision/value of the heritage and apply them to create the review criteria for the state-change allowance per heritages. Here we set the Focus of Landscape Management Indicators in order to actively preserve and manage the physical characteristics and the native value by analyzing the Cultural Heritage Protection Laws and related guidelines, manuals and research papers, and redesign the cultural propertiy's classification scheme and propose the Review Standard for state-change from the view point of changing the current state. With this research, we expect increase in the satisfaction for the Property management system with public understanding promotion regarding the Standards by applying the reviewed state-change allowance Standards, white securing the consistency for the review criteria as well as the systematic management of historical/cultural environment with their typification characteristics and the value for short-term.

1962년 제정된 문화재보호법은 지속적인 개정을 통해 급속한 경제성장 과정에서 문화재의 체계적인 보존 관리 및 활용에 그 역할을 다해왔다. 특히, 2000년에는 문화재 영향검토제도를 도입하고, 2006년에는 국가지정문화재 현상변경 허용기준 마련 지침을 제정하며 문화재 및 역사문화환경의 보존과 더불어 행정효율성 제고, 정주환경 개선에 상당한 기여를 하고 있다. 그러나, 문화재 가치에 대한 국민의식 향상과 문화유산을 활용한 지역 활성화의 필요성이 대두되는 동시에 문화재 가치 및 유형적 특성, 토지이용실태 등 주변 여건을 적의 반영하지 못하는 일부 허용기준을 적용함에 따라 주민 불편사항이 계속 제기되고 있어, 본 연구는 문화재의 핵심가치를 명확히 하고, 이를 반영한 문화재 유형별 현상변경 검토기준 마련을 목적으로 하였다. 이에 문화재보호법 및 관련 지침 매뉴얼, 각종 연구자료 등의 분석을 통해 물적 특성 및 본연의 가치를 적극적으로 보존 관리하기 위한 경관관리 중점지표를 설정하고, 현상변경 관점에서 문화재 유형분류체계를 재분류하여 현상변경 검토기준을 제시하였다. 이를 통해, 단기적으로는 문화재 가치 및 유형별 특성을 반영한 역사문화환경의 체계적 관리와 검토기준의 일관성을 확보하는 한편, 이를 적용한 허용기준의 조정을 통해 기준설정에 대한 대국민 이해도 증진을 도모함으로써 문화재 관리행정에 대한 만족도가 제고되길 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cultural Heritage Administration.(2014) Internal data at the Cultural Heritage Administration.
  2. Cho, H. S., Park, H. J. and Park, J. S.(2014). Basic Research On Improvement Schemes for the Limit of changing Current State of the Cultural Properties. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 32(4): 105-119. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2014.32.4.105
  3. Yoon, C. S., Kim, D. I. and Cho, H. C.(1986). A Study on the Urban Development Criteria for Consideration of Architectural Heritages. Journal of the architectural institute of Korea. 2(2): 89-95.
  4. Cho, H. S., Oh, J. A. and Kim, C. D.(1999). Focused on the Formation and the Transition Process of Modern Architecture in Kong-ju = A Study on Modern Architecture in the Local City. The Journal of Architectural and Urban Environmental Research. 7(-): 1-13.
  5. Lee, H.(2000). Study on the Characteristics of Processional Space in Traditional Buddhist Temple, focused on the Gates. Mastes's Thesis of Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  6. Choi, H. S.(2001). Control of Building Height to Preserve Urban Historic Landscapes in Korea. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 36(1): 99-117.
  7. Cho, H. S., Oh, S. K. and Kim, C. D.(2001). Analysis on Conservation Methods of the Historical and Cultural Environment in Kongju City, Korea. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 36(2): 225-239.
  8. Cultural Heritage Administration(2004). Guide for Changing Current State of the Cultural Properties in Practice. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  9. Industry-University Cooperation Foundation Sungkyunkwan University (2006). Research on Preparation of the Manual for the Permission Criteria for Changing surroundings of the State-designated Cultural Heritage Properties. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  10. Korea Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture(2008). Study on Improvement of Impact Assessment Area around the Cultural Heritage properties. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  11. Paek, C. C., Jo, U. Y. and Nah, M, H.(2008). The Solution Plan and Problems of Preparing Standards for Condition Changes for Cultural Properties Designated by the Nation. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 26(4): 74-84.
  12. Cultural Heritage Administration-Conservation Policy Division(2009). Manual for Changing Current State of the Cultural Properties Works. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  13. Lim, B. E., Sim, W. K. and Choi, J, H.(2009). Measures to Implements the Landscape Conservation and Management on Consideration of Changing the Actual Condition and Landscape Visibility in the Surround Area of the Royal Tombs Jangneung. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 27(3): 18-29.
  14. Park, E. H., Kim, T. H. and Lee, J. K.(2011). A Study on the Visibility Ratio Analysis Technique for Establishing the Cultural Property Protective Zone. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 29(2): 108-117.
  15. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements(2012). Approaches for the Systematic Management of Historical and Cultural Preservation Area. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  16. Cho, H. S.(2012). A Study on Securing the View Axis of Cultural Heritage using Landscape Simulation Analysis in Downtown. Journal of Architectural History. 21(3): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.7738/JAH.2012.21.3.029
  17. Ko, K. N.(2012). A Study on Improving the Allowable Standards for Changing the Status of Cultural Heritage. Mastes's Thesis of Mokwon University, Daejeon, Korea.
  18. Kim, D. C., Lim, J. K.(2012). A Study on Analysis and Problems of Deliberation to Change the Present Condition Around Cultural Properties -Focusing on the Cultural Properties of Standard Establishment for Change the Present Condition. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 30(1): 22-30.
  19. Cultural Heritage Administration Directive No.316(2014). Established Guidelines for the Allowance Limit for State-Designated Cultural Heritage Change. Cultural Heritage Administration.
  20. Lee, W. H., Kim, J. U., Kim, D, H. and Shin, H. S.(2014). Research on the Visual Historical & Cultural Resources. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. International Edition Number 12: 90-98.
  21. Cultural Heritage Administration Regulation No.112(2012). Public Design Manual for the Facilities around the Cultural Properties
  22. Cultural Heritage Administration Notification No.2009-74(2009). General Principles for Repairing and Restoring the Historical Architecture and Relics.
  23. Cultural Heritage Administration Guidelines No.18, (2009. discontinued). Guide for Preserving and Maintaining Forest in Cultural Properties Area
  24. Cultural Heritage Administration. Standards for Facilities Installation in Folk Villages(in and out of the premises)(2014.03.02.).
  25. Cultural Heritage Administration Directive No.269(2012). Guide for Preserving and Maintaining the Natural Monument Old Trees and Silva.
  26. Cultural Heritage Administration Directive No.189(2009). Guide for Preserving and Maintaining Traditional Village Forest.
  27. Cultural Heritage Administration Directive No.277(2012). Maintenance Manual for Marado Natural Reserve.
  28. Cultural Heritage Administration Directive No.315(2014). Maintenance Manual for Hongdo Natural Reserve.
  29. Historic Site Maintenance Manual(2011). Cultural Heritage Administration.
  30. Cultural Heritage Administration(2012). Manual for Preserving and Maintaining Prehistoric Relics.
  31. Cultural Heritage Administration(2014). Manual for Preserving and Maintaining the Town-fortress.
  32. Cultural Heritage Administration(2011). Manual for Preserving and Maintaining the Burial Mounds.
  33. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements(2011). Preservation Plans for Gyeongju Ancient City.
  34. Gyeonggi Research Institute(2007). Improving building regulations surrounding area Cultural Heritage.
  35. Cultural Heritage Administration(2006). A Study on the Application and Conservation of the Modern Cultural Heritages of Korea.
  36. http://www.unesco.or.kr/heritage
  37. http://www.cha.go.kr