Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 23, 2018

Impact of blood cell counts and volumes on glucose concentration in uncentrifuged serum and lithium-heparin blood tubes

  • Giuseppe Lippi ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Gian Luca Salvagno , Simona Lampus , Elisa Danese , Matteo Gelati , Chiara Bovo , Martina Montagnana and Ana-Maria Simundic

Abstract

Background:

Although it is known that glucose concentration exhibits a time-dependent decay in uncentrifuged serum and lithium-heparin blood tubes, no evidence exists on how this variation may depend on blood cell counts (CBC) and volumes.

Methods:

Venous blood was drawn from 30 non fasting healthy volunteers into three serum and three lithium-heparin tubes. One serum and lithium-heparin tubes were centrifuged within 15 min after collection and glucose was measured with a hexokinase assay. The second and third serum and lithium-heparin tubes were maintained at room temperature for 1 and 2 h after the first tubes were centrifuged. These other tubes were then centrifuged and glucose was measured. CBC was performed in the first lithium-heparin tube, before centrifugation.

Results:

The mean decrease of glucose was higher in lithium-heparin plasma than in serum (0.33 vs. 0.24 mmol/L/h; p<0.001). Glucose concentration decreased by 7% and 5% per hour in lithium-heparin plasma and serum, respectively. In univariate analysis, the absolute decrease of glucose concentration was associated with sex (higher in men than in women), red blood cell (RBC) count, hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophils and monocytes in both lithium-heparin plasma and serum. In multivariate analysis, the decrease of glucose concentration remained independently associated with RBC, WBC, neutrophils and monocytes in both sample matrices. No significant association was found with platelet number and erythrocyte or platelet volume.

Conclusions:

Glucose concentration decrease in uncentrifuged lithium-heparin and serum tubes depends on the baseline number of RBC, WBC, neutrophils and monocytes within the tubes.


Corresponding author: Prof. Giuseppe Lippi, Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale LA Scuro, 37100 Verona, Italy

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. American Diabetes Association- Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2017. Diabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–135.10.2337/dci17-0007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Montagnana M, Lippi G. Overcoming preanalytical issues for diagnosing diabetes with fasting plasma glucose. Ann Transl Med 2017;5:257.10.21037/atm.2017.05.19Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Lippi G, Nybo M, Cadamuro J, Guimaraes JT, van Dongen-Lases E, Simundic AM. Blood glucose determination: effect of tube additives. Adv Clin Chem 2018;84:101–23.10.1016/bs.acc.2017.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Giavarina D, Lippi G. A survey on sample matrix and preanalytical management in clinical laboratories. Biochim Clin 2017;41:142–7.Search in Google Scholar

5. Nikolac N, Krleza JL, Simundic AM. Preanalytical external quality assessment of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and CROQALM: finding undetected weak spots. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2017;27:131–43.10.11613/BM.2017.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Smellie WS. Demand management and test request rationalization. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:323–36.10.1258/acb.2011.011149Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Rodríguez-Borja E, Corchon-Peyrallo A, Aguilar-Aguilar G, Carratala-Calvo A. Utility of routine laboratory preoperative tests based on previous results: time to give up. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2017;27:030902.10.11613/BM.2017.030902Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Lippi G, Panteghini M, Bernardini S, Bonfanti L, Carraro P, Casagranda I et al. Laboratory tests in the Emergency Department: a consensus document by SIBioC-Medicina di Laboratorio and the Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care. Biochm Clin 2017;41:183–8.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, Bruns DE, Horvath AR, Kirkman MS, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2011;57:e1–47.10.1373/clinchem.2010.161596Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Westgard J. Desirable Specifications for Total Error, Imprecision, and Bias, derived from intra- and inter-individual biologic variation. Available at: https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. Accessed: 16 May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

11. Mikesh LM, Bruns DE. Stabilization of glucose in blood specimens: mechanism of delay in fluoride inhibition of glycolysis. Clin Chem 2008;54:930–2.10.1373/clinchem.2007.102160Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Schoorl M, Schoorl M, Chevallier M, van der Ploeg T, van Pelt J. Multicenter verification of the Sysmex XN-Series. Int J Lab Hematol 2017;39:489–96.10.1111/ijlh.12674Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Stark K, Olden M, Brandl C, Dietl A, Zimmermann ME, Schelter SC, et al. The German AugUR study: study protocol of a prospective study to investigate chronic diseases in the elderly. BMC Geriatr 2015;15:130.10.1186/s12877-015-0122-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Xia C, Liu O, Wang L, Xu G. Trueness assessment for serum glucose measurement using commercial systems through the preparation of commutable reference materials. Ann Lab Med 2012;32:243–9.10.3343/alm.2012.32.4.243Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Lepper PM, Ott S, Nüesch E, von Eynatten M, Schumann C, Pletz MW, et al. Serum glucose levels for predicting death in patients admitted to hospital for community acquired pneumonia: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 2012;344:e3397.10.1136/bmj.e3397Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Huang W, Xu W, Zhu P, Yang H, Su L, Tang H, et al. Analysis of blood glucose distribution characteristics in a health examination population in Chengdu (2007–2015). Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8765.10.1097/MD.0000000000008765Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Guppy M, Attwood PV, Hansen IA, Sabaratnam R, Frisina J, Whisson ME. pH, temperature and lactate production in human red blood cells: implications for blood storage and glycolytic control. Vox Sang 1992;62:70–5.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1992.tb01173.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Arem R, Jeang MK, Blevens TC, Waddell CC, Field JB. Polycythemia rubra vera and artifactual hypoglycemia. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:2199–201.10.1001/archinte.1982.00340250165027Search in Google Scholar

19. Goodenow TJ, Malarkey WB. Leukocytosis and artifactual hypoglycemia. J Am Med Assoc 1977;237:1961–2.10.1001/jama.1977.03270450051020Search in Google Scholar

20. Canivet B, Squara P, Elbaze P, Gratecos N, Cassuto JP, Dujardin P, et al. In vitro glucose consumption in severe hyperleukocytosis. A cause of factitious hypoglycemia. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1982;30:843–6.Search in Google Scholar

21. Billington CJ, Casciato DA, Choquette DL, Morley JE. Artifactual hypoglycemia associated with polycythemia vera. J Am Med Assoc 1983;249:774–5.10.1001/jama.1983.03330300058035Search in Google Scholar

22. Kim HS. Blood glucose measurement: is serum equal to plasma? Diabetes Metab J 2016;40:365–6.10.4093/dmj.2016.40.5.365Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Dimeski G, Yow KS, Brown NN. What is the most suitable blood collection tube for glucose estimation? Ann Clin Biochem 2015;52:270–5.10.1177/0004563214544708Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. van Wijk R, van Solinge WW. The energy-less red blood cell is lost: erythrocyte enzyme abnormalities of glycolysis. Blood 2005;106:4034–42.10.1182/blood-2005-04-1622Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2011;48:143–53.10.3109/10408363.2011.600228Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Kramer PA, Ravi S, Chacko B, Johnson MS, Darley-Usmar VM. A review of the mitochondrial and glycolytic metabolism in human platelets and leukocytes: implications for their use as bioenergetic biomarkers. Redox Biol 2014;2:206–10.10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Loftus RM, Finlay DK. Immunometabolism: cellular metabolism turns immune regulator. J Biol Chem 2016;2911:1–10.10.1074/jbc.R115.693903Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2018-05-16
Accepted: 2018-05-30
Published Online: 2018-06-23
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0523/html
Scroll to top button