Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 29, 2019

Leaving No one Behind: Some Conceptual and Empirical Issues

  • Stephan Klasen ORCID logo and Marc Fleurbaey EMAIL logo

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the conceptual and empirical issues involved in the overarching goal of “leaving no one behind” (LNOB). After reviewing some existing documents on the topic, it proposes ways to operationalize LNOB, discusses whether to take a country-focused or person-focused approach, examines various (multidimensional) ways to measure those who are left behind, argues for grounding LNOB on intrinsic and instrumental reasons, suggests ways to identify those at risk of being left behind, and discusses difficult trade-offs with other SDGs for an agenda focused on LNOB.

JEL Classification: D63; I38

Acknowledgment

We thank the Editor for very helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Adler, M. 2016. “Extended Preferences.” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by Matthew Adler and Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245797.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alkire, S. 2016. “The Capability Approach and Well-Being Measurement for Public Policy.” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by Matthew Adler and Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.18Search in Google Scholar

Alkire, S., and J. Foster. 2011. Understandings and Misunderstandings of Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. OPHI Working Paper 43.10.1007/s10888-011-9181-4Search in Google Scholar

ATD. 2013. Breaking the Silence. New York: ATD Fourth World.Search in Google Scholar

Bourguignon. 2015. The Globalization of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99: 906–944.10.1086/293126Search in Google Scholar

Decancq, Koen, and Dirk Neumann. 2016. “Does the Choice of Well-Being Measure Matter Empirically?” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by Matthew Adler and Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.22Search in Google Scholar

Decancq, Koen, Marc Fleurbaey, and Erik Schokkaert. 2015. “Happiness, Equivalent Incomes, and Respect for Individual Preferences.” Economica 82: 1082–1106.10.1111/ecca.12152Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. 1981. “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 283–345.10.4324/9781315199795-7Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2008. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199215911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2016. “Equivalent Income.” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by Matthew Adler and Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., and D. Blanchet. 2013. Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199767199.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Klasen, S. 2008. “Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction: Measurement Issues in Income and Non-Income Dimensions.” World Development 36 (3): 420–445.10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008Search in Google Scholar

Klasen, Stephan, Nathalie Scholl, Rahul Lahoti, Sophie Ochmann, and Sebastian Vollmer. 2016. Inequality – Worldwide Trends and Current Debates, No 209, Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth – Discussion Papers, Courant Research Centre PEG, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:got:gotcrc:209.Search in Google Scholar

Klasen, Stephan, Giovanni Andrea Cornia, Rebeca Grynspan, Luis Felipe Lopez-Calva, Nora Lustig, Augustin Fosu, Sripad Motiram, Flora Myamba, Andreas Peichl, Sanjay Reddy, Eldar Shafir, Ana Sojo, and Ingrid Woolard. 2018. “Economic Inequality and Social Progress.” In Rethinking Society for the 21st Century, edited by IPSP. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lo Bue, M. C., and S. Klasen. 2013. “Identifying Synergies and Complementarities between MDGs: Results from Cluster Analysis.” Social Indicators Research 113 (2): 647–670.10.1007/s11205-013-0294-ySearch in Google Scholar

Mack, Elke, Michael Schramm, Stephan Klasen, and Thomas Pogge. 2009. Absolute Poverty and Global Justice: Empirical Data – Moral Theories – Initiatives. London: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–147.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.xSearch in Google Scholar

Naraya, Deepa, Raj Patel, Kai Schafft, Anne Rademacher, and Sarah Koch-Schulte. 2000. Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear us? New York: Oxford University Press.10.1596/0-1952-1601-6Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841286Search in Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, and Scott Wisor. 2016. “Measuring Poverty: A Proposal.” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by Matthew Adler and Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.20Search in Google Scholar

Ravallion. 1998. Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice. Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper No. 133. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-4226-6Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar

Roemer, J. E. 1998. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042872Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 1974. “Complementarity-An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory,” Journal of Economic Literature 12 (4): 1255–1289.Search in Google Scholar

Sen. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Shafir, E. 2016. “Inconsistent Preferences.” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by Matthew Adler and Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, F. 2008. Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict. Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Sumner, A. 2012. Where Do the World’s Poor Live? A New Update. IDS Working Paper, Issue 393, pp. 1–27.Search in Google Scholar

UN Statistical Commission. 2016. Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

UN. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

UN. 2016. Global Sustainable Development Report 2016, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

UN Chief Executives Board. 2016. Equality and Non-Discrimination at the Heart of Sustainable Development: A Shared United Nations Framework for Action. Report of the High-level Committee on Programmes at its Thirty-Second Session. New York: UN CEB/2016/6/Add.1.Search in Google Scholar

UNDP. 2014. Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience, Human Development Report 2014. New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2006. Equity and Development. World Development Report.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-29

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgd-2018-0045/html
Scroll to top button