Does Physical Environment Contribute to Basic Psychological Needs? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Learning in the Chemistry Laboratory

Main Article Content

Kirsi Sjöblom
Kaisu Mälkki
Niclas Sandström
Kirsti Lonka

Abstract

The role of motivation and emotions in learning has been extensively studied in recent years; however, research on the role of the physical environment still remains scarce. This study examined the role of the physical environment in the learning process from the perspective of basic psychological needs. Although self-determination theory stresses the role of the social and cultural environment, as yet the role of the physical environment has been unexplored.

The study focused on beginning chemistry university students’ (n=21) experiences in a chemistry laboratory. The data consisted of focus-group interviews and self-report questionnaires. The results indicate that the physical environment can support or thwart the fulfillment of the basic psychological needs. The usability and functionality of spaces and tools contributed to not just the fluency of the intellectual activity but also to the related emotional experience of oneself acting in a particular environment. The physical environment was a source of procedural facilitation: It complemented and challenged the students’ existing skills, contributing to their experiences of autonomy and competence. The everyday successes or struggles in the laboratory built on the students’ developing professional identity as well as their sense of belonging to the professional community.

This study demonstrates that the design and functionality of the physical environment has a significant role in users’ intellectual and emotional functioning. It is essential to utilize psychological and pedagogical knowledge when designing or renovating work and learning environments in order to fully make use of the potential of physical environments as part of human performance. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sjöblom, K., Mälkki, K., Sandström, N., & Lonka, K. (2016). Does Physical Environment Contribute to Basic Psychological Needs? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Learning in the Chemistry Laboratory. Frontline Learning Research, 4(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i1.217
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Kirsi Sjöblom, University of Helsinki

M.A. Psychologist, PhD Researcher

Research Group of Educational Psychology

Department of Teacher Education

Faculty of Behavioural Sciences

University of Helsinki, Finland

Kaisu Mälkki, University of Helsinki

PhD, University lecturer

Research Group of Educational Psychology

Department of Teacher Education

Faculty of Behavioural Sciences

University of Helsinki, Finland

Niclas Sandström, University of Helsinki

M.A., M.Soc.Sci., PhD Researcher

Research Group of Educational Psychology

Department of Teacher Education

Faculty of Behavioural Sciences

University of Helsinki, Finland

Kirsti Lonka, University of Helsinki

PhD, Professor of Educational Psychology

Research Group of Educational Psychology

Department of Teacher Education

Faculty of Behavioural Sciences

University of Helsinki, Finland

References

Alfonsi, E, Capolongo, S. & Buffoli, M. (2014). Evidence based design and healthcare: An unconventional approach to hospital design. Annali di igiene : Medicina preventiva e di comunità, 26, 137–143. doi:10.7416/ai.2014.1968
Alker, J., Malanca, M., Pottage, C., O’Brien, R., Akhras, D., Ambrose, B., …Wong, J. (2015). Health, Wellbeing and Productivity in Offices. World Green Building Council, http://www.worldgbc.org/activities/health-wellbeing-productivity-offices/research.
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (2000). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives (pp. 24–49). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Beard, C. (2009). Space to learn: The development and evolution of new learning environments in higher education. In Buswell, J. & Becket, N. (Eds.), Enhancing student centred learning in business and management, hospitality, leisure, sport, and tourism. Oxford, UK: Threshold Press.
Beard, C. (2012). Spatial ecologies: Learning and working environments that change people and organisations. In Alexandra, K. & Price, I. (Eds.), Managing Organisational Ecologies (pp.69–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
Beard, C. & Price, I. (2010). Space, conversations and place: Lessons and questions from organisational development. International Journal of Facility management, 1.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Black, A. E. & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: a self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihály Csíkszentmihályi. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 431–442) Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Evans, G. W., Bullinger, M. & Hygge, S. (1998). Chronic noise exposure and physiological response: A prospective study of children living under environmental stress. Psychological Science, 9, 75–77. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00014
Gay, J. L. (2008). Testing self-determination theory and the roles of the social and physical environments in an adult beginning exerciser population. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.
Gay, J. L., Saunders, R. P. & Dowda, M. (2011). The relationship of physical activity and the built environment within the context of self-determination theory. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42, 188–196. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9292-y
Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213–231. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9064-x
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of Networked Expertise: Professional and Educational Perspectives. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 99–117. doi:10.1080/03075070500392433
Heikkilä, A., Lonka, K., Nieminen, J. & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Relations between teacher students' approaches to learning, cognitive and attributional strategies, well-being, and study success. Higher Education, 64, 455–471. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9504-9
Heikkilä, A., Niemivirta, M., Nieminen, J. & Lonka, K. (2011). Interrelations among university students’ approaches to learning, regulation of learning, and cognitive and attributional strategies: A person oriented approach. Higher Education, 61, 513–529. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9346-2
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Hutchins, E. (2000). Distributed cognition. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2068–2072.
Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 375–398).
Inkinen, M., Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K., Muukkonen, H., Litmanen, T. & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). The interface between core affects and the challenge-skill relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 891–913. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9455-6
Iyengar, S. S., & DeVoe, S. E. (2003). Rethinking the value of choice: Considering cultural mediators of intrinsic motivation. In Murphy-Berman, V. & Berman, J. J. (Eds.), Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on self (pp. 146–191). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Jang, H., Reeve, J. & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682
Job, V., Walton, G. M., Bernecker, K. & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Implicit theories about willpower predict self-regulation and grades in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 637–647. doi:10.1037/pspp0000014
Küller, R. & Lindsten, C. (1992). Health and behavior of children in classrooms with and without windows. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 305–317. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80079-9
Lansdale, M., Parkin, J., Austin, S. & Baguley, T. (2011). Designing for interaction in research environments: A case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 407–420. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.006
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Lonka, K. (2000). Interaction between Learning Environment and Expert Learning. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 5, 90–97.
Lonka, K. (2012). Engaging learning environments for the future: The 2012 Elizabeth W. Stone lecture. In Gwyer, R., Stubbings, R. &Walton, G. (Eds.), The road to information literacy: Librarians as facilitators of learning (pp. 15–30). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Lonka, K. & Ketonen, E. (2012). How to make a lecture course an engaging learning experience? Studies for the Learning Society, 2, 63–74. doi:10.2478/v10240-012-0006-1
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 92, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Mälkki, K. (2010). Building on Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning: Theorizing the challenges to reflection. Journal of Transformative Education, 8, 42–62. doi:10.1177/1541344611403315
Mälkki, K. (2012). Rethinking disorienting dilemmas within real-life crises: The role of reflection in negotiating emotionally chaotic experiences. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 207–229. doi:10.1177/0741713611402047
Mälkki, K., Sjöblom, K. & Lonka, K. (2014). Transformation of the physical space and transformation of the subject. In Nicolaides, A. & Holt, D. (Eds.), Spaces of transformation and transformation of space: Proceedings of the XI International Transformative Learning Conference (pp. 550–556). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Nenonen, S., Kärnä, S., Junnonen, J.-M., Tähtinen, S. & Sandström, N. (Eds.) (2015). How to co-create campus. Tampere, Finland: Suomen Yliopistokiinteistöt Oy, Tampere Juvenes Print. (in Finnish)
Niemiec, C. P. & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom - Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144. doi:10.1177/1477878509104318
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576. doi:10.3102/00346543074004557
Parsons, R. & Hartig, T. (2000). Environmental psychophysiology. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G. & Berntson, G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 815–846). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Perry, N. E., Turner, J. C. & Meyer, D. K. (2006). Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Rutten, C., Boen, F. & Seghers, J. (2012). How school social and physical environments relate to autonomous motivation in physical education: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31: 216–230.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
Ryan, R. M. (2009). Self-determination theory and wellbeing. Wellbeing in Developing Countries Research Review, 1.
Ryan, R. M. & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33) Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning and well-being. In Wentzel, K. R. & Wigfield, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 171–195). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V. & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
Sandström, N., Eriksson, R., Lonka, K. & Nenonen, S. (accepted for publication 2015). Usability and affordances for inquiry-based learning in a blended learning environment. Facilities.
Sandström, N., Ketonen, E. and Lonka, K. (2014). The experience of laboratory learning – how do chemistry students perceive their learning environment? European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 11, 1612–1625. doi:10.15405/ejsbs.144
Sandström, N., Sjöblom, K., Mälkki, K. & Lonka, K. (2013) The role of physical, social and mental space in chemistry students’ learning. European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 6, 1134–1139. doi:10.15405/ejsbs.90
Scott, D. & Usher, R. (1999). Researching education: Data, methods and theory in educational enquiry. London, UK: Continuum.
Seligman, M., Ernst, R., Gillham, J., Reivich, K. & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 293–311. doi:10.1080/03054980902934563
Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Dochy, F. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 108–120. doi:10.1037/a0025742
Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K. & Niemivirta, M. (2008). Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: A person-centred analysis. Learning and Instruction, 18, 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.003
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556. doi:10.1177/0013916581135001
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L. & Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22, 431–439. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002
Vermunt, J. D. & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0
Wigfield, A., Cambria, J. & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Motivation in education. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. (2000). Interpretivism and generalisation. Sociology, 34, 209–224. doi:10.1177/S0038038500000146
Winterbottom, M. & Wilkins, A. (2009). Lighting and discomfort in the classroom. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.007
Wolters, C. A. & Gonzalez, A-L. (2008). Classroom climate and motivation: A step toward integration. In Maehr, M. L., Karabenick, S. A. & Urdan, T. C. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement - social psychological perspectives. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 47–70. doi:10.1080/03054980601094693