Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 16, 2016

Analytical Evaluation of the Effect of Cross-Polarization-induced Crosstalk on the BER Performance of a PDM-QPSK Coherent Homodyne Optical Transmission System

  • K. A. Taher EMAIL logo and S. P. Majumder

Abstract

An analytical approach is developed to find the effect of cross-polarization (XPol)-induced crosstalk on the bit error rate (BER) performance of a polarization division multiplex (PDM) quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) optical transmission system with polarization diversity receiver. Analytical expression for the XPol-induced crosstalk and signal to crosstalk plus noise ratio (SCNR) are developed at the output of polarization diversity PDM-QPSK coherent optical homodyne receiver conditioned on a given value of mean misalignment angle. Considering Maxwellian distribution for the pdf of the misalignment angle, the average SCNR and average BER are derived. Results show that there is significant deterioration in the BER performance and power penalty due to XPol-induced crosstalk. Penalties in signal power are found to be 8.85 dB, 11.28 dB and 12.59 dB correspondingly for LO laser power of −10 dBm, −5 dBm and 0 dBm at a data rate of 100 Gbps, mean misalignment angle of 7.5 degree and BER of 10−9 compared to the signal power without crosstalk.

Acknowledgment

The work is carried out as a part of Ph. D. dissertation in the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

References

1. Ezra I, Alan PT, Daniel JF, Joseph KM. Coherent detection in optical fiber system. Opt Express 2008;16:753–91.10.1364/OE.16.000753Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Bottacchi S, Beling A, Matiss A, Nielsen ML, Steffan AG, Unterb G, et al. Advanced photoreceivers for high-speed optical fiber transmission systems. IEEE J Sel Topics Quantum Electron 2010;16:1099–112.10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2042283Search in Google Scholar

3. Rasmussen JC, Hoshida T, Tanimura T, Nakashima H, Oda S, Tao Z, et al. Advances in coherent detection algorithms. Proc SPIE 2011;7960:796002-1–10.10.1117/12.881627Search in Google Scholar

4. Wree C, Hecker-Denschlag N, Gottwald E, Krummrich P, Leibrich J, Schmidt ED, et al. High spectral efficiency 1.6-b/s/Hz transmission (8 40 Gb/s with a 25-GHz grid) over 200-km SSMF using RZ-DQPSK and polarization multiplexing. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2003;15:1303–5.10.1109/LPT.2003.816119Search in Google Scholar

5. Murata K, Saida T, Sano K, Ogawa I, Fukuyama H, Kasahara R, et al. 2100-Gbit/s PDM-QPSK coherent receiver with wide dynamic range and excellent common mode rejection ratio. Opt Express 2011;19:B125–30.10.1364/OE.19.00B125Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Menyuk CR, Marks BS. Interaction of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearity in optical fiber transmission systems. J Lightwave Technol 2006;24:2806–26.10.1109/JLT.2006.875953Search in Google Scholar

7. Karlsson M, Sunnerud H. Effects of nonlinearities on PMD-induced system impairments. J Lightwave Technol 2006;24:4127–37.10.1109/JLT.2006.884200Search in Google Scholar

8. Masayuki M. Polarization-mode dispersion and its mitigation. J Natl Inst Inf Commun Technol 2006;53:46–52.Search in Google Scholar

9. Xie C. Impact of nonlinear and polarization effects in coherent systems. Opt Express 2011;19:B915–30.10.1364/ECOC.2011.We.8.B.1Search in Google Scholar

10. Krummrich PM, Schmidt ED, Weiershausen W, Mattheus A. Field trial results on statistics of fast polarization changes in long haul WDM transmission systems. In OFC/NFOEC 2005; OThT6.10.1109/OFC.2005.193020Search in Google Scholar

11. Woodward SL, Phillips MR, Smith RL. Cross-polarization modulation: theory and experiment of a multiple-wavelength system. OSA 2006;OW115:1–3.10.1109/OFC.2006.215499Search in Google Scholar

12. Winter M, Bunge CA, Setti D, Petermann K. A statistical treatment of cross-polarization modulation in DWDM systems. J Lightwave Technol 2009;27:3739–51.10.1109/JLT.2009.2025394Search in Google Scholar

13. Winter M, Setti PK. Cross-polarization modulation in polarization-division multiplex transmission. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2010;22:538–40.10.1109/LPT.2010.2042164Search in Google Scholar

14. Ghazisaeidi A, Salsi M, Renaudier J, Pardo O, Mardoyan H, Charlet G. Performance analysis of decision-aided nonlinear cross-polarization mitigation algorithm. In ECOC Tech Digest, OSA 2012; We.3.c.2–4.10.1364/ECEOC.2012.We.3.C.2Search in Google Scholar

15. Keerthika SS, Sivanantharaja A, Selvendran S, Mahendran C. Analysis of cross polarization modulation in semiconductor optical amplifier for wavelength conversion. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 2014;5:901–3.Search in Google Scholar

16. Holbrow CH, Galvez E, Parks ME. Photon quantum mechanics and beam splitters. Am J Phys 2002;70:260–5.10.1119/1.1432972Search in Google Scholar

17. Olsson NA. Lightwave systems with optical amplifiers. J Lightwave Technol 1989;7:1071–82.10.1109/50.29634Search in Google Scholar

18. Dar R, Feder M, Mecozzi A, Shtaif M. Properties of nonlinear noise in long, dispersion-uncompensated fiber links. Opt Express 2013;21:25685–99.10.1364/OE.21.025685Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-6-1
Accepted: 2016-6-15
Published Online: 2016-7-16
Published in Print: 2017-5-24

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2016-0072/html
Scroll to top button