Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter December 15, 2016

Antibacterial potential of nanocomposite-based materials – a short review

  • Ewa Karwowska

    The research activity of the author focuses on the field of biotechnology in environmental engineering, microbiology and monitoring of environment quality. Her scientific interests include issues such as bioremediation of petroleum products contaminated soils, the use of biotechnological processes for the removal and recovery of metals from sewage and industrial waste, the phenomena associated with the microbiological contamination of fuels, microbiological air pollution and the influence of newly synthesized nanoproducts on microorganisms.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Nanotechnology Reviews

Abstract

Nanotechnology allows for the development of new types of materials containing antimicrobial properties. Nanocomposite-based products are increasingly applied in medicine, industry and everyday life. Antibacterial features allow the use of nanoproducts in filters for water and air purification, textiles, food packages, medical materials and devices, ceramics, glass, plastics, paints, cosmetics and personal care products. Numerous studies concern the synthesis of novel antimicrobial nanoproducts as well as modification of already existing nanomaterials in order to supply them with antibacterial activity. However, some problems related to the potential emission of nanocomponents into the environment can appear and should be considered.

1 Introduction

The recent development of nanotechnology increases the number of potential applications of synthetic nano-scale materials (nanopowders, nanocomposites, nanofibers, etc.), the products characterized by sizes below 100 nm in at least one dimension [1]. Examples of practical applications [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Potential applications of nanoproducts.

Area of applicationNanoproductsReference
Water treatment systemsAg, Fe3O4, TiO2, carbon nanotubes and nanofibers, zeolites[2], [5], [6], [10], [11]
Air filters and air purifiersAg[2], [7], [11]
TextilesAg, CuO, different metal nano-oxides[2], [3], [7]
Food packages and food protection filmsAg, TiO2, organic nanocomposites[2], [5], [7]
Self cleaning glass and ceramicsTiO2, ZnO, CuO, Ni, Al2O3[2], [6]
PaintsZnO, Ag, CuO, TiO2, Ni[2], [3], [6]
VarnishAg[7]
Cleaners and personal care productsAg[2]
CosmeticsCarbon nanotubes, fullerols,TiO2, ZnO, CuO, Ni[3], [6], [8], [13]
LubricantsCarbon nanotubes[7]
Medical products and devicesAg, CuO, Fe3O4, chitosan[2], [6], [8], [9], [11], [14]
Batteries and catalystsTiO2, ZnO, CuO, Ni, Pd, Pt[6], [7]
Polishing agents, plasticsAg, Al2O3, different metal nano-oxides[3], [7]
BiosensorsCarbon nanotubes, metal nanoparticles, nanowires[4], [12]

Among nanoparticle-based materials, antimicrobially active products have become of particular interest lately. The biocidal or bacteriostatic properties of nano-scaled materials such as fabrics, plastics and metal coated with nano-silver as well as nanocomponents based on titanium dioxide, magnesium oxide, copper and copper oxide, zinc oxide, cadmium selenide/telluride, chitosan and carbon nanotubes have been reported [15], [16]. The antibacterial activity of nanosized metal compounds has also been confirmed in both gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) and gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) [3].

Silver-based nanomaterials are those most frequently used as antibacterial agents. Jastrzębska et al. [17] described the antibacterial activity of nano forms of ionic silver, silver monoxide and metallic silver incorporated into alumina nanopowder. The differences in sensitivity of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria to silver-doped nanocrystalline material was observed by Costescu et al. [18].

The antimicrobially active forms of nanomaterials include salts, oxides, complexes and elemental nanoparticles [19]. Their efficiency is related to the chemical toxicity, small size, and their characteristic shape, which allows them to damage a cell membrane [6]. Nanoparticles can negatively influence the structure of cell membranes including disturbances in its surface loading and permeability. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is probably the most common mechanism of nanoparticles’ influence on bacteria [20]. The mechanisms responsible for antibacterial activity of nanomaterials at the molecular level are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The main mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of nanoproducts [2], [21], [22], [23].
Figure 1:

The main mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of nanoproducts [2], [21], [22], [23].

Antimicrobial properties of newly developed or modified nanoparticles are usually tested on “model” bacterial strains such as E. coli. The main procedures include a disc diffusion method, turbidity assay and a microdilution method. Several ISO regulations were developed to test the antimicrobial activity of some industrial products, for example, ISO 20743 for textile products and ISO 22196 for plastics and other non-porous materials [24].

2 Antibacterial nanoproducts in medicine

The antibacterial activity of nanoparticle-based materials is helpful in numerous medical applications including implants, wound and burn dressings, medical devices, filters and dental plaque reduction materials [6], [24]. Their potential influence on antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which pose a severe problem in current medical settings, is one of the most essential reasons for application of novel nanocomposites for clinical use [22], [25], [26].

Nanoproducts can be applied as components of coatings for medical devices, modification agents and impregnates for textiles, and “construction” elements for implants, cements and resins (Table 2) [14], [18], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. One example application of Ag-nanoparticles is in antibacterial coatings of external ventricular drains and venous catheters which diminish the threat of potential infections [14].

Table 2:

Examples of applications of nanomaterials in implants and bone cement.

A type of nanomaterialFunction and antibacterial effectReference
Silver-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite nanopowder (Ca10-xAgx )(PO4)6(OH)2Additive in prostheses or implants[18]
Poly(methyl-methacrylate) supplemented with chitosan and quaternary ammonium chitosan derivative nanoparticlesAntibacterially active bone cement allowing to combat joint implant infections (the number of viable cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis decreased a 1000-fold)[27]
Silver/hydroxyapatite nanocompositeAntibacterial bone implants, active against Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus and Issatchenkia orientalis[24]
Hydroksyapatite/silver nanomaterial of the particle size below 10 nmFor limiting implant-related infections, characterized by strong antimicrobial effect accompanied by a very low metal release rate[28]

Numerous medical applications of nanoproducts are based on chitosan and its derivatives (chitosan-carbon dots, chitosan-i-cysteine quantum dots, chitosan-based biosensors and biomarkers) [31] since chitosan nanoproducts have been shown to have potential antimicrobial properties [32]. Chitin- and chitosan-based materials have been proposed for application in scaffolds and wound healing materials. Archana et al. [23] prepared a wound healing film based on chitosan and polyvinylpyrrolidone with an addition of silver oxide nanoparticles which showed significant antibacterial activity towards S. aureus (stronger effect) and E. coli (a less intensive impact). Some newly synthesized chitin/nanosilver composites were characterized by their influence on E. coli and S. aureus, revealing proper blood-clothing capacity [27], [29].

The chitosan-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-TiO2 nanocomposite was proposed as a wound dressing material due to its significant antibacterial impact against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. aureus and B. subtilis and its ability to intensify the wound treatment. The titanium dioxide nanocomponent was suggested to be responsible for the adsorption of bacteria and their inactivation [33].

Srivastava et al. [34] developed a nanocomposite based on chitosan and 4-(ethoxycarbonyl) phenyl-1-amino-oxobutanoic acid supplied with nano-Ag. The obtained nano-film was proposed as a material for application in medicine due to its effect on bacteria including S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa [34].

A potential wound healing nano-based material composed of genipin-crosslinked chitosan, poly(ethylene glycol), zinc oxide and silver produced significant antibacterial activity in tests with E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and B. subtilis [35]. Vimala et al. [36] achieved a significant antimicrobial impact for chitosan films with the addition of silver nanoparticles (12 nm), making them potentially useful in wound dressings also. Li et al. [37] described the antimicrobial effect of the mixture of silver nitrate and titanium dioxide nanoparticles applied on facemasks. During the tests they observed 100% reduction in viable E. coli cells after 48 h.

Singh et al. [38] dispersed magnetic nano-α-Fe2O3 in a chitosan matrix resulting in a magnetic nanocomposite film with potential applications in biosensors and tissue engineering. The antibacterial activity of chitosan-containing composites used for tissue engineering was then confirmed by Archana et al. [39].

Nowadays, it is stressed that nanoparticle production for medical purposes should avoid the usage of highly toxic chemical reagents, especially in the case of Ag-containing materials. Therefore, a “green synthesis approach” is considered. For example, starch-protected Ag nanoparticles can be obtained from aqueous solutions of AgNO3, glucose and starch. These solutions allow the production of nano-Ag films (50–200 nm), Ag hydrosols (20–50 nm) and Ag colloids through the process of Ag(NH3)2+ reduction by carbohydrates. The Ag(NH3)2+ can also be reduced using n-hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide. Irradiation of Ag+ ions is proposed as an alternative “green” method for the creation of Ag-nanoparticles for medicine [11].

Recently, metal nanoclusters have appeared as new functional materials. They consist of several to tens of atoms that result in a particle core size below 2 nm. Ultrasmall metal particles can differ in chemical and physical properties (geometric structure, molecular magnetism, molecular chirality and luminescence) from traditionally used nano-metals. They can also reveal significant antimicrobial properties, making them useful as disinfecting agents [40].

Nanoclusters based on Au, Ag and Cu can be widely applied in medicine and biosensing [41]. The mechanism for the elimination of pathogenic bacteria in the presence of Ag-nanoclusters most likely depends on the generation of ROS according to Zhang et al. [42], while the cellular toxicity of the nanoclusters can be related to the core surface speciation [43]. Their ultrasmall size allows them to achieve a significantly higher surface-to-volume ratio, increasing the antibacterial effect caused by ROS generation and interaction with intracellular components [40]. There is a possibility that combining Ag nanoclusters with drugs can intensify the therapeutic effects. Damage to microbial DNA was observed in the presence of combined daptomycin-Ag nanoclusters [44]. Zheng et al. [40] described thiolate-protected Ag ~1 nm nanoclusters which can be applied as antimicrobial agents. Yuan et al. [45] reported the synthesis of highly luminescent, stabile Ag nanoclusters that revealed remarkable antibacterial activity against a multi-resistant strain of P. aeruginosa. Some new perspectives appear in the area of “molecularly pure” metal nanoparticles of a high precision of atomic structure [46].

Nano-scale materials can be widely used in dentistry as well. Uses include not only nano-apatite liquids and pastes for teeth biofilm control but also products for remineralization of tooth enamel lesions, resin-based composites and implant materials [47], [48].

Acrylic resins are commonly used polymers for denture-based applications. Kassaee et al. [49] added 38 nm silver nanoparticles into a commercial acrylic resin. The obtained dental composite revealed improved mechanical properties accompanied by significant antimicrobial activity against E. coli. Aydin Sevinç and Hanley [48] showed that 10% (w/w) fraction of zinc oxide nanoparticles applied in dental composites limited the growth of one-species dental biofilm created by Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC 27352 strain reducing bacterial number by 80%. However, the effect was not so significant in the case of a three-species biofilm.

Application of polyethyleneimine nanoparticles resulted in antibacterial efficiency of composite resins against biofilm-producing Streptococcus mutans. The antibacterial properties of the material were observed even in 6-month-aged samples. The total growth inhibition of S. mutans was observed during direct contact tests, confirming the suitability of the material for clinical purposes [50]. A long-lasting antibacterial effect was also observed for dental composite resins supplied with 1% of immobilized quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles [51], [52].

Amorphous calcium phosphate nanocompounds with a quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate and nano-silver caused a 10-fold reduction in the number of S. mutans cells in biofilms as well as a diminution of the production of lactic acid and metabolic activity [53].

3 Fibers and fabric

The control and prevention of bacterial proliferation is essential not only for medical materials like bandages and dressings but also in case of clothes and domestic-use textile products. Textiles can easily serve as the substratum for microbial growth. Therefore, numerous projects are being undertaken to develop fibers and textiles with “self-cleaning properties”, allowing them to limit microbial contamination.

Nanoparticle-based coatings and impregnates are also of large interest nowadays. Nanocompounds like TiO2, silver, ZnO, copper, gold and gallium-based nanoparticles, as well as some nano-clays, are applied due to their antimicrobial properties and their potential activity against microbial pathogens [3], [7], [54].

Silver-based nanoproducts are those most recommended for fabric modifications. The antimicrobial influence of nanosilver-based colloidal solutions applied on textile fabrics was observed by Lee et al. [55]. The cellulose/cotton fiber can be easily modified by the nano-additives (Table 3).

Table 3:

Nano-modification of cotton/cellulose fiber.

Nano-additiveAntibacterial effectReference
40 nm silver nanoparticlesAntibacterial properties in very low concentration 0.0001%[56]
80 nm silver nanoparticlesStrong impact on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli[57]
Nano-Ag (75 nm) in glycidyl methacrylate-iminodiacetic acidAntibacterial impact on Escherichia coli[58]
Nano-AgSignificant antibacterial effect against Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua[59]
Metallic nano-silver (20.9±13.7 nm)Significant UV-protection capability and antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae[60]
Nano-Ag, additional modification with hexadecyltrimethoxysilane to obtain hydrophobicitySuperhydrophobic cotton textile active against Escherichia coli[61]
Nano-silver (88 mg/kg of the material)Elimination of 99% of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli; antimicrobial properties were observed up to 20 home laundering[62]
Silica-silver core-shell particles consisting of 1–2 nm silver and 270 nm silica particles100% antimicrobial effect for bacterial concentration of 104 cfu/ml; the fabric was antibacterially active even in 10-fold washed samples[63]

Escherichia coliand S. aureus were sensitive to nano-Ag-containing poly(methyl methacrylate) nanofiber described by Kong and Jang [64]. Rujitanaroj et al. [65] developed ultrafine gelatin fiber mats with nano-Ag (11–20 nm). Smooth fibers of the material, with average diameter of 230 and 280 nm, revealed activity against bacterial strains typical for wound infections, with the efficiency as follows: P. aeruginosa >S. aureus >E. coli > methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Antibacterial properties can also be achieved in synthetic fibers such as nano-Ag modified nylon and polyester [57]. Yeo et al. [66] developed nano-Ag/polypropylene nanocomposite fibers characterized by permanent antibacterial activity against S. aureus and Klebsiela pneumoniae. Perkas et al. [67] achieved significant antimicrobial effect for the nano-Ag/nylon 6,6 composite with 1% of metallic silver in the form of 50–100 nm nanocrystals. Polyamide 6 with 2% of silver nanoparticles revealed the antibacterial effect against E. coli, even after 100 days of immersion in water [68].

Some silver-containing dressings are available commercially. Applying the tests with bacteria (S. aureus, E. coli) and yeasts (Candida albicans), Thomas and McCubbin [69] confirmed the antimicrobial activity of three commercial dressings: Acticoat (Smith and Nephew), Actisorb Silver 220 (Johnson and Johnson) and Contreet-H (Coloplast).

Not only silver but the other metals in nano form can also be applied to imbue fibers and fabrics with antibacterial properties. The positive effect can be obtained for nano-Cu-modified fabrics [19], [70]. The impregnation of cotton and polyester fibers with cationic copper (3–10%) resulted in broad-spectrum activity towards viruses, bacteria and fungi [71]. Vigneshwaran et al. [72] observed the activity of cotton fabric, impregnated with zinc oxide/soluble starch nanocomposite, against S. aureus and Klebsiella sp.

Antibacterial properties can also be achieved by application of non-metallic nanoparticles. Wang et al. [73] investigated the activity of nano-SiO2 grafted on wool. The best results were obtained for wool fibers with 4.3% of the nanocompound.

4 Paper

Paper characterized by antimicrobial properties can be very useful in different applications, including packaging and filtering.

Gottesman et al. [15] described a method for the production of colloidal silver-coated paper, with a uniform coating of 90–150 nm, which is very stable due to the silver penetration into the paper. The material inhibited the growth of E. coli and S. aureus. Cellulose-based filter paper supplied with the entrapped silver nanoparticles can be obtained following the methods found in Tankhiwale and Bajpai [74]. Ghule et al. [75] applied ultrasound in the process of production of nano-ZnO (20 nm)-coated paper. Both the cellulose-based filter paper and nano ZnO-coated paper revealed excellent antibacterial properties in tests with E. coli.

A paper-like ceramic matrix characterized by antimicrobial properties was developed by Koga et al. [76]. The authors used ceramic fibers as a framework for the spontaneous formation of silver nanoparticles on ZnO whiskers. The disc diffusion test with E. coli showed that the material had a higher antimicrobial efficiency with the silver-modified paper.

5 Ceramics, glass and fiberglass

Antibacterial ceramic or fiberglass can be successfully applied for the removal of bacteria, especially in drinking water treatment. Lv et al. [77] developed a cheap and effective ceramic material modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and supplied with nano-silver that allowed for 100% removal of E. coli from water at a 0.01 l/min flow rate. No significant release of the nanoparticles from the material was observed during tests including a 15 min ultrasound treatment followed by storage for several weeks. Its high stability makes it potentially applicable for drinking water treatment. Kallman et al. [78] described the results of tests using nano-Ag-modified ceramic filters. The filters were used by people living in a peri-urban community. The presence of nano-silver additives increased the efficiency of E. coli removal by up to 92% and 87% after 12 and 23 months, respectively.

A novel bactericidal fiberglass impregnated with silver nanoparticles (below 1.8%) was described by Nangmenyi et al. [79]. The 50 mg/l of the tested material revealed a 7 log reduction of the number of E. coli cells after 5 min. The fiberglass can be regenerated by thermal treatment at 350°C. A similar material supplied with nano-Ag and Fe2O3 revealed both antibacterial and antiviral properties, with a 100-fold decrease in bacterial number after 1 min (from 106 cfu/ml to 104 cfu/ml) [80].

6 Membranes

Antibacterial membranes are very useful in water and wastewater treatment as well as in some branches of industry (biotechnology and food and drug production). It was revealed that the antimicrobial activity of nanoparticle-modified membranes makes them less sensitive to biological fouling [81], [82]. Membrane modification with TiO2, SiO2, ZnO and Ag nanoparticles all limited the microbial growth [83]. Therefore, it is possible to apply many of them in environmental applications [84].

Fibrous membranes composed of nano-Ag and a poly-l-lactic acid (Ag/PLLA) with a silver content of 5% (w/w) were proposed as a scaffold for tissue engineering. The membranes revealed antibacterial activity towards E. coli and S. aureus [85]. A strong effect on both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was noticed for nano-Ag/cellulose composite membranes [86]. Jain and Pradeep [87] obtained nano-Ag-coated polyurethane foam which lowered the number of E. coli in water from 105 cfu/ml to 0 cfu/ml when used at a flow rate of 0.5 l/min. The authors stated that nano-silver is not washed away from the material, which, therefore, recommends its use as a potential antibacterial drinking water filter. Nanoporous alumina membranes coated with titania nanocrystals were also recommended for water purification systems. Their antibacterial activity was confirmed in tests with E. coli [88]. Jame and Zhou [89] described electrochemically active carbon nanotube filters also suitable for effective wastewater and water treatment. They showed the ability to remove biological agents, including viruses, and to limit the biofouling of the filter.

Liu et al. [90] obtained a water treatment membrane, which was highly and uniformly loaded with Ag nanoparticles, demonstrating antibacterial resistance towards E. coli up to 14 days under laboratory conditions. Brady-Estévez et al. [91] reported significant antibacterial and antiviral activity of a filter membrane coated with single-walled carbon nanotubes.

The properties of polyethersulfone-based products, commonly used in the food processing industry and medicine, can be improved by addition of silver nanoparticles. Cao et al. [92] obtained polyethersulfone membranes coated with nano-Ag with antibacterial effects towards S. aureus, Staphylococcus albus and E. coli. The antibacterial features were also observed for a poly(vinylidene fluoride)/sulfonated polyethersulfone blend membrane modified with TiO2 nano-particles and activated by UV irradiation [93].

7 Food packaging

Food packaging should support a comparatively long shelf life for products, providing proper food quality and microbiological safety. Packages characterized by antimicrobial properties limit the growth of microorganisms responsible for food spoilage and pathogenic effects. Nanotechnology allows the development of new kinds of food packaging materials that combine good barrier properties and antimicrobial activity [94], [95]. Gold, silver or copper nanoparticles, nano-metal oxides and organic nano-compounds (for example starch-clay nanopreparations) are usually applied inside of packages [5], [74], [96], [97].

Cárdenas et al. [98] proposed a composite food packaging material obtained by supplementation of a chitosan matrix with colloidal nano-Cu. The material revealed good barrier properties (reducing oxygen and water vapor permeability and providing UV light protection) and antibacterial activity against Salmonella enterica and S. aureus. It was confirmed that chitosan provides a significant antimicrobial effect towards bacteria and fungi responsible for food decay as well as potentially pathogenic microorganisms [99]. It makes chitosan-based materials suitable for food protection and packaging [100], [101], [102]. The food packaging film developed by Tripathi et al. [103], which utilized a solution casting method to obtain a chitosan-silver oxide nanomaterial, revealed an outstanding antimicrobial effect against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and B. subtilis.

Antimicrobial properties were also confirmed for TiO2-based nanopowders, nano-xerogels and nano-aerogels used as additives to different packaging materials [104]. Antibacterial effects against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris were observed for a Ag-containing polyethyleneoxide-like coating layered on polyethylene [105]. A significant reduction of the number of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria in orange juice was observed in the case of nanocomposite-based packaging supplied with Ag and ZnO nanoparticles [106].

Silver nanoparticles present in absorbent pads were able to prevent growth of E. coli and S. aureus [107]. Fernandez et al. [108] developed a silver-based antibacterial hybrid material that was able to significantly reduce the total number of Pseudomonas spp. and Enterobacteriaceae bacteria in absorbent pads in meat storage containers.

It was observed that polypropylene films supplied with TiO2 were able to inhibit growth of E. coli [109]. The promising results of zone inhibition tests and growth kinetics analysis on the same bacterial species confirmed the antibacterial properties of a starch-coated polyethylene film loaded with ZnO nanoparticles [110]. Díaz-Visurraga et al. [111] produced semitransparent composite films made of TiO2-modified chitosan revealing the activity against S. enterica, E. coli and S. aureus. Rhim et al. [112] developed four types of chitosan-based antibacterial composites embedded with nano-Ag, Ag-zeolite, as well as modified and not modified montmorillonite.

8 Household products and cosmetics

Antibacterial properties related to the presence of nano-compounds can be provided to some household products like paints and cleaners also. Antimicrobial activity of Ag nanoparticles makes them useful for production of foot powders, soaps and sprays [28]. Metallic nano-silver and titanium nanoparticles are applied in paints [7], [113]. Kumar et al. [114] reported a synthesis method of applying an oxidative drying process in order to reduce metal salts and disperse metal nanoparticles in oil which allowed the creation of a metal-nanoparticle-embedded paint. The nanoparticle-in-oil mixture may be used directly as paint on wood, metal, glass and polymer surfaces. The bactericidal properties of the paints were tested against S. aureus and E. coli.

Antimicrobial features of Ag nanoparticles allow their application as preservative agents in cosmetics. Nano-Ag-based products are used in deodorants to reduce the number of bacteria responsible for the appearance of odors. Ag-zeolite powder spray revealed an antibacterial activity in the case of skin-resident bacteria [115]. The results of the research of Kokura et al. [116] suggested that antimicrobial Ag nanoparticles did not penetrate into human skin.

Aoshima et al. [13] proposed a material which can be potentially applied in the production of cosmetics. They observed that hydroxylated derivatives of fullerens (fullernenols) can inhibit bacterial growth. One of them, C60 (OH)44, was characterized by significant antibacterial activity against such microorganisms as Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, C. albicans and Malassezia furfur.

9 Sensors

Antimicrobial applications of nanoproducts cover not only bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities but also the possibility to detect potentially pathogenic microorganisms in medicine and food. For this purpose, some nanoparticle-based sensors were developed. This application of nanoproducts allows the achievement of higher sensitivity, stability, and selectivity of biosensors [4]. The nanoproducts, including bio-conjugated materials, can be effectively used in selective bacterial sensing, biological imaging and therapy without traditional drugs [117], [118], [119].

Wang et al. [117] developed a kind of glyconanoparticle useful in biosensing by means of combining gold and iron oxide nanoparticles with underivatized carbohydrates. The function of such biosensors covers both ligand-receptor biological interactions and specific physicochemical features of the nanomaterial.

Carbon nanotubes, metal nanoparticles, nanowires and other nanocomposite structures are used to design sensors and biosensors applicable to the food industry. Nanoparticle-based biosensors are effectively used in food analyses to detect such microorganisms as Salmonella spp., Salmonella typhi (Au) and E. coli (Au, Cu/Au and Silica/Ag) [4]. Nano-sensors facilitate the control and monitoring of food quality, especially during storage and transport [95].

Yang et al. [120] described conjugated biosensors consisting of biomolecules and nanomaterials with applications as bio-detectors for pathogenic microflora in food. The authors stated that an application of these biosensors causes a significant reduction in pathogen detection time and improves the sensitivity all the way up to a single bacterial cell.

10 Nanoparticle-based materials as an environmental challenge

Besides all of the benefits, the application of nanoparticle-based materials should be considered as a potential source of emission of substances that are potentially harmful to the natural environment [8], [54], [121], [122]. The production and application of newly synthesized nanoproducts results in the appearance of new types of wastes with special properties and reactivities [7], [122], [123]. Therefore, their specific disposal and landfilling requirements need to be considered [124]. Numerous literature confirm the negative interactions of engineered nanoparticles with the environment including ecotoxicological effects in living organisms [9], [125], [126]. The extensive application of nanomaterials results in their appearance in aquatic ecosystems. The ecotoxicity of silver nanoparticles has been confirmed in the case of microorganisms (E. coli, P. aeruginosa and nitrifying bacteria), invertebrates, vertebrates, algae (Thalassiosira pseudonana and Synechococcus sp.) and higher aquatic plants [42]. Al2O3 nanopowders inhibited growth of algae such as Scenedesmus quadricauda [127]. ZnO nanoparticles were shown to be harmful to tadpoles of Xenopus laevis, the algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and the fish Danio rerio [126]. High concentrations of Al2O3, TiO2 and ZnO were toxic to the crustacean Daphnia magna [128]. TiO2/Ag, TiO2/Au and TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposites inhibited the germination and early growth of higher plants (Sorghum saccharatum and Lepidium sativum) in a Phytotoxkit test (Figure 2) [129].

Figure 2: The influence of TiO2/Ag and TiO2/Au nanocomposites (1000 mg/kg of soil) on plant germination and early growth. From the left: control culture, TiO2/Ag (1 g/kg) and TiO2/Au (1 g/kg) (photograph by E. Karwowska).
Figure 2:

The influence of TiO2/Ag and TiO2/Au nanocomposites (1000 mg/kg of soil) on plant germination and early growth. From the left: control culture, TiO2/Ag (1 g/kg) and TiO2/Au (1 g/kg) (photograph by E. Karwowska).

Examples of the potentially negative influence of nanoparticles based on silver, titanium, zinc oxide, carbon nanotubes and fullerenes (C60) on the wastewater treatment process have also been shown [130]. They are widespread in domestic and industrial wastewater. However, at the moment only very low cytotoxicity of ZnO, Ag and TiO2 nanoparticles have been reported in the case of the human gastrointestinal system [1].

In the environment, organisms can be exposed to nanoparticles via ingestion, inhalation and penetration through the skin surface. The inflammatory cell response can be activated even from a low concentration of nanoparticles. The induction of genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed for a nanoparticle concentration of only 10−7 g/ml [131].

It was estimated that up to 14% of commonly used Ag-based nanoproducts can be a source of nanoparticle emission into the air, making them potentially harmful via inhalation [132]. Therefore, the fate of nanoproducts should be thoroughly investigated at the molecular, cellular and community level including their effect on environmental conditions such as pH, UV radiation, salinity and interactions with organic matter [6], [125], [133], [134]. Interestingly, nanoclusters appear to be less toxic compared with traditional nanoparticles. For example, the ecotoxicity of Ag-nanoclusters is rarely reported. Moreover, the investigation on the impact of strongly red-emitting fluorescent silver nanoclusters on green algae, Scenedesmus obliquus, revealed that the algal growth inhibition was not related to ROS production [42].

11 Perspectives and conclusions

Current literature shows that the most promising areas of nanotechnology applications is in the development of new antibacterial agents. There is evidence that they can be used in numerous environment protection technologies. The “molecularly pure nanoparticles” appear to be the best perspective due to their high precision of atomic structure. Nanocluster engineering can broaden the application of Ag- and Au-based antimicrobial preparations, although there is still a need for more research on the stability, distribution in biological systems, and potential toxicity and ecotoxicity of the nanoclusters.

For many potential applications, the key problem is in trying to obtain a product which is selectively active against potential pathogens yet harmless to other organisms. The investigated concentrations of nanoproducts should be relevant to those present in consumer products. The commercial application of nanoproducts should also be carefully monitored because of their potential negative environmental effects. It should be considered that the development of nanosciences can appear not only as a technological advantage but also as a kind of threat and new challenge in environment protection.


Corresponding author: Ewa Karwowska, DSc, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 20, 00-653, Warsaw, Poland

About the author

Ewa Karwowska

The research activity of the author focuses on the field of biotechnology in environmental engineering, microbiology and monitoring of environment quality. Her scientific interests include issues such as bioremediation of petroleum products contaminated soils, the use of biotechnological processes for the removal and recovery of metals from sewage and industrial waste, the phenomena associated with the microbiological contamination of fuels, microbiological air pollution and the influence of newly synthesized nanoproducts on microorganisms.

References

[1] Giovanni M, Tay CY, Setyawati MI, Xie J, Ong CN, Fan R, Yue J, Zhang L, Leong DT. Toxicity profiling of water contextual zinc oxide, silver, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human oral and gastrointestinal cell systems. Environ. Toxicol. 2015, 30, 1459–1469.10.1002/tox.22015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Li Q, Mahendra S, Lyon DY, Brunet L, Liga MV, Li D, Alvarez PJ. Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water Res. 2008, 42, 4591–4602.10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A. Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 6003–6009.10.2147/IJN.S35347Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Pérez-López B, Merkoçi A. Nanomaterials based biosensors for food analysis applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 625–639.10.1016/j.tifs.2011.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chaudhry Q, Castle L. Food applications of nanotechnologies: an overview of opportunities and challenges for developing countries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 595–603.10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[6] Suresh AK, Pelletier DA, Doktycz MJ. Relating nanomaterial properties and microbial toxicity. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 463–474.10.1039/C2NR32447DSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska G, Golimowski J, Urban PL. Nanoparticles: their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management. Waste Manage. 2009, 29, 2587–2595.10.1016/j.wasman.2009.04.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C. Current and Future Predicted Environmental Exposure to Engineered Nanoparticles, Central Science Laboratory, Department of the Environment and Rural Affairs: London, UK, vol. 89, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311, 622–627.10.1126/science.1114397Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Tiwari DK, Behari J, Sen P. Application of nanoparticles in waste water treatment. World Appl. Sci. J. 2008, 3, 417–433.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y. Silver nanoparticles: green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 145, 83–96.10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Schmid, G., Ed., Nanoparticles: From Theory to Application, John Wiley & Sons: Weinheim, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Aoshima H, Kokubo KEN, Shirakawa S, Ito M, Yamana S, Oshima T. Antimicrobial activity of fullerenes and their hydroxylated derivatives. Biocontrol Sci. 2009, 14, 69–72.10.4265/bio.14.69Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Knetsch ML, Koole LH. New strategies in the development of antimicrobial coatings: the example of increasing usage of silver and silver nanoparticles. Polymers 2011, 3, 340–366.10.3390/polym3010340Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gottesman R, Shukla S, Perkas N, Solovyov LA, Nitzan Y, Gedanken A. Sonochemical coating of paper by microbiocidal silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011, 27, 720–726.10.1021/la103401zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Duncan TV. Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 363, 1–24.10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Jastrzębska AM, Karwowska E, Olszyna AR, Kunicki AR. Comparative assessment of antimicrobial efficiency of ionic silver, silver monoxide and metallic silver incorporated onto an aluminum oxide nanopowder carrier. J. Nanosci. 2013, Article ID 263583, 12 pages. doi:10.1155/2013/263583.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Costescu A, Ciobanu CS, Iconaru SL, Ghita RV, Chifiriuc CM, Marutescu LG, Predoi D. Fabrication, characterization, and antimicrobial activity, evaluation of low silver concentrations in silver-doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2013, Article ID 194854, 9 page. doi:10.1155/2013/194854.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Llorens A, Lloret E, Picouet PA, Trbojevich R, Fernandez A. Metallic-based micro and nanocomposites in food contact materials and active food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 24, 19–29.10.1016/j.tifs.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[20] Neal AL. What can be inferred from bacterium-nanoparticles interactions about the potential consequences of environmental exposure to nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17, 362–371.10.1007/s10646-008-0217-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Marambio-Jones C, Hoek EM. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 1531–1551.10.1007/s11051-010-9900-ySearch in Google Scholar

[22] Huh AJ, Kwon YJ. Nanoantibiotics: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J. Controlled Release 2011, 156, 128–145.10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Archana D, Singh BK, Dutta J, Dutta PK. Chitosan-PVP-nano silver oxide wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 73, 49–57.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.055Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Moritz M, Geszke-Moritz M. The newest achievements in synthesis, immobilization and practical applications of antibacterial nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 596–613.10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.046Search in Google Scholar

[25] Jayakumar R, Menon D, Manzoor K, Nair SV, Tamura H. Biomedical applications of chitin and chitosan based nanomaterials – a short review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 227–232.10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.074Search in Google Scholar

[26] Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials, Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 76–83.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Shi Z, Neoh KG, Kang ET, Wang W. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of bone cement impregnated with chitosan nanoparticles. Biomater. 2006, 27, 2440–2449.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Miranda M, Fernández A, Lopez-Esteban S, Malpartida F, Moya JS, Torrecillas R. Ceramic/metal biocidal nanocomposites for bone-related applications. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. M. 2012, 23, 1655–1662.10.1007/s10856-012-4642-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Madhumathi K, Kumar PS, Abhilash S, Sreeja V, Tamura H, Manzoor K, Naor SV, Jayakumar R. Development of novel chitin/nanosilver composite scaffolds for wound dressing applications. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. M. 2010, 21, 807–813.10.1007/s10856-009-3877-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Kumar PT, Abhilash S, Manzoor K, Nair SV, Tamura H, Jayakumar R. Preparation and characterization of novel β-chitin/nanosilver composite scaffolds for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym.2010, 80, 761–767.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.024Search in Google Scholar

[31] Jain T, Kumar S, Dutta PK. Chitosan in the light of nanobiotechnology: a mini review. J. Biomed. Technol. Res. 2015, 1, 101–107.10.19104/jbtr.2015.103Search in Google Scholar

[32] Nigam N, Kumar S, Dutta PK, Pei S, Ghosh T. Chitosan containing azo-based Schiff bases: thermal, antibacterial and birefringence properties for bio-optical devices. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 5575–5581.10.1039/C5RA27210FSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Archana D, Singh BK, Dutta J, Dutta PK. In vivo evaluation of chitosan-PVP-titanium dioxide nanocomposite as wound dressing material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 530–539.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Srivastava R, Tiwari DK, Dutta PK. 4-(Ethoxycarbonyl) phenyl-1-amino-oxobutanoic acid-chitosan complex as a new matrix for silver nanocomposite film: preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 863–870.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.07.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Liu Y, Kim HI. Characterization and antibacterial properties of genipin-crosslinked chitosan/poly (ethylene glycol)/ZnO/Ag nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 111–116.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Vimala K, Mohan YM, Sivudu K, Varaprasad K, Ravindra S, Reddy NN, Padma Y, Sreedhar B, Mohana Raju K. Fabrication of porous chitosan films impregnated with silver nanoparticles: a facile approach for superior antibacterial application. Colloid. Surface B 2010, 76, 248–258.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.10.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Li Y, Leung P, Yao L, Song QW, Newton E. Antimicrobial effect of surgical masks coated with nanoparticles. J. Hosp. Infect. 2006, 62, 58–63.10.1016/j.jhin.2005.04.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Singh J, Srivastava M, Dutta J, Dutta PK. Preparation and properties of hybrid monodispersed magnetic α-Fe2O3 based chitosan nanocomposite film for industrial and biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 170–176.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.10.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Archana D, Upadhyay L, Tewari RP, Dutta J, Huang YB, Dutta PK. Chitosan-pectin-alginate as a novel scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 475–482.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Zheng K, Yuan X, Goswami N, Zhang Q, Xie J. Recent advances in the synthesis, characterization, and biomedical applications of ultrasmall thiolated silver nanoclusters. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 60581–60596.10.1039/C4RA12054JSearch in Google Scholar

[41] Song XR, Goswami N, Yang HH, Xie J. Functionalization of metal nanoclusters for biomedical applications. Analyst 2016, 141, 3126–3140.10.1039/C6AN00773BSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Zhang L, He Y, Goswami N, Xie J, Zhang B, Tao X. Uptake and effect of highly fluorescent silver nanoclusters on Scenedesmus obliquus. Chemosphere 2016, 153, 322–331.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.076Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Setyawati MI, Yuan X, Xie J, Leong DT. The influence of lysosomal stability of silver nanomaterials on their toxicity to human cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 6707–6715.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Zheng K, Setyawati MI, Lim TP, Leong DT, Xie J. Antimicrobial cluster bombs: silver nanoclusters packed with daptomycin. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7934–7942.10.1021/acsnano.6b03862Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Yuan X, Setyawati MI, Tan AS, Ong CN, Leong DT, Xie J. Highly luminescent silver nanoclusters with tunable emissions: cyclic reduction-decomposition synthesis and antimicrobial properties. NPG Asia Mater. 2013, 5, e39.10.1038/am.2013.3Search in Google Scholar

[46] Jin R, Nobusada K. Doping and alloying in atomically precise gold nanoparticles. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 285–300.10.1007/s12274-014-0403-5Search in Google Scholar

[47] Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 565–569.10.1038/nnano.2010.83Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Aydin Sevinç B, Hanley L. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2010, 94, 22–31.10.1002/jbm.b.31620Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Kassaee MZ, Akhavan A, Sheikh N, Sodagar A. Antibacterial effects of a new dental acrylic resin containing silver nanoparticles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 1699–1703.10.1002/app.28762Search in Google Scholar

[50] Beyth N, Yudovin-Fearber I, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Long-term antibacterial surface properties of composite resin incorporating polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. Quintessence Int. 2009, 41, 827–835.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3995–4002.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Yudovin-Farber I, Beyth N, Weiss EI, Domb AJ. Antibacterial effect of composite resins containing quaternary ammonium polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 591–603.10.1007/s11051-009-9628-8Search in Google Scholar

[53] Cheng L, Weir MD, Xu HH, Antonucci JM, Kraigsley AM, Lin NJ, Lin-Gibson S, Zhou X. Antibacterial amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomposites with a quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate and silver nanoparticles. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28, 561–572.10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Dastjerdi R, Montazer M. A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloid. Surface B 2010, 79, 5–18.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Lee HJ, Yeo SY, Jeong SH. Antibacterial effect of nanosized silver colloidal solution on textile fabrics. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 2199–2204.10.1023/A:1023736416361Search in Google Scholar

[56] Pinto RJ, Marques PA, Neto CP, Trindade T, Daina S, Sadocco P. Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of silver and bacterial or vegetable cellulosic fibers. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 2279–2289.10.1016/j.actbio.2009.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Perelshtein I, Applerot G, Perkas N, Guibert G, Mikhailov S, Gedanken A. Sonochemical coating of silver nanoparticles on textile fabrics (nylon, polyester and cotton) and their antibacterial activity. Nanotechnol. 2008, 19, 24, Article ID 245705. doi: 10.1088/0957–4484/19/24/245705.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Chen CY, Chiang CL. Preparation of cotton fibers with antibacterial silver nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 3607–3609.10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[59] Messaoud M, Chadeau E, Brunon C, Ballet T, Rappenne L, Roussel F, Leonard D, Oulahal N, Langlet M. Photocatalytic generation of silver nanoparticles and application to the antibacterial functionalization of textile fabrics. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 2010, 215, 147–156.10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[60] Vigneshwaran N, Kathe AA, Varadarajan PV, Nachane RP, Balasubramanya RH. Functional finishing of cotton fabrics using silver nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 1893–1897.10.1166/jnn.2007.737Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Xue CH, Chen J, Yin W, Jia ST, Ma JZ. Superhydrophobic conductive textiles with antibacterial property by coating fibers with silver nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 2468–2472.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.074Search in Google Scholar

[62] Zhang F, Wu X, Chen Y, Lin H. Application of silver nanoparticles to cotton fabric as an antibacterial textile finish. Fibers Polym. 2009, 10, 496–501.10.1007/s12221-009-0496-8Search in Google Scholar

[63] Nischala K, Rao TN, Hebalkar N. Silica-silver core-shell particles for antibacterial textile application. Colloid. Surface B 2011, 82, 203–208.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Kong H, Jang J. Antibacterial properties of novel poly (methyl methacrylate) nanofiber containing silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 2008, 24, 2051–2056.10.1021/la703085eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Rujitanaroj PO, Pimpha N, Supaphol P. Wound-dressing materials with antibacterial activity from electrospun gelatin fiber mats containing silver nanoparticles. Polymer 2008, 49, 4723–4732.10.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[66] Yeo SY, Lee HJ, Jeong SH. Preparation of nanocomposite fibers for permanent antibacterial effect. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 2143–2147.10.1023/A:1023767828656Search in Google Scholar

[67] Perkas N, Amirian G, Dubinsky S, Gazit S, Gedanken A. Ultrasound-assisted coating of nylon 6, 6 with silver nanoparticles and its antibacterial activity. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 1423–1430.10.1002/app.24728Search in Google Scholar

[68] Damm C, Münstedt H, Rösch A. Long-term antimicrobial polyamide 6/silver-nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 6067–6073.10.1007/s10853-006-1158-5Search in Google Scholar

[69] Thomas S, McCubbin P. A comparison of the antimicrobial effects of four silver-containing dressings on three organisms. J. Wound Care 2003, 12, 101–107.10.12968/jowc.2003.12.3.26477Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Mary G, Bajpai SK, Chand N. Copper (II) ions and copper nanoparticles-loaded chemically modified cotton cellulose fibers with fair antibacterial properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 757–766.10.1002/app.29890Search in Google Scholar

[71] Gabbay J, Borkow G, Mishal J, Magen E, Zatcoff R, Shemer-Avni Y. Copper oxide impregnated textiles with potent biocidal activities. J. Ind. Text. 2006, 35, 323–335.10.1177/1528083706060785Search in Google Scholar

[72] Vigneshwaran N, Kumar S, Kathe AA, Varadarajan PV, Prasad V. Functional finishing of cotton fabrics using zinc oxide-soluble starch nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 5087–5095.10.1088/0957-4484/17/20/008Search in Google Scholar

[73] Wang S, Hou W, Wei L, Jia H, Liu X, Xu B. Antibacterial activity of nano-SiO2 antibacterial agent grafted on wool surface. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 202, 460–465.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.012Search in Google Scholar

[74] Tankhiwale R, Bajpai SK. Graft copolymerization onto cellulose-based filter paper and its further development as silver nanoparticles loaded antibacterial food-packaging material. Colloid. Surface B 2009, 69, 164–168.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.11.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Ghule K, Ghule AV, Chen BJ, Ling YC. Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 1034–1041.10.1039/b605623gSearch in Google Scholar

[76] Koga H, Kitaoka T, Wariishi H. In situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles on zinc oxide whiskers incorporated in a paper matrix for antibacterial applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2135–2140.10.1039/b820310eSearch in Google Scholar

[77] Lv Y, Liu H, Wang Z, Liu S, Hao L, Sang Y, Liu D, Wang J, Boughton RI. Silver nanoparticle-decorated porous ceramic composite for water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 331, 50–56.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.007Search in Google Scholar

[78] Kallman EN, Oyanedel-Craver VA, Smith JA. Ceramic filters impregnated with silver nanoparticles for point-of-use water treatment in rural Guatemala. J. Environ. Eng. 2010, 137, 407–415.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000330Search in Google Scholar

[79] Nangmenyi G, Xao W, Mehrabi S, Mintz E, Economy J. Bactericidal activity of Ag nanoparticle-impregnated fibreglass for water disinfection. J. Water. Health 2009, 7, 657–663.10.2166/wh.2009.107Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Nangmenyi G, Li X, Mehrabi S, Mintz E, Economy J. Silver-modified iron oxide nanoparticle impregnated fiberglass for disinfection of bacteria and viruses in water. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1191–1193.10.1016/j.matlet.2011.01.042Search in Google Scholar

[81] Choi H, Stathatos E, Dionysiou DD. Photocatalytic TiO2 films and membranes for the development of efficient wastewater treatment and reuse systems. Desalination 2007, 202, 199–206.10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.055Search in Google Scholar

[82] Kwak SZ, Kim SH, Kim SS. Hybrid organic/inorganic reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for bactericidal anti-fouling. 1. Preparation and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 2388–2394.10.1021/es0017099Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Li J, Yin L, Qiu G, Li X, Liu Q, Xie J. A photo-bactericidal thin film composite membrane for forward osmosis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6781–6786.10.1039/C5TA00430FSearch in Google Scholar

[84] Liu Y, Ong CN, Xie J. Emerging nanotechnology for environmental applications. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2016, 5, 1–2.10.1515/ntrev-2015-0072Search in Google Scholar

[85] Li L, Li Y, Li J, Yao L, Mak AF, Ko F, Qin L. Antibacterial properties of nanosilver PLLA fibrous membranes. J. Nanomater. 2009, Article ID 168041, 5 pages. doi:10.1155/2009/168041.Search in Google Scholar

[86] Barud HS, Regiani T, Marques RF, Lustri WR, Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJ. Antimicrobial bacterial cellulose-silver nanoparticles composite membranes. J. Nanomater. 2011, Article ID 721631, 8 pages, 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/721631.Search in Google Scholar

[87] Jain P, Pradeep T. Potential of silver nanoparticle-coated polyurethane foam as an antibacterial water filter. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90, 59–63.10.1002/bit.20368Search in Google Scholar

[88] Narayan R. Use of nanomaterials in water purification. Mater. Today, 2010, 13, 44–46.10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70108-5Search in Google Scholar

[89] Jame SA, Zhou Z. Electrochemical carbon nanotube filters for water and wastewater treatment. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2016, 5, 41–50.10.1515/ntrev-2015-0056Search in Google Scholar

[90] Liu Q, Zhou Z, Qiu G, Li J, Xie J, Lee JY. Surface reaction route to increase the loading of antimicrobial Ag nanoparticles in forward osmosis membranes. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 11, 2959–2966.10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00931Search in Google Scholar

[91] Brady-Estévez AS, Kang S, Elimelech M. A single-walled-carbon-nanotube filter for removal of viral and bacterial pathogens. Small, 2008, 4, 481–484.10.1002/smll.200700863Search in Google Scholar

[92] Cao X, Tang M, Liu F, Nie Y, Zhao C. Immobilization of silver nanoparticles onto sulfonated polyethersulfone membranes as antibacterial materials. Colloid. Surface B 2010, 81, 555–562.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.057Search in Google Scholar

[93] Rahimpour A, Jahanshahi M, Mollahosseini A, Rajaeian B. Structural and performance properties of UV-assisted TiO2 deposited nano-composite PVDF/SPES membranes. Desalination 2010, 285, 31–38.10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.026Search in Google Scholar

[94] Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S. Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1766–1782.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[95] Appendini P, Hotchkiss JH. Review of antimicrobial food packaging. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2002, 3, 113–126.10.1016/S1466-8564(02)00012-7Search in Google Scholar

[96] Azeredo H. Nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1240–1253.10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.019Search in Google Scholar

[97] Avella M, De Vlieger JJ, Errico ME, Fischer S, Vacca P, Volpe MG. Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 467–474.10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.024Search in Google Scholar

[98] Cárdenas G, Meléndrez MF, Cancino AG. Colloidal Cu nanoparticles/chitosan composite film obtained by microwave heating for food package applications. Polym. Bull. 2009, 62, 511–524.10.1007/s00289-008-0031-xSearch in Google Scholar

[99] Dutta J, Tripathi S, Dutta PK. Progress in antimicrobial activities of chitin, chitosan and its oligosaccharides: a systematic study needs for food applications. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2012, 18, 3–34.10.1177/1082013211399195Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Dutta PK, Tripathi S, Mehrotra GK, Dutta J. Perspectives for chitosan based antimicrobial films in food applications. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1173–1182.10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.047Search in Google Scholar

[101] Tripathi S, Mehrotra GK, Dutta PK. Preparation and physicochemical evaluation of chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol)/pectin ternary film for food-packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 711–716.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.09.029Search in Google Scholar

[102] Tripathi P, Gupta AK, Dutta PK. Titanium dioxide impregnated chitosan based nanocomposite: A facile approach for superior antibacterial assessment for food packaging. Asian Chitin J. 2013, 9, 7–10.Search in Google Scholar

[103] Tripathi S, Mehrotra GK, Dutta PK. Chitosan-silver oxide nanocomposite film: preparation and antimicrobial activity. Bull. Mater. Sci., 2011, 34, 29–35.10.1007/s12034-011-0032-5Search in Google Scholar

[104] Jastrzębska AM, Kurtycz P, Olszyna A, Karwowska E, Miaśkiewicz-Pęska E, Załęska-Radziwiłł M, Doskocz N, Basiak D. The impact of zeta potential and physicochemical properties of TiO2-based nanocomposites on their biological activity. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2014, 12, 1157–1173.10.1111/ijac.12340Search in Google Scholar

[105] Del Nobile MA, Cannarsi M, Altieri C, Sinigaglia M, Favia P, Iacoviello G, d’Agostino R. Effect of Ag-containing nano-composite active packaging system on survival of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris.J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, E379–E383.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09899.xSearch in Google Scholar

[106] Emamifar A, Kadivar M, Shahedi M, Soleimanian-Zad S. Effect of nanocomposite packaging containing Ag and ZnO on inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum in orange juice. Food Control 2011, 22, 408–413.10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[107] Fernández A, Soriano E, López-Carballo G, Picouet P, Lloret E, Gavara R, Hernández-Muñoz P. Preservation of aseptic conditions in absorbent pads by using silver nanotechnology. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1105–1112.10.1016/j.foodres.2009.05.009Search in Google Scholar

[108] Fernandez A, Picouet P, Lloret E. Reduction of the spoilage-related microflora in absorbent pads by silver nanotechnology during modified atmosphere packaging of beef meat. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 2263–2269.10.4315/0362-028X-73.12.2263Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[109] Chawengkijwanich C, Hayata Y. Development of TiO2 powder-coated food packaging film and its ability to inactivate Escherichia coli in in vitro and in actual tests. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 288–292.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Tankhiwale R, Bajpai SK. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial applications of ZnO-nanoparticles coated polyethylene films for food packaging. Colloid. Surface B 2012, 90, 16–20.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.09.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Díaz-Visurraga J, Melendrez MF, Garcia A, Paulraj M, Cardenas G. Semitransparent chitosan-TiO2 nanotubes composite film for food package applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 3503–3515.Search in Google Scholar

[112] Rhim JW, Hong SI, Park HM, Ng PK. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 5814–5822.10.1021/jf060658hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] Kaegi R, Sinnet B, Zuleeg S, Hagendorfer H, Mueller E, Vonbank R, Boller M, Burkhardt M. Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 2900–2905.10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] Kumar A, Vemula PK, Ajayan PM, John G. Silver-nanoparticle-embedded antimicrobial paints based on vegetable oil. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 236–241.10.1038/nmat2099Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[115] Edwards-Jones V. The benefits of silver in hygiene, personal care and healthcare. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 49, 147–152.10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02648.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] Kokura S, Handa O, Takagi T, Ishikawa T, Naito Y, Yoshikawa T. Silver nanoparticles as a safe preservative for use in cosmetics. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2010, 6, 570–574.10.1016/j.nano.2009.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[117] Wang X, Liu LH, Ramström O, Yan M. Engineering nanomaterial surfaces for biomedical applications. Exp. Biol. Med. 2009, 234, 1128–1139.10.3181/0904-MR-134Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[118] Ray PC, Khan SA, Singh AK, Senapati D, Fan Z. Nanomaterials for targeted detection and photothermal killing of bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 41, 3193–3209.10.1039/c2cs15340hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Li J, Zhao T, Chen T, Liu Y, Ong, CN, Xie J. Engineering noble metal nanomaterials for environmental applications. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 7502–7519.10.1039/C5NR00857CSearch in Google Scholar

[120] Yang H, Li H, Jiang H. Detection of foodborne pathogens using bioconjugated nanomaterials. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2008, 5, 571–583.10.1007/s10404-008-0302-8Search in Google Scholar

[121] Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150, 5–22.10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[122] Handy RD, von der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M. The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicol. 2008, 17, 287–314.10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[123] Powell MC, Griffin MP, Tai S. Bottom-up risk regulation? How nanotechnology risk knowledge gaps challenge federal and state environmental agencies. Environ. Manage. 2008, 42, 426–443.10.1007/s00267-008-9129-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[124] Breggin L, Pendergrass J. Where does the nano go. Project of Emerging Technology, vol. 10, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: Washington, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[125] Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR. Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Sci. Total. Environ. 2008, 400, 396–414.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Łebkowska M, Załęska-Radziwiłł M. Występowanie i ekotoksyczność nanocząstek. Ochrona Środowiska 2011, 33, 23–26.Search in Google Scholar

[127] Karwowska E, Mrozowicz M, Zawada A, Ząbkowski T, Ziemkowska W, Kunicki AR, Olszyna A. Impact of Al2O3 nanopowders characterised by various physicochemical properties on growth of green alga Scenedesmus quadricauda. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2012, 111, 142–148.10.1179/1743676111Y.0000000062Search in Google Scholar

[128] Zhu X, Zhu L, Chen Y, Tian S. Acute toxicities of six manufactured nanomaterial suspensions to Daphnia magna. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 67–75.10.1007/s11051-008-9426-8Search in Google Scholar

[129] Karwowska E, Miaśkiewicz-Pęska E, Załęska-Radziwiłł M. Wpływ nanoproduktów na wybrane organizmy-ocena ekotoksykologiczna. Inżynieria i Ochrona Środowiska 2015, 18, 109–118.Search in Google Scholar

[130] Musee N, Thwala M, Nota N. The antibacterial effects of engineered nanomaterials: implications for wastewater treatment plants. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13, 1164–1183.10.1039/c1em10023hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[131] Giovanni M, Yue J, Zhang L, Xie J, Ong CN, Leong DT. Pro-inflammatory responses of RAW264. 7 macrophages when treated with ultralow concentrations of silver, titanium dioxide, and zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 297, 146–152.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.081Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[132] Quadros ME, Marr LC. Environmental and human health risks of aerosolized silver nanoparticles. J. Air Waste Manage. 2010, 60, 770–781.10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.770Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[133] Lee J, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJ. Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3580–3590.10.1021/nn100866wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Ostrowski AD, Martin T, Conti J, Hurt I, Harthorn B H. Nanotoxicology: characterizing the scientific literature, 2000–2007. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 251–257.10.1007/s11051-008-9579-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2016-6-13
Accepted: 2016-10-25
Published Online: 2016-12-15
Published in Print: 2017-4-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 10.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2016-0046/html
Scroll to top button