Abstract
This study focuses on the reconstruction of experience in the online environment of the Pick-up Artist (PUA) community forums and aims to uncover yet another facet of personal narrative, namely the role and performance of framing in the reporting of events. Discursive psychologists have often pointed out that a narrative is not a precise reflection of reality but a device that itself shapes the social world because reality always under-determines the verbal representation of events. In this study, we show how the verbalisation of narrative guides the reader towards the intended understanding by establishing the shared knowledge schema in the community of practice. Utilising data from a specific genre in the PUA forums, the “field reports” (i.e. narrative reconstructions of encounters between the PUAs and women), we describe three pertinent layers of frames, how they are evoked linguistically and how they interact with each other. Our investigation of the hierarchical framing of the interaction as [pua training], [personal narrative] and [success report] shows that they are based on group-specific knowledge schemas but, at the same time, draw on conventionalised narrative structures.
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.10Search in Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/ Search in Google Scholar
Arendholz, Jenny. 2010. Neeed to put this out there (My Story) – Narratives in message boards. In Christian Hoffmann (ed.), Narrative revisited. Telling a story in the age of new media, 109-142. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.199.07areSearch in Google Scholar
Bartlett, Frederic. 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Search in Google Scholar
BBC News. “Julien Blanc: UK denies visa to ‘pick-up artist’”. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30119100 (accessed 30 March 2016). Search in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2005. Frames revised - the coherence-inducing function of frames. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 685-705. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic colour terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian and George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226Search in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1977. The recall and verbalization of past experience. In R.W. Cole (ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory, 215-246. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague language. Oxford: Oxford UP. Search in Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria & Sofia Rüdiger. 2014. Speak your mind, but watch your mouth: Complaints in Couchsurfing references. In Kristina Bedijs, Gudrun Held and Christiane Maaß (eds.), Face work and social media, 193-212. Berlin: LIT. Search in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21. 461-490. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333Search in Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceeding of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Institute of Human Learning, 123-131. Berkeley: University of California. Search in Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.8Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis – An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row. Search in Google Scholar
Graham, Sage Lambert, 2007. Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742-759. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017Search in Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 2000. Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagskommunikation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110919974Search in Google Scholar
Hambling-Jones, Oliver & Andrew John Merrison. 2012. Inequity in the pursuit of intimacy: An analysis of British pick-up artist interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9). 1115-1127. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.008Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Christian (ed.). 2010. Narrative revisited. Telling a story in the age of new media. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.199Search in Google Scholar
Holleman, Bregje C. & Henk L. W. Pander Maat. 2009. The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 2204-2221. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.038Search in Google Scholar
Hössjer, Amelie. 2013. Small talk, politeness, and email communication in the workplace. In Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, 613-638. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214468.613Search in Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Ways of speaking. In Richard Bauman & Joel Scherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 433-451. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9780511611810.029Search in Google Scholar
IMDb - The Pickup Artist. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1083958/ (accessed 4 August 2016). Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1978. Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organisation of conversational interaction, 219-248. New York: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar
Kamoen, Naomi, Maria B.J. Mos & Willem F.S. Dekker (Robbin). 2015. A hotel that is not bad isn’t good. The effects of valence framing and expectation in online reviews on text, reviewer and product appreciation. Journal of Pragmatics 75. 28-43. Search in Google Scholar
Kuypers, Jim. 2009. Framing analysis. In Jim Kuypers (ed.), Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action, 181-204. Plymouth: Lexington Press. Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis. Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting, 12-44. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1977. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black Vernacular English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1971. Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman. Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Irwin P., Sandra L. Schneider & Gary J. Gaeth. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (2). 149–188. 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804Search in Google Scholar
McKenzie, Craig & Jonathan Nelson. 2003. What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychological Bulletin Review 10(3). 596-602. Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1965. A linguistic study of the English verb. London: Longman. Search in Google Scholar
Perelmutter, Renee. 2013. The flamewar as a genre in Russian blogosphere. Journal of Pragmatics 45. 74-89. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Ross, Robert. 1975. Ellipsis and the structure of expectation. San Jose State Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. 183-191. Search in Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia & Daria Dayter. forthcoming. The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects: Language in an online community. Applied Linguistics Review. Search in Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David. 1975. Notes on a schema for stories. In Daniel Bobrow & Allan Collins (eds.), Representation and understanding, 211-236. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6Search in Google Scholar
Schank, Roger & Robert Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel. 1992. In another context. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context, 191-227. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Search in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narrative. Linguistic Society of America 57(1). 45-62. 10.1353/lan.1981.0011Search in Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation analysis: An introduction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.21832/9781847692849-020Search in Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1978. The effect of expectations on conversation. Discourse Processes 1(2). 203-209. 10.1080/01638537809544435Search in Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1993. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Framing in discourse, 14-56. Oxford: Oxford UP. Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard. 1951. The problem of future contingencies. Philosophical Review 66(1). 1-28. 10.2307/2182851Search in Google Scholar
The Game – Neil Strauss. https://www.neilstrauss.com/books/the-game/ (accessed 4 August 2016). Search in Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman. Search in Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992. Temporal adverbials in text structuring: On temporal text strategy. Nordic Research on Text and Discourse. NORDTEXT Symposium (Espoo, Finland, May 10-13, 1990). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED359761.pdf (accessed 29 March 2016). Search in Google Scholar
© 2016 Daria Dayter, Sofia Rüdiger
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
