Abstract
This paper presents a study on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) of pressure coefficients hyperbolic parabolic roofs. The main goal of this study is to obtain pressure coefficient maps taking into account spatial non-uniform distribution and time-depending fluctuations of the pressure field. To this aim, pressure fields are described through pressure modes estimated by using the SVD technique. Wind tunnel experimental results on eight different geometries of buildings with hyperbolic paraboloid roofs are used to derive these pressure modes. The truncated SVD approach was applied to select a sufficient number of pressure modes necessary to reconstruct the measured signal given an acceptable difference. The truncated pressure modes are fitted through a polynomial surface to obtain a parametric form expressed as a function of the hyperbolic paraboloid roof geometry. The superpositions of pressure (envelopes) for all eight geometry were provided and used to modify mean pressure coefficients, to define design load combinations. Both symmetrical and asymmetrical pressure coefficient modes are used to estimate the wind action and to calculate the vertical displacements of a cable net by FEM analyses. Results clearly indicate that these load combinations allow for capturing large downward and upward displacements not properly predicted using mean experimental pressure coefficients.
References
[1] Vassilopoulou I., Petrini F., Gantes C.J., Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of Cable Nets Subjected to Wind Loading, Structures, 2017 10, 170-183.10.1016/j.istruc.2017.03.004Search in Google Scholar
[2] Vassilopoulou I., Gantes C.J., Influence of a Deformable Contour Ring on the Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Cable Nets. Structures, 2016, 6, 146-158.10.1016/j.istruc.2016.02.007Search in Google Scholar
[3] Rizzo F., Zazzini P., Shape dependence of acoustic performances in buildings with a Hyperbolic Paraboloid cable net membrane roof, J. Acoust. Australia, 2017, 45 (2), 421-443.10.1007/s40857-017-0092-9Search in Google Scholar
[4] Rizzo F., Zazzini P., Improving the acoustical properties of an elliptical plan space with a cable net membrane roof, J. Acoust. Australia, 2016, 44, 449-456.10.1007/s40857-016-0072-5Search in Google Scholar
[5] Kawai H., Yoshie R., Wind-induced response of a large cantilevered roof., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1999, 83, 263-275.10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00077-XSearch in Google Scholar
[6] Letchford C.W., Killen G.P., Equivalent static wind loads for cantilevered grandstand roofs. Eng. Struct., 2002, 24(2), 207-217.10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00085-2Search in Google Scholar
[7] Letchford C.W., Denoon R.O., Johnson G., Mallam A., Dynamic characteristics of cantilever grandstand roofs, Eng. Struct., 2002, 24(8), 1085-1090.10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00035-4Search in Google Scholar
[8] Killen G.P., Letchford C.W., A parametric study of wind loads on grandstand roofs, Eng. Struct., 2001, 23(6), 725-735.10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00069-9Search in Google Scholar
[9] Kimoto E., Kawamura S., Aerodynamic criteria of hanging roofs for structural Design, Proc. IASS Symposium, Osaka, 1986, 249-256.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Kimoto E., Kawamura S., Aerodynamic behavior of one-way type hanging roofs, J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1983, 13(1-3), 395-405.10.1016/0167-6105(83)90159-9Search in Google Scholar
[11] Zhang Z., Tamura Y., Wind Tunnel Test on Cable Dome of Geiger Type., J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn., 2007, 2(3): 218-224.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Forster B., Cable and membrane roofs, a historical survey, Struct. Eng. Rev.,1994, 6,3-5.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Lewis W.J..Tension structures: form and behavior, Thomas Telford, London, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
[14] Majowiecki M., Tensostrutture: Progetto e Verifica, Crea, Milano (in Italian), 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[15] Novak M., Kassem M., Free Vibration of Light Roofs Backed by Cavities., J. Eng. Mech. Div., 1990, 116(3), 549-564.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:3(549)Search in Google Scholar
[16] Rizzo F., D’Asdia P., Lazzari M., Procino L., Wind action evaluation on tension roofs of hyperbolic paraboloid shape, Eng. Struct., 2011, 33 (2), 445-461.10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.001Search in Google Scholar
[17] Rizzo F., Barbato M., Sepe V., 2018. Peak factor statistics of wind effects for hyperbolic paraboloid roofs, Eng. Struct., 173, 313-330.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.106Search in Google Scholar
[18] Rizzo F., Sepe V., Ricciardelli F., Avossa A. M., Wind pressures on a large span canopy roof, Wind Struct., 2020, 30(2): 299-316.Search in Google Scholar
[19] CNR (National Research Council of Italy), CNR-DT207/2018, Guide for the Assessment of Wind Actions and Effects on Structures, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
[20] AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan), Recommendations for Loads on Buildings, Chapter 6: Wind Loads, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[21] ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineering), Wind tunnel studies of buildings and structures, N. Isyumov, Ed., Manuals of Practice (MOP) 67, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
[22] ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineering), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7:2010, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[23] AS/NZS (Standards Australia / Standards New Zealand), Structural design actions; Part 2: Wind actions. AS/NZS 1170.2:2002, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[24] NRC/CNRC (National Research Council / Conseil National de Recherches Canada), Commentary to the National Building Code of Canada, Commentary I: Wind Load and Effects, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[25] CEN (Comité Européen de Normalization), Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions, EN-1991-1-4, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[26] Australian/New Zealand Standard, Structural design actions; Part 2: Wind actions, AS/NZS 1170.2:2002.C.W, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
[27] Krishna P., Kumar K., Bhandari N.M., Wind Loads on Buildings and Structures. Indian Standard IS:875, Part 3, Proposed Draft & Commentary, Bendat, J.S., Piersol, A.G., 2000. Random data analysis and measurement procedures, (3rd edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[28] CEN (Comité Européen de Normalization). EN1991-1-4: Eurocode1: Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[29] SIA (Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects). Action on structures – Appendix C: Force and pressure factors for wind, SIA 261:2003, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Ueda H., Hibi K., Tamura Y., Fujii K., Multi-channel simultaneous fluctuating pressure measurement system and its application., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1994, 51, 1, 93-104.10.1016/0167-6105(94)90079-5Search in Google Scholar
[31] Holmes, J. D., Analysis and synthesis of pressure fluctuations on bluff bodies using eigenvectors., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1990, 33, 219-230.10.1016/0167-6105(90)90037-DSearch in Google Scholar
[32] Tamura Y., Kareem E. A., CERMAK, J. E., Pressure fluctuations on a square building mode in boundary-layer flows., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1984 16, 17-41.10.1016/0167-6105(84)90047-3Search in Google Scholar
[33] Cook N.J., Mayne J.R., A novel working approach to the assessment of wind loads for equivalent static design., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1979, 4(2), 149-164.10.1016/0167-6105(79)90043-6Search in Google Scholar
[34] Cook N.J., Mayne J.R., A refined working approach to the assessment of wind loads for equivalent static design, J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1980, 6(1-2), 125-137.10.1016/0167-6105(80)90026-4Search in Google Scholar
[35] Cook N.J., Calibration of the quasi-static and peak-factor approaches to the assessment of wind loads against the method of Cook and Mayne., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1982, 10(3), 315-341.10.1016/0167-6105(82)90005-8Search in Google Scholar
[36] Cook N.J., The designer’s guide to wind loading of building structures, Part 1: Background, damage survey, wind data and structural classification, Building Research Establishment, Butter-worths, U.K, 1985.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Cook N.J., The designer’s guide to wind loading of building structures, Part 2: Static structures, Building Research Establishment, Butterworths, U.K, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
[38] Tamura Y., Yoshida A., Zhang L., Ito T., Nakata S., Examples of modal identification of structures in Japan by FDD and MRD techniques. Proceedings of the EACWE4 — The Fourth European & African Conference on Wind Engineering J. Naprstek & C. Fischer (eds); ITAM AS CR, Prague, 11-15 July, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Tamura Y., Ueda H., Kikuchi H., Hibi K., Suganuma S., Bienkiewicz B., Proper orthogonal decomposition study of approach wind-building pressure correlation, In: Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. Wind Eng., Retrospect and Prospect, 1995, (4), 2115-2126.Search in Google Scholar
[40] Tamura Y., An introduction of applying proper orthogonal decomposition to random fields, J. Wind Eng., Trans. Japan Assoc. Wind Eng., 1995, 65, 33-41 (in Japanese).10.5359/jawe.1995.65_33Search in Google Scholar
[41] Bienkiewicz B., Ham H.J., Proper orthogonal decomposition of roof pressure., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1993, 50, 193-202.10.1016/0167-6105(93)90074-XSearch in Google Scholar
[42] Bienkiewicz B., Tamura Y., Ham H.J., Ueda H., Hibi K., Proper orthogonal decomposition and reconstruction of multi-channel roof pressure., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1995, 54-55, 369-381.10.1016/0167-6105(94)00066-MSearch in Google Scholar
[43] Kikuchi H., Tamura Y., Ueda H., Hibi K., Dynamic wind pressures acting on a tall building model proper orthogonal decomposition., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1997, 69-71, 631-646.10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00193-1Search in Google Scholar
[44] Armitt J., Eigenvector analysis of pressure fluctuations on the West Burton instrumented cooling tower, Central Electricity Research Laboratories (U.K.) Internal Report RD/L/N 114/68, 1968.Search in Google Scholar
[45] Best R.J., Holmes J.D., Use of eigenvalues in the covariance integration method for determination of wind load elects., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1983, 13, 359-370.10.1016/0167-6105(83)90156-3Search in Google Scholar
[46] Matlab software, Mathwork documentation, https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
[47] Holmes J.D., Optimised peak load distributions., J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1992, 41-44, 267-276.10.1016/0167-6105(92)90419-BSearch in Google Scholar
[48] Holmes J.D., Denoon R., Kwok K.C.S., Glanville M.J., Wind loading and response of large stadium roofs, In: Proc. of the IASS Int. Symp. Shell and Spatial Structures, Singapore, 10-14 November 1997, 317-324.Search in Google Scholar
[49] Isyumov N., Poole M., Wind induced torque on square and rectangular building shapes., J. Eng. Industr. Aerodyn., 1984, 13, 183-196.10.1016/B978-0-444-42340-5.50024-5Search in Google Scholar
[50] Lee B.E., The elects of turbulence on the surface pressure field of a square prism, J. Fluid Mech., 1975, 69, 263-282.10.1017/S0022112075001437Search in Google Scholar
[51] Rizzo F., Caracoglia L., Artificial Neural Network model to predict the flutter velocity of suspension bridges, Comp. Struct., 2020, 233, 106236.10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106236Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Fabio Rizzo et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
