Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 12, 2017

A local regularity theorem for mean curvature flow with triple edges

  • Felix Schulze EMAIL logo and Brian White

Abstract

Mean curvature flow of clusters of n-dimensional surfaces in n+k that meet in triples at equal angles along smooth edges and higher order junctions on lower-dimensional faces is a natural extension of classical mean curvature flow. We call such a flow a mean curvature flow with triple edges. We show that if a smooth mean curvature flow with triple edges is weakly close to a static union of three n-dimensional unit density half-planes, then it is smoothly close. Extending the regularity result to a class of integral Brakke flows, we show that this implies smooth short-time existence of the flow starting from an initial surface cluster that has triple edges, but no higher order junctions.

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-1440140

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-1404282

Funding statement: The research of the first author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1440140 while the author was in residence at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley, California during the Spring 2016 semester. The research of the second author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1404282.

A Initial regularity

We verify that any local solution to Brakke flow, which can be written as the graph of a C1-function and has smooth initial data, is actually locally smooth and attains its initial data smoothly. We work again with parabolic Cq,α-spaces.

Theorem A.1.

Let U:=B1(0)Rn and assume that u:U×[0,1)Rk is C1,α and that graph(u) defines a unit density Brakke flow. If u(,0):URk is smooth, then u:U×[0,b)Rk is smooth.

Proof.

Let the nonparametric equation for mean curvature flow be given by

tu=Q(u,Du,Du2).

We extend u to U×(-1,1) by setting

u(x,t)=u(x,0)+tQ(u(x,0),Du(x,0),D2u(x,0))

for t<0. Note that since u(,0) is smooth, u is smooth on U×(-1,0] and C1,α on U×(-1,1). The graph of u(,t) does not anymore constitute a Brakke flow for t(-1,1), but it does so with transport term as follows: For xn+k write x=(x,x′′) where xn,x′′k and let f:U×(-1,1)k be defined by

f(x,t)=Q(u(x,0),Du(x,0),D2u(x,0))-Q(u(x,t),Du(x,t),D2u(x,t))

for t0 and f(x,t)=0 otherwise. Note that f is C0,α on U×(-1,1). Then graph(u) constitutes a Brakke flow with transport term as considered in [18]. We can thus apply [18, Theorem 6.3] (with g=0) to see that u is C2,α on U×(-1,1). Therefore u is C2,α on U×[0,1). Now by standard parabolic PDE theory, u is smooth on U×[0,1). ∎

Remark A.2.

The same proof shows that if the assumption u(,0) is smooth is relaxed to u(,0) is in Cq,α for q4, then u is Cq,α on U×[0,1).

Corollary A.3.

Let U:=B1(0)Rn and assume that

u:U×[0,1)k

is C1(U×[0,1))C(U×(0,1)) and that graph(u) defines a unit density Brakke flow. If u(,0):URk is smooth, then u:U×[0,b)Rk is smooth.

Proof.

To apply Theorem A.1, we need to show that u is C1,α on U×[0,1). First note that for higher codimension mean curvature flow, balls of radius R(t)=(R0-2nt) still act as barriers. Thus we can adapt the final barrier argument in [5, Section 9.11] to show that uC1,1(U×[0,1)). ∎

Remark A.4.

It suffices to assume that uC1(U×[0,1)) since Brakke’s local regularity theorem [2] (or alternatively [18]) implies that u is smooth for t>0. By the proof of Proposition 5.3, this even extends to unit regular Brakke flows: the initial surface is attained locally in C1 and thus the higher initial regularity extends.

References

[1] U. Abresch and J. Langer, The normalized curve shortening flow and homothetic solutions, J. Differential Geom. 23 (1986), no. 2, 175–196. 10.4310/jdg/1214440025Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. A. Brakke, The motion of a surface by its mean curvature, Math. Notes 20, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1978. Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Bronsard and F. Reitich, On three-phase boundary motion and the singular limit of a vector-valued Ginzburg–Landau equation, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 124 (1993), no. 4, 355–379. 10.1007/BF00375607Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. Depner, H. Garcke and Y. Kohsaka, Mean curvature flow with triple junctions in higher space dimensions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 211 (2014), no. 1, 301–334. 10.1007/s00205-013-0668-ySearch in Google Scholar

[5] N. Edelen, The free-boundary brakke flow, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03614. 10.1515/crelle-2017-0053Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Freire, Mean curvature motion of graphs with constant contact angle at a free boundary, Anal. PDE 3 (2010), no. 4, 359–407. 10.2140/apde.2010.3.359Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Freire, Mean curvature motion of triple junctions of graphs in two dimensions, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), no. 2, 302–327. 10.1080/03605300903419775Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Ilmanen, Elliptic regularization and partial regularity for motion by mean curvature, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1994), no. 520. 10.1090/memo/0520Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. Ilmanen, A. Neves and F. Schulze, On short time existence for the planar network flow, preprint (2014), https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4756. 10.4310/jdg/1547607687Search in Google Scholar

[10] L. Kim and Y. Tonegawa, On the mean curvature flow of grain boundaries, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 67 (2017), no. 1, 43–142. 10.5802/aif.3077Search in Google Scholar

[11] D. Kinderlehrer, L. Nirenberg and J. Spruck, Regularity in elliptic free boundary problems, J. Anal. Math. 34 (1978), 86–119. 10.1007/BF02790009Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Krummel, Regularity of minimal hypersurfaces with a common free boundary, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 51 (2014), no. 3–4, 525–537. 10.1007/s00526-013-0685-6Search in Google Scholar

[13] B. Krummel, Regularity of minimal submanifolds and mean curvature flows with a common free boundary, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08036. 10.1080/03605302.2019.1611848Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Mantegazza, M. Novaga and V. M. Tortorelli, Motion by curvature of planar networks, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 3 (2004), no. 2, 235–324. 10.2422/2036-2145.2004.2.01Search in Google Scholar

[15] L. Simon, Cylindrical tangent cones and the singular set of minimal submanifolds, J. Differential Geom. 38 (1993), no. 3, 585–652. 10.4310/jdg/1214454484Search in Google Scholar

[16] L. Simon, Schauder estimates by scaling, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 5 (1997), no. 5, 391–407. 10.1007/s005260050072Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. E. Taylor, Regularity of the singular sets of two-dimensional area-minimizing flat chains modulo 3 in 3, Invent. Math. 22 (1973), 119–159. 10.1007/BF01392299Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Tonegawa, A second derivative Hölder estimate for weak mean curvature flow, Adv. Calc. Var. 7 (2014), no. 1, 91–138. 10.1515/acv-2013-0104Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Tonegawa and N. Wickramasekera, The blow up method for Brakke flows: Networks near triple junctions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 221 (2016), no. 3, 1161–1222. 10.1007/s00205-016-0981-3Search in Google Scholar

[20] B. White, Existence of least-energy configurations of immiscible fluids, J. Geom. Anal. 6 (1996), no. 1, 151–161. 10.1007/BF02921571Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. White, Stratification of minimal surfaces, mean curvature flows, and harmonic maps, J. reine angew. Math. 488 (1997), 1–35. Search in Google Scholar

[22] B. White, A local regularity theorem for mean curvature flow, Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), no. 3, 1487–1519. 10.4007/annals.2005.161.1487Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-06-09
Revised: 2017-08-24
Published Online: 2017-11-12
Published in Print: 2020-01-01

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2017-0044/html
Scroll to top button