skip to main content
article

Spatial keyword query processing: an experimental evaluation

Published:01 January 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Geo-textual indices play an important role in spatial keyword querying. The existing geo-textual indices have not been compared systematically under the same experimental framework. This makes it difficult to determine which indexing technique best supports specific functionality. We provide an all-around survey of 12 state-of-the-art geo-textual indices. We propose a benchmark that enables the comparison of the spatial keyword query performance. We also report on the findings obtained when applying the benchmark to the indices, thus uncovering new insights that may guide index selection as well as further research.

References

  1. N. Beckmann, H.-P. Kriegel, R. Schneider, and B. Seeger. The R*-tree: An efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles. In SIGMOD, pages 322-331, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. X. Cao, L. Chen, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, Q. Qu, A. Skovsgaard, D. Wu, and M. L. Yiu. Spatial keyword querying. In ER, pages 16-29, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. X. Cao, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and B. C. Ooi. Collective spatial keyword querying. In SIGMOD, pages 373-384, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Cary, O. Wolfson, and N. Rishe. Efficient and scalable method for processing top-k spatial boolean queries. In SSDBM, pages 87-95, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Y.-Y. Chen, T. Suel, and A. Markowetz. Efficient query processing in geographic web search engines. In SIGMOD, pages 277-288, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Christoforaki, J. He, C. Dimopoulos, A. Markowetz, and T. Suel. Text vs. space: efficient geo-search query processing. In CIKM, pages 423-432, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and D. Wu. Efficient retrieval of the top-k most relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB, 2(1):337-348, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Faloutsos and S. Christodoulakis. Signature files: An access method for documents and its analytical performance evaluation. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 2(4):267-288, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. I. D. Felipe, V. Hristidis, and N. Rishe. Keyword search on spatial databases. In ICDE, pages 656-665, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Göbel, A. Henrich, R. Niemann, and D. Blank. A hybrid index structure for geo-textual searches. In CIKM, pages 1625-1628, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Guttman. R-trees: A dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In SIGMOD, pages 47-57, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Hariharan, B. Hore, C. Li, and S. Mehrotra. Processing spatial-keyword (sk) queries in geographic information retrieval (gir) systems. In SSDBM, page 16, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Huang, G. Li, K.-L. Tan, and J. Feng. Efficient safe-region construction for moving top-k spatial keyword queries. In CIKM, pages 932-941, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Khodaei, C. Shahabi, and C. Li. Hybrid indexing and seamless ranking of spatial and textual features of web documents. In DEXA, pages 450-466, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Li, J. Feng, and J. Xu. Desks: Direction-aware spatial keyword search. In ICDE, pages 474-485, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Z. Li, K. C. K. Lee, B. Zheng, W.-C. Lee, D. L. Lee, and X. Wang. Ir-tree: An efficient index for geographic document search. IEEE TKDE, 23(4):585-599, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Lu, Y. Lu, and G. Cong. Reverse spatial and textual k nearest neighbor search. In SIGMOD, pages 349-360, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. B. Rocha-Junior, O. Gkorgkas, S. Jonassen, and K. Nørvåg. Efficient processing of top-k spatial keyword queries. In SSTD, pages 205-222, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Vaid, C. B. Jones, H. Joho, and M. Sanderson. Spatio-textual indexing for geographical search on the web. In SSTD, pages 218-235, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Wu, G. Cong, and C. S. Jensen. A framework for efficient spatial web object retrieval. VLDBJ, 21(6):797-822, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Wu, M. L. Yiu, G. Cong, and C. S. Jensen. Joint top-k spatial keyword query processing. IEEE TKDE, 24(10):1889-1903, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Wu, M. L. Yiu, C. S. Jensen, and G. Cong. Efficient continuously moving top-k spatial keyword query processing. In ICDE, pages 541-552, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. H. Yan, S. Ding, and T. Suel. Inverted index compression and query processing with optimized document ordering. In WWW, pages 401-410, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Zhang, Y. M. Chee, A. Mondal, A. K. H. Tung, and M. Kitsuregawa. Keyword search in spatial databases: Towards searching by document. In ICDE, pages 688-699, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Zhang, B. C. Ooi, and A. K. H. Tung. Locating mapped resources in web 2.0. In ICDE, pages 521-532, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Y. Zhou, X. Xie, C. Wang, Y. Gong, and W.-Y. Ma. Hybrid index structures for location-based web search. In CIKM, pages 155-162, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Spatial keyword query processing: an experimental evaluation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
          Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment  Volume 6, Issue 3
          January 2013
          72 pages

          Publisher

          VLDB Endowment

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 2013
          Published in pvldb Volume 6, Issue 3

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader