Abstract
In today’s world, individuals should be able to maintain their expertise amidst constant changes. Thus, this type of agency should be supported in higher education. One approach for a teacher-researcher to examine supporting agency and how it manifests itself in higher education courses is through the learning design. In this article, learning design is defined as the planned course path and the way in which that path is enacted in the course in a real-life setting. Thus, the learning design of a blended EAP course is examined, with a focus on the course assignments in two different groups in two consecutive years. Different types of agency were assumed through the tasks and those types of agency were expressed in the learners’ completed texts. For example, tasks in which learners were positioned as traditional “students” presented problems in terms of the learners’ agency. Instead, tasks fostering the learners’ position as experts, their initiative and accountability to draw on their life-worlds were deemed to support the type of agency necessary and valuable for academic graduates. Design-based research strategy was employed to allow a cyclical process of developing the design based on the results of the previous cycle. It is hoped that the insights gained through the research might inform the planning of higher education language courses.
About the author
Riina Seppälä has previously worked as a lecturer in English at the University of Jyväskylä Language Centre where she collected data for her research. She is a postgraduate student of applied linguistics at the Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä. Her research focuses on exploring the concept of learner agency on higher education English courses. She is currently a lecturer of English at Aalto University Language Centre.
References
Amiel, Tel & Thomas C. Reeves. 2008. Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society 11(4). 29–40.Search in Google Scholar
Aro, Mari. 2009. Speakers and doers – Polyphony and agency in children’s beliefs about language learning. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Aro, Mari. 2015. In action and inaction: English learners authoring their agency. In Ana Paula Kalaja, Maria Ferreira Barcelos, Mari Aro & Maria Ruohotie-Lyhty (eds.), Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching, 48–65. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137425959_4Search in Google Scholar
Blin, Françoise & Juha Jalkanen. 2014. Designing for Language Learning: Agency and languaging in hybrid environments. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies 8(1). 147–170.Search in Google Scholar
Cobb, Paul, Jere Confrey, Andrea diSessa, Richard Lehrer & Leona Schauble. 2003. Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher 32(1). 9–13.10.3102/0013189X032001009Search in Google Scholar
Conole, Gráinne. 2012. Designing for learning in an open world: Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Coughlan, Peter & Patricia Duff. 1994. Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In James P. Lantolf & Gabriela Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 173–193. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher 32(1). 5–8.10.3102/0013189X032001005Search in Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Duff, Patricia. 2012. Identity, agency and second language acquisition. In Alison Mackey & Susan M. Gass (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition, 410–426. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Dufva, Hannele & Mari Aro. 2015. Dialogical view on language learners’ agency: Connecting intrapersonal with interpersonal. In Ping Deters, Xuesong (Andy) Gao, Elizabeth R. Miller & Gergana Vitanova (eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning – Interdisciplinary approaches, 37–53. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783092901-005Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Harré, Rom & Luk van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hunter, Judy & David Cooke. 2007. Through autonomy to agency: Giving power to language learners. Prospect 22(2). 72–88.Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20. 207–226.10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 1091–1112.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2010. Community and Individuality: Performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication 27(2). 159–188.10.1177/0741088309357846Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156Search in Google Scholar
Ivanič, Roz. 1998. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/swll.5Search in Google Scholar
Ivanič, Roz & David Camps. 2001. I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10(1–2). 3–33.10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0Search in Google Scholar
Kalaja, Paula, Riikka Alanen, Åsa Palviainen & Hannele Dufva. 2011. From milk cartons to English roommates: Context and agency in L2 learning beyond the classroom. In Phil Benson & Hayo Reinders (eds.), Beyond the language classroom, 47–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230306790_5Search in Google Scholar
Kalantzis, Mary & Bill Cope. 2001. New Learning: a charter for Australian education. Canberra: Australian Council of Deans of Education.Search in Google Scholar
Kalantzis, Mary & Bill Cope. 2004. Designs for Learning. E-Learning 1(1). 38–93.10.2304/elea.2004.1.1.7Search in Google Scholar
Lantolf, James P. & Steven L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lipponen, Lasse & Kristiina Kumpulainen. 2011. Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 27. 812–819.10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Lund, Andreas & Trond Eiliv Hauge. 2011. Designs for Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Learning Environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 6(4). 258–272.10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-04-05Search in Google Scholar
Maguire, Mary H. & Barbara Graves. 2001. Speaking personalities in primary school children’s L2 writing. TESOL Quarterly 35(4). 561–593.10.2307/3588428Search in Google Scholar
Mercer, Sarah. 2012. The complexity of learner agency. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies 6(2). 41–59.Search in Google Scholar
Muller, Theron. 2015. Critical discourse analysis in a medical English course: Examining learner agency through student written reflections. In Ping Deters, Xuesong (Andy) Gao, Elizabeth R. Miller & Gergana Vitanova (eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning – Interdisciplinary approaches, 232–251. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783092901-015Search in Google Scholar
Murphey, Tim & Christopher Carpenter. 2008. The seeds of agency in language learning histories. In Paula Kalaja, Vera Menezes & Ana Maria F. Barcelos (eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL, 17–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Norton, Bonny. 2000. Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2006. Introduction: The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816833.002Search in Google Scholar
Vaarala, Heidi & Juha Jalkanen. 2010. Changing spaces, expanding mindsets: Towards L2 literacies on a multimodal reading comprehension course. Language Value 2(1). 68–99.Search in Google Scholar
van Lier, Leo. 2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/1-4020-7912-5Search in Google Scholar
van Lier, Leo. 2008. Agency in the classroom. In James P. Lantolf & Matthew E. Poehner (eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages, 163–186. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Feng & Michael J. Hannafin. 2005. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 53(4). 5–23.10.1007/BF02504682Search in Google Scholar
Wiggins, Grant & Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by design 2nd. New Jersey: Pearson education.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
