Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 24, 2020

Contraception use: is everything played at first intercourse?

  • Marion Meuwly , Yara Barrense-Dias , Diane Auderset and Joan-Carles Surís EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objectives

The rate of condom and other contraception use varies depending on social, personal and sexual characteristics. We present a study covering various contraceptive means, considering sexual orientation and considering a large panel of co-variables among Swiss resident young adults.

Methods

Data were obtained from a self-administrated national survey on sexual behavior. Participants (N=4703, 49% males) were divided into three groups based on the mean of contraception used at last intercourse: CONDOM (55.1, 54.3% males), CONTRACEPTIVE (34.3, 43.1% males) and NON-USE (10.5, 50.7% males). By gender, groups were compared on sociodemographic and personal characteristics, contraception used at first intercourse (FI) and sexual life.

Results

Globally, 90% of participants used a reliable contraception at last intercourse. Compared to the CONDOM group, participants in the CONTRACEPTIVE group were more likely to have already used a contraceptive at FI, and individuals in the NON-USE group were more likely to have had a non-use or to have used a contraceptive only at FI.

Conclusions

Contraception at FI seems to have a considerable impact on the further use of contraception. It seems thus essential to make all necessary efforts in order to promote the best contraception and protection at FI.


Corresponding author: Professor Joan-Carles Suris, MD, MPH, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Research Group on Adolescent Health, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Phone: +41 21 314 73 75, E-mail:

Funding source: Swiss National Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: 162538

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation [grant 162538]. The sponsor source had no role in the study design, collection of data, data analysis and interpretation of results, the writing of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: All authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

  4. Ethical approval: The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the canton of Vaud (CER-VD).

References

1. Mandira Paul, SC, Light, Ben, Anneka Knutsson of UNFPA, Adesegun Fatusi of the Guttmacher Institute. Contraception for adolescents and youth. Being responsive to their sexual and reproductive health needs and rights. Issue paper. UNFPA 2019.Search in Google Scholar

2. Noar, SM, Cole, C, Carlyle, K. Condom use measurement in 56 studies of sexual risk behavior: review and recommendations. Arch Sex Behav 2006;35:327–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9028-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. World Health Organization (WHO). Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Global AIDS response progress reporting 2015. Geneva: WHO; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

4. Moreira, LR, Dumith, SC, Paludo, SDS. Condom use in last sexual intercourse among undergraduate students: how many are using them and who are they? Ciencia Saude Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro 2018;23:1255–66. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018234.16492016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Gremy, I, Beltzer, N. HIV risk and condom use in the adult heterosexual population in France between 1992 and 2001: return to the starting point? AIDS (Lond) 2004;18:805–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200403260-00013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Klavs, I, Rodrigues, LC, Wellings, K, Weiss, HA, Hayes, R. Increased condom use at sexual debut in the general population of Slovenia and association with subsequent condom use. AIDS (Lond) 2005;19:1215–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000176223.78979.26.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Shafii, T, Stovel, K, Holmes, K. Association between condom use at sexual debut and subsequent sexual trajectories: a longitudinal study using biomarkers. Am J Publ Health 2007;97:1090–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.068437.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Barrense-Dias, Y, Akre, C, Berchtold, A, Leeners, B, Morselli, D, Suris Granell, J-C. Sexual health and behavior of young people in Switzerland (Raison de santé 291). Lausanne: Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

9. Martyn, KK, Saftner, MA, Darling-Fisher, CS, Schell, MC. Sexual risk assessment using event history calendars with male and female adolescents. J Pediatr Health Care 2013;27:460–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2012.05.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Morselli, D, Berchtold, A, Suris Granell, J-C, Berchtold, A. On-line life history calendar and sensitive topics. A Pilot Study 2016;58:141–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.068.Search in Google Scholar

11. Apter, D. Contraception options: aspects unique to adolescent and young adult. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;48:115–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2016. Atlanta: U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

13. Coker, TR, Austin, SB, Schuster, MA. The health and health care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Annu Rev Publ Health 2010;31:457–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103636.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Priebe, G, Svedin, CG. Operationalization of three dimensions of sexual orientation in a national survey of late adolescents. J Sex Res 2013;50:727–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.713147.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Workowski, KA, Bolan, GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Recommendations and reports: MMWR Recomm Rep (Morb Mortal Wkly Rep) 2015;64:1–137. 2015.10.1086/342100Search in Google Scholar

16. Low, N, Broutet, N, Adu-Sarkodie, Y, Barton, P, Hossain, M, Hawkes, S. Global control of sexually transmitted infections. Lancet 2006;368:2001–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69482-8.Search in Google Scholar

17. Wigginton, B, Harris, ML, Loxton, D, Lucke, J. Who takes responsibility for contraception, according to young Australian women? Sexual & reproductive healthcare. Off J Swed Assoc Midwives 2018;15:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2017.11.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Smith, JL, Fenwick, J, Skinner, R, Merriman, G, Hallett, J. Young males’ perspectives on pregnancy, fatherhood and condom use: where does responsibility for birth control lie? Sexual & reproductive healthcare. Off J Swed Assoc Midwives 2011;2:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2010.10.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Ekstrand, M, Tydén, T, Darj, E, Larsson, M. Preventing pregnancy: a girls’ issue. Seventeen-year-old Swedish boys’ perceptions on abortion, reproduction and use of contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care: Off J Eur Soc Contracept 2007;12:111–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625180701201145.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Brown, S. They think it’s all up to the girls’ : gender, risk and responsibility for contraception. Cult Health Sex 2015;17:312–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.950983.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Wong, T, Singh, A, Mann, J, Hansen, L, McMahon, S. Gender differences in bacterial STIs in Canada. BMC Wom Health 2004;4(1 Suppl):S26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-4-s1-s26.Search in Google Scholar

22. van Wersch, A, Eberhardt, J, Stringer, F. Attitudes towards the male contraceptive pill: psychosocial and cultural explanations for delaying a marketable product. Basic Clin Androl 2012;22:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12610-012-0185-4.Search in Google Scholar

23. Amory, JK. Male contraception. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1303–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Pinter, B, Hakim, M, Seidman, DS, Kubba, A, Kishen, M, Di Carlo, C. Religion and family planning. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2016;21:486–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1237631.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Baggaley, RF, Dimitrov, D, Owen, BN, Pickles, M, Butler, AR, Masse, B, et al. Heterosexual anal intercourse: a neglected risk factor for HIV? Am J Reprod Immunol (New York, NY; 1989) 2013;69(1 Suppl):95–105.10.1111/aji.12064Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Abel, G, Fitzgerald, L. ‘When you come to it you feel like a dork asking a guy to put a condom on’: is sex education addressing young people’s understandings of risk? Sex Educ 2006;6:105–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810600578750.Search in Google Scholar

27. Takemoto, MLS, Menezes, MO, Polido, CBA, Santos, DS, Leonello, VM, Magalhaes, CG, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis among lesbian women: systematic review and recommendations to improve care. Cad Saúde Pública 2019;35: e00118118. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00118118.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Muzny, CA, Harbison, HS, Pembleton, ES, Hook, EW, Austin, EL. Misperceptions regarding protective barrier method use for safer sex among African-American women who have sex with women. Sex Health 2013;10:138–41. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh12106.Search in Google Scholar

29. Baggaley, RF, White, RG, Boily, MC. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:1048–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq057.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Owen, BN, Brock, PM, Butler, AR, Pickles, M, Brisson, M, Baggaley, RF, et al. Prevalence and frequency of heterosexual anal intercourse among young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav 2015;19:1338–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-0997-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Jorgensen, MJ, Maindal, HT, Christensen, KS, Olesen, F, Andersen, B. Sexual behaviour among young Danes aged 15-29 years: a cross-sectional study of core indicators. Sex Transm Infect 2015;91:171–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051814.10.1136/sextrans-2014-051814Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2020-04-03
Accepted: 2020-06-02
Published Online: 2020-08-24

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2020-0061/html
Scroll to top button