Abstract
Three claims are advocated in this article. Firstly, the article suggests that there is no relevant “sameness approach,” which would advise reading fiction and non-fiction similarly. Secondly, it argues that both fiction and non-fiction exhibit multiple functions and cannot be reduced to the binary setting of informing or entertaining. Thirdly, it suggests that the continuity thesis does not imply sameness. By applying the fundamental logical distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions, one can accept major similarities between the resources of reading fiction and non-fiction without ever presuming their sameness. These claims are considered by first revisiting the histories of narratology and the narrative social research and then discussing M. A. K. Halliday’s systemic-functional language theory.
Acknowledgement
I am grateful for the Academy of Finland research project (2509730) Voices of democracy for supporting my work with this article.
References
Abbott, H. Porter. 2002. The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Andersson, Greger & Tommy Sandberg. 2018. Sameness versus difference in narratology: Two approaches to narrative fiction. Narrative 26(3). 241–261.10.1353/nar.2018.0012Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1991. The art of rhetoric (H. C. Lawson-Tancered trans.). London: Penguin Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays (Vern W. McGee trans.). Austin: Texas University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael (ed.). 1997 a. Oral versions of personal experience: Three decades of narrative analysis. [Special Issue]. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4).10.1075/jnlh.7.1-4Search in Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael. 1997 b. Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4). 335–342.10.1075/jnlh.7.42posSearch in Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael. 2004. Positioning with Davie Hogan. Stories, Tellings, and Identities. In Colette Daiute and Cynthia Lightfoot (eds.), Narrative analysis. Studying the development of individuals in society, 135–157. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781412985246.n23Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, Julian. 2016. The noise of time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. In Stephen Heath (ed.), Image, music, text. Roland Barthes, 79–124. New York: Hill and Wang. [Original edition, 1966.]10.1007/978-1-349-03518-2Search in Google Scholar
Bertaux, Daniel (ed.). 1981. Biography and society. The life history approach in the social sciences. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1990. Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymor. 1978. Story and discourse. Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Coetzee, J.M. 1999. Elizabeth Costello. London: Vintage Random House.Search in Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 2015. Narrative and identities. In Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.) The handbook of narrative analysis, 351–368. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118458204.ch18Search in Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. How to get a grip on identities-in-interaction. (What) does “positioning” offer more than “membership categorization”? Evidence from a mock story. Narrative Inquiry 23(1). 62–88.10.1075/ni.23.1.04depSearch in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a “natural” narratology. London: Routledge.10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2005. Histories on narrative theory (II): From structuralism to the present. In James Phelan & Peter J. Rabinowitz (eds.), A companion to narrative theory, 36–59. Malden, Ma.: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405114769.2005.00004.xSearch in Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1980. Narrative discourse (Jane E. Lewin trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small Stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.8Search in Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2015. Small stories research. Methods-analysis-outreach. In Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, 255–271. Chichester: John Wiley.10.1002/9781118458204.ch13Search in Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2017. Narrative/life of the moment. From telling a story to taking a narrative stance. In Brian Schiff, Elizabeth A. McKim & Sylvie Patron (eds.), Life and narrative: The risks and responsibilities of storying experience, 29–54. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256654.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. Victoria: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Hatavara, Mari, Matti Hyvärinen & Lars-Christer Hydén. 2013. Introduction, or another story of narrative. In Matti Hyvärinen, Mari Hatavara & Lars-Christer Hydén (eds.), The travelling concepts of narrative, 1–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sin.18Search in Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2009. Basic elements of narrative. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444305920Search in Google Scholar
Hyvärinen, Matti. 2012. Prototypes, genres, and concepts: Travelling with narratives. Narrative works: Issues, investigations & interventions 2(1). 10–32.Search in Google Scholar
Hyvärinen, Matti. 2015. Analyzing narrative genres. In Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, 178–193. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9781118458204.ch9Search in Google Scholar
Hyvärinen, Matti, Mari Hatavara & Hanna Rautajoki. 2019. Kerronta, asemointi ja haastattelun analyysi [Narration, positioning and the analysis of interviews]. Sosiologia 56(1). 6–25.Search in Google Scholar
Kafka, Franz, Richie Robertson & Joyce Crick. 2009. The metamorphosis and other stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures past: On the semantics of historical time (Keith Tribe trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. [1967] 1997. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4). 3–38.10.1075/jnlh.7.02narSearch in Google Scholar
Langellier, Kristin M. & Eric E. Peterson. 2004. Storytelling in daily life. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Search in Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd edn.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar
McEwan, Ian. 2014. The children act. New York: Nan A, Talese/Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar
Meretoja, Hanna. 2014. The narrative turn in fiction and theory. Houndmills: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137401069Search in Google Scholar
Meretoja, Hanna. 2018. The ethics of storytelling. Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O. 1987. Historical understanding (Brian Fay, Eugene O. Golob & Richard T. Vann ed.). Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas. 1988. Formalism and narrative semiotics. Poetics Today 9(3). 593–606.10.2307/1772734Search in Google Scholar
Phelan, James. 2005. Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Phelan, James & Peter J. Rabinowitz. 1994. Introduction: Understanding narrative. In James Phelan & Peter J. Rabinowitz (eds.), Understanding narrative, 11–15. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pikkanen, Ilona. 2012. Casting the ideal past. A narratological close reading of Eliel Aspelin-Haapkylä’s history of the Finnish Theatre Company (1906–1910) (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1797). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca & Pang Ching Bobby Chen. 2012. Narrative and social movements. In Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ronald N. Jacobs & Philip Smith (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology, 487–506. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 2002. Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies 4(4). 539–542.10.1177/14614456020040040901Search in Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 2004. Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice, 200–221. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1968. Morphology of the folktale (Lawrence Scott trans.) (2nd edn.). Austin: University of Texas Press.10.7560/783911Search in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Time and narrative 1 (Kathleen McLaughlin & David Pellauer trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Riessman, Catherine Kohler. 1990. Divorce talk: Women and men make sense of personal relationships. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397Search in Google Scholar
Sebald, W.G. 1998 [1995]. The rings of Saturn (Michael Hulse trans.). London: The Harvill Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sebald, W.G. 2001. Austerlitz (Anthea Bell trans.). London: Hamish Hamilton.Search in Google Scholar
Skalin, Lars-Åke. 2017. Turning life into stories – turning stories into lives. In Brian Schiff, Elizabeth A. McKim & Sylvie Patron (eds.), Life and narrative: The risks and responsibilities of storying experience, 120–136. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256654.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1988. Language and social change. In James Tully (ed.), Meaning and context: Quentin Skinner and his critics, 119–132. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2002. “Natural” and “contrived” data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse studies 4 (4). 511–525.10.1177/1461445602004004027Search in Google Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2008. Natural and contrived data. In Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman & Julia Brannen (eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods, 290–312. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446212165.n17Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. 2004. Against narrativity. Ratio (New Series) XVII (4). 428–452.10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00264.xSearch in Google Scholar
Walsh, Richard. 2007. The rhetoric of fictionality. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, Richard. 2010. Person, level, voice: A rhetorical reconsideration. In Jan Alber & Monika Fludernik (eds.), Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses, 35–57. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1981. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), On narrative, 1–23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992. Issues of text typology: Narrative – a “basic” type of text? Text 12. 293–310.10.1515/text.1.1992.12.2.293Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
